forum

KISIDA KYODAN & THE AKEBOSI ROCKETS - pp

posted
Total Posts
46
Topic Starter
Deppyforce
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Tehron
Dis timing is mine ples :^) Well I agreed to time it so yeh.
Topic Starter
Deppyforce
thanks for mp3+timing dood!
A r M i N
EZ PP
Topic Starter
Deppyforce
i agree
Shyotamaze
WTF od8.742389 pls ban pp mapper
Topic Starter
Deppyforce
FCL
Lince Cosmico_old
rip FCL connection
Underforest
nice meme
Affirmation
cs5!!

[give me pp]
*00:20:702 (4,5) - I think this notes were not stacked.
*00:26:606 (6,1) - I think this is stack error. It didn't stacked perfectly.
*00:50:223 (1,3) - this overlap looks bad. Could you avoid these overlaps?
*00:54:372 (5,6) - I think players can confuse about the reading. I think you should think about other patterns.
*01:02:989 (1,2) - DS error. it's 0.97x
*01:34:266 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - why DS is changing, I don't think this music part don't need to stress.
*02:10:968 (3,1) - could you make perfect stack?
*03:15:755 (1,2,3) - how about make anti jump? It could be better.
*03:20:861 (1,2) - I think this slider is hard to read for players. could you make other pattern?
*04:44:778 (6,1) - how about this?
*05:20:523 (4,1) - It's stack error. could you stack them perfect?
*05:36:161 (1,2) - because of their DS, 05:37:438 (3,4,5) - their rhythm could be confused, could you make same DS with 05:37:438 (3,4,5) - ?

Good luck
Topic Starter
Deppyforce

Neoskylove wrote:

cs5!!

[give me pp]
*00:20:702 (4,5) - I think this notes were not stacked. they are lol
*00:26:606 (6,1) - I think this is stack error. It didn't stacked perfectly. fixed
*00:50:223 (1,3) - this overlap looks bad. Could you avoid these overlaps? its fine imo, wont affect readabilty anyways
*00:54:372 (5,6) - I think players can confuse about the reading. I think you should think about other patterns. its fine since i use prety much same ds and only make jump on strong notes, and this is hard diff lol u need some skills to pass
*01:02:989 (1,2) - DS error. it's 0.97x 0.95 now
*01:34:266 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - why DS is changing, I don't think this music part don't need to stress. buildup pattern would fit the most here
*02:10:968 (3,1) - could you make perfect stack? no it was intentional
*03:15:755 (1,2,3) - how about make anti jump? It could be better. thats more confuse to read than my pattern that you said it was hard ._.
*03:20:861 (1,2) - I think this slider is hard to read for players. could you make other pattern? no
*04:44:778 (6,1) - how about this? wot
*05:20:523 (4,1) - It's stack error. could you stack them perfect? ok
*05:36:161 (1,2) - because of their DS, 05:37:438 (3,4,5) - their rhythm could be confused, could you make same DS with 05:37:438 (3,4,5) - ? would destroy emphasis, so will keep for now. might change later tho

Good luck
thanks for mod
Seaweed
this is the lowest cs I've seen u use
Topic Starter
Deppyforce
i make cs2
Hollow Wings
m4m

sorry for my really huge delay... ;w;

General

  1. idk, the metadata is correct? i think you need to complete it 1st.
  2. timing is bad, offset should be like -12 (in detail, timing line's offset is better at 4244), resnap all objects and other green lines.

performance

  1. 00:32:351 (1,2) - overlapping the arrow is unrankble. same to 05:26:587 (2,4) - .
  2. 00:50:223 (1,3) - not quite overlapped the arrow but still recommend you fix this.
  3. i should addmit that this is a really well composed map, even with proper settings in flow and distance. and the style of the map is straight forward but still have interesting patterns in it. it's like fit my taste very much, i shoot 2 stars for this.
watch out the timing, i think you need more guys to check it.

good luck
Topic Starter
Deppyforce

Hollow Wings wrote:

m4m

sorry for my really huge delay... ;w;

General

  1. idk, the metadata is correct? i think you need to complete it 1st. it is correct lol
  2. timing is bad, offset should be like -12 (in detail, timing line's offset is better at 4244), resnap all objects and other green lines. ok changed im bad at offset

performance

  1. 00:32:351 (1,2) - overlapping the arrow is unrankble. same to 05:26:587 (2,4) - . fixed first one but kept the 2nd one i think gap is enough to overlap like this
  2. 00:50:223 (1,3) - not quite overlapped the arrow but still recommend you fix this. will keep cuz aesthetics its better this way imo
  3. i should addmit that this is a really well composed map, even with proper settings in flow and distance. and the style of the map is straight forward but still have interesting patterns in it. it's like fit my taste very much, i shoot 2 stars for this. yEY
watch out the timing, i think you need more guys to check it. ok

good luck
thanks!
1Computer
That's the actual song name? lol

SPOILER
[pp]
  1. 00:50:849 (2,3) - Fix blanket.
  2. 01:39:998 (4,5) - Stack error.
  3. 02:01:062 (5) - You should make this slider. While playing, that gap really threw me off...
  4. 03:40:636 (5) - Same here too 03:43:190. It's kinda awkward, considering there is still notes and vocals here.
  5. 05:26:575 (2,4) - Stack is off.
  6. 05:42:373 (2) - The sound starts on the red tick, doesn't it? Shorten 05:41:256 (1) to the blue tick and have 05:42:373 (2) start at red would be better.
Topic Starter
Deppyforce

1Computer wrote:

That's the actual song name? lol yes

[pp]
  1. 00:50:849 (2,3) - Fix blanket. fix
  2. 01:39:998 (4,5) - Stack error. fix
  3. 02:01:062 (5) - You should make this slider. While playing, that gap really threw me off... just circle fits best with rhythm there though i feel like just vocal and no instruments / drums doesnt strong enough to be clickable here
  4. 03:40:636 (5) - Same here too 03:43:190. It's kinda awkward, considering there is still notes and vocals here. same
  5. 05:26:575 (2,4) - Stack is off. fix
  6. 05:42:373 (2) - The sound starts on the red tick, doesn't it? Shorten 05:41:256 (1) to the blue tick and have 05:42:373 (2) start at red would be better.its 2 different sounds on red and blue if you try listen with slower playback rate!
thanks!
DeRandom Otaku
Diff name should be "performance points" lol
Topic Starter
Deppyforce
i afraid dat would be unrankable like my old diffname on duet lol cuz bns are bAD
DeRandom Otaku

Deppyforce wrote:

bns are bAD
+1
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply