Mihaugoku wrote:

Sorry, if the mod is bad, i'm just a beginner! no perobelem
Mod from the Queue

[Tatsujin]
00:02:180 (14,15) - i think k d matches the music better nice catch
01:26:330 (590,591,592) - change to k d k or k k k to fit the song better (you put k on half-beat mostly, so why not here?) to empashized 01:26:480 - this sound, changed k d k or k k k looks boring *mostly this follow snare, but I had exception in here*
01:45:455 - i feel like you should put notes here, 01:46:055 here, and 01:46:505 here to make it a stream I dont hear drum playing, but if this like to adding I will considering this *might keep it orz*
02:55:130 (391,392,393) - same as in 01:26:330 ^
04:29:865 (314,315,316,317) - i would do a |kkdd| or |dkkd| here to match the low sound at the end did something
04:52:837 (540,541,542,543) - notice this ends with a higher sound, consider changing the pattern to end with a k not looks necessary, if the sound like 04:36:722 (382,383,384,385) - these I would do that
04:59:008 (605,606,607,608) - i don't think this matches the song, i would prefer standard end of the stream in place of this your right, but I prefer to emphasized that 1/6 sounds
05:33:465 (936) - this feels unnecessary - suggest removing it. I know there's a silent sound, but i think you can make that empty no ( I like it lol )
06:06:615 (30,31,32) - same as 01:26:330 ^
06:25:065 - 06:27:315 - again, would add notes to make it a full stream I considering this in the future
06:28:965 (241) - maybe add a d? not needed like that lol

I hope this mod helps!
Have a good day!

kogasa wrote:

here with a BEYOND OVERDUE mod. first of all, i just want to say i am truly sorry for taking so long to mod back, i had to deal with personal irl issues and could not work for a while. ;; np, you was here and did it

[ Tatsujin]

1. 00:13:355 (106) - k? is the same pitch as 00:13:355 (106), and matches the pattern used for 00:12:980 (101,102,103), with the difference being that there isnt a d at 00:13:505 (108) ☑
2. 00:15:905 (127) - i think this should be d, for the guitar going up and down, while- see below
3. 00:15:980 (128) - should be a k, since its clearly going up here. additionally, youve used an alternating pattern like this before thats make repeating, but the sounds is really bumpy. so I keep it
4. 00:27:830 (95) - i think this should be a k to compliment the guitar more. OR, if you dont take that suggestion, you could change 00:27:905 (96) to a k to hit the snare both of that is really bad to applied imo, I keep it
5. 00:28:280 (101) - make this a d? since theres a big kick here, and it would be more emphasized this way, since 00:28:130 (99,100) are k's I keep it, the sound is goes up and consistent with 00:28:880 - *the sound is unique to emphasize with kat*
6. 00:28:880 (108) - ^ ^, omg 108 my FAV NUMBET
7. 00:48:680 (240,241,242) - this doesnt really make sense to me to be kkk, since the snare clearly has more impact than the previous 2 notes. i think you should just stick with either ddk, kkd for inversion, or ddd ☑
8. 00:53:705 (293) - i think this could be removed, since its not really mapped to anything specific and removing it puts more emphasis on the guitar .... ahh
9. um ok well `L_`
10. 01:11:180 (448,450) - first of all these are missing snares, especially the first one since its a very distinct snare and feels like it should be a k I prefer this as don for goes up drum and to emphasize this 01:11:480 (452,453,454,455,456,457) - pattern
11. 01:11:480 (452) - i dont see why this is a k, im not hearing anything to suggest it especially when the previous 2 snares were missed no.. it would odd pattern if applied
12. ^ the above is especially confusing since you follow the drums and snares for the rest of this stream dont worry.. this fine imo
13. 01:25:955 (586) - i dont know if this was intentional to emphasize the vocals, but there is a missed kick here where a d could be weird emphasize imo
14. 01:26:330 (590) - this would make more sense to be a k since it lands on a snare but I want emphasize 01:26:480 - this kat so the contrast seems clear imo
15. 01:26:555 (592) - theres also a missed beat here where you could add a note no its fine, I just focus on instrument
16. 01:27:155 (597) - a missed kick where a d should be, i dont really see a reason to leave one out here this a high sound, dkd looks weird imo
17. 01:27:455 (600) - ^ this snare
18. 01:36:755 (687) - theres a beat here where you could add something I not really follow the drum, since I mapped on flow and guitar, bcus the drum repeating and looks boring.. and then if added this would make a long pattern..
19. 01:38:180 (700) - theres a missed kick here where a d could be, and the rhythm with the vocals doesnt match up with leaving it out either I know, but this actually for variaton
20. 01:50:780 (813) - why not a finish? it would add a LOT more emphasis to the silence/quietness of the song at this part and feel a lot more intense a don is enough imo, finisher looks too over imo
21. 01:51:980 (814) - i think this could use a finish too this already finisher, ^ so if both of them is finisher. it would block the contrast
22. 01:56:030 (857,858,859,860,861) - making this kkddk would make a lot more sense instead, since it fits the current pattern and because 01:56:330 (861) - is landing on a snare the flow started wild and I like to keep it, if applied it looks repeating
23. 01:56:480 (862) - this could be a d to fit the pattern better, like how 01:56:780 (864) is a d but 01:56:630 (863,865) are k's because they land on snares but the guitar flow is on high sound
24. 02:17:480 (42,43,44) - same thing i said before ☑
25. 03:20:780 (51) - finisher? thats already finisher
26. 03:23:555 - a d could be here since theres a missed kick I focusd on guitar
27. 03:28:355 - ^ no for this..
28. 03:28:430 (126) - this should be a k, it lands on a snare and makes more sense if 03:28:355 is a d contrast seems right imo with dkd, kkd looks bad for this sound
29. 03:28:655 - theres also a missed kick here, except this one is more audible this one, again.. I mapped as following the flow and guitar. I dont need to follow drum always.. thats bad to make a pattern
30. 04:07:408 (102,103,104) - imo these are really hard to read in the midst of all thats going on but the Sound it is imo
31. 04:17:265 (185,186,187,188) - dkkd instead? since 04:17:522 (188) has a kick ☑
32. 04:29:865 (313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320) - im... not sure 1/6 is the best idea, considering this is 200 bpm. i think it could be simplified and still be fine... this applies to all other instances of 1/6 dont worry... :^)
33. 06:06:615 (30) - k? snare here rip the contrast imo...
34. 06:19:440 (148) - another missed kick ........
35. 06:40:215 (89,90,91,92,93) - kdkdk maybe? 06:40:365 (91) - i really think this should be a k since its the same high hat sound as 06:40:215 (89) I dont hear thats be good as kdkdk. if on kat is similar sound I would applied that

