1. Futsuu (2.72 stars, 527 notes)
2. Inner Oni (5.29 stars, 1258 notes)
3. Kantan (1.96 stars, 306 notes)
4. Muzukashii (3.16 stars, 743 notes)
5. Oni (4.55 stars, 1041 notes)

1. 00:23:677 (10) - No reason to add this on Kantan. It should play similarly to 00:17:077 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
2. 00:34:477 (10) - k for the cymbal?
3. 00:50:677 (47,48,49,50,51,52,53) -I think this should be done the same way you did 00:45:877 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41) - . You even did that over at 02:02:677 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75) - Which is a equivalent part.
4. 01:01:777 (73) - I can't imagine a BN letting a Kantan get ranked with these 7 notes on 200bpm. Removing 73 cuts it down and still sounds good.
5. 01:09:127 (90) - Even if the vocals support it, your definitely better off moving this to 01:08:977
6. 01:12:727 (99) - To 01:12:577 - Same as above
7. 01:16:477 (109,110,111,112,113,114,115) - Again this is a long string of notes
8. 02:26:677 - This part got finishers? I dont really see why. It also makes it completely inconsistent with the previous kai part.

1. 00:27:877 (1,2,3,4) - Instruments support d k d k better
2. 00:30:277 (9,10,11,12) - ^
3. 00:34:477 (18) - k for cymbal
4. 00:43:927 - Add a d and change 00:43:777 (45,46) - to k
5. 01:09:577 (146) - k
6. 01:17:977 (179) - k
7. 01:39:277 (48) - Move to 01:39:577 - and delete 01:40:477 (52) -
8. 01:59:377 (106) - k

1. 00:49:777 (97) - k for vocals? I'm not a fan of 5 note single color patterns...
2. 00:52:627 (114,115,116) - This can just b kkk
3. 00:54:877 (126) - d
4. 01:03:427 (174) - k would probably be more appropriate. Its pitch is closer to #173 then #172 and there is no drum hit on it either.
5. 01:52:777 - You need to make this section's finishers consistent with the section over at 00:40:777 - (I personally prefer the way you did in the first one)

1. 00:18:277 (108,109) - Consider changing these to k
2. 00:23:527 (152) - k Definitely sounds better
3. 00:27:877 (186,187,188,189) - Again I don't feel that these should be different from the others
4. 01:05:377 (410,419) - Don't you need to change these to ks? It makes sense and you did it at 01:19:777 (514,524) -
5. 02:17:377 (331,341) - Same as above
6. 02:22:177 (367,377) - ^
7. 00:40:777 - I feel like the finishers are on the wrong spots here. I think they are much better the way to did them in the Muzukashii

Skyhmer wrote:

Kantan

1. 00:23:677 (10) - No reason to add this on Kantan. It should play similarly to 00:17:077 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Sure.
2. 00:34:477 (10) - k for the cymbal? No, the d plays better.
3. 00:50:677 (47,48,49,50,51,52,53) -I think this should be done the same way you did 00:45:877 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41) - . You even did that over at 02:02:677 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75) - Which is a equivalent part. Sure. It's now d ddd kdd.
4. 01:01:777 (73) - I can't imagine a BN letting a Kantan get ranked with these 7 notes on 200bpm. Removing 73 cuts it down and still sounds good. 01:01:177 - I tried it, I ended up deleting the don in between instead.
5. 01:09:127 (90) - Even if the vocals support it, your definitely better off moving this to 01:08:977 For readability? No, I think the player would know where that beat falls. I do it all throughout the map, including parts before the first kiai.
6. 01:12:727 (99) - To 01:12:577 - Same as above No, for the reason as above.
7. 01:16:477 (109,110,111,112,113,114,115) - Again this is a long string of notes Yup. I deleted the second, to create k kdkdk.
8. 02:26:677 - This part got finishers? I dont really see why. It also makes it completely inconsistent with the previous kai part. I did that because I wanted to make the finale more intense, but in retrospect it kind of sucks. I adjusted it to be more like the previous kiai.

Futsuu

1. 00:27:877 (1,2,3,4) - Instruments support d k d k better Yeah, but it's not as fun.
2. 00:30:277 (9,10,11,12) - ^ Same as above. I don't want the same pattern 4 times in a row...
3. 00:34:477 (18) - k for cymbal No, I prefer keeping it the way it is just as a style preference.
4. 00:43:927 - Add a d and change 00:43:777 (45,46) - to k That seems a little hard considering the doubles that follow- but this suggestion made me think to change the first d to a k here, and add a preceding d.
5. 01:09:577 (146) - k That's much too hard to read. I'm considering deleting this note entirely.
6. 01:17:977 (179) - k Then the pattern would become d k K- three different notes next to each other is pretty scary for a Futsuu.
7. 01:39:277 (48) - Move to 01:39:577 - and delete 01:40:477 (52) - No, I prefer the d d d.
8. 01:59:377 (106) - k Since this song is fast and I have a significant amount of density for a futsuu, I'm putting preference towards these monocolor patterns.

