It is lame if you only quote people you have counterarguments for and ignore the others.
Having a map loved or not, its target audience is always the community anyway. Adding whatever maps (by mysterious preselectors[tm]) to loved is as good as adding all or as adding none.
Also consider this: The feature request that was considered "fulfilled" with this novelty actually specifically called for a "New beatmap category for good unrankable mapsets".
Let's read that again.
Assuming that the "Loved" category is supposed to be for the "best quality unrankable" mapsets then I think the question as to why Red Like Roses was even considered for the vote is very valid.
Rabbitjump maps were always popular because they are indeed fun for scrub players. That is why they don't need this category.
I expected better research from you, Railey.
Having a map loved or not, its target audience is always the community anyway. Adding whatever maps (by mysterious preselectors[tm]) to loved is as good as adding all or as adding none.
Also consider this: The feature request that was considered "fulfilled" with this novelty actually specifically called for a "New beatmap category for good unrankable mapsets".
Let's read that again.
goodOr even in the OP itself. Now I don't know what the OP edited in the last couple days but:
TL;DR: The best unrankable maps could be moved to a special category where they would have scoreboards while giving no ppWe read words like "best" and "quality" here.
→AFTER BEING SELECTED AND PASSING A MODDING PROCCESS←
This'd encourage the creation of quality gimmick maps (as they'd get more attention) and reward players with unique skills.
Assuming that the "Loved" category is supposed to be for the "best quality unrankable" mapsets then I think the question as to why Red Like Roses was even considered for the vote is very valid.
Rabbitjump maps were always popular because they are indeed fun for scrub players. That is why they don't need this category.
I expected better research from you, Railey.