never grave
forum
M2U - BlythE (Osuka)
posted
Total Posts
413
.
Topic Starter
Why would hard rock prevent it from being ranked?
.
Topic Starter
Well hidden removes the approach circles (which I have already done) so hard rock just flips it. Thus you essentially have to play this map on hidden. It's no different from playing a normal osu map with irregular spacing and strange blue bars distracting you and also happen to pass x axis at the right time you're supposed to hit that note.
I agreed that Hardrock really ruin this map, but this is not a valid reason make this one unrank.
Plus there is no such rule or guildeline talking about it, I think it will probably be OK.
take my support and star~
Plus there is no such rule or guildeline talking about it, I think it will probably be OK.
take my support and star~
Topic Starter
2009 vs 2012
Omgomgomgomgomgomg.
That's awesooome ! /has no kds. Sorry.
http://puu.sh/myul here's an exemple of Hard Rock. ._.
That's awesooome ! /has no kds. Sorry.
Oh, great. I was looking for this. LOLAoko Kuroba wrote:
Why is this map approved and this isn't?!
http://puu.sh/myul here's an exemple of Hard Rock. ._.
Topic Starter
you can clearly see the approach bar at the bottom.
That other map doesn't even have a tutorial. Gods.
Lemme kick this map a star :O
Lemme kick this map a star :O
(Looks at his kudowallet. Sees 1 Star. Throws 1 Star)
Was there ever a stated reason as to why this map can't be approved?
Topic Starter
skinning out the approach circle is probably enough for it to be denied. That's likely the only "unrankable" thing, though if this were an osu map it would be horrible, and shouldn't be ranked (again). I'll actively push for approval when newrules/osz2 comes out, or I get 1000 stars. We're almost halfway there.
omg why cant we make it ranked - -
Heh, I have only 3 free kds, but anyway: take it!
Maybe second unrankable issue is that Stack Leniency is set to minimum?
Maybe second unrankable issue is that Stack Leniency is set to minimum?
Topic Starter
oh crap yo it almost got graved
Aaah, a nice even +500.
I know someone's going to break it really fast, but whatever.
I know someone's going to break it really fast, but whatever.
^uehuehuehuehuh
Topic Starter
why did this grave?
This is no scienceziin wrote:
why did this grave?
Having a map grave or not is based on the creator posting/updating or not as of recently.
Topic Starter
Guess I need to fix the skin and get this back in pending.
If you get this back in pending I will star it for you.
can't be ranked means nothing, we've all enjoyed this
good job ziin
good job ziin
This is so amazing.
It's back!
Topic Starter
I still don't understand how it got gone.
You got my 3 last kudosu!
This is soooooo great
This is soooooo great
COOL!! 
ohyes!♥
Topic Starter
So I guess only the beatmap creator can keep a map from graving now. Good to know.
Topic Starter
THAT WASN'T 4 WEEKS
[Hard]
----
[Easy](I couldn't find any lite mixing videos...)
Maniac → Technical Mixing
right?
- 00:12:333 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Following the pitch, is something like this
- 00:21:500 (x) - Add a normal note one line underr the last and
- 00:21:833 (x) - Add a normal note at y 288 ?
- 00:31:333 (2) - +1 repeat (to make it end at the same sound of the start)
- 00:36:166 (x) - Expected note y 256 ?
- 00:43:833 (1) - If it's following the ever~, it should end in the big white tick
- 00:59:333 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Blue Hold ?
- 01:04:000 (5) - "The-", one line higher than the last since is higher pitched
- 01:09:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since 01:08:833 (5,6,7,8) - went up, this can went down?
- 01:17:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since the jump are quite large, I suggest to do this
- 01:23:833 (5,6,7) - Move the notes one line under for this (since the jump does not quite fit)
- 01:26:500 (1) - e - ver~ stays better than a single hold
- 01:37:500 (x) - Add normal note here
- 01:45:166 (1) - Instead, an hold that start from 01:45:000 (x) - ?
- 01:46:000 (4,1,2,1) - uhm, use a different pattern? it's not quite easy to intuit it
- 01:51:166 (x) - Add a normal note for "I" ?
----
[Easy](I couldn't find any lite mixing videos...)