Muzukashii

1. 00:49:777 (97) - k for vocals? I'm not a fan of 5 note single color patterns... Sure, that works.
2. 00:52:627 (114,115,116) - This can just b kkk You're right - that's more fun anyway, and it goes well with the rest of the map.
3. 00:54:877 (126) - d Yeah, sure.
4. 01:03:427 (174) - k would probably be more appropriate. Its pitch is closer to #173 then #172 and there is no drum hit on it either. Oh wow. Definitely. This should have been k in the first place- maybe I switched it by accident.
5. 01:52:777 - You need to make this section's finishers consistent with the section over at 00:40:777 - (I personally prefer the way you did in the first one)OK then.

Oni

1. 00:18:277 (108,109) - Consider changing these to k I changed 108 and 110 to k.
2. 00:23:527 (152) - k Definitely sounds better
   It's a lot harder to play though, since it breaks the d k d k d k pattern on the right hand (assuming the player is using right hand kddk)
3. 00:27:877 (186,187,188,189) - Again I don't feel that these should be different from the others As I said above, I think this more fun.
4. 01:05:377 (410,419) - Don't you need to change these to ks? It makes sense and you did it at 01:19:777 (514,524) - I'll change these to make the pattern easier.
5. 02:17:377 (331,341) - Same as above Yes, this plays a little better.
6. 02:22:177 (367,377) - ^ Alright
7. 00:40:777 - I feel like the finishers are on the wrong spots here. I think they are much better the way to did them in the Muzukashii Ok.

Getting on that Inner Oni

1. 00:15:877 (13,18,22) - Change to d? These can reflect the drum hits
2. 00:49:927 (290,291) - If your following the vocals, switch these colors
3. 01:32:677 (44,45,46,47,48,49) - kdk ddk
4. 01:33:577 (54) - k
5. 01:47:827 (175) - Nothing in the song really supports this being a k instead of d

Skyhmer wrote:

No Kudosu, just rest of the mod Ah, thanks! Hope your finals went well! I really appreciate your coming back to finish!

Inner Oni
I can't play this diff so these suggestions where by ear

1. 00:15:877 (13,18,22) - Change to d? These can reflect the drum hits I like this quite a bit, but it clashes with the mapping style of the rest of the map, so I'd like to get a few more mods before changing it.
2. 00:49:927 (290,291) - If your following the vocals, switch these colors I like what I have now, but I don't know if it's because it's actually better or if I like it just because I put it there, hahaha. So again, I'll see what others have to say.
3. 01:32:677 (44,45,46,47,48,49) - kdk ddk I prefer the way dkd kdk plays.
4. 01:33:577 (54) - k Yeah, that's a good idea. This stream is too obnoxious.
5. 01:47:827 (175) - Nothing in the song really supports this being a k instead of d I had to think for a few minutes about this one... I'm going to leave it as is to match the mapping style of the rest of the map, and since I think it's a fun pattern- of course, both patterns are fun, but I prefer this one.

Thanks for the understanding, if I knew the last two weeks were going to be this busy I would have never left my queue open. Well, I'm glad you did
GL with the map! To you as well!

PolkaMocha wrote:

small random mod!

D= big don d=small don K=big katsu k= small katsu

Kantan:

00:59:077 (66,67,68) - This should play more like 00:57:877 (63,64,65). Okay, I like that.

01:13:177 (98,99,100,101,102,103) - dkkddk would work better. I thought that was a little scary so I did that, but deleted the leading don.

01:21:877 (120,121,122,123,124) - ddkdk would be nicer, so that way it's not so much of the same key. I'd like to keep it as easy to read as possible. I did delete a note here though.

01:24:277 (126) - A spinner would do this held note more justice. I tried that, then I ended up remapping these 10 or so seconds, keeping the drumroll here and putting a spinner on the held note about a second later.

01:27:577 (1,2,3) - These all dont need to be finishes. Overkill at this point. I thought it was cool at first but yeah, it's too many.

02:09:877 (87,88,89,90,91,92) - I would prefer kkkddd because theres a long part before this of nothing but dons. Putting in some katsus sooner will keep the map from getting boring.Ok, sure.

02:15:877 (100,101,102) - I think all of these finishes are overdone. Consider reducing the number. Deleted the middle D.

02:19:477 (109,110,111,112,113) - kdkdk would play nicer. Good eye!

