forum

Imperial Circus Dead Decadence - Gekiai no Yobigoe ga Dekiai

posted
Total Posts
22
Topic Starter
Stoof
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on October 26, 2016 at 8:50:52 PM

Artist: Imperial Circus Dead Decadence
Title: Gekiai no Yobigoe ga Dekiai no Kyougoe wo Kurau
BPM: 210
Filesize: 11779kb
Play Time: 06:30
Difficulties Available:
  1. Retribution (7.16 stars, 2149 notes)
Download: Imperial Circus Dead Decadence - Gekiai no Yobigoe ga Dekiai no Kyougoe wo Kurau
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
bad map Cx (seriously give me a fking diff name)

bg by Nanomortis
20Below
Kiai Issues:
00:00:000 - Kiai should not be here at all
03:13:714 - Make the gaps have Kiai as well
_______________________________________________________

Italics = Nitpicks, nothing against you

01:24:000 (1,2,3,4) - This plays really weird. The notes stacked on each other then transitioning to back and forths feels awkward to play
01:33:142 (1) - This just feels out of place
01:42:285 (5,6,7,8,9) - This irritates me. There is place for some streams or kick-streaks and you do slow, boring sliders. Yes, they are in tune with the song, it just feels out of place for a map that has been constant streaming and jumping
02:05:142 (1) - Extend to the next white tick maybe
02:12:285 (6,7,8,9) - Once again awkward. You place 6 to show significance on the held note then put jumps while the note is still being held
02:44:000 (1,2) - A stack seems strange here
02:46:285 (1,2) - ^
02:48:571 (1,2) - ^
02:58:571 (1,2) - Same as above but more so for reason. You have two back and forths with a stack separating them, just seems strange to have
03:06:857 (3,4,5,1,2) - Same reasoning for 01:42:285 (5,6,7,8,9) - And remove NC if you do decide to keep it
04:11:785 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - Make the sliders more pretty and less.... Tsubaki
04:20:928 - I don't like the jumps and personally myself would change them
05:28:928 (1,1,2,3,4) - Same reasoning for 01:42:285 (5,6,7,8,9) -
05:35:785 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I don't really hear anything warranting the significance of these back and forth jumps
05:54:071 (1,2,1,2) - Make them pretty or make them streams

Really good job and seems like a solid map, good luck trying to rank it!
awesomemacD
good shit
EDIT: I'll make this a little mod.
-
03:34:857 - 03:59:142 - This should be a slow part, but timing it is so hard I can't help there :(
05:28:928 (1,1,2,3,4) - This part is too slow for a map full of streams.
05:54:071 (1,2,1,2) - This should be streams, not back and forward sliders.
04:11:785 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - The sliders don't fit here, this part should actually be harder than most parts of the map especially with the guy screaming in the background.
01:42:285 (5,6,7,8) - Too slow.
03:06:857 (3,4,5,1) - Again, too slow.
02:34:857 - 02:49:714 - This kiai is unnecessary.
03:06:857 - kiai should begin here, not 02:57:714
-
Good luck!
Topic Starter
Stoof

20Below wrote:

Kiai Issues:
00:00:000 - Kiai should not be here at all fixed
03:13:714 - Make the gaps have Kiai as well fixed
_______________________________________________________

Italics = Nitpicks, nothing against you

01:24:000 (1,2,3,4) - This plays really weird. The notes stacked on each other then transitioning to back and forths feels awkward to play
01:33:142 (1) - This just feels out of place
01:42:285 (5,6,7,8,9) - This irritates me. There is place for some streams or kick-streaks and you do slow, boring sliders. Yes, they are in tune with the song, it just feels out of place for a map that has been constant streaming and jumping
02:05:142 (1) - Extend to the next white tick maybe fixed, extended slider and slowed it down
02:12:285 (6,7,8,9) - Once again awkward. You place 6 to show significance on the held note then put jumps while the note is still being held fixed, was originally because i was too lazy to make bigger slider
02:44:000 (1,2) - A stack seems strange here
02:46:285 (1,2) - ^
02:48:571 (1,2) - ^ if i removed these stacks, i would also have to remap almost all of the map
02:58:571 (1,2) - Same as above but more so for reason. You have two back and forths with a stack separating them, just seems strange to have fixed
03:06:857 (3,4,5,1,2) - Same reasoning for 01:42:285 (5,6,7,8,9) - And remove NC if you do decide to keep it fixed NC
04:11:785 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - Make the sliders more pretty and less.... Tsubaki
04:20:928 - I don't like the jumps and personally myself would change them fixed
05:28:928 (1,1,2,3,4) - Same reasoning for 01:42:285 (5,6,7,8,9) -
05:35:785 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I don't really hear anything warranting the significance of these back and forth jumps
05:54:071 (1,2,1,2) - Make them pretty or make them streams

