This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on piątek, 2 grudnia 2016 at 01:10:32

Artist: USAO
Title: Chrono Diver -PENDULUMs-(USAO remix)
Source: beatmania IIDX 22 PENDUAL
Tags: Nekomata 猫叉 L.E.D.Master+ dnb drum and bass dubstep toshiyuki kakuta 角田利之 naoyuki sato 佐藤直之 chrono breaks drumstep konami bemani
BPM: 184
Filesize: 11597kb
Play Time: 05:10
Difficulties Available:

1. Everlasting Ticking (5,76 stars, 1401 notes)

Download: USAO - Chrono Diver -PENDULUMs-(USAO remix)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------





----------

Beafowl wrote:

nice map nice song and nice mapper

New mp3 from 26/10/2016 - redownload if you have the version of the map before that date

Thanks to -Tochi for the mp3, without him I couldn't have continued

----------

The diff names comes from the title of the song Pendulum, which can end up going for ever, therefore i assembled a name "Everending Ticking" To refer to non stop time that keeps going and will never stop

----------

Metadata Source - Thanks HighTec !!! - Metadata from HighTec's set xd

Favourite if you enjoyed

Ooh, nice
Gl on this

_DT3 wrote:

Ooh, nice
Gl on this

danks :3

m4m from your queue

Everending Ticking

• 00:03:240 (6,6,6,6,6,6,6,3) - spacing could be more consistent. I suggest to increase it progressively
  00:17:588 (1,2) - would replace by more spaced stream
  00:22:479 (1,2,3,4) - 00:22:805 (1,2,3,4) - make them different
  00:27:696 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same. Identical parts don't suit here
  00:33:647 (1) - long slider represented by the song poorly and it length seems weird. Would finish it earlier at 00:36:175 - or even 00:34:870 -
  01:32:098 (8,1,2,3,4) - significantly harder than previous 01:30:957 (1,2,3,4) - due to heavier flow and additional 01:32:098 (8) - too much tough cursor shaking. Move 01:32:098 (8) - away from this flow pattern (example: 01:31:935 (7) - x:194, y:234. 01:32:098 (8) - x:10, y:311)
  01:57:696 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - readability is a bit confusing
  02:01:446 - robotic voice could be represented by the next fast slider
  02:10:903 (4,5) - Ctrl+G fits better and consistent with the other used flow patterns
  02:14:490 (3) - stack with 02:14:001 (1) - end
  02:28:348 (1) - need some preparation. Unite the corresponding sound 02:25:740 (1,2,3) - into 1 slower & shorter slider
  02:53:783 - 02:57:696 - better do not skip that strong beat. Inconsistent at least with 02:54:435 (1,1) - and which more important 02:43:348 (7,8,9,10) - here it is 02:43:348 (7)
  04:42:370 (6,7,1) - more distance for emphasis ?
  04:43:838 (6) - same
  04:59:653 - why the slider's end isn't here ? Following space is empty.

Good luck!

ayyy

-himei wrote:

ayyy

Ayyy

Maelstrrom wrote:

m4m from your queue

Everending Ticking

• 00:03:240 (6,6,6,6,6,6,6,3) - spacing could be more consistent. I suggest to increase it progressively i see no point its already consistent as it is, and a graduall increase wont fit, since its the same thing over and over xd
  00:17:588 (1,2) - would replace by more spaced stream the 1/4 sounds are really faint and are only building up so i see no reason to increase the spacing just to make it harder. i gradually increase the stream ds as it gets into the later section when it builds up, here i see no point
  00:22:479 (1,2,3,4) - 00:22:805 (1,2,3,4) - make them different wut, they are different to represent the change in sounds i change the angle at which they are facing, again no need for a ds boost since its really faint still
  00:27:696 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same. Identical parts don't suit here ^
  00:33:647 (1) - long slider represented by the song poorly and it length seems weird. Would finish it earlier at 00:36:175 - or even 00:34:870 - spinner* xd and sure
  01:32:098 (8,1,2,3,4) - significantly harder than previous 01:30:957 (1,2,3,4) - due to heavier flow and additional 01:32:098 (8) - too much tough cursor shaking. Move 01:32:098 (8) - away from this flow pattern (example: 01:31:935 (7) - x:194, y:234. 01:32:098 (8) - x:10, y:311) it follows a pattern of back and forth and then jumpy
  01:57:696 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - readability is a bit confusing nobody from the testplays missed on this, this is actually easy to read compared to a later section
  02:01:446 - robotic voice could be represented by the next fast slider sure i woudn't add a fast slider doe since that would be bad imo, i just shortened 02:01:283 (1) -
  02:10:903 (4,5) - Ctrl+G fits better and consistent with the other used flow patterns no it isnt xd, its so much more weird to hit since then 02:10:903 (4) - this is really unatural to hit
  02:14:490 (3) - stack with 02:14:001 (1) - end why would i do that, it would create uneccessary overlaps
  02:28:348 (1) - need some preparation. Unite the corresponding sound 02:25:740 (1,2,3) - into 1 slower & shorter slider done something else that fits imo but nice idea
  02:53:783 - 02:57:696 - better do not skip that strong beat. Inconsistent at least with 02:54:435 (1,1) - and which more important 02:43:348 (7,8,9,10) - here it is 02:43:348 (7) tru
  04:42:370 (6,7,1) - more distance for emphasis ? sure
  04:43:838 (6) - same this already has a lot of emphasis
  04:59:653 - why the slider's end isn't here ? Following space is empty. drain time reasoning xd needs to be 5min

