pimpG wrote:

to make my hitsounds consistent and nicer.
slider tick rate 4 is as rankable as slider tick rate 3 2 or 1 anyway.

pimpG wrote:

updated.
changed some things following TheKingHenry's suggestions.

Bonsai wrote:

yo very cool map, but what's the timing seciton at 00:57:863 for?
bc if it's for resetting the Nightcore-stuff, you'd also need sections at 04:32:408 and 04:37:863 right (lol yes, nightcore, finally someone who "speaks my language". it's funny because i always check this when i'm requested for timing checks, but i didn't checked my own map completely, i'm hopeless Q.Q)

also why did you set all the unnecessary sliderticks to inaudibly low volume instead of just using a silent wav for those, aren't you using different samplesets for the hitsounded ticks anyways? (I used to have them silenced with muted files but people complained and I made it that way)
also, a random find, around 01:31:613 there's a lot of lines that don't do anything so the unnecessary sliderticks are actually audible here, is that intentional? (yes those are intentional. i had a very complex hitsounding in the slider ticks a few weeks ago but i decided to roll back to simpler one. still kept one or two parts with audible ticks, since this part is very loud. i think it sounds nice and the volume is not too loud, so it won't sound random imo.)
tbh at this point I'm questioning how meaningful that metronome-hitsounding is when it's not there to enhance gameplay but just adds penetrative noises to a well-crafted song, I mean why even add it in the first place, but sure lol I'm not here to make a big deal out of it ^^ (metronome hitsounding is like the most used hitsound patterning we see in this game, that's because unlike the other rhythm games, we don't have specific audio files for every single hit object. the thing is that i needed to do this metronome hitsounding on sliderticks too since my mapping is not a generic 1/1 1/2 spam).
i believe you will agree with me with this since i saw you ranting about generic mapping recently, somewhere.. xD

pimpG wrote:

my map is fine the way it is, already explained all of this before and I'm not going to explain everything again.
if you read the thread and are still not going to respect my decisions, then there is nothing I can do for you.
if my map doesn't meets your needs I kindly suggest you to find other map.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

updated.
changed some things following TheKingHenry's suggestions.

pimpG wrote:

the way you map affects the way you want/can use new combos, it's no different with symmetry.

my version is more appropriate for symmetry than the suggestion.
It only shows you didn't plan the symmetry properlly with the rhythm here 04:30:590 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - if you wanted it to have the triangle with only one combo, it's inconsistent and doesn't make much sense to me :/
also the 3rd kiai starts/ends differently than the other two kia It might end differently but starts in the same way compared to the previous, just need to check this 03:29:908 (1,2,3,1) - i, they don't have that slow down, and this slow down ends after the kiai stars for the previous two, just compare 01:55:363 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - to 04:29:908 (3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - . You're making a comparision of the first chorus with the third, I'm just taking into consideration how the rhythm of the second chorus starts in the same way as the third

04:32:181 - this is the spot where the slow down ends, it has a louder sound than the previous four objects, sounds much closer to the intensity level of the next objects, i also don't see a problem with not having a new combo on a main beat, the player doesn't pay attention to these things when playing unless the new combo usage is too unreasonable.The main transition is still the sound here 04:32:408 (2) - not 04:32:181 (1) - . Indeed there's a distinction of 04:32:181 (1) - compared to the other 1/1 red ticks circles before 04:30:817 (2,3,4) - , but that distinction is nothing compared to the actual start of the chorus here 04:32:408 (2) - , it's applying NC idea for a small transition and not in a major one. I really recommend you re-consider another symmetric idea here 04:30:590 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - so that it can allow you to NC 04:32:408 (2) -

pimpG wrote:

the way you map affects the way you want/can use new combos, it's no different with symmetry.

pimpG wrote:

the player doesn't pay attention to these things when playing unless the new combo usage is too unreasonable.

Seto Kousuke wrote:

I don't know if you actually play this game besides mapping, but the reading is part of the rythm of the player, the NCs tells a LOT about the rythm and the intensities, if you place a NC the way you did, you're implying there is intensity on that note, but there is not, it's clearly not the strong sound of the kiai. That can actually make the rythm confusing for some people and even remove a lot of the ''feel'' of the map.
the player DOES pay attention to NC

Mordred wrote:

#bringbackiconposts

UndeadCapulet wrote:

Mordred wrote:

#bringbackiconposts

Ascendance wrote:

UndeadCapulet wrote:

Mordred wrote:

#bringbackiconposts