1. Urakaze (6,58 stars, 2039 notes)

VINXIS wrote:

CXu wrote:

thx

LordGeek101 wrote:

I can't find much wrong with this map, but I'm inexperienced so only obvious issues stand out to me.

OD 9.5 seems very high for a map of this bpm and length. I'd drop it to OD 9. - The map is technical enough that I think having a focus on accuracy isn't bad.

00:13:768 (1,2,1,2) - These sliders break the consistency of each slider pair having the same shape - You're... right, but I never intended them to have the same shape, it just kinda happened
00:40:767 (1) - This corner in the stream has no emphasis in the music (that I can hear) - It doesn't That was just because I was at the end of the playfield LOL. I don't think it's that weird to play, and the other times I make a straight line stream it's to keep some consistency.
01:19:768 (1) - Slider is very close to being off-screen - As long as it isn't, it's fine.
01:45:768 (1) - I'd move this circle down a bit to fit with the increasing distance between the sliders in the stream - Hmm, I think it fits where it is as it's at the end of where you would move your cursor if you follow the sliders down the mdidle.
02:28:101 (1) - This corner in the stream has no emphasis in the music (that I can hear)
02:59:601 (1) - This slider breaks flow - I understand what you mean, but just for future reference, it's often a good idea to explain why you think something breaks flow, and not just saying it does. Anyhow, ctrl+j'd the whole thing, should be better now.
03:29:435 (2) - Slider is very close to being off-screen - As long as it isn't, it's okay
03:57:101 (4,5,6) - (5) is closer to (6) than the end of (4) - How do people even notice a 0.01x difference. I fixed it.
04:13:601 (1) - I don't think that increasing the spacing in this stream so much is warranted by the music. - Not sure if you copied the correct timestamp there, but the stream uses the same spacing as previous streams at the same place. If you mean the one at 04:15:101 (1) - , that's because of the different drum sound.

In other streams with corners, I think they're fine because the streams there are more spaced and in more energetic sections of the song.

Overall, it's a very fun map to play.

-Fluffy wrote:

TATOE!, - T A T O E

From my modding queue.
Insert self advertisement here: p/5928394/

00:40:767 (1,2,3,4) - This random straight part triggers my OCD. - As explained above, the first one is because of playfield space The rest are to keep some consistency. I don't think they overall make much of a difference in playability, and provide some variance in aesthetics.
00:42:768 (1) - The kiai part after this has a bit too many hitsounds. 00:59:101 (1) - and you stopped it after here. ohkay. Scratch that, it sounds nice after listening through a couple times. - Yeah, the whistles can be a bit too busy for some I think, but I don't really have any other fitting hitsounds for those parts, and it's important that they're there to add proper emphasis on the actual clicked beats.
02:27:851 (2,3,4) - Random straight part in stream triggering OCD again D:
03:59:768 (1,2) - change these to 1/4 jumps like you did for everything else. You never used these again so doesn't make much sense. - Not sure what you mean here by 1/4 jumps like everything else The reason they're 1/4 sliders and not a stream is because of the vocals still being sung, similar to 04:10:434 -
04:15:101 (1,2,3,4) - aaa, OCD
05:15:101 (1) - Change volume to 60 or maybe 70. I understand the build-up to the next kiai,but it sounds too loud and it ends up standing out more than the chorus. - I use 80 for every buildup in the map though, so I think it's fine for now, unless you think that for every build up. Also I think the kiai parts stand out enough with the use of hitsounds and the mapping anyhow.

Sorry can't offer much. Still new to modding.
<3

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello - Hi
from my q.
sry for terrible English

[Urakaze]
^ is it her name, right? just interesting - Yes, the name of best waifu.

00:16:434 (1,2,3,4) - i might be wrong but it's not square 4 a bit off 90 degrees - I think that's just from the angling. You can try moving 2 of the notes on top of the other two and see that they fit, or check the distance snap for all of them to be equal.

01:03:934 (2) - kind a strange move to slower movement. As follow your stream i expected really big jump and after slow down slider (as it is). Actually i think for this palce really good fits 2 kicksliders. You'll still get decreases an intense as it's less clicable objects, catch weak but noticable blue ticks and follow strong lingering sounds on 01:03:768 - and 01:03:934 - - I think the two strong sounds there should be emphasized much more, which is why I use two notes rather than kicksliders. Since the stream 01:03:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) clearly follow the same sound as 01:03:767 (1,2) - , usng kicksliders add two sliderends on parts where that sound isn't present.