Really good job and seems like a solid map, good luck trying to rank it! Thanks! although i don't feel like i am good enough to get this ranked ;w;
Thanks for the mod!
Topic Starter
Stoof

awesomemacD wrote:

good shit
EDIT: I'll make this a little mod.
-
03:34:857 - 03:59:142 - This should be a slow part, but timing it is so hard I can't help there :( I think I'll keep this as a break for now
05:28:928 (1,1,2,3,4) - This part is too slow for a map full of streams. upped the slider velocity, but I intend to keep sliders for now
05:54:071 (1,2,1,2) - This should be streams, not back and forward sliders. fixed
04:11:785 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - The sliders don't fit here, this part should actually be harder than most parts of the map especially with the guy screaming in the background. replaced with streams
01:42:285 (5,6,7,8) - Too slow.
03:06:857 (3,4,5,1) - Again, too slow. keeping sliders like in 05:28:928 and 01:42:285 (5,6,7,8)
02:34:857 - 02:49:714 - This kiai is unnecessary. moved to 02:37:142
03:06:857 - kiai should begin here, not 02:57:714 fixed
-
Good luck!
Thanks for the mod!
Ender_Sword
Heyo, just a nood modder here trying to mod!

=asthetic

00:05:714 (1,4,5,6) - Might want to move 4,5,6 from 1 since they are all a bit too close and doesn't look too nice
00:14:285 (1,4,5,6) - ^
00:20:857 (2,3,4) - ^
00:27:142 (6,4) - Overlap 6 and 4
00:30:428 (8,2) - Maybe an overlap between 8 and the end of 2?
00:31:142 (3,7) - Overlap 7 and 3 and possibly make it look like this
00:41:857 (5,6,7,1) - Might wanna move these apart
00:59:285 (4,1,2,3) - The huge jump here from 4 to 1 is a bit out of place and flip 00:59:714 (4) - horizontally
00:59:714 (4,6,7,1) - This just looks ugly, but that might just be me
01:23:571 (2,1,2) - Why are these so awkwardly put together? I suggest moving them to go with what your previous jumps were doing before, going from little jumps to these relatively large jumps aren't really needed as the song doesn't change much for such a thing
02:01:142 (1,1) - Why not stack these, move them slightly lower and moving 02:01:000 (4,2,2) - a bit down as well since they are kinda off the mapping area lol
02:17:142 (1,1,1) - Just saying this is very nice!
02:40:571 (1) - Move this down like this, looks nice and makes it to where it's not off the screen lol
02:44:000 (1) - Consider moving this a little further to the left
02:55:428 (9,10,1) - This ruins the flow imo, you're going to the left and instantly start a stream on the right? Could just be me but plays a bit awkward
02:57:714 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This whole bit reminds me of tsubaki lol
03:40:196 - This bit could be mapped with some slow sliders and notes, but your choice
04:02:500 (1,2) - lmao did not expect this change xd
04:57:357 (6,1,5) - 6 could be moved above 1 so it's not too close to 5
05:03:642 (6,1) - You could try stacking 6 on 1
05:16:073 - This bit could also be mapped quite nicely

Very nice map, hope I was able to help a bit and if I didn't well that's to be expected from a noob modder xd
Good Luck!
Topic Starter
Stoof

E n d wrote:

Heyo, just a nood modder here trying to mod!

