Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Mapping Discussion
  4. Management
  5. Archive

[Bubbled] Mizuki Nana - Shin Ai

posted
Total Posts
5
Sonnyc
7,753 posts
Joined June 2008
Topic Starter
Sonnyc
URL: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/432550

Some concerns regarding kick slider usage. 04:29:825 (1) - This one was the most questionable usage since I couldn't feel a beat at the beginning of the slider which made me feel as an overmap. While 04:37:268 (1) being a nice kick slider usage, I'd like to hear opinions of 03:38:622 (1,1,1) too (which was less severe than the first one and could work finely enough, but still).
Yuii-
2,503 posts
Joined July 2013
Yuii-
As for 04:29:825 (1) - I would really like to see a different transition since in 04:30:125 - there's a much more noticeable sound and separating that rhythm into two different objects would make more sense. So yeah, basically as you said, mapping such a weird kickslider like that from the very beginning should be something to reconsider!

04:37:268 (1) - This one in particular is very nice, I like how is sounds, although finishing it at 04:37:494 - where there's a tiny beat makes more sense to my point of view.

03:37:719 (2) - I feel like it's a bit off, maybe starting it on 03:37:776 - would sound better?

03:39:524 (1) - Should this slider be 1/6 actually?

Personally I like how he made use of the sliderkicks, it's an acceptable case of overmapping. Although some of them (especially the first one) would make more sense if changed as you specified.
Nathan
Beatmap Nominator
2,144 posts
Joined August 2014
Nathan
04:29:825 (1) - feels unintuitive since it skips over 04:30:501 - which is a sound definitely deserving of emphasis. 04:30:050 - and 04:30:276 - could both be made clickable too, but to me those aren't completely necessary.

the rest sounds good to me
HappyRocket88
4,321 posts
Joined May 2014
HappyRocket88
Dropping my opinion here but I agree with this slider 04:29:825 (1) - being overmapped at the first seconds since there's not prominent sounds to highlight there. I do believe starting it here 04:30:332 - would be more wise accordingly to what the song offers.

03:39:524 (1) - should start here 03:39:580 -

Best of success with this map! >w<)/
Sonnyc
7,753 posts
Joined June 2008
Topic Starter
Sonnyc
Thanks for the input!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 5