We've changed some hitsounds through the difficulties to make them consistent, due that some of them were missed.
forum
Dreamcatcher - Chase Me
posted
Total Posts
181
We've changed some hitsounds through the difficulties to make them consistent, due that some of them were missed.
2 minutes after i played the pantsu diff it got re-qualified...coincidence? :thinking:
anyway regratz, song is addicting as hell
anyway regratz, song is addicting as hell
Monstrata wrote:
Rebubble since discussion has wrapped up and all 3 QAT's associated with this discussion have given the green light to rebubble now. Sorry I wasn't able to participate in this discussion, was quite busy irl. But I'm glad it got resolved without too much drama.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I spoke with Mao a bit during the whole thing, and from that discussion he said:Gero wrote:
I'm glad that everything has been resolved now. So, since all QATs that were involved in the discussion are okay with the set, and the things were addressed by the Mapper, this should be good to go now.
We've changed some hitsounds through the difficulties to make them consistent, due that some of them were missed.~ Requalified ~
16:38 Mao: Something I want to clarify again is that the only actual QAT action in the thread was the disqualification in order to halt the ranking process so that we can discuss the issues that were addressed without rushing it
16:38 Mao: everything a QAT posted in there is their own opinion
16:38 Mao: which isn't worth more than any other opinion in the thread
16:39 Mao: nobody ever said that we force Natsu to do this
16:39 Mao: he can just find 2 more BNs and get it requalified
but from the way both of you write your posts, it seems like the QAT's opinions are indeed held higher than anyone else in the discussion. It might not be the case, it might not be supposed to be the case, it might be a misunderstanding between BN/QAT, or something else, but I just wanted to point it out since the impression I get from BNs and what Mao told me seems to not really match up.
Also, grats on the requalification!
Topic Starter
Thanks everyone~ 
00:50:506 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - idk why this is more emphasized now but
01:00:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ this one stayed the same though, if you're gonna emphasize the latter portions more might as well just do it with all of them, right?
02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - this pattern is actually a lot better than the previous one, while i'm not really too big of a fan of the fullscreen at first the spacing reduction makes sense now
idk I'm still not fully behind these fullscreen jumps in the kiai, everything else makes a lot more sense now though
01:00:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ this one stayed the same though, if you're gonna emphasize the latter portions more might as well just do it with all of them, right?
02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - this pattern is actually a lot better than the previous one, while i'm not really too big of a fan of the fullscreen at first the spacing reduction makes sense now
idk I'm still not fully behind these fullscreen jumps in the kiai, everything else makes a lot more sense now though
Topic Starter
01:00:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - vocals here are different as I explained before, thats why-fieryrage wrote:
00:50:506 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - idk why this is more emphasized now but
01:00:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ this one stayed the same though, if you're gonna emphasize the latter portions more might as well just do it with all of them, right?
02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - this pattern is actually a lot better than the previous one, while i'm not really too big of a fan of the fullscreen at first the spacing reduction makes sense now
idk I'm still not fully behind these fullscreen jumps in the kiai, everything else makes a lot more sense now though
02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - and yeah this is really cool
Topic Starter
lool09simp wrote:
Not even straight
grats
@CXu: They were able to requalify it because we got to an agreement. It has nothing to do with us being QAT but rather us being the ones who criticised the map. That's why we had to agree on it in order to have the initial nominators nominate it again.
btw, shouldn't romanized artist be Dream Catcher? If we check their official website we can see that they call themselves "Dream Catcher" instead of "Dreamcatcher": http://www.dreamcatcher7.com/# I think that would be better if we use the artist from the official website.
Topic Starter
In the website it's just an style thing the same for being all in caps, if you check their other official sites such as twitter youtube naver Facebook or instagram they are using it together as Dreamcatcher, ex https://mobile.twitter.com/hf_dreamcatcher
probably worth to add as online tags
I agree with Sieg that "Dream Catcher" might be added as tag and that would be better
Topic Starter
it can be added to online tags, but I really doubt someone would search for it
Well, it's up to you (:
The offset should be around 330. I hope you'll change it before ranking this map(and seriously? fucking offset so much? isn't it one of the first thing you should do when starting to map a song?). s4be.
EDIT:
Sorry, it seems that i had to redownload this map, now it is ok.
EDIT:
Sorry, it seems that i had to redownload this map, now it is ok.
Topic Starter
don't be agresive and delete and redownload I changed mp3 and I think you still have the old oneSzamanFL wrote:
The offset should be around 330. I hope you'll change it before ranking this map(and seriously? fucking offset so much? isn't it one of the first thing you should do when starting to map a song?). s4be.
Topic Starter
It's fineSzamanFL wrote:
Sorry for being agresive D:
gz
Topic Starter
gracias bomba
G
R
A
T
Z
OMG
R
A
T
Z
OMG
please chase me
Regratzz! :3
btw, Natsu, here the metadata link more valid!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zihoyz0u_cs
I can't waiting this map is ranked, good luck for ranked selection!
btw, Natsu, here the metadata link more valid!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zihoyz0u_cs
I can't waiting this map is ranked, good luck for ranked selection!
02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - vs 00:43:456 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) -
:\ Why such a big difference ... there's not that much difference in intensity.
:\ Why such a big difference ... there's not that much difference in intensity.
Topic Starter
, 02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - is a decrescendo/diminuendoXexxar wrote:
02:33:856 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - vs 00:43:456 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) -
:\ Why such a big difference ...
00:43:456 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - it's a buildup for the chorus
both parts are totally different
well w/e. Overall I feel like these updates you made since qualified ruined the song since everything is so over spaced its like my hero in that nothing feels important and everything is emphasized.
Sad to see what you criticized me for in the past is what you do in your maps now ;w; I'm not gonna mod or request a DQ or anything but :\
Sad to see what you criticized me for in the past is what you do in your maps now ;w; I'm not gonna mod or request a DQ or anything but :\
Topic Starter
Xexxar wrote:
well w/e. Overall I feel like these updates you made since qualified ruined the song since everything is so over spaced its like my hero in that nothing feels important and everything is emphasized.
Sad to see what you criticized me for in the past is what you do in your maps now ;w; I'm not gonna mod or request a DQ or anything but :\
Well my back and forth, the horizontal jumps and the decrescendo where the problem, I made a compromise with that (as you can read in the previous 6 pages of discussion), my first approach of the song was to HL the more emotive part of the songs, but I made changes to keep a constant emphasis, tbh nowadays modders are too based on drum sounds that forget things as vocals, overall section feeling etc.
If you ask me, my previous version was better, but I made changes for a compromise with the QAT. I like the current ver too tho
Yeah I agree that mods negatively impacted the map but oh well.
Topic Starter
thank you, yeah the style is the same, just some jumps and patterns are different now- Squishi wrote:
doesnt look any different than what it used to be, still godly natsu
ya por fin se acabó la masacre de una diff?
The nightmare difficulty feels extremely out of time. Is this just me or are other people getting this aswell?
Topic Starter
Delete and redownload
Good map. Nice work on organizing consistent pattern usage through similar parts of the song, and such setting also being consistsently designed through the spread.
Topic Starter
Sonnyc wrote:
Good map. Nice work on organizing consistent pattern usage through similar parts of the song, and such setting also being consistsently designed through the spread.
