Awh it's wa_ vs ETIA.
M4M from my modding queue.
Technically this is good, but this could be more difficult to show the real impact of the song ;w;
I'm so frustrated ;w;
Good Luck ~
M4M from my modding queue.
Eternal
- 00:11:343 (3) - the piano starts on the 1/3 tick after the white tick, and the slider should end on a 1/3 tick too.
- 00:12:010 (4) - Same as ^ If you listen carefully, it's not a reversed 3/4 slider, it's a reversed slider snapped on 1/3 ticks.
- 00:17:343 (6,1) - same as ^, this rhythm suits better :
- 00:31:343 (1,2,3,4) - a little confusing. I expected that your first intention was to follow the beats behind, but you started following the piano here by skipping some piano notes like 00:32:788 - (snapped on 1/3). And also this 00:33:593 (5) - is snapped wrongly, it starts and ends on a 1/3 tick. You should make the rhythm consistent (following beats instead of piano), or follow all piano notes for this pattern only (something you didn't do).
- 00:38:232 (1,2,1,2,3) - They are all snapped on 1/3 if you follow the piano.
- I didn't really get the rhythm you follow, you miss some very important ticks like 00:46:426 - 00:46:593 (6) - ,
- 01:09:343 (10,11,12) - This kind of flow could be improved if you make the slider 01:09:343 (10) - played fully. So it would be better to move 01:09:593 (11,12) - on the right.
- 01:26:343 (2,1) -
It's a trapThis could be a little confusing for players to have this kind of antijump which is not really predictable because the objects have the same distance visually but not the same gap in timeline. It would be better to add a circle here 01:26:593 - (which is an audible note) and stack it on 01:26:676 (1) - 's head to make things fluid and not that confusing. - 01:30:926 (5,6,1) - it's the same idea as i mentioned ^. The distance between 01:30:676 (4,5) - and 01:31:010 (6,1) - is visually the same but they don't have the same gap in timeline. It could be confusing, and it would be better to increase the distance between 01:31:010 (6,1) - or reduce it between 01:30:676 (4,5) - .
- 03:37:677 (9) - Okay it's just me but, i don't really think it's a nice idea to just make this tick 03:37:843 - only followed by a sliderend, when it is the last note of this section, and when it is one of the most intense note. You could make something which gives a better impression to introduce the next section, like a 1/4 slider which starts on 03:37:843 -.
- 03:59:343 - My instinct would tell me to add a slow slider here which ends on this tick 03:59:593 -. Just my idea :3
- 04:42:344 - for that last section, why not using silent-sliderslide ? it sounds a little weird to hear the sliderslide imo.
Technically this is good, but this could be more difficult to show the real impact of the song ;w;
I'm so frustrated ;w;
Good Luck ~