02:35:077 (146,147,148,149) - I would prefer either kkdk or ddkd because on that third beat, the vocals are different and should be accommodated for. I'd prefer to leave it as is, to leave the pattern simple.

02:36:277 (150) - I feel this part could be mapped. I'm keeping the drumroll to match the previous kiai.

1. Put "Kyouran Kazoku Nikki" in the source, and add some tags
2. I suppose you can uncheck "Widescreen support", but it doesn't really make that much of a difference either way

1. 00:13:477 (17) - would sound better as a k, to have the same effect as something like 00:26:677 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
2. 00:24:577 (11) - delete? seems a bit out of place given the patterns before
3. 00:24:877 (11,12) - i would ctrl+g these
4. 00:41:077 (26) - k sounds better imo
5. 00:48:727 (41) - k
6. 00:48:277 - you mapped these, but did not map the sounds here 00:53:077 even though they are the same, the difference in density is inconsistent imo
7. 00:58:327 (63) - sounds better as k
8. 01:09:577 (87) - k?
9. 01:43:477 (23) - K
10. 02:00:727 (57) - d
11. 02:01:477 (59,61) - k ? :v
12. 02:07:477 (74,77) - not mapping these with k feels kind of off idk, since i feel the rhythm should mostly have kats on beats 2,4 to keep it flowing but hmm, i see your way of mapping does not rely on this

1. 00:24:427 (64) - i would delete to stay consistent
2. 00:36:577 (25,28) - feels like there should be k on these notes
3. 00:47:077 (59,60) - ctrl+g
4. 00:47:677 (61,62,63) - maybe use a pattern like 00:46:477 (56,57,58) -
5. 01:17:077 (177) - k?
6. 01:32:677 (20,21,22,23,24) - considering the way you map your difficulties (like how you told me before, arcade style i think), these would fit better as kats
7. 01:33:877 (25,26,27,28) - and then these dons?

1. 00:19:627 (71) - beat sounds kind of off with a kat on a red tick, delete?
2. 00:19:927 - d
3. 00:37:627 (35) - would sound better if you delete this
4. 00:37:777 (35,36) - ctrl+g?
5. 01:17:227 (244) - d?
6. 01:41:527 (67,68,69) - don't really like how this sounds, maybe ddk
7. 01:50:677 (113,114,115,116,117) - kdkkd?
8. 01:51:577 (118,119,120,121) - kdkk
9. 01:52:177 (122) - delete if you do the above
10. 01:52:477 (123) - move this to the red tick before it because vocals feel prominent here
11. 02:11:077 (222,223) - would sound better if you ctrl+g
12. 02:24:427 (290) - having a kat here sounds weird, 02:24:277 (289,290) ctrl+g?

Thievley wrote:

aaaa first time modding taiko, be gentle

k= smol kat, K= big kat, d= smol don, D= big don
[General]

1. Put "Kyouran Kazoku Nikki" in the source, and add some tags So that's where it's from
2. I suppose you can uncheck "Widescreen support", but it doesn't really make that much of a difference either way Ooooops! That's required to do in Taiko and I forgot to do it.

[Kantan]

1. 00:13:477 (17) - would sound better as a k, to have the same effect as something like 00:26:677 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - No, those two sections sound different.
2. 00:24:577 (11) - delete? seems a bit out of place given the patterns before No, that's to finish off this little pattern.
3. 00:24:877 (11,12) - i would ctrl+g these I like the way it sounds as it is. Also, this suggestion conflicts with the one above it, be careful with that
4. 00:41:077 (26) - k sounds better imo I agree, but I'm going to leave it as is because the previous pattern is d d d, and putting a kat after that is more difficult for newbies than I'd like for this particular part of the song.
5. 00:48:727 (41) - k No, they should all be dons. This is a difficult enough pattern for newbies as it is.
6. 00:48:277 - you mapped these, but did not map the sounds here 00:53:077 even though they are the same, the difference in density is inconsistent imo It's intentionally inconsistent so that players don't have to do the same thing 4 times in a row.
7. 00:58:327 (63) - sounds better as k Same as above
8. 01:09:577 (87) - k? Sure
9. 01:43:477 (23) - K No, this section is mostly monocolor in keeping with the other diffs.
10. 02:00:727 (57) - d Same as above
11. 02:01:477 (59,61) - k ? :v Gosh, you really hate this pattern don't you I'd like to leave it as is though
12. 02:07:477 (74,77) - not mapping these with k feels kind of off idk, since i feel the rhythm should mostly have kats on beats 2,4 to keep it flowing but hmm, i see your way of mapping does not rely on this Yeah it doesn't, but this part made me really uncomfortable to map this way (It's as if the bars flow together in a gross way?). I thought about doing it your way when I first mapped it. I think I'll change it; this also makes it more consistent with the other diffs.