i tried to keep it sort of short so i didn't end up repeating myself over and over, but i hope at least some suggestions are useful to you! yep, this good to took!

good luck with your map! and once again, i'm REALLY sorry for taking FOREVER to mod this. lol np, you modded it and I appreciate it

Surono wrote:

03:39 Surono: I already ask offset for de map.. dem, warfu. the offset fine? or dem
03:40 Midnaait: just checked the ranked version
03:43 *Midnaait is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/245960 DragonForce - Heroes of Our Time]
04:14 Surono: ty[/box]

Tatsujin
00:06:980 (46) - I think this should be a kat. Higher pitch than 00:06:830 (45)
03:40:280 (1) - Move it here 03:40:130
05:33:465 (936) - Remove this?

Friggy-chan wrote:

Hi! Random mod. woahhh

Tatsujin
00:06:980 (46) - I think this should be a kat. Higher pitch than 00:06:830 (45) ups, sure!
03:40:280 (1) - Move it here 03:40:130 that doesnt matter for me, 03:40:280 - in here is more feels on flow than move to red tick, gap would be good for that flow imo
05:33:465 (936) - Remove this? I like to keep it lol, that beat makes me wont delete it XD

Sorry for the short mod! Good luck with your map.

Nyan wrote:

[Tatsujin]

00:45:455 - add a don
00:47:855 - add a don
00:55:055 - add a don
00:57:455 - add a don no for all ~_~
01:06:380 (419) - add Finish oke
01:27:155 - add a don no...
01:32:405 (648,649,650,651,652,653) - dkkdkd oke
02:14:255 - add a don
02:16:655 - add a don
02:23:855 - add a don
02:26:255 - add a don no for all
02:48:530 (328) - don 02:48:530 (328,332) - ~_~ I dont see its similar..
02:49:580 (338,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348,349,350) - kddd/dddd/kddd/kddd no change at here
02:50:780 (350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360) - minor suggestion thats horrible, nyan... T_T

03:18:380 (40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51) - kddd/dddd/kddd/kddd/k dem 4plet.. I like 3plet
04:07:408 (105,106,107,108) - kd dk(1/4) I dont hear guitar or drum like that, the guitar more like 1/3
05:33:465 (940) - delete xd pls

Raiden wrote:

[Tatsujin]
00:08:780 (59,60,61,62) - finisher to all of them to finalize the stanza oke
00:16:580 (134,135,136,137,138,139) - these are just... plain bad. Do kkkd kkkd I think it too for make it xxxx bcus yeah, xx x on don is sick XD
00:17:855 - don't pause the stream here, it feels out of place as the momentum doesn't change. Fill in 00:19:505 - and probably make some adjustments so the pattern doesn't play too badly Moar LOONNGG stream (owo)9
00:19:430 - ^
00:21:305 - ^
00:25:505 - ^
00:26:705 - ^
00:28:355 - ^ LMAO, oke dad XD *Moar LOONNGG stream (owo)9 (2)
00:28:955 - 00:29:105 - ^ make the transition smooth from 1/4 to 1/3 oke
00:42:530 - Low volume spinner until 00:44:630 - ? weird if guitar playing like this for a spinner, I like to keep it blank
00:44:780 - Point of this red line if it's exactly on a downbeat and with the same BPM new rhytm.. I think is fits with beat from NC mods. maybe it works for some notes at few tick *effect gameplay? xd*. should I remove it?
02:07:955 - Fill in, guitar is still holding 1/4 dem, I forget here..
03:18:455 - 03:18:755 - 03:19:055 - 03:19:355 - 03:19:505 - Fill in, drums are going 1/4 oke, I didnt realize this lol
04:36:722 (385,386,387,388) - why dkkk?? Guitar does rather kkkd and and drums would do dddk you right, I just dont have idea or dem xd 04:36:722 (385,386,387,388,389) - kkkd k! cuz gitar strong XD
05:33:465 (940) - ????? what is this doing here I hear that sound in the background but it's just offputting Edit: forget to reply this, lmao pls keep it XDDD
06:53:881 - delete red line, it's useless wat de, I guess this for fix the omit. *but I forget this all is 200bpm lloolll xD
06:55:525 - add redline with 200BPM and check "Omit first bar line"
06:56:720 - ^
06:57:991 - ^
06:59:274 - ^ fixed
07:02:278 - progressively decrease the volume of the spinner done, dcreased to 25%

yet another undermapped dragonforce *sigh* :'D dem sir

Nwolf wrote:

TEAM DRAGONFORCE EAEYHEyeayeh Yeahahyeaheayeaheah

[Obligatory Tatsujin diff name]

00:28:980 (113,114) - why is this 1/3 this should be 1/4 :v :^^^^^^^^^) just being safe or idk.. ye is 1/4 :'^)

00:49:880 (257,258,259,260,261,262) - is this doublets just for vocals or why is this doublets, doesn't seem to suit song yeh.. these intentional.. oke changed this dem pattern *ddk d bla*
> 00:50:930 (268,269,270,271) - 02:43:130 (277,278,279,280,281,282) - ^
> 01:37:880 (702,703,704,705,706,707) - 03:06:680 (498,499,500,501,502,503) - ^ other like these.. I just intentionalli make it as evens pattern and I think is suit with vocal.. since music arrangement is demm

01:31:805 (647,648,649,650,651,652) - imo it plays nicer when 01:31:805 (647) - this is don. Maybe also change 01:32:105 (651) - to a kat cause ew kdkd (?) nice mirror pottarn brahh

01:45:980 (784,785,786,787,788,789) - To fit better to 01:44:780 (768,769,770,771,772,773,774,775) - I'd suggest making this kkddkd as well. The difference is still there with there being much more kats. oh okok okok, demm yieaaaaaahhhhh heaeaeahhhh

01:48:380 - y u no strem I keep these density, I liek it :U

03:14:780 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - why is this so different from 01:46:055 (785,786,787,788,789,790,791,792,793,794,795) - ???
> if for variety: 03:15:305 - y u no don????????????
> 06:26:265 - Same (06:26:040 (215) - also why is this kat) ohh okok okok, re-arrangedem.. make same pattern n same sound

03:18:530 (42,43) - I think it's nicer for these to be kats for the pitch change (aka toms) between 03:18:605 (43,44) - :^)

03:28:430 (132) - pls don't break kat rhythm, make this kat, thanks 03:28:505 - I wank emphasizd this, plsssss

03:29:555 - could fill a kat here too waek sound... I doubt here. I want stop stream 03:29:480 - here

03:59:930 - might be nicer if you start slowing down the SV starting with this note so the stream is overlapped less. My suggestion is: 0.96, 0.93, 0.9 (down from 0.95) on each kat. oeg oeg

06:54:625 - Starting here it might be interesting for the song to have SV slow downs again, maybe ending with 0.5 07:01:678 - here maybe I keep it as Normal.. slowdown are killler for HD user :'D

Volta wrote:

05:33:465 - mending apus aja biar breaknya dimulai di suara kuat di 05:32:265 - kalo pasang note di situ seolah breaknya mau diisi sesuai vokal. bener juga, tapi disitu ada ketukan kan? aku fokus neken itu suara sebenarnya, bukan vokal. ya bisa dibilang ngikut si vokal juga seterusnya tapi ya buat 1 ini aja si ketukan.
05:32:265 - gimana kalo pasang green line dengan kecepatan x0.875 biar kecepatan notenya sama. terus di 05:41:865 - pasang x1.00 lagi. wih x0.88 jadinya kwkwkw, oke diterapin. pas juga sama power partnya ini
05:50:265 - lebih enak dibiarin kosong, karena sebelumnya menekankan ke suara gitar yang kenceng, jadi mending vokalnya disini gak usah dimap sip

rasanya endingnya gak perlu kiai sih tp terserah lah pippidon ga joget di bagian last epik, ntar ga woke woke....