deepsea wrote:

[Boy]
00:14:410 (1,2,3) - Personally don't like stack in the beginning, especially for an Easy.
Hmm yeah, too much stacks in Easy can be hard for beginners. Made it like this:

SPOILER

[Gachimuchi]
Ahhhhhhhhhhh stacks stacks stackssssss I can't even get A on this in first try.
I know map reading ability is part of osu!(And I suck), but notes stack like this in a Normal is too ridiculous.
Unstacked some notes(distance snap'd most of them). for full list of changes click the spoilerbox below

SPOILER

00:02:897 (3) -
00:18:789 (4,5) -
00:20:897 (1,2,3,4) -
00:45:221 (6,7,8) - moved away from 00:44:248 (5), but those three notes still stack.
For other stacks in 00:24:789 - 00:45:546 I don't think they're a problem = =
01:04:843 (4) - moved onto 01:05:005 (1), still a stack but I think it's a bit easier to read
01:13:437 (4,5) -
01:25:113 (2) -
01:35:978 (6) -
01:37:924 (2,3) -
01:39:221 (7,8) -

(Also made 00:01:924 (2) & 00:04:519 (2) look a bit better

[Psykioh]
wow you love (256, 192) so much.
Hard is harder than hard(Normal as well), but we know evans is evans so I won't being picky to this.
No problem
Thanks for understanding...

None of above is unrankable so I won't pop this, and you can decide if you want to fix or not. Just throw a teletubby star atm.

Katsuri wrote:

Again I'm popping a bubble because the mp3 is over than 192kbps, Please re-encoded, the maximum allowed is 192 and your is 320kbps.

Your beatmap is perfect, These things ruin a rank easy.

MediaInfo wrote:

Bit rate : 182 Kbps

MediaInfo wrote:

Bit rate : 182 Kbps

MediaInfo wrote:

Bit rate : 182 Kbps

Katsuri wrote:

Again I'm popping a bubble because the mp3 is over than 192kbps, Please re-encoded, the maximum allowed is 192 and your is 320kbps.

Your beatmap is perfect, These things ruin a rank easy.

Card N'FoRcE wrote:

Normal, Hard, Insane, Extreme mapset: here you go.

take♂it♂boy

Cirno wrote:

\ASS♂WE♂CAN!/

Colin Hou wrote:

Cirno wrote:

\ASS♂WE♂CAN!/

JesusYamato wrote:

so gay lol

Ibuki Suika wrote:

搞毛你敢做点简单的图吗

Backfire wrote:

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhahahaha....Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahahaha...My god. What did I just see.

Backfire wrote:

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhahahaha....Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahahaha...My god. What did I just see.

awp wrote:

This beatmap has been unranked due to verified reports of inappropriate content.

Please resubmit this beatmap without the video (you may use a different video as long as it is not inappropriate in nature) and without the inappropriate hitsounds (eg half the soft sounds are just sexual expletives and have no beat).

Modders/MAT/BAT: when modding, please do a thorough job as if a bubble had been popped - don't simply check that the media issues have been resolved. If everyone managed to overlook the inappropriate nature of the video, something that is glaringly obvious six seconds in, who knows what else may have been overlooked.

Happy modding!

Ibuki Suika wrote:

原来在niconico全年龄观看的东西在西方观念里竟然是不适内容

what about this?
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/22506


哈哈哈哈

Ibuki Suika wrote:

what about this?
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/22506

NatsumeRin wrote:

the map has a caution (write in bold and large font size) on the download page, and yeah..."*Note that the video is avaliable to audience of all ages on nicovideo" (not to mention if this is fine to put it in all-ages, but at least it's an example)

NatsumeRin wrote:

i don't think he gets enough opinion from BATs nor the whole community.)

Shiirn wrote:

Meanwhile, panty shots, explicit clothing on women, sexualization of children (drawn, admittedly), general vulgarity in some cases, and almost explicit sex scenes get ranked on other maps simply because they're anime. Hurrah!

Shiirn wrote:

Meanwhile, panty shots, explicit clothing on women, sexualization of children (drawn, admittedly), general vulgarity in some cases, and almost explicit sex scenes get ranked on other maps simply because they're anime. Hurrah!

awp wrote:

and without the inappropriate hitsounds

Derekku wrote:

obscene audio is allowed.

Derekku wrote:

NatsumeRin wrote:

the map has a caution (write in bold and large font size) on the download page, and yeah..."*Note that the video is avaliable to audience of all ages on nicovideo" (not to mention if this is fine to put it in all-ages, but at least it's an example)

Giving a warning of NSFW content doesn't excuse the video from breaking the rules.

It's still not a rule. And in every meaning i can think about, using a new rule to check things before it is a really senseless idea. The video is obviously not that fine, but what we should discuss is if it's already below the borderline. The map has submitted for long, bubbled for long (more than 6 weeks), at least 2 MATs and 2 BATs checked it, do you mean these 4 guys are the people to blame?

NatsumeRin wrote:

i don't think he gets enough opinion from BATs nor the whole community.)

The map was discussed in #bat; it wasn't one person's decision.

This makes me feel better anyway.

JesusYamato wrote:

aha? is sexually disturbing to me.
It sounds like NotShinta is getting fucked in the ass.
Dear staff, please go unrank it!

Faust wrote:

People mod maps after they're ranked, didn't you know.

NatsumeRin wrote:

JesusYamato wrote:

aha? is sexually disturbing to me.
It sounds like NotShinta is getting fucked in the ass.
Dear staff, please go unrank it!

Here's really a good example: most of the community feel it really annoying after it ranked, and people even find it against rules (we call it guidelines that time) when it was in pending, when it got bubbled. but hell yeah "what you said is great, but meaningless rofl"

Tell me why, not "what's done is done". Do we really have a rule, do we really need it.

JesusYamato wrote:

What's funny is some maps get ranked with mistakes and they go "Oops! It's been ranked for 1 day now, it's too late to unrank now..."

This map has been ranked for 3 days (259200secondes!) so I think it's safe to assume I can link every map with offensive BG/Video and ask them to be unranked right?

ziin wrote:

A guy masturbating with a baby's face covering his junk is still a guy masturbating. This was a silly rank for a video.

Let's see:
Someone licking an ass
A baby's face censoring out penises (you could make an argument saying that's all clothes do, but you'd be an idiot).
In the United States, bare ass is partial nudity and has many restrictions on when you can show it on TV. Most of the time it's censored.
People having sex (although all inappropriate parts are censored)


What the fuck? People having sex is NOT RANKABLE.

Just get that done, do what's needed again to get it bubbled and ranked, and then things will be all fine and happy again.

ziin wrote:

A guy masturbating with a baby's face covering his junk is still a guy masturbating. This was a silly rank for a video.

Let's see:
Someone licking an ass
A baby's face censoring out penises (you could make an argument saying that's all clothes do, but you'd be an idiot).
In the United States, bare ass is partial nudity and has many restrictions on when you can show it on TV. Most of the time it's censored.
People having sex (although all inappropriate parts are censored)


What the fuck? People having sex is NOT RANKABLE.

lufi10 wrote:

I think this map is pretty good, except the video

ziin wrote:

A guy masturbating with a baby's face covering his junk is still a guy masturbating. This was a silly rank for a video.

Let's see:
Someone licking an ass
A baby's face censoring out penises (you could make an argument saying that's all clothes do, but you'd be an idiot).
In the United States, bare ass is partial nudity and has many restrictions on when you can show it on TV. Most of the time it's censored.
People having sex (although all inappropriate parts are censored)


What the fuck? People having sex is NOT RANKABLE.

they're not gay dude. but the video in this map is so gay

lufi10 wrote:

I think this map is pretty good, except the video

ziin wrote:

A guy masturbating with a baby's face covering his junk is still a guy masturbating. This was a silly rank for a video.

Let's see:
Someone licking an ass
A baby's face censoring out penises (you could make an argument saying that's all clothes do, but you'd be an idiot).
In the United States, bare ass is partial nudity and has many restrictions on when you can show it on TV. Most of the time it's censored.
People having sex (although all inappropriate parts are censored)


What the fuck? People having sex is NOT RANKABLE.

they're not gay dude. but the video in this map is so gay

mekadon wrote:

If you hate the video, delete it or play with NoVideo. End story.

Luna wrote:

mekadon wrote:

If you hate the video, delete it or play with NoVideo. End story.

The problem is not if people like the video or not. The problem is that a clearly NSFW video is "promoted" (through ranking) for everyone to download. If I had a child, I wouldn't really want it to (unknowingly) download and watch stuff like this from a game that's supposed to be PG.

Cirno wrote:

Guys stop about the video. It had been removed from the osz. Now leave this map in peace if you have got nothing else to say.

Stop about the video

1. Clean :>

1. I find this AR too high for this diff tbh. The BPM is not helping at all, please, consider reducing AR at least 1 tick.
2. 00:28:356 (3,4,5,6) - I think this pattern is might be hard for the easiest diff. Repeating sliders, stacked objects and 185 as BPM, yeah it's too hard imo. Perhaps, try something like this instead? It sounds perfectly fine and it's way easier to read.
3. 00:33:870 (1,2) - This one is not as bad but It's not too convincing either. I strongly suggest to replace the first 1/4 repeating slider with a 1/1 one, the pattern will sound ok and it will suit better this diff.
4. 00:53:329 (1) - I wouldn't suggest to use this kind of anti-jumps for the easiest diff. Spacing should be easy to read and intuitive for these diffs. (Increase spacing a bit should be enough)
5. 00:58:762 - I find this break completely unnecessary, you should remove it. The Drain Rate is low enough so there shouldn't be any problem.
6. 01:42:302 (3,4) - Just a minor suggestion, stacked objects at the end of a slider are a bit hard to read for rookies so you should consider unstacking these circles.

1. Just a comment, the first part of the map was a bit hard to read due to some spacing changes.
2. 00:11:167 (1) - I don't find this anti-jump intuitive enough, it kills the flow of the map. You should increase spacing a bit to make it easier to read and to improve the flow.
3. 00:58:681 - Same thoughts as [Boy]. I find this break unnecessary, you should remove it.
4. 01:05:005 (1) - Half of the slider-body and the-slider end is getting covered by the previous slider making this one really hard to see while playing, you will need to move this somewhere else.

1. Really nice and creative patterns at the beginning. Some circles were a bit hard to see due to hitbursts but I guess it's ok... nothing else to say here.

• 
  -Some minor suggestions to improve the readability and the flow of map a bit:

1. 00:16:356 (1) - Would you use 0.75x instead of 0.50x here? That slider-speed change seems unintuitive mainly because there's not a noticeable music change, plus 0.75x flows better.
2. 00:29:978 (1,1,2) - Is the 2nd NC really necessary? It looks quite random, I suggest to remove it and then place the NC here: 00:30:465 where it makes more sense
3. 00:31:275 (1,1,2) - Same here, remove the 2nd NC and then place it here: 00:31:762
   
   -Some important stuff
4. 01:06:789 (2,3,4) - That anti-jump seems a bit unexpected, you should use distance snap or increase spacing a bit more, but if you wish to keep it, then place a NC on (4) please. Otherwise it's too confusing.
5. 01:12:789 (6) - The 2nd repeat arrow is getting completely covered by the previous hitbursts making it unrankable, try removing 1 repeat and then adding some circles instead.