Derail me

posted
Total Posts
25
show more
ztrot
On 24 February 2010 the Metropolitan government submitted a proposed revision to the Ordinance that would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age, referred to in the bill as "non-existent youths" (非実在青少年, hijitsuzai seishõnen?). The bill received strong opposition from manga creators, the publishing industry, the Writers Guild of Japan and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and was rejected by the Metropoiltan Assembly on 16 June 2010
Discuss the possible end of lolicon
Danzai
It's not a complete removal, just a censor thing.
They will mark sexual stuff 18+ if it is uncensored, and censor it if they want to reach everyone.
Lizzehb

ztrot wrote:

On 24 February 2010 the Metropolitan government submitted a proposed revision to the Ordinance that would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age, referred to in the bill as "non-existent youths" (非実在青少年, hijitsuzai seishõnen?). The bill received strong opposition from manga creators, the publishing industry, the Writers Guild of Japan and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and was rejected by the Metropoiltan Assembly on 16 June 2010
Discuss the possible end of lolicon
IT'S FANTASY FOR A REASON.
IT'S NOT REAL GET OVER IT JAPAN.
Shellghost

ztrot wrote:

On 24 February 2010 the Metropolitan government submitted a proposed revision to the Ordinance that would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age, referred to in the bill as "non-existent youths" (非実在青少年, hijitsuzai seishõnen?). The bill received strong opposition from manga creators, the publishing industry, the Writers Guild of Japan and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and was rejected by the Metropoiltan Assembly on 16 June 2010
Discuss the possible end of lolicon
I find it interesting since in Australia a while ago, there was a bill being pushed that banned the use of flat chested women in porn magazines believing that it was similar enough to child pornography in order to be considered illegal. However I believe it their plea was used as toilet paper, although it wouldn't surprise me if an issue about the appearance of girls in anime would rise in Australia as well sometime in the future.
Lizzehb

Shellghost wrote:

ztrot wrote:

On 24 February 2010 the Metropolitan government submitted a proposed revision to the Ordinance that would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age, referred to in the bill as "non-existent youths" (非実在青少年, hijitsuzai seishõnen?). The bill received strong opposition from manga creators, the publishing industry, the Writers Guild of Japan and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and was rejected by the Metropoiltan Assembly on 16 June 2010
Discuss the possible end of lolicon
I find it interesting since in Australia a while ago, there was a bill being pushed that banned the use of flat chested women in porn magazines believing that it was similar enough to child pornography in order to be considered illegal. However I believe it their plea was used as toilet paper, although it wouldn't surprise me if an issue about the appearance of girls in anime would rise in Australia as well sometime in the future.
I know someone who's almost 18 and it really flat chested.
But she's tall so no loli status for her.
Jarby
Oh good, another reason to link this article.
jericho2442

ztrot wrote:

On 24 February 2010 the Metropolitan government submitted a proposed revision to the Ordinance that would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age, referred to in the bill as "non-existent youths" (非実在青少年, hijitsuzai seishõnen?). The bill received strong opposition from manga creators, the publishing industry, the Writers Guild of Japan and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and was rejected by the Metropoiltan Assembly on 16 June 2010
Discuss the possible end of lolicon
as you know im not really a huge fan of the loli craze myself, but creating laws to limit imagination can only end up hurting more than helping. as with everything once a law is passed will it be abused and used just to destroy a industry. japan should be helping the industry within this time of crisis, not trying to destroy parts of culturewhat define japan from other country's (the more seedy parts of a culture are normally what are remembered most unfortunately).

there is better ways to try and change how an industry works than pretty much trying to kill the imagination it runs from, with the backlash what has been happening lately from japan it also shows how much of a bad idea this is in the long term.

in short, i can understand the merit behind such a change, but i do think it is being done in the wrong way and all japan is gonna end up doing is creating a lot more disorder in the industry rather than improving it
NoHitter
This should be in Forum Games?

ztrot wrote:

On 24 February 2010 the Metropolitan government submitted a proposed revision to the Ordinance that would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age, referred to in the bill as "non-existent youths" (非実在青少年, hijitsuzai seishõnen?). The bill received strong opposition from manga creators, the publishing industry, the Writers Guild of Japan and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and was rejected by the Metropoiltan Assembly on 16 June 2010
Discuss the possible end of lolicon
Basically I agree with what jericho said. Do you need to censor? Perhaps, but not in a way that would ruin a very big industry.
awp
Derail her?

I hardly know her!
SpacemanSpiff
Let's discuss the validity of people claiming a "waifu" from an anime character.

http://pdfcast.org/pdf/a-discourse-on-a ... -movement#

Any of you lonely enough to do such a thing? I know I've considered it a few times.
Lizzehb

mrmike503 wrote:

Let's discuss the validity of people claiming a "waifu" from an anime character.

http://pdfcast.org/pdf/a-discourse-on-a ... -movement#

Any of you lonely enough to do such a thing? I know I've considered it a few times.
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=45989
Vish024

mrmike503 wrote:

Any of you lonely enough to do such a thing? I know I've considered it a few times.
That's what she said.
Discuss....
TBTE
This is like the complete opposite of what I usually do this is going to be a challenging.

To the That's what she said.

Yes that is what my mom---- No that is not what she said she said something else.

To the Waifu, doesn't everyone want to be your Waifu Lizzehb >////////<

and I am out.
Xgor
thebesthingever is annoying.

Discuss.
deadbeat

Xgor wrote:

thebesthingever is annoying.

Discuss.
maybe if we ignore him he'll go away. like a bad itch
Xgor

deadbeat wrote:

Xgor wrote:

thebesthingever is annoying.

Discuss.
maybe if we ignore him he'll go away. like a bad itch
He will probably only be worse if we do :|
deadbeat
everyone has a breaking point...no exceptions
ouranhshc
jjrocks

deadbeat wrote:

everyone has a breaking point...no exceptions
The question is can we live with it until that point?
deadbeat
i seem to manage just fine. doesn't /ignore block all messages from a person anyway..or does that not work in #osu?
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply