forum

The Meta Rule Game

posted
Total Posts
30
Topic Starter
Softwarm
[Current Ruleset]

1. Members can modify any rule of the game through voting.
2. Members can add rules through voting.
3. At minimum, a three votes majority of Yay/Nay is needed to pass or discard a change/addition to a rule.
4. Given that three or more votes have been cast for both Yay/Nay, a 3/5 minimum majority for/against a change/addition must be obtained to pass the vote.
5. Rules can consist of anything.
6. Members can only vote once on any given change/addition, but they can alter their vote.
7. Not following the rules Once: incurs a warning, but Twice: earns you a disqualification from participating.
8. Collect 100 points to win the game.
Legacy Rules
No rules have been discarded.
Original Rules
1. Members can modify any rule of the game through voting.
2. Members can add rules through voting.
3. At minimum, a three votes majority of Yay/Nay must be pass or discard a change/addition to a rule.
4. Given that three or more votes have been cast for both Yay/Nay, a 3/5 minimum majority for/against a change/addition must be obtained to pass the vote.
5. Rules can consist of anything.
6. Members can only vote once on any given change/addition, but they can alter their vote.
7. Not following the rules Once: incurs a warning, but Twice: earns you a disqualification from participating.
8. Collect 100 points to win the game.

Notes:
- Try to be clear about what your rule is going to be/what changes you want to make.
- Bolding your suggestions/votes/addenda would make them easier to spot. Thanks.
- The latest rules of the game will be posted in OP.
- I intend to do multiple rounds of this game if it ends up getting popular or dies instantly because everyone voted for a rule like "All member get 100 points." or something similar.
- Once a round is over, all people who were disqualified for breaking a rule or who got a warning have their collective slates wiped clean.
- This is not my original idea: credit where credit is due goes to dxu.

Have fun!
Blitzfrog
Ok I add a rule

Everyone has to say Deez nuts on your chin
Topic Starter
Softwarm
Are you saying that I have to come up to me and say "Deez nuts" to my chin? I'd vote against this.

Or are you saying that all the members should write "Deez nuts" on their chin? I'd vote for this.
Blitzfrog
All members have to post "Deez nuts on your chin"
Topic Starter
Softwarm
Alright I'll vote for it.


(We still need one more person.)
vinnicci
I vote no, lol
Blitzfrog

vinnicci wrote:

I vote no, lol
***k you
DJ Enetro
I second vinicci's idea. Get Necro'd
abraker
vote to add rule "feel free to talk about anything here"
DJ Enetro

abraker wrote:

vote to add rule "feel free to talk about anything here"
if you can get a few mods to monitor this then I will vote yay. Otherwise nay
Ryoid

DJ Enetro wrote:

abraker wrote:

vote to add rule "feel free to talk about anything here"
if you can get a few mods to monitor this then I will vote yay. Otherwise nay
Same
Topic Starter
Softwarm
I vote nay, that would devolve into stupidity real fast. Got anything else?
DJ Enetro
I vote to add rule +1 point for successfully adding or discarding a rule
(This one doesn’t count for a point btw)

well fuccme
Achromalia
I vote to add rule "ignore sentimentality/morality/ethics, debate any conceivable topic".
DJ Enetro
Please explain
(Also, are you gonna say yay or nay for my rule?)
abraker

DJ Enetro wrote:

I vote to add rule +1 point for successfully adding or discarding a rule
hmmm how about +2 pts for the proposer and +1 pts for anyone who voted. If it gets removed, proposer and voters for that specific rule all get -3 pts.
Achromalia

DJ Enetro wrote:

Please explain
(Also, are you gonna say yay or nay for my rule?)
O shit I didn't notice I got ninja'd until 4 or 5 hours later

hmmm. I'd say yay.

also explanation isn't really needed, I'm pretty sure its simple enough but ill describe it as this -- anything, even something controversial can be debated and people can have their own conclusions regardless of how ethical or unethical said conclusions seem.

abraker wrote:

DJ Enetro wrote:

I vote to add rule +1 point for successfully adding or discarding a rule
hmmm how about +2 pts for the proposer and +1 pts for anyone who voted. If it gets removed, proposer and voters for that specific rule all get -3 pts.
I'd vote for that addition, sounds interesting.
vinnicci
ok, equinox's proposal gets a yay from me.


for DJ's +1 point rule, until abraker's suggestion gets approved it's no for now.
DJ Enetro
yay for both abraker’s and Xuequinox’s proposals
Topic Starter
Softwarm
Oh, now you guys are taking this seriously, hm?

I actually prefer abraker's system to Enetro's, but I wouldn't mind giving a yay to Enetro's on its own. As for Xuequinox's addition... I'm rather indifferent, I'll throw my vote in if there's a tie.
abraker
So what's the vote count? If my suggestion gets passed we need to keep track a status and history of votes, so better start now.
schilar
You must listen to It's Raining Men to participate. Is that a good rule?
Achromalia
You might want to be a bit more specific. Do you want someone to listen to "It's Raining Men" each time they post on this thread, do they need to have heard the song in it's entirety at least once, do they have to listen to it once every day, once every hour...?
vinnicci
I vote no, i don't wanna post some proof every time(if that's what they meant) i post.
Achromalia

vinnicci wrote:

I vote no, i don't wanna post some proof every time(if that's what they meant) i post.
referring to whom? I'm assuming you meant my rule, so okay

you don't have to, as far as I recall, you don't have to have proof to debate something, you just need a strong opinion of something and argue about it with others.
vinnicci

Xuequinox wrote:

vinnicci wrote:

I vote no, i don't wanna post some proof every time(if that's what they meant) i post.
referring to whom? I'm assuming you meant my rule, so okay

you don't have to, as far as I recall, you don't have to have proof to debate something, you just need a strong opinion of something and argue about it with others.
no, i meant the raining men rule.
as for your rule I already voted yes.
Achromalia

vinnicci wrote:

no, i meant the raining men rule.
as for your rule I already voted yes.
oh wait

woops sorry

ohhhhhhhhhhhhh you mean we'd have to share proof we listened to it-- oh.

im fucking stupid x'D

yeah i misinterpreted your thing because it didnt give much context

but its okay, i think i got it now xD
vinnicci

Xuequinox wrote:

vinnicci wrote:

no, i meant the raining men rule.
as for your rule I already voted yes.
oh wait

woops sorry

ohhhhhhhhhhhhh you mean we'd have to share proof we listened to it-- oh.

im fucking stupid x'D

yeah i misinterpreted your thing because it didnt give much context

but its okay, i think i got it now xD

it's my bad, i didn't quote the post.


I might post my rule too, but i can't think of a good one for now.
Achromalia
hmmm don't mind me just giving this a cancerous bump because I think there's something we can contribute to this thread.

but tbh I really just was interested in how this would work, but there haven't been any ideas for rules implemented yet by the lack of votes.
abraker
Brisk Clarity hasn't touched osu for 2 months. Who will apply the rule?
Please sign in to reply.

New reply