m4m from my q
normal ???????????
use these combocolours
Combo1 : 249,176,6
Combo2 : 159,199,3
Combo3 : 240,32,105
Combo4 : 34,232,123
00:00:089 (1) - you can emphasis this part a lot better than with a single repeatslider over one whole measure.
https://puu.sh/rCgH6/21b7596e10.png Just something simple as this
00:13:803 - dont end spinners on important notes. The end of a spinner is not clicked and thus the player doesnt get any feedback from this intense beat 00:15:946 (2,3,4,5) - since 00:16:160 - has a melodic note i would suggest you use a rythm like this so you properly emphasise the most out of this part
https://puu.sh/rCgVx/173f76cda3.png. Note: 00:16:589 - is the weakest of all notes here so it would be wise to put the slider taile over this beat
00:17:232 (1,2,3,4) - off-stack these a bit. Example
https://puu.sh/rCh3x/63f2d3c795.png. Here i used 0.05-ish spacing and rotated each for 20°
00:20:660 - same thing with spinners
00:22:804 (5) - again, having both of these notes clickable would be preferable since the tail is on 00:23:017 - which is stronger than 00:22:803 -
00:24:089 (1) - just use a spinner here 00:24:517 - . It would be much more fitting and swap the head of the slider with a single note
00:29:124 (15,1) - why this much emphasis on this. There is barely anything important on 00:29:231 - in the song, you just put a finish over it. Besides, 00:30:731 (15) - you used a kick here which is a much smoother transition to the next long stream. but you spaced the next one half the grid away... wtf?
00:32:554 (16,1) - lets not begin talking about this
00:32:661 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - or this
00:34:375 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - these feel way more natural to play
00:37:696 (16,1,2) - same thing.
pls reconcider your spacing in this part, its rediculous
00:54:518 (1,2,3,4) - inear spacing would be more fitting and look less like 2 random doubles. You will be playing 2 doubles 00:53:875 (1,2,1,2) - with similar spacing and then suddenly the doubles turn into a 4 note stream which could be misread as 2 doubles
00:56:232 (2,3) - dont stack these. Move 00:56:661 (3) - like half across the screen to emphasise this strong piano-like sound
i have no idea what you did with the spacing in the following part, and i dont have the motivation to figure it out
01:30:947 (1,2,3,4,5) - Why isnt this spacest lower or the same than 01:29:232 (1,2,3,4,5) - since they sound the same if not 01:30:947 (1,2,3,4,5) - even weaker
01:50:661 (2) - emphasise the wubs with slider shapes mb ?
01:50:661 (2,1,2,6,1) - same and so on...
02:42:947 (1) - like this
https://puu.sh/rCi36/2d88a2f377.png02:48:518 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - spacing, rythm and visual representation isnt rly complimenting the music. You did it a lot better later on
The map gets a bit better after this, the climax is decently done, but i stopped playing before i hit it.
this needs a lot of work and i see you dont have much experience yet. You should be able to make this better if you put the effort doe
gl&hf mapping