[Futsuu]

1. 00:24:427 (64) - i would delete to stay consistent Sure, I like that
2. 00:36:577 (25,28) - feels like there should be k on these notes I prefer to leave them monocolor
3. 00:47:077 (59,60) - ctrl+g No, this is an invert of the previous pattern
4. 00:47:677 (61,62,63) - maybe use a pattern like 00:46:477 (56,57,58) - ^
5. 01:17:077 (177) - k? Sounds gud
6. 01:32:677 (20,21,22,23,24) - considering the way you map your difficulties (like how you told me before, arcade style i think), these would fit better as kats No, that feels weird to me. This section is a bit bland though, so I adjusted it a bit.
7. 01:33:877 (25,26,27,28) - and then these dons? ^

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:19:627 (71) - beat sounds kind of off with a kat on a red tick, delete? Sure
2. 00:19:927 - d Yep
3. 00:37:627 (35) - would sound better if you delete this Hmm... TBH Yeah it does!
4. 00:37:777 (35,36) - ctrl+g? No, I like this as it is- and btw, this sort of conflicts with your previous suggestion again >_< Just group them together if you want me to do both, say like "Change this pattern from dkdkd to d kdd"
5. 01:17:227 (244) - d? No, I do a bunch of kdddk's in the next section, so I'd like this to be more like the 'ddkkd ' section.
6. 01:41:527 (67,68,69) - don't really like how this sounds, maybe ddk I think it sounds OK...
7. 01:50:677 (113,114,115,116,117) - kdkkd? I dunno, I like the way this pattern flows.
8. 01:51:577 (118,119,120,121) - kdkk ^
9. 01:52:177 (122) - delete if you do the above ^
10. 01:52:477 (123) - move this to the red tick before it because vocals feel prominent here ^
11. 02:11:077 (222,223) - would sound better if you ctrl+g Yeah, I guess there's not much reason for it to be kdk rather than dkk.
12. 02:24:427 (290) - having a kat here sounds weird, 02:24:277 (289,290) ctrl+g? Mmm, no, I like this pattern.

good luck~! really fun map

katacheh wrote:

Hi~ from my queue!

Oni

00:36:727 (227,228,229,230,231) - d k ddk I prefer to leave this in a d d k d d pattern

00:49:327 (306,307,308,309,310) - d k d k k (same as Inner oni) Ok

01:39:277 () - possible add something here (vocal) For now I want to keep this part as it is but I'm considering remapping it
01:40:477 () - ^
01:41:677 () - ^
01:44:077 () - ^
01:45:277 () - ^

02:06:577 (258,259) - Ctrl+G No, I prefer it as d k k k d

02:09:877 (284,285,286,287) - Ctrl+G same as Inner oni (d k d k) Ok

02:29:077 (420,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429) - kdd kdd kdd kdd like 02:19:477 (348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359) - Nah, then it would just be a copy paste of the previous pattern

02:32:677 (445) - d Ok

02:35:077 (465,468,471,474) - d d d d Too difficult for this diff I think

Inner oni

00:17:077 (24) - add finish Nah, seems unnecessary

00:29:677 (140) - k Sure

00:30:127 () - add d I like it as a k.

00:33:727 () - add d ^

00:58:927 (363,364,365,366,367) - d k d k k same as 00:49:327 (286,287,288,289,290) - No, I'd like them to be different.

01:00:727 (377,378,379,380,381,382,383) - kkdkkdk That's brutal, but I do like it

01:10:477 (453,454,455,456,457,458) - kdkdkkd I really really like this pattern, but I don't want to increase the density here

01:11:677 (465,466,467,468,469,470) - dkddkkd ^

01:15:277 (492,493,494,495) - kdkdkkd ^

01:17:077 (509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516) - kdd kdd kdd kdd same as 01:07:477 (430,431,432,433,434,435,436,437,438,439,440,441) - There are too many finishers here, so sure.

01:36:277 (81,82,83,84,85,86,87) - kkddkdk I'm really not sure about this one, I like both patterns. So I'm gonna leave it as is for now and see what other people think.

01:36:877 (88,89,90,91,92,93,94) - dkddkkd ^

02:06:127 (142,143,144,145,146) - d k k d k Nah, I prefer simpler patterns

02:09:277 (169) - k I really like the way the one I have plays

02:13:777 (205,206,207,208,209) - kdkkd Yes!

02:17:677 (230,231,232,233,234) - kdkdkkd Hmmm, I like this the way it is

02:22:477 (277,278,279,280,281,282) - ddk kkd Yes
02:23:677 (289,290,291,292,293,294) - ^ Yes

02:29:077 (340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348,349,350,351) - ddk kkd ddk kkd similar to 02:19:477 (246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257) - Nah, I like this part being technical

Good luck!