01:05:768 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Can You palce it more structurized? If to be honest i didn't get patterns following... Yeah it's strong-weak doubles but why 01:06:768 - two beat here don't stacked and NCed as new part? Follow vocals? Imo it's wierd when You swap to vocals right after kicks follow pattern. - I use doubles like that when I don't follow vocal, and go to the background beat (like at 01:19:101 (1,2,3,4) - and 03:27:101 (1,2,3,4) - ) The pattern is a zig-zag of doubles with increased spacing, and the nc and the 2 notes not being stacked is because the vocals start up again, yea. I don't think it's too confusing like that.

01:05:768 (1,2,3,4) - Also I want to note that there is a good instrumental part, which is quite noticeable, and you can base pattern on it. By using [url] https://puu.sh/vdzqB.jpg [/ url] rhythm and jumping 1,2,3,4 or ... string hmmm. There can be many things: lol :, based on instruments - Yeah I know, I decided to map the vocals instead since they're more focused in this part than the background instruments

01:13:768 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i've got your polarity based NC, but i think 1-2's patterns is more intuitivity variatoin for this part. I'll try to explain... 01:14:268 (3,1) - This 2 beats have pretty similar sound structure with a bit different with other pars (01:13:768 (1,2) - 01:14:684 (2,3) - ) wich make feeling like 01:14:268 (3) - sound goes over to 01:14:434 (1) - mainly because of accompanying noise after beats. And others (01:13:768 (1,2) - 01:14:684 (2,3) - ) feels like independent ones. So this parts more intuvity readable as 1-2 jumps imo. i'm not fan of 1-2 pattern but ... yea https://puu.sh/vdB09.jpg Maybe if You applied this, make sance to restructure pattern a bit as well... - I think that's gonna be way more confusing, since it'll make people expect all 3 to be using the same rhythm. If you look at other miiro maps, you'll notice that unless they spam NC's, they usually divide them into 3 notes each for this part.

01:32:101 (4,1) - fix blanket xD - lul.

01:35:351 (2,3) - make sense to unstack it. Cause it'll be more similar visually with 01:35:768 (5,6,7) - wich sounds equal - Sure, fixed.

01:39:434 (2,3,4,5) - ^ same idea , make sense to do equal visual spacing here - Not sure what you mean here, but (4) has an emphasis on the vocal going higher in pitch so the spacing is slightly higher.

01:41:768 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - It's kind a wierd suggestion but.. Can You make patterns wich makes 2 lines (or mabe 2 double lines) instead of https://puu.sh/vdBGe.jpg like https://puu.sh/vdBNU.jpg for visual equivalent ship's position-attack in kancolle game https://puu.sh/vdC6J.jpg i did't play but saw it somewhere - I don't think anyone would ever catch that, and i like showing the slight change in the vocals with the different spacing

02:07:768 (1,2,3,1) - Fix 1,2,3 blanket arond 1. Each circle have different visual spacing. - Should be better

02:26:268 (4,1) - it's unrankable overlap, nearly unreadable - These are really common though, and not unreadable since everyone I asked to try it hit it xd

02:28:101 (1,2,3,4) - i guess if You change flow in stream, it (changes) should be starts from NC like https://puu.sh/vdE40.jpg - It changes, but it's still a part of the same stream, so connecting them on the downbeat makes more sense to me imo.
05:18:434 (1) - ^

02:45:768 (1,2,3,1,4,5) - Can You make these overlaps have equal spacing to be more neat? - Done.

02:48:850 (6,4) - stack? - Wouldn't really be possible with the way the curve curves and the spacing.

04:16:434 (2) - any sense for NC here You already base on patterns here so remove it 04:15:851 (1,2,1,2) - - Because it changes into the other NC pattern,
that's why it has a NC again

[]

Thats all.
Hope You find smthing helpfull.
Goodluck!

Gokateigo wrote:

Hi Shoe Guy o/

Mod (nice bg btw)

1. 00:04:934 (3,1) - 2x ds between these two sliders, it's too high
2. 01:14:268 (3,1) - remove nc and remap these triangles, the spacing is too confusing
3. 01:42:434 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - nerf
4. 01:55:101 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make this easier, it's a calm part, remove the stream and add a repeat slider
5. 02:27:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why this stream isn't curved everywhere, there is a line in the middle, it looks bad
6. 03:51:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - nerf
7. 03:54:101 (1,2,3,4) - nerf (x15 ds wow)

gl

YokesPai wrote:

Modded this cuz I want cookie
Also I couldn't find a lot.

