I personally think good aim comes first. I've noticed that the better my aim gets, the less I have to think about aiming, and the more I can focus on hitting everything at the correct time.
here's that guyKisses wrote:
I think fun comes first
quote="-Toushin"]Genstars31 wrote:
Rhythm.
A: It's a rhythm game.
B: You can hit the objects without even thinking about the rhythm if you practice enough, then you can just focus on aim.
Chicken or egg dilemma ikr
Same for me partially because my accuracy is horrible. Playing fast stuff is really stress relieving part of the reason why I keep on clicking circles on daily basis. So yeah osu is not just a rhythm game and thats what makes it fun.[/quote]Khelly wrote:
-Toushin wrote:
I wish OP understood that he's digging a grave for himself playing like this.
osu is a rhythm game after all.
Osu is an aim and physically intensive game with rthymical elements thank you
If I had to play for acc only and not physical strain I might stop
triggeredPhilosofikal wrote:
nobody plays this game to have fun baka
aim depends on feeling the rhythm which is hard cuz jumps usually follows the VERY OBVIOUS beat or at least that's how i feel itwinber1 wrote:
good coordination
I like you and all your recent posts.vsprite wrote:
play more comes first
I think the posts would have more weight if he didn't bulkpost. One post at a time looks intelligent and elitistic as if you'd chosen time and place for your statement wisely.Khelly wrote:
I like you and all your recent posts.vsprite wrote:
play more comes first
He's incredibly original.Khelly wrote:
I like you and all your recent posts.vsprite wrote:
play more comes first
His vvvortic avatar adds taste to his posts.Khelly wrote:
I like you and all your recent posts.vsprite wrote:
play more comes first
Inconsistent aim will take you furthest in terms of rank/pp but are you really deserving if you can't even come close to repeating your scores? "Luck" will take you "further" than both rhythm and aim tbh. Should practice being lucky first.Floob wrote:
Good aim+bad acc will take you further than good acc+bad aim imo
I think it's good to find a good middle ground between the two, but play however you feel most comfortable.
Why not bothFloob wrote:
Good aim+bad acc will take you further than good acc+bad aim imo
I think it's good to find a good middle ground between the two, but play however you feel most comfortable.
If it were simply "at the limit of your abilities" you'd still be able to come close on subsequent plays.Khelly wrote:
Yes you are because you got the score. It's just at the limit of your abilities.
I disagree because being at the limit it's vary rare for you to achieve?chainpullz wrote:
If it were simply "at the limit of your abilities" you'd still be able to come close on subsequent plays.Khelly wrote:
Yes you are because you got the score. It's just at the limit of your abilities.