=asthetic

00:05:714 (1,4,5,6) - Might want to move 4,5,6 from 1 since they are all a bit too close and doesn't look too nice fixed
00:14:285 (1,4,5,6) - ^ fixed
00:20:857 (2,3,4) - ^ fixed
00:27:142 (6,4) - Overlap 6 and 4 fixed
00:30:428 (8,2) - Maybe an overlap between 8 and the end of 2? fixed
00:31:142 (3,7) - Overlap 7 and 3 and possibly make it look like this changed to this
00:41:857 (5,6,7,1) - Might wanna move these apart how could I miss this... fixed
00:59:285 (4,1,2,3) - The huge jump here from 4 to 1 is a bit out of place and flip 00:59:714 (4) - horizontally changed pattern of 1-2-3, keeping slider the same
00:59:714 (4,6,7,1) - This just looks ugly, but that might just be me I think this goes well with the song imo, so i'm gonna keep this
01:23:571 (2,1,2) - Why are these so awkwardly put together? I suggest moving them to go with what your previous jumps were doing before, going from little jumps to these relatively large jumps aren't really needed as the song doesn't change much for such a thing fixed(?)
02:01:142 (1,1) - Why not stack these, move them slightly lower and moving 02:01:000 (4,2,2) - a bit down as well since they are kinda off the mapping area lol I prefer them as they are now rather than stacked, but I did move them down a bit
02:17:142 (1,1,1) - Just saying this is very nice! Thanks!
02:40:571 (1) - Move this down like this, looks nice and makes it to where it's not off the screen lol fixed
02:44:000 (1) - Consider moving this a little further to the left fixed
02:55:428 (9,10,1) - This ruins the flow imo, you're going to the left and instantly start a stream on the right? Could just be me but plays a bit awkward It plays just fine for me
02:57:714 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This whole bit reminds me of tsubaki lol
03:40:196 - This bit could be mapped with some slow sliders and notes, but your choice like I said in a previous mod, I'm gonna keep this as part of the break
04:02:500 (1,2) - lmao did not expect this change xd got any other suggestions? xd
04:57:357 (6,1,5) - 6 could be moved above 1 so it's not too close to 5 the plan for this section was to have the jumps expand, so i'm gonna keep it this way for now
05:03:642 (6,1) - You could try stacking 6 on 1
05:16:073 - This bit could also be mapped quite nicely I'm going to keep this as a break also, because the part after here is faster and I already used slow sliders


Very nice map, hope I was able to help a bit and if I didn't well that's to be expected from a noob modder xd
Good Luck!
Thanks for the mod! (and yes, it was helpful ;) )
[-CeMAqpOP-]kee
nANOMORTIS
Lilynn
I love the map! ^-^


Great job Stoof.

I really hope you keep mapping.
Topic Starter
Stoof

Lilynn wrote:

I love the map! ^-^


Great job Stoof.

I really hope you keep mapping.
thank you >_<
- Juno -
Hope this gets ranked for a Cookiezi 700pp play XD
Great Map!
Danii
yo!!!

japanese black metal
I think that in maps of this type (7+* stream map) just need cs above 4. Put at least cs 4.2 (or more, at your discretion)

But OD would be need to reduce to 9

Also, before you fix the map itself, check AiMod, ends of some objects (sliders) are not on the tick, and also fix green lines with kiai time, they also are not on the tick

00:00:142 (2,7) - stack note with end of slider

00:01:714 (3,3) - stack

00:02:000 (4,2) - maybe make here blanket? (more curve slider for this)

00:04:571 (1,5,6) - i think that its a bad ovelap, move (5,6) up

00:06:571 (4,3) - make here blanket

00:08:571 (1,1) - bad ovelap which can be avoided, also you can here make blanket between 00:08:571 (1,3) -

00:13:000 (4,5) - stack

00:15:142 (7,2) - too bad ovelap imo, move note right for normal blanket with slider

00:18:285 (13) - nc

00:20:571 (1,6) - bad ovelap, move triple right

00:22:571 (6) - maybe move this note down for better flow between jumps?

00:24:000 (7) - maybe nc?

00:25:000 (1,6,7,8) - stack slider start with 7-th note in triple (move whole triple for this)

00:26:142 (9,4) - stack, just i think that square 00:26:857 (3,4,5,6) - some kind of compressed due position of this note (or of 00:27:142 (5) - , lul). But, in our case better move (4) than (5) (actually if stacked (9,4) anyway square will be wrong, in this case move 00:26:857 (3) - a bit right)

00:27:714 (4,6) - stack

00:30:142 (5,6,7) - maybe ctrl+g for better flow?