- 01:10:166 (x) - Add note here? You're following voice in that part, and a note here is felt
- 01:34:833 (x) - Add note for the same reason
- 01:37:333 (6) - For the vocal, it should be at 01:37:416 (Use Grid 2), for the hitsounds at 01:37:500 (6)
- 01:40:666 (1) - Make it start from 01:40:500 (1)
- 01:42:333 (1) - Move at 01:42:000 (1) -
- 01:51:333 (1) - Make it start from 01:51:166 (1) -
- 01:52:833 (x) - Add note for the dear
- 01:58:500 (x) - the "e"
- 00:03:833 (x) - Circle dat snap?
- 00:12:500 (x) - Since you're following 00:12:666 (1,2,3,4,5), why not adding a note here?
- 00:42:000 (2,3) - It's quite confusing, since it doesn't follow whay you were following before and interrupt abrupty the flow- move to 00:41:833 (2,3) ?
- 01:29:833 (2,1,1) - It's quite confusive...
- 00:21:666 (2) - Since the 00:20:666 (2,1) follow that snare(?) sound many could mistake this being in 00:21:500 (it does have that snare) and 00:21:833 (x) have the sound sound at an higher pitch(aka should be 2 grid higher than the last)
- 00:31:000 (2) - 1 grid up for the difference in pitch with last. Should have a better flow, since (1) ↑(2) ↓(3) ↑↑(4)
- 00:32:500 (4) - Same height as 00:32:167 (2) (same sound)
- 01:20:166 (x) - Add note at lower height
- 01:21:500 (2) - Make it start at 01:21:833 (2) to better follow voice - and add a note at 01:21:500 (1) if you want(make sure you make (2) one grid higher
- 01:29:833 (3,4,1,1) - Like this should feel quite better
Maniac → Technical Mixing
right?
Topic Starter
I went through and rechecked hard and maniac, found a few things to fix. The bookmarked areas in it are the only non-authentic parts, so I'm more likely to make changes there. Normal is completely non-authentic, so anything goes there. If something is indeed too hard, then I'll make changes, but I think I got all of it. Thanks for the mod. I wouldn't have rechecked it myself without it.HakuNoKaemi wrote:
[Hard]If I'll mod it considering it non-authentic, I'll do something like this, can I continue?
- 00:12:333 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Following the pitch, is something like this
1st 3 notes are harp, last 4 are synth. Plus, I only have 4 y axes I can choose from. Also authentic.- 00:21:500 (x) - Add a normal note one line underr the last and
- 00:21:833 (x) - Add a normal note at y 288 ?
Did something different and followed bass- 00:31:333 (2) - +1 repeat (to make it end at the same sound of the start)
made it authentic. Somehow I missed this one, or it got changed in modding- 00:36:166 (x) - Expected note y 256 ?
authentic- 00:43:833 (1) - If it's following the ever~, it should end in the big white tick
I'm not sure why it ends on a blue tick like that, but it's authentic, and it's not noticeable to me. Maniac has this too- 00:59:333 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Blue Hold ?
there's actually a drum beat here with the sliderslide noise that I tried to get. Also authentic.- 01:04:000 (5) - "The-", one line higher than the last since is higher pitched
authentic- 01:09:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since 01:08:833 (5,6,7,8) - went up, this can went down?
I moved one note down at the end. Jump was 3.0 back down to 2.5.- 01:17:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since the jump are quite large, I suggest to do this
eww. This is far easier than the previous stream. The only time I'm going to stray from authentic notes is when I really need to due to difficulty, or it's just impossible to recreate in osu.- 01:23:833 (5,6,7) - Move the notes one line under for this (since the jump does not quite fit)
Okay, but it goes to the bottom instead of the top. Lol, it's the same distance either way. First 2 notes are the ewi, 3rd is a bass hit. Matched something I did later. http://puu.sh/17JiG- 01:26:500 (1) - e - ver~ stays better than a single hold
I'm actually never mapping lyrics in this.- 01:37:500 (x) - Add normal note here
I like it better without- 01:45:166 (1) - Instead, an hold that start from 01:45:000 (x) - ?
There's actually 2 notes here- 01:46:000 (4,1,2,1) - uhm, use a different pattern? it's not quite easy to intuit it
It's intuitive when you know what you're listening for. In any case, fixed SB for one of the holds- 01:51:166 (x) - Add a normal note for "I" ?
again, mapping the ewi here.