hi, played this in multi and thought it was nice... felt like mapping the song too but i guess you saved me some work xD
[General]
Diffname could be something more creative tbh.. off the top of my head we got "Downpour" "Drenched" "Raindrop" or something like that, this was just a brief 15sec brainstorming lul
OD could be 6.5 or 7 since it is DnB and following the rythm/accing is very easy for this type of music
BG isn't 16:9, resize if you want to or keep it at the current resolution, it will just get stretched a bit i guess
[Diff]
00:06:480 - 00:11:966 - i'd suggest keeping these consistent as d k d with 00:17:451 (58,59,60) - through all the repetitions since it would flow more naturally with your d k d k rythm you have going on here, maybe d d k or d k k would fit better too
00:30:909 - maybe move this to 00:31:080 - to be consistent with the other repetitions, the way you have it now sounds a bit weird imo and it's more creating one thing that stands out than consistent variety imo
01:19:251 - move this to 01:19:337 - here again i'd be fine with the current arrangement if it were somehow built in as a 1 2 1 2 for consistent variety but it's just a lone outstander, so changing it to be consistent would be better.
04:21:309 - same as earlier, move to 04:21:480 -
04:46:251 - again, the d k d would be better here imo
edit: 00:47:280 - turn these to k d to fit the melody better, (00:52:766 - this etc. too)
shoot this up to 12SP and call me back
[General]
Diffname could be something more creative tbh.. off the top of my head we got "Downpour" "Drenched" "Raindrop" or something like that, this was just a brief 15sec brainstorming lul
OD could be 6.5 or 7 since it is DnB and following the rythm/accing is very easy for this type of music
BG isn't 16:9, resize if you want to or keep it at the current resolution, it will just get stretched a bit i guess
[Diff]
00:06:480 - 00:11:966 - i'd suggest keeping these consistent as d k d with 00:17:451 (58,59,60) - through all the repetitions since it would flow more naturally with your d k d k rythm you have going on here, maybe d d k or d k k would fit better too
00:30:909 - maybe move this to 00:31:080 - to be consistent with the other repetitions, the way you have it now sounds a bit weird imo and it's more creating one thing that stands out than consistent variety imo
01:19:251 - move this to 01:19:337 - here again i'd be fine with the current arrangement if it were somehow built in as a 1 2 1 2 for consistent variety but it's just a lone outstander, so changing it to be consistent would be better.
04:21:309 - same as earlier, move to 04:21:480 -
04:46:251 - again, the d k d would be better here imo
edit: 00:47:280 - turn these to k d to fit the melody better, (00:52:766 - this etc. too)
shoot this up to 12SP and call me back