Mod

00:33:101 (3,4,1) - Could be better triangle - I guess.
00:32:434 (1,2,3,4) - Unconsistent spacing (if that's what you're going for here)
00:33:768 (1,2,3,4) - ^ (1 is 0.89x and the rest are 0.88x) - It's a result of rounding. This is negligible in-game anyway.
01:13:768 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 3/4 rhythms haven't come up before this point so I'd suggest to make them sliders so it's easier to read/acc - The difficulty of the map (and the intended player audience anyway) probably won't have too much of a problem reading this, considering the high AR and difference in spacing between 01:13:601 (5,1,2) - being clear.
06:13:434 (1) - This blanket can get fixed - I kinda moved the endpoint around a bit, but tbf I think it looks close enough.
06:16:434 (1) - ^ - It's probably negligible really.
06:23:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 2, 4 and 6 could be a better triangle (move 6), and 1, the sliderend if 4 and 5 could be a better triangle as well (move 5) - Oh yeah I wanted to fix this thing the other day and forgot. Done.
06:34:101 (2,3,4) - Could be better triangle and 06:34:101 (2,3) - could be a better blanket - They're not really blankets of the sliderend and more blankets of the slider-body itself. Also it's not supposed to be a triangle.
06:35:768 (1,2) - These sliders are different from the other sliders (like 06:30:434 (1,2)) and I don't see or hear why - I don't know what you mean by different. If you mean the hitsounding, then the clap/drum thing stopped playing.
06:45:101 (3) - This blanket can get fixed - I guess.

There's a lot of blankets that can be done better, so here's some timestamps:
00:20:434 (1,2) -
00:22:101 (2) - Is this a blanket for 00:21:101 (3) or 00:22:434 (1,2)?
00:31:101 (1,2) -
00:33:101 (3,4) -
00:34:768 (4,1) -
I'd suggest looking through the map again and look for more - I'm not too interested in looking through to find a bunch of random blankets that are 1-2 pixels off, really.

Sorry for nitpicking a lot, but I couldn't find anything else
Looks like a great map!

Ohwow wrote:

NM from mah q

[Tatoe]
Whistle sound kinda annoying for me - Dunno what other hitsound to use for it, and having no hitsounds make the map more awkward to play as you don't get enough feedback to what the objects are following (due to the nature of the song being a bunch of 1/2's), at least imo.
00:37:934 (2,1,2,3) - try to line up with 00:38:101 (3,4) - - Ops, should be better now.
01:11:268 (2) - ctrl+g for flow? - It does flow better, but the current pattern doesn't really play bad even if it doesn't follow circular flow, and I like how it feels disjoint, kind of like how the vocals are fairly syllabic at this point.
01:13:768 (1,2,3) & 01:14:434 (1,2,3) - I suggest having smaller jumps on these 3/4 jumps and have a big jump at 01:14:268 (3,1) - - That wouldn't really make sense spacing wise imo, and also the notes are fairly strong so the jumps indicate that better.
02:08:101 (3,1) - increase spacing cuz it looks like 1/2 beat like 02:07:768 (1,2,3) - - The NC and AR should make this easily readable for most players (unless they purely play on reaction anyway)
03:44:101 (8,1) - I think it'd be cool if you partially stack these 2 - I mean I guess, but I like the general patterning of the next few notes, and I'm kinda lazy to remap parts of it just for this which isn't relaly that significant xd.
04:16:351 (1) - I think you should delete NC here - It's mostly for consistency with the NCs in other "intermissions" between kiai parts.
05:07:101 (1,1,1,1) - Shouldn't NC spam here, I don't see reason why to do so. - Every repeat slider with 1 repeat has a NC on them, while the 2 repeat ones don't. And also I'm NC spamming because I like the colors. The whole map uses a lot of very short combos in general, and I think it fits aethetically as well.
05:08:434 (1,1,1,1,1) - ^
05:39:768 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this part of the stream is really clumped up and not looking too good - Eh I like my hexagon . I'll think about it, but it's late and I cba to do huge changes right now.
06:06:600 (2) - AIMod: Object not snapped - Rip, fixed.

I think you can make these streams nicer 02:27:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) & 06:21:768 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - - with spacing changes & flow breaks, like the one you did here 02:48:101 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - - Hmm, probably. I'll look into maybe reworking some of the streams when I have more time.

Lit song and mapping dude gl

1. *cough* *cough* the bg res *cough* not even moe enough :v
2. 00:16:434 (1,2,3,4) - i did a recheck on a square pattern here, but it isn't the constant spacing what i've been expecting though. move 00:17:100 (3) - on 203|79, then (4) on 325|232. should fixed the square pattern there. oh, 00:17:768 (1) - to 189|216 for a middle point of the square too
3. 00:17:768 (1,2,3,4,1) - the same as above, but u know what to do about it, right? xd
4. 00:32:101 (1) - clap, not whistle
5. 00:46:601 (5) - it wouldn't hurt if u want to linear it with 00:45:434 (2,3) - with a constant spacing there by setting it to 229|258 :/
6. 00:47:518 (3) - nice unintentional whistle here :^)
7. 01:28:684 (2) - idk what u're trying to map here, since it's an absent note .-.
8. 01:43:268 (2,1) - 01:43:601 (2,1) - 01:43:934 (2,1) - comparing from the previous notes by its distance, this one's kinda different. let's say as an example that it is an initial beat before going to a chorus part. why not go with like low to high spacing like that from the start until 01:44:434 - instead for the main idea? (a bit similar with a zig zag pattern though)
9. 01:54:934 - why not use this timing here as a note? it'd be way more cooler to have it clickable on this synth sound like u did the rest. something like 01:59:101 (2,3,1) - for clickable is a perfect example there
10. 02:47:684 - oh wow, u missed a note here, even that u did it like the other previous notes from 02:46:268 (1,2,3) -
11. 03:11:767 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - ah shoet, i was expecting that u'd go with such spacing to lower from the streams, since you're following the pitch of the synth sound from high to low, but it isn't .-.
12. 03:44:434 (1) - optional, u can move it at 450|108 for a triangle pattern, so it'd be better to have a view there in editor view xd
13. 03:51:101 (1,2,1,2,1) - u know about the spacing as i have mentioned it before
14. 04:34:268 (2) - u're going to make a jumps there huh? should've set a 1/4 slider to follow the beat on that blue tick as a support from a background music, just like what u did on triplets for this
15. 04:41:768 (1) - at least u should have a tail clickable rather than using a slider

lit120 wrote:

and so, i'm here

1. *cough* *cough* the bg res *cough* not even moe enough :v - Cropped it from a 1000xSomething image to 16:9
2. 00:16:434 (1,2,3,4) - i did a recheck on a square pattern here, but it isn't the constant spacing what i've been expecting though. move 00:17:100 (3) - on 203|79, then (4) on 325|232. should fixed the square pattern there. oh, 00:17:768 (1) - to 189|216 for a middle point of the square too - Uh afair I created the square in the middle and just rotated it, so any small distance differences are probably only due to rounding. These small changes in DS is negligible though.
   I did move the next square to the middle of the square though.
3. 00:17:768 (1,2,3,4,1) - the same as above, but u know what to do about it, right? xd
4. 00:32:101 (1) - clap, not whistle - lolops. fixed
5. 00:46:601 (5) - it wouldn't hurt if u want to linear it with 00:45:434 (2,3) - with a constant spacing there by setting it to 229|258 :/ - Huh, never noticed that. Fixed
6. 00:47:518 (3) - nice unintentional whistle here :^) - I dunno what this timestamp even is, but the whistles here are intentional as far as I can tell.
7. 01:28:684 (2) - idk what u're trying to map here, since it's an absent note .-. - I dunno either lolol. I'll change them if they feel bothersome to play, but I kinda just like them as they are, and it's not uncommon for people to use triples for emphasis and whatnot, so I guess they emphasize the last note :^) I'll change it if people complain/I'm not lazy.
8. 01:43:268 (2,1) - 01:43:601 (2,1) - 01:43:934 (2,1) - comparing from the previous notes by its distance, this one's kinda different. let's say as an example that it is an initial beat before going to a chorus part. why not go with like low to high spacing like that from the start until 01:44:434 - instead for the main idea? (a bit similar with a zig zag pattern though) - I didn't quite understand what you meant by this.
9. 01:54:934 - why not use this timing here as a note? it'd be way more cooler to have it clickable on this synth sound like u did the rest. something like 01:59:101 (2,3,1) - for clickable is a perfect example there - I tried doing that, but it feels awkward in junction with 01:55:101 (1,2,3,4) - , and I want that and 01:56:101 (1,2,3,4) - to be similar instead.
10. 02:47:684 - oh wow, u missed a note here, even that u did it like the other previous notes from 02:46:268 (1,2,3) - - I transition from triangles into 1/2 jumps xd. I do the same later on too. I dunno why but I feel the triple doesnt sound as prominent in that half of the buildup as the first half.
11. 03:11:767 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - ah shoet, i was expecting that u'd go with such spacing to lower from the streams, since you're following the pitch of the synth sound from high to low, but it isn't .-. - What? xD
12. 03:44:434 (1) - optional, u can move it at 450|108 for a triangle pattern, so it'd be better to have a view there in editor view xd - Lol sure xd.
13. 03:51:101 (1,2,1,2,1) - u know about the spacing as i have mentioned it before - Well yes, but I didn't really understand what you meant xd.
14. 04:34:268 (2) - u're going to make a jumps there huh? should've set a 1/4 slider to follow the beat on that blue tick as a support from a background music, just like what u did on triplets for this - Same as before, but actually, good idea I'll add a 1/4 slider.
15. 04:41:768 (1) - at least u should have a tail clickable rather than using a slider - I think the sliderheads are the more important sounds here, so it works out using a slider imo

well, guess that's it from me then~

shoe mapper xd