00:32:000 (1,2,3,6) - located too close, move slider left

00:36:285 (3,1) - make here blanket

00:37:142 (1,2,3,4,5) - too far in relation to next stream imo, move it closer to 3.00x spacing (it was 4.00x for comparison) (and also put this stream down for better flow)

00:43:714 (3,5,6,7) - bad overlap, move (5,6,7) right (for example you can make here blanket with (3), lol)

00:46:285 (4,3) - stack end of repeat slider with note in stream

00:48:000 (5) - nc and also 00:48:285 (1) - remove nc

00:49:428 (2,5) - located too close, move note right

00:50:857 (5,5) - maybe make here blanket? Imo looks like better than ovelap

00:52:142 (3,1,2,3) - almost ovelap, move triple right

00:52:857 (1) - remove nc

00:54:857 (1,6,7,8) - stack start of slider with 7-th note in triple (move whole triple for this)

00:56:000 (2,4) - stack ends of sliders (move 4-th slider)

00:57:142 (6) - nc and also 00:57:428 (1) - remove nc

00:59:714 (4) - nc

01:07:428 (13) - nc

01:12:000 (9) - ^

01:13:285 (2,4) - located too close, move note up

01:14:000 (5,7) - make here blanket

01:16:571 (9) - nc

01:17:857 (2,4) - make here blanket because bad ovelap (again)

01:18:571 (5,7) - ^

01:21:142 (4) - nc

01:33:142 (1) - move this slider down to blanket with 01:32:857 (5) -

01:34:428 (2,5) - blanket

01:38:285 (1,3) - i not immediately understand that (3) lies beneath (1), make here overlap

01:41:142 (9) - nc

01:42:285 (5) - nc

01:51:428 (9) - nc and also 01:51:857 (1) - remove nc

02:00:285 (1,3) - a bit curve blanket, move note a bit right (make it without grid snap)

02:03:285 (2,2,2,2,2) - too far imo, move this right (closer)

02:07:428 (11) - nc and also 02:07:857 (1) - remove nc

02:09:000 (5,7) - make here blanket

02:16:571 (9) - nc

02:21:142 (1,5,6,7) - bad overlap, make here blanket

02:25:714 (13) - nc and also 02:26:000 (1) - remove nc

02:30:285 (13) - 02:30:571 (1) - ^

02:31:142 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - stack 3-rd note in first stream with 4-th note in last stream (move last stream for this)

02:48:571 (1,2,4) - curve blanket, move slider a bit up

02:55:428 (9) - nc

02:56:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - maybe ctrl+h? for even flow

02:56:571 (9) - nc

02:57:857 (2,4) - too bad overlap, stack note with end of slider

03:01:142 (9) - nc

03:05:714 (9) - ^

03:13:000 (3,1) - located too close, move (1) up

03:17:428 (4,9) - same, move note right

03:34:857 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe with each 2 sliders change angle to 15? for more various pattern

03:59:138 - i hear here strong bit, or put here note, or extend to this place repeat slider

04:29:499 (1) - this slider looks like ugly imo, more curve it

04:29:999 (1) - remove nc and also 04:30:070 (2) - add nc

04:34:641 (4) - nc

04:34:784 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 04:35:784 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - remake this jumps, they are very similar to 04:33:213 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - in own structure. and also this kind of jumps is difficult to read imo

04:36:927 (1) - starting spinner on the strong sound is very bad idea. On the strong sound (04:36:927 - ) put note and put spinner start on 04:36:999 - (spinner end you can leave there where it was)

04:42:641 (9) - nc

04:47:212 (4) - ^

04:51:784 (9) - ^

04:57:070 (3,4,5) - move this triple left to blanket with 04:56:356 (1) -

05:01:499 (7) - nc

05:05:213 (3,5) - bad overlap, move note down

05:04:356 (1,3) - too far imo, move this left (dont care that its kiai, such full screen jumps almost no one likes)

05:07:927 (2,2) - same, move this up

05:11:784 (9) - nc

05:28:927 (1) - maybe improve repeat slider to ephasize vocal?

05:30:070 (1) - ^

05:31:213 (1) - ^

05:32:356 (1) - i dont hear here 1/8 , make here normal 1/4 repeat sliders

05:34:070 (5,1) - almost a bad overlap, move 5-th slider left (also move 05:33:784 (2,3,4) - left)

05:34:641 (1,3,4) - make here blanket

05:44:499 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this turn in the stream looks like curve, fix it (the idea is good, just execution is bad) (just move 05:44:784 (7,8,9) - a bit up)

05:44:927 (9) - nc

05:47:070 (4,2) - make here blanket

06:03:213 (1) - move this slider right to blanket with 06:02:784 (4) -

06:09:784 (13) - maybe nc?

06:11:499 (1,2,3) - too far imo, move (1,3) right

06:15:927 (2,2) - move this down, because too far, to spacing was ~2.50x

06:16:499 (2,2) - ^

06:18:499 (4,6) - unstack this (move 4-th note right) for better flow

06:18:641 (5) - weird slider form in this position imo , more curve end of this slider (move the point on this end of slider)

06:23:784 (8) - add nc and also 06:23:927 (1) - remove nc

06:23:927 (1) - move this slider up because a bad overlap with 06:22:784 (2,4,6) - and because too far from 06:24:071 (2,3,4) -

06:28:284 - i hear here strong sound, in vain you pass it, it would be possible to do something like this (for example)

06:30:641 (9) - nc

despite all the mistakes listed in mod, this map is really good
good luck

in my opinion thrash metal>death metal>black metal sorry
Topic Starter
Stoof

DaniilLillifag wrote:

yo!!!

japanese black metal
I think that in maps of this type (7+* stream map) just need cs above 4. Put at least cs 4.2 (or more, at your discretion)

But OD would be need to reduce to 9

Also, before you fix the map itself, check AiMod, ends of some objects (sliders) are not on the tick, and also fix green lines with kiai time, they also are not on the tick

00:00:142 (2,7) - stack note with end of slider

00:01:714 (3,3) - stack

00:02:000 (4,2) - maybe make here blanket? (more curve slider for this)

00:04:571 (1,5,6) - i think that its a bad ovelap, move (5,6) up

00:06:571 (4,3) - make here blanket

00:08:571 (1,1) - bad ovelap which can be avoided, also you can here make blanket between 00:08:571 (1,3) -

00:13:000 (4,5) - stack

00:15:142 (7,2) - too bad ovelap imo, move note right for normal blanket with slider

00:18:285 (13) - nc

00:20:571 (1,6) - bad ovelap, move triple right

00:22:571 (6) - maybe move this note down for better flow between jumps?

00:24:000 (7) - maybe nc?

00:25:000 (1,6,7,8) - stack slider start with 7-th note in triple (move whole triple for this)

00:26:142 (9,4) - stack, just i think that square 00:26:857 (3,4,5,6) - some kind of compressed due position of this note (or of 00:27:142 (5) - , lul). But, in our case better move (4) than (5) (actually if stacked (9,4) anyway square will be wrong, in this case move 00:26:857 (3) - a bit right)

00:27:714 (4,6) - stack

00:30:142 (5,6,7) - maybe ctrl+g for better flow?

00:32:000 (1,2,3,6) - located too close, move slider left

00:36:285 (3,1) - make here blanket

00:37:142 (1,2,3,4,5) - too far in relation to next stream imo, move it closer to 3.00x spacing (it was 4.00x for comparison) (and also put this stream down for better flow)

00:43:714 (3,5,6,7) - bad overlap, move (5,6,7) right (for example you can make here blanket with (3), lol)

00:46:285 (4,3) - stack end of repeat slider with note in stream

00:48:000 (5) - nc and also 00:48:285 (1) - remove nc

00:49:428 (2,5) - located too close, move note right

00:50:857 (5,5) - maybe make here blanket? Imo looks like better than ovelap

00:52:142 (3,1,2,3) - almost ovelap, move triple right

00:52:857 (1) - remove nc

00:54:857 (1,6,7,8) - stack start of slider with 7-th note in triple (move whole triple for this)

00:56:000 (2,4) - stack ends of sliders (move 4-th slider)

00:57:142 (6) - nc and also 00:57:428 (1) - remove nc

00:59:714 (4) - nc

01:07:428 (13) - nc

01:12:000 (9) - ^

01:13:285 (2,4) - located too close, move note up

01:14:000 (5,7) - make here blanket

01:16:571 (9) - nc

01:17:857 (2,4) - make here blanket because bad ovelap (again)

01:18:571 (5,7) - ^

01:21:142 (4) - nc

01:33:142 (1) - move this slider down to blanket with 01:32:857 (5) -

01:34:428 (2,5) - blanket

01:38:285 (1,3) - i not immediately understand that (3) lies beneath (1), make here overlap

01:41:142 (9) - nc

01:42:285 (5) - nc

01:51:428 (9) - nc and also 01:51:857 (1) - remove nc

02:00:285 (1,3) - a bit curve blanket, move note a bit right (make it without grid snap)

02:03:285 (2,2,2,2,2) - too far imo, move this right (closer)