Good luck!

danks

gl with le map
ill mod it sometime

btw extend last slider it is not 5min yet

spinner* and danks

nice

dank for ster

Hi o/

M4M from your queue

This is all my personal opinion, I may be wrong.

[Everending Ticking]
(*) 00:04:870 (1,2) - Avoid this overlap, doesn't look good. Try and place (2) so it ends on where (1) ended. Like this
(*) 00:10:088 (1,2) - Again here.
(*) 00:13:511 (5) - Stack head on the head of the previous (1).
(*) 00:13:675 (1) - Remove NC
(*) 00:14:979 (1) - ^
(*) 00:16:283 (1) - ^
(*) You can see a pattern.
(*) 00:14:001 (2) - NC
(*) 00:15:305 (2) - ^
(*) Your NCs here seem out of place, there's no need to NC these notes as the SV is consistent and it isn't difficult to read the jump
(*) 00:19:707 (5) - Stack on previous (1)
(*) 00:20:685 (3) - Stack on previous (7)
(*) 00:23:620 (3) - Stack on tail of previous (1)
(*) 00:32:261 (1) - Stack on (5)
(*) A lot of stacking issues, where notes overlap. Just run through and make sure there aren't any overlaps, and try stack more.
(*) 01:00:957 (4) - Blanket around previous (2)
(*) 01:04:870 (1) - Stack head on head from 01:03:892 (2) -
(*) 01:43:838 (2,1) - You can make this cleaner, make it blanket (2)
(*) 01:48:566 (1) - I think a SV of 2 is too much for this slider, it is pretty fast for its length. Try 1.7
(*) 01:53:783 (1) - Again
(*) 02:21:338 (1) - Remove NC and reduce DS, possibly to 1.0x like you had it. I really see no emphasis here.
(*) 02:28:348 (1,1,1,1,2,3,4,1) - Silence the tails, doesn't sound nice to me.
(*) 02:40:088 (5) - NC
(*) 02:42:696 (5) - ^
(*) 02:45:305 (5) - ^
(*) 02:47:914 (5) - ^ You can see where I'm going with this. NC all the (5)s that are like this.
(*) 04:18:077 (2) - Try stack on the previous (6), or repositition so there's no overlap.
(*) 04:49:707 (3) - Same here, try avoid the overlap with (1)
(*) 04:53:457 (1,2,3,4,5) - This very hard to read and aim, even though it's doable I don't see it being very popular. You're gonna have a lot of map people breaking before the end lmao. Maybe keep the curve but avoid it looping back on itself.

Overall a VERY good map, I'm sure this'll get ranked sometime soon. Again this is all my opinion, you don't need to take any of this advice, maybe I'm wrong, but this is what I found. Anyway, here's my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/377148

Good luck

Hey, m4m

Everending Ticking

00:03:240 (6,7) - I suggest to edit it like this: http://puu.sh/rxEn5/cfb3bf27e8.jpg Looks pretty :3
00:59:653 (1,2) - Overall, I don't like how the flow gets reversed here, it felt pretty strange seeing it on the right side, I expected it to continue flow after the repeater. My suggestion is, rotate 00:59:001 (1,1,1,1,1) - like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6246090 then place 01:00:142 (2) - below it so flow stays smooth. It also fixes reading issue on the pause between 01:00:142 (2,1) - by overlaping them. Way easier to read.
01:01:446 (5,1) - Same issue with reading this as above.
01:03:892 (2) - Hmmm, Ctrl+J?
01:25:740 (1,2,3,4,5) - Okay, so uhh, this is pretty hard to read since spacing doesn't tell you anything about the rhytm, maybe place double kicks 01:25:740 (1,2) - closed to each other so players know they are 1/4? I'd personally do that throught the whole section. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6246145
02:28:348 (1) - Why not separate it into 2 sliders? There is a kick at 02:30:957 and it's totally ignored.
03:41:392 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again spacing is very confusing, try the thing I mentioned before.
04:53:620 (3,4,5) - I could barely see it's going this way xd Maybe change the direction? 04:53:702 (4) - being stacked with 04:53:376 (4) - is a bit confusing.

That's all I found, sorry it's pretty short mod but the way you mapped it doesn't really let me mention thing I would normally do (like weird shapes, not natural flow, blankets, overlaps and general problems). Really good, stunning map, good luck Ziomeczku

Kanye wrote:

Hi o/

M4M from your queue

This is all my personal opinion, I may be wrong.

[Everending Ticking]
(*) 00:04:870 (1,2) - Avoid this overlap, doesn't look good. Try and place (2) so it ends on where (1) ended. Like this this is a overlap pattern dud, and it looks fab
(*) 00:10:088 (1,2) - Again here. ^
(*) 00:13:511 (5) - Stack head on the head of the previous (1). i don't stack
(*) 00:13:675 (1) - Remove NC 00:13:675 - see these sounds that are given off by these sldiers i feel like emphasizing them with a nc is much much more better than emphasizing it here, 00:14:001 (2) - since basicly nothing changes. Also since the new seciton starts at 00:12:696 (1) - a slider like this i wanted to keep consistency that every slider is nc'ed like this one was, so this makes sense both emphasis wise and aesthetically.
(*) 00:14:979 (1) - ^
(*) 00:16:283 (1) - ^ ^^
(*) You can see a pattern. i hope you do too
(*) 00:14:001 (2) - NC
(*) 00:15:305 (2) - ^ ^^
(*) Your NCs here seem out of place, there's no need to NC these notes as the SV is consistent and it isn't difficult to read the jump above exaplined xd
(*) 00:19:707 (5) - Stack on previous (1) i dont use stacks aaaa, dude by this time you should recognise that those "bad" overlaps that you are saying are my mapping style and they are consistent, not every overlap is bad yeno if its planned out well
(*) 00:20:685 (3) - Stack on previous (7)
(*) 00:23:620 (3) - Stack on tail of previous (1)
(*) 00:32:261 (1) - Stack on (5)
(*) A lot of stacking issues, where notes overlap. Just run through and make sure there aren't any overlaps, and try stack more. sigh
(*) 01:00:957 (4) - Blanket around previous (2) ?
(*) 01:04:870 (1) - Stack head on head from 01:03:892 (2) -
(*) 01:43:838 (2,1) - You can make this cleaner, make it blanket (2) where do you see a blanket x)
(*) 01:48:566 (1) - I think a SV of 2 is too much for this slider, it is pretty fast for its length. Try 1.7 pew sound, below that not fast enough xd
(*) 01:53:783 (1) - Again whispers: its a sv pattern xd
(*) 02:21:338 (1) - Remove NC and reduce DS, possibly to 1.0x like you had it. I really see no emphasis here. wubby sound is the same so i kept jumping same
(*) 02:28:348 (1,1,1,1,2,3,4,1) - Silence the tails, doesn't sound nice to me. tru
(*) 02:40:088 (5) - NC
(*) 02:42:696 (5) - ^
(*) 02:45:305 (5) - ^
(*) 02:47:914 (5) - ^ You can see where I'm going with this. NC all the (5)s that are like this. its the same sounds over and over again so i mean a nc woudnt fit here at all since nothing changes
(*) 04:18:077 (2) - Try stack on the previous (6), or repositition so there's no overlap. its a overlap pattern aaaaaaa
(*) 04:49:707 (3) - Same here, try avoid the overlap with (1) ^
(*) 04:53:457 (1,2,3,4,5) - This very hard to read and aim, even though it's doable I don't see it being very popular. You're gonna have a lot of map people breaking before the end lmao. Maybe keep the curve but avoid it looping back on itself. nop it fits since new sounds come into play and it makes a lot of sense changing the angles and ds up a bit since it gets more intense as it reaches the end

Overall a VERY good map, I'm sure this'll get ranked sometime soon. Again this is all my opinion, you don't need to take any of this advice, maybe I'm wrong, but this is what I found. Anyway, here's my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/377148 thank you those "I'm sure this'll get ranked sometime soon." makes me feel warm inside

Good luck

A lot of red from me but dont worry about it too much, since everything i map usually has its reason i dont map for random stuff so i think through everything before i even place the notes Also for your future mods dont repeat the same thing over and over again since theres a high chance that if you find something that you may think isnt correct but he denies it, theres a high chance hell deny all similar suggestions, like what happened here. I havent answered to all points since its mostly the nearest point under the suggestion says that i dont agree with all of the above (thats what it means anyway lo)

----------

deadpon3 wrote:

Hey, m4m

Everending Ticking

00:03:240 (6,7) - I suggest to edit it like this: http://puu.sh/rxEn5/cfb3bf27e8.jpg Looks pretty :3 00:03:077 (5,6,7) - im going with a triangle pattern here 00:03:077 (5,6,7) -
00:59:653 (1,2) - Overall, I don't like how the flow gets reversed here, it felt pretty strange seeing it on the right side, I expected it to continue flow after the repeater. My suggestion is, rotate 00:59:001 (1,1,1,1,1) - like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6246090 then place 01:00:142 (2) - below it so flow stays smooth. It also fixes reading issue on the pause between 01:00:142 (2,1) - by overlaping them. Way easier to read. i mean i get your point but it really doesnt make a huge difference, besides it flows really nicely as it is already and the circle appearing at the right is something the player is used to already (anti-flow patterns) since they appeared before that section for instance like here 00:55:088 (2) - , so i mean eh, your suggestion also go nicely with me sz
01:01:446 (5,1) - Same issue with reading this as above. what? therers no reading issue at all here the spacing between the 1/2 jumps and the 1/1 gap is different to distinguish the difference
01:03:892 (2) - Hmmm, Ctrl+J? could
01:25:740 (1,2,3,4,5) - Okay, so uhh, this is pretty hard to read since spacing doesn't tell you anything about the rhytm, maybe place double kicks 01:25:740 (1,2) - closed to each other so players know they are 1/4? I'd personally do that throught the whole section. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6246145 again its not hard to read and listen to these sounds really closely 01:28:022 (7,8,1) - since thats the reason on 1/4 kicksliders being there
02:28:348 (1) - Why not separate it into 2 sliders? There is a kick at 02:30:957 and it's totally ignored. true and the reason for that is its that theres no follow up sound to that, so it starts at with a sort of whoosh and then its the same, thats why i just missed out creating a new slider for it, also this slider has a turn change at that exact moment to emphasize that part more, since the new sounds kick in here 02:33:566 (1) - not before it
03:41:392 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again spacing is very confusing, try the thing I mentioned before. ^
04:53:620 (3,4,5) - I could barely see it's going this way xd Maybe change the direction? 04:53:702 (4) - being stacked with 04:53:376 (4) - is a bit confusing. go to view in the top and enable hit animations youll see that the nc distinguishes the difference between the stream, and its really easy to read. Also new sounds come in so i wanted to emphasize that with it being spaced bigger

That's all I found, sorry it's pretty short mod but the way you mapped it doesn't really let me mention thing I would normally do (like weird shapes, not natural flow, blankets, overlaps and general problems xd). Really good, stunning map, good luck Ziomeczku dzieki

dank for meds

hi from q


gl c:

Hi, Mod for Mod.

[Everending Ticking]


GL~

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

hi from q

x d

00:23:457 (2,4,5) - very cluttered stacking of notes, i would mind 00:23:457 (2,4) - but the varying spacing of the notes in this area is very cluttered yea... you're right only one like that too xd

00:24:925 (1) - the element you're trying to capture starts 00:25:088 - , not 00:24:925 - . fill this beat with a hit circle instead. (play on 25%/50% and delete the note to hear) nice

00:30:142 (1) - ^ ^

00:44:001 - sliderslide hitsound a bit intrusive to the music, maybe lower hitsounds to 5% like you did 00:02:262 - ? 5% is way too low, also i still have hs to do so maybe when im making adjustments ill change this but for now 5% is too low

01:16:609 (1,2) - make sliders to be consistent with the rest? nope because these are different than the rest tbh,and it consistent with 01:21:827 (1,2) - also just doing the same thing over and over again is boring af

01:21:827 (1,2) - same? these 2 sections are mapped the same way so i guess its alright i just feel like those 2 notes drop the "ayy" vibe ^

02:15:631 (2) - make slider to emphasize winding noise? nah i prefer a pause here before the next section, also it stops at a wubby sound lo

04:22:805 (4,5) - felt overmapped, maybe try a slow slider on 04:22:642 (3) - to cover the time? nah but yea i agree tbh i left it like that since i wanted a nice harder ting before next section but w/e

04:53:539 (2,3,4,5) - not sure how i felt about this but as long as other testplayers can hit it then thats dope. it looked pretty and complimented the flow of 04:52:805 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - nicely so idk lmao xd

gl c:

---------

William K wrote:

Hi, Mod for Mod.

[Everending Ticking]

1. 00:13:348 (4) - The sound here is not as strong as 00:13:185 (3) - so I think using almost the same spacing for 00:13:185 (3,4) - is not recommended. its like exatcly the same lol
2. 00:15:631 (4) - Why's the spacing here become smaller than the one you did with 00:15:305 (2) - . I think this is not consistent like the others, inb4 you get the "tshh" sound has a more spacing than the one with the drum hit, and the one you did at 00:14:327 (4) - is good in spacing (the biggest spacing between 00:13:675 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ) since it has the "tshh" something sound and drum hit on the same spot and if it's for aethetics, you must've made the one at 00:14:001 (2,3,4) - a fixed shape triangle too. It looks a lot nicer imo, for consistency. one thing i dont do is map with ds, xd so my jumps may seem not exatcly the same ds but they play the same role each time being off by a little or more by a little xd, and tbh using ds constantly looks ugly rather than nice
3. 00:17:588 (1,2) - Since you put the notes, many of them, with a zig-zag patterning 00:15:468 (3,4,5,6) - etc... How about making this has an up and down motion like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6256590 rather than making it blanketed with such a short slider and fast one. The flow for this kind of zig zag slider has a good flow. believe it or not i did once have it like that but it was weird to hit 00:18:077 (2) - , so i introduced the circle motion : o, which played much better imo
4. 00:24:761 (2,1) - I think the one you did here is a mistake, I think the instrument which you put 1/8 starts at 00:25:088 - not 00:24:925 - . And changing this would make consistency between the one you did before at 00:23:457 (2,3) - and the rhythm feels much better. yes you're right but the previous modder beat you to it xdxd
5. 00:27:533 (4) - How about making it under number 2 rather than overlapping in such a random way? It looks neater imo. its not random jesus, its my style of mapping, legit look through the whole map youll see them everywhere aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
6. 00:31:609 (4) - Fix your blanket if you meant to. :3 : o how did this happen
7. 00:32:588 (3) - NC-ing here would help players to be aware of SV change. done stuff
8. 01:16:609 (1,2) - Why're these suddenly become a single note, it's more suiting with sliders same with the others. If you're trying to emphasize, the one you did at 01:17:914 (1,2) - must be the same since they have the same sound. because using constant sliders is boring also theres a downbeat new vocals etc.
9. 01:23:783 (1,2,3,4) - Overlaps here made it so hard to read, consider changing it. i'd disagree here with you a bunch, they arent hard to read thats first xdxdxd, also the intensity drop so i mean spacing them out woudnt be a good idea xd
10. 01:38:131 - Be consistent with your SV change, they all sounded the same 01:43:022 (1,1) - but yet you did an increase in SV until 2.00x at 01:43:022 (1,1) - . mb
11. 01:50:848 (1) - How about CTRL+G-ing this and 01:51:011 (2) - one by one so that they have a good flow, In my opinion, moving up and downwards with a reversed short-stream slider is a bit too hard and it breaks the flow. its already got good flow xdxd, flow isnt just that it has to face the next slider
12. 01:57:696 (2) - NC-ing the one here would make people know that it has a 1/1 gap and the SV changes again. You must prioritize NC-ing in a SV map. i dont nc sv changes that often unless its a huge change, i priorotise nc changes that make the beat change and as you hear there there isnt really a change from (1) to (2) just a continuation xd
13. 02:41:229 (9) - How about repeating the action at 02:41:066 (8) - since I hear the same sound here? not sure what you mean lol 02:41:066 (8,9) - but thats why they have the same spacing xd
14. 03:04:055 (3) - Felt a bit tricky to me, 03:03:403 (5,3) - the one you did here are different and the players must be fast to read this since they usually just repeat the action done if they have the same flow for 1-2 objects for a short slider stream like this. that is why its ctrl +g since its different to distinguish that, also these patterns arent for a 1st play understanding, once you play it once youll understand the next time you play, that was my intention and tbh its working pretty well, also noone complains on these patterns out of the testplays that i got since they arent really hard to read nor do they require fast reading (thats subjective doe)
15. 03:32:261 (1,2) - The one I said at 01:16:609 (1,2) - ^
16. 04:28:348 (1) - Not putting a larger jump here? It felt so high at pitch, also adding a drum-hitclap would be better. There's some kind of drum there. 04:28:185 (3,1) - 2,4x is enough tbh, no need for more about hs thatll come later
17. 04:32:914 (1,2,3,4) - I think this part's calm, until 04:33:566 - but you made a giant spacing for the one here. Consider lowering the spacing here but not lower than the one you did with 04:32:261 (1,2,3) - since they don't sound the same. 04:32:914 (1,2,3,4) - They felt more intense than the 4 notes behind. its getting the player used to the high end jumps again after a small decrease xd also its building up so i thought why not xd
18. 04:53:457 (1,2,3,4,5) - The overlaps you did here for the square is not too fixed, and it's pretty not good to play since they have such a sharp edge. i dont map to any shapes omg, also i was going for a more circular ting
19. 04:54:435 (3) - I think adding a Finish sound here (Normal sampleset for default) would sound better, there's a cymbal sound there. And NC-ing would be some help for emphasizing too. And not just for emphasizing, it's also downbeat. hitsounds later xdxdxdx

GL~

danks guise

Hey, M4M from your queue


Good Luck!

- source should be "beatmania IIDX 22 PENDUAL"
- remove the space after -PENDULUMs- because that's how it is in the original game (pendual)
- proper romanised artist should be "Nekomata L.E.D.Master+"
- add "toshiyuki kakuta", "角田利之, "naoyuki sato", and "佐藤直之" to the tags. they are the original composers (led-g and 猫叉master)
- add "chrono breaks" and "drumstep" to tags because it's the official genres of the song. also, add "konami" and "bemani" to tags
- offset 2288 is more accurate. the notes feel pretty late

[Everending Ticking]
- check aimod. lots of unsnapped object ends
- making the AR .2 or so higher would fit this map more due to incredibly fast sliders/patterns
00:02:298 (1) - make the curve on this slider more drastic like you do at 00:06:211 (1) and so on for consistency
00:03:602 (1) - same as above
01:00:504 (1) - i don't agree with your decision to start putting jumps in this section. the song here is not intense enough to warrant the same jumps you've been using in the map previous. the entire portion of the song from here to 01:15:341 (1) is increasing in intensity, so it would be more intuitive for you to re-work this section to make the jumps start off sparse and small, and gradually increase in intensity as the song's intensity increases.
01:11:917 (3) - reverse this for better flow and a cooler pattern
01:20:069 (3,4) - reversing this feels more natural to play
01:52:841 (3) - shorten this to end on the previous red tick. there's a heavy beat in the music there, and there is no beat at where you currently have it
01:55:124 (3,4) - reverse for better flow
01:57:732 (3) - curving this slider in the opposite direction, like this, looks better when coupled with 01:57:895 (4)
02:00:504 (4) - same as above
02:25:776 (1) - end of this isn't snapped to the proper beat
02:27:080 (1) - there's no reason for the slight slowdown on this slider here. it's unnoticeable while playing
03:19:091 (7) - curve in the opposite direction similar to what i mentioned previously
03:19:906 (1) - feels way better and matches the music more if you extend the end of this slider to end on the next blue tick
03:20:558 (1) - this section feels nice with the way you gradually increased the spacing of the jumps to match the rising song intensity. this is something you should consider at 01:00:504 (1) like i said before
03:53:330 (2) - curve in opposite direction
04:00:993 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this should be mapped to 1/3! i suggest using sliders or NC spam so it's easily readable
04:03:764 (2) - curve in opposite direction
04:11:427 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as mentioned previously
04:21:863 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - map to 1/3
04:54:961 (3) - curve in opposite direction
05:03:602 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 1/3

overall, the composition of this map is rather scattered. things aren't too consistent all around, but it feels fun to play. good luck

it's not dnb or drumstep, it's WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB

LawL4Ever wrote:

Hey, M4M from your queue

Everending Ticking

1. 00:02:588 (2) - This slider ends on a stronger sound than it starts on, which isn't really nice. Same for all the other (2) sliders in this section. changed
   
2. 00:03:403 (7,1,7,1,7,1,7,1) - It would be nice if these would be more visually consistent. As it is the kicksliders all overlap a slightly different amount (most noticeable on the first one though, the rest of the ones I checked passes as "good enough" for me). o
   
3. 00:09:109 (2) - Have it blanket the end of (1) maybe? that got changed above loo
   
4. 00:12:696 (1,2) - Having the spacing here so much lower than for the rest of the jumps is a bit weird considering (2) is noticeably stronger than (3,4). This repeats a few times in this section. fair enough changed
   
5. 01:16:609 (1,2) - Suddenly making these circles seems random fine ill change it jez ppl
   
6. 01:44:653 (3,4) - If you swapped these on the timeline it'd do a nice job of emphasizing the drum hits here, as it is you have much lower spacing leading to the stronger sound which is a bit weird. fair enough
   
7. 01:47:261 (1,2) - ^ but you'll have to adjust the rest of the pattern oka, although i liked previous pattern so much better :I
   
8. 01:48:892 (1,2) - Here the drum hit is on the start of (2), and (2) is what has lower spacing leading to it. yea but thats spacing just because the sv was changed so itll be different, but vissually they are more or less equal
   
9. 01:49:055 (2,1) - Should also have higher spacing, more so than any of the previous ones since (1) starts on a downbeat ^
   
10. 01:49:870 (3,4) - This one's fine cool
    
11. 02:00:631 (4,5) - Maybe make (4) a 1/2 slider in line with the previous 1/4 sliders for that sound? ugh i changed this since we seem to be having different thigns here,
    
12. 02:07:805 (2,3) - I'd suggest making (2) into a slider and (3) into a circle since the white ticks are strongest here, and it'd still work for following the same sound imo. ugh nah, i dont think so since the sounds kinda lead onto the (3) so making (2) a slider would make it 1. kinda repetetive and 2. underemphasised : o
    
13. 02:09:109 (2,3) - ^ etc ^ d
    
14. 02:28:348 (1) - Would be nicer if it were two sliders imo, skipping over the sound at 02:30:957 feels weird. eya, that got changed so long ago owo
    
15. 02:58:838 (2) - Should be snapped to the red tick ?
    
16. 03:06:011 (5,3) - Make these into a kickslider with a circle after to be consistent with 03:04:055 (3,4) and not have the downbeat on a sliderend? ugh that would not be consistent even if i done it lo , since the other circels get emphasis since the vocals repeat stronger xd
    
17. 03:11:229 (5,3) - ^^
    
18. 03:13:838 (5) - ^ etc. ^ etc.
    
19. 03:20:522 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - I think it'd be better if you would skip over 03:22:316 (3,6,3,6), the general clicking rhythm isn't following the drums, and if you map active objects on ticks with only drums while having the sliders start on ticks without drums and end on ticks with drums it feels weird. There's a new sound from 03:25:740 (1) onwards that's consistently every 1/2, so I think it's fine there. o, not changed everything but made changes accordinally
    
20. 04:32:914 (1,2,3,4) - I think these could use a decrease in spacing, as it is they're larger than most jumps in the rest of the ending while being in a very quiet part. I get that you want an increase from the previous notes, I just think it should be a bit less. ugh to me the spacing here is perfect sorry :///
    
21. 04:36:664 (2) - If you ctrl-g'd this it would probably better fit for the intended emphasis. As it is the jump from (2) to (3) is effectively larger than the following since the effective distance from a kickslider to the next note begins on its head. Maybe check if this occurs in other places as well, I just happened to notice this one. cant find the snapping for that aaa
    
22. 04:50:522 (1) - I think if you'd ctrl-h this (and move the sliderhead back to where it was) it'd nicely continue the movement of the previous pattern. hmm idk i like the way its currently since it reflects the music really nicelly imo
    
23. 04:53:376 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - I don't really like this since it's confusing, but I guess it's ok. this one is fine

Good Luck!

Thanks

-----------

Low wrote:

- source should be "beatmania IIDX 22 PENDUAL"
- remove the space after -PENDULUMs- because that's how it is in the original game (pendual)
- proper romanised artist should be "Nekomata L.E.D.Master+"
- add "toshiyuki kakuta", "角田利之, "naoyuki sato", and "佐藤直之" to the tags. they are the original composers (led-g and 猫叉master)
- add "chrono breaks" and "drumstep" to tags because it's the official genres of the song. also, add "konami" and "bemani" to tags
- offset 2288 is more accurate. the notes feel pretty late
changed everything except of the timing suggestion since if you listen closely at the one you suggested you can actually hear the metronome click before the actual music starts, and imo the current one i have is fine

[Everending Ticking]
- check aimod. lots of unsnapped object ends fml
- making the AR .2 or so higher would fit this map more due to incredibly fast sliders/patterns done
00:02:298 (1) - make the curve on this slider more drastic like you do at 00:06:211 (1) and so on for consistency done
00:03:602 (1) - same as above eya
01:00:504 (1) - i don't agree with your decision to start putting jumps in this section. the song here is not intense enough to warrant the same jumps you've been using in the map previous. the entire portion of the song from here to 01:15:341 (1) is increasing in intensity, so it would be more intuitive for you to re-work this section to make the jumps start off sparse and small, and gradually increase in intensity as the song's intensity increases. fair enough changed
01:11:917 (3) - reverse this for better flow and a cooler pattern green
01:20:069 (3,4) - reversing this feels more natural to play is this mod going to be full green?
01:52:841 (3) - shorten this to end on the previous red tick. there's a heavy beat in the music there, and there is no beat at where you currently have it oops
01:55:124 (3,4) - reverse for better flow eya
01:57:732 (3) - curving this slider in the opposite direction, like this, looks better when coupled with 01:57:895 (4) o i like

SPOILER

02:00:504 (4) - same as above gren
02:25:776 (1) - end of this isn't snapped to the proper beat oops
02:27:080 (1) - there's no reason for the slight slowdown on this slider here. it's unnoticeable while playing i gradually decreases the sv to lead the player into the slower sliders at 02:28:382 (1) - since i got complaints that that should be done, if someone else thinks this is uneccessary then ill change it back to original :^P
03:19:091 (7) - curve in the opposite direction similar to what i mentioned previously hmm imo this one is kinda not necessary since then it ruins the flow by so much, so far im keeping this since i like it and i think your suggestion will make it unnecessarily awkward to hit
03:19:906 (1) - feels way better and matches the music more if you extend the end of this slider to end on the next blue tick done
03:20:558 (1) - this section feels nice with the way you gradually increased the spacing of the jumps to match the rising song intensity. this is something you should consider at 01:00:504 (1) like i said before eya
03:53:330 (2) - curve in opposite direction no then the slider curve would go away from the next hit and thats kinda making it unnecessarily awkward to hit again
04:00:993 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this should be mapped to 1/3! i suggest using sliders or NC spam so it's easily readable aaaa i dont want to map this to 1/3 it sounds so uneeded anyway and keeping it to 1/4 only would be a better idea imo. Sorry but i won't change this since imo it's a bad thing considering also that this will be the only part where 1/3 comes up. Also theres sounds at 1/4 so i mean its not really wrong if i keep it like that (i tihnk) Again i understand your suggestion but i don't want to go with it. Sorry :///
04:03:764 (2) - curve in opposite direction no again what i said above it will curve in the opposite direction which isnt what i was going for and will ruin the flow
04:11:427 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as mentioned previously
04:21:863 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - map to 1/3
04:54:961 (3) - curve in opposite direction nag i don't like that sorry
05:03:602 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 1/3 ^ for all 1/3 mentions

overall, the composition of this map is rather scattered. things aren't too consistent all around, but it feels fun to play. good luck

Imo consistency is good, but overusing it constantly is soo boring imo, that's why i tried variating things a little, idk if i done it good or bad /shrug
Thanks for the mod

-----------

InternalLight wrote:

it's not dnb or drumstep, it's WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB WUB

I AGREE!!!!!

Hi, mod because nice map nice song and nice mapper
nice map pls rank because i really like the song and pueepueee~
gl bro

Bubbled!~