02:07:428 (11) - nc and also 02:07:857 (1) - remove nc

02:09:000 (5,7) - make here blanket

02:16:571 (9) - nc

02:21:142 (1,5,6,7) - bad overlap, make here blanket

02:25:714 (13) - nc and also 02:26:000 (1) - remove nc

02:30:285 (13) - 02:30:571 (1) - ^

02:31:142 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - stack 3-rd note in first stream with 4-th note in last stream (move last stream for this)

02:48:571 (1,2,4) - curve blanket, move slider a bit up

02:55:428 (9) - nc

02:56:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - maybe ctrl+h? for even flow

02:56:571 (9) - nc

02:57:857 (2,4) - too bad overlap, stack note with end of slider

03:01:142 (9) - nc

03:05:714 (9) - ^

03:13:000 (3,1) - located too close, move (1) up

03:17:428 (4,9) - same, move note right

03:34:857 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe with each 2 sliders change angle to 15? for more various pattern

03:59:138 - i hear here strong bit, or put here note, or extend to this place repeat slider

04:29:499 (1) - this slider looks like ugly imo, more curve it

04:29:999 (1) - remove nc and also 04:30:070 (2) - add nc

04:34:641 (4) - nc

04:34:784 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 04:35:784 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - remake this jumps, they are very similar to 04:33:213 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - in own structure. and also this kind of jumps is difficult to read imo

04:36:927 (1) - starting spinner on the strong sound is very bad idea. On the strong sound (04:36:927 - ) put note and put spinner start on 04:36:999 - (spinner end you can leave there where it was)

04:42:641 (9) - nc

04:47:212 (4) - ^

04:51:784 (9) - ^

04:57:070 (3,4,5) - move this triple left to blanket with 04:56:356 (1) -

05:01:499 (7) - nc

05:05:213 (3,5) - bad overlap, move note down

05:04:356 (1,3) - too far imo, move this left (dont care that its kiai, such full screen jumps almost no one likes)

05:07:927 (2,2) - same, move this up

05:11:784 (9) - nc

05:28:927 (1) - maybe improve repeat slider to ephasize vocal?

05:30:070 (1) - ^

05:31:213 (1) - ^

05:32:356 (1) - i dont hear here 1/8 , make here normal 1/4 repeat sliders

05:34:070 (5,1) - almost a bad overlap, move 5-th slider left (also move 05:33:784 (2,3,4) - left)

05:34:641 (1,3,4) - make here blanket

05:44:499 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this turn in the stream looks like curve, fix it (the idea is good, just execution is bad) (just move 05:44:784 (7,8,9) - a bit up)

05:44:927 (9) - nc

05:47:070 (4,2) - make here blanket

06:03:213 (1) - move this slider right to blanket with 06:02:784 (4) -

06:09:784 (13) - maybe nc?

06:11:499 (1,2,3) - too far imo, move (1,3) right

06:15:927 (2,2) - move this down, because too far, to spacing was ~2.50x

06:16:499 (2,2) - ^

06:18:499 (4,6) - unstack this (move 4-th note right) for better flow

06:18:641 (5) - weird slider form in this position imo , more curve end of this slider (move the point on this end of slider)

06:23:784 (8) - add nc and also 06:23:927 (1) - remove nc

06:23:927 (1) - move this slider up because a bad overlap with 06:22:784 (2,4,6) - and because too far from 06:24:071 (2,3,4) -

06:28:284 - i hear here strong sound, in vain you pass it, it would be possible to do something like this (for example)

06:30:641 (9) - nc

despite all the mistakes listed in mod, this map is really good
good luck

in my opinion thrash metal>death metal>black metal sorry
Thanks for the mod! I fixed just about everything you mentioned. :)
20Below
02:05:142 (1) - extend to red tick
Topic Starter
Stoof

20Below wrote:

02:05:142 (1) - extend to red tick
ok i think i did it i dont remember
awesomemacD
I don't know if this is correct Japanese I kinda just typed out the name of the song but put "劇愛の呼び声が出来合いの今日声を食らう" as the title.

EDIT:
03:58:857 (1) - Change hitsounds at this green tick to soft. Also try to fix the hitsounds in this section, I hear loud drums on notes that don't have any additions at all wtf.
03:58:857 (1) - Remove whistle here too, maybe just put whistle here 03:59:138 -
Topic Starter
Stoof
6 months later
- Ed -
e
20Below
a
goink
h
Xaver
Looks ready
Topic Starter
Stoof
ready for what
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply