there is no point in me continuing this "discussion" when it seems like you misinterpret what concerns.
forum
xi - Halcyon -Long Version-
posted
Total Posts
151
There are many correct rhythms for any given song which are defined upon the creation of the song.Kibbleru wrote:
stop trying to force ur opinion on natsu, he gave his fair reasoning, just wait for the QATs to judge it.
also stop saying his rhythm is 'incorrect' since there is no objectivity in that, his opinion is his hence he expressed it his map, ur opinion is urs.
There are many incorrect rhythms for any given song which are created by misinterpretations, mistakes, and ignorance.
It's not all a gray area, and a lot of small parts of this set fall into the "incorrect" side.
cool map
because ur not openmindedMun wrote:
There are many correct rhythms for any given song which are defined upon the creation of the song.Kibbleru wrote:
stop trying to force ur opinion on natsu, he gave his fair reasoning, just wait for the QATs to judge it.
also stop saying his rhythm is 'incorrect' since there is no objectivity in that, his opinion is his hence he expressed it his map, ur opinion is urs.
There are many incorrect rhythms for any given song which are created by misinterpretations, mistakes, and ignorance.
It's not all a gray area, and a lot of small parts of this set fall into the "incorrect" side.
Topic Starter
because you are not open to other ideas, I put my interpretation here as I did in any of my maps, you are free to like it or dislike it that's fine, but also learn that no everyone do things as u likeMun wrote:
There are many correct rhythms for any given song which are defined upon the creation of the song.Kibbleru wrote:
stop trying to force ur opinion on natsu, he gave his fair reasoning, just wait for the QATs to judge it.
also stop saying his rhythm is 'incorrect' since there is no objectivity in that, his opinion is his hence he expressed it his map, ur opinion is urs.
There are many incorrect rhythms for any given song which are created by misinterpretations, mistakes, and ignorance.
It's not all a gray area, and a lot of small parts of this set fall into the "incorrect" side.
Please focus on the actual discussion on the map objectively, we will review the discussion soon.
cool map!
Yo natsuuuu congratulations!
I've been waiting for this map to get approved for a long time. This was my favorite pending map to play since you've submitted it, and it's actually helped me grow as a player, as it's helped me to better play streams at higher bpm and intensity.
As one of my favorite mappers, I thank you for fighting so hard to get this map where it is <3
I've been waiting for this map to get approved for a long time. This was my favorite pending map to play since you've submitted it, and it's actually helped me grow as a player, as it's helped me to better play streams at higher bpm and intensity.
As one of my favorite mappers, I thank you for fighting so hard to get this map where it is <3
Oh my gosh I don't think I've ever seen a map that had such nice and developed hitsounds omg so aesthetic. Also really fun IMO! I like being aesthetic but I dont know how to manage to make it so fun AND aesthetic at the same time TwT
But what about the title?
I know there got an album name "Groundbreaking -BOF2010 COMPILATION ALBUM-"
but from Parousia (xi's 1st album)
The title should be: Halcyon
https://diverse.direct/diverse-system/100sr-a013/
A little confused right now.
I know there got an album name "Groundbreaking -BOF2010 COMPILATION ALBUM-"
but from Parousia (xi's 1st album)
The title should be: Halcyon
https://diverse.direct/diverse-system/100sr-a013/
A little confused right now.
so Parousia came after Groundbreaking album
I think the lastest is the most correct tho
But since they have 2 conflicted song name, then just keep what you think is the best.
I think the lastest is the most correct tho
But since they have 2 conflicted song name, then just keep what you think is the best.
Topic Starter
yeah that's what we discussed there.Kuo Kyoka wrote:
so Parousia came after Groundbreaking album
I think the lastest is the most correct tho
But since they have 2 conflicted song name, then just keep what you think is the best.
I have concern on human diff, due to this rule:
And why using 1/4 slider stream here 03:12:750 (4,5) - ? yet on demigod and deity use more simple rhythm, a bit questionable to me when the easier diff use denser rhythm choice than higher diffs. The comparison,
Just my two cents when I played the diff
Slider anchors/nodes must not be used to manipulate slider speeds (whether they are normal nodes or red ones). Using extra nodes to make a slider "wiggle" is usually fine, but using so many that the slider gets scrunched up (which also makes the sliderball go crazy) or become a "hold slider" is abuse of the hitobject's intended use and is not allowed. AIMod (shortcut ctrl+shift+a) will also point out sliders that move in an "abnormal" way, so make sure to check that if you're unsure of a slider.Isn't this kind of wiggle are not allowed 02:09:295 (2) - , 03:53:524 (2) - and 04:14:257 (7) - ? Let's we compared the length of these (2) and (3) http://puu.sh/t3kml/3003703f0b.jpg literally they both use 7/4 slider but by using so many red nodes on (2) it will make its length shorter about half than it supposed to be without having slow sv manipulation on it, which I think that against the current rules above
And why using 1/4 slider stream here 03:12:750 (4,5) - ? yet on demigod and deity use more simple rhythm, a bit questionable to me when the easier diff use denser rhythm choice than higher diffs. The comparison,
Just my two cents when I played the diff
Topic Starter
Mako Sakata wrote:
I have concern on human diff, due to this rule:Slider anchors/nodes must not be used to manipulate slider speeds (whether they are normal nodes or red ones). Using extra nodes to make a slider "wiggle" is usually fine, but using so many that the slider gets scrunched up (which also makes the sliderball go crazy) or become a "hold slider" is abuse of the hitobject's intended use and is not allowed. AIMod (shortcut ctrl+shift+a) will also point out sliders that move in an "abnormal" way, so make sure to check that if you're unsure of a slider.Isn't this kind of wiggle are not allowed 02:09:295 (2) - , 03:53:524 (2) - and 04:14:257 (7) - ? Let's we compared the length of these (2) and (3) http://puu.sh/t3kml/3003703f0b.jpg literally they both use 7/4 slider but by using so many red nodes on (2) it will make its length shorter about half than it supposed to be without having slow sv manipulation on it, which I think that against the current rules above
They are allowed, since they have a clear slider patch.
And why using 1/4 slider stream here 03:12:750 (4,5) - ? yet on demigod and deity use more simple rhythm, a bit questionable to me when the easier diff use denser rhythm choice than higher diffs. The comparison,
because they are different diffs, they don't need to be consistent with each other and both rhythms are valid there tho, btw the slider is easier to play than the 3 circles
Just my two cents when I played the diff
I'm talking about manipulating slider speed without having an actual sv change because of the bunch of red nodes, not the slider's path lol
But oh well
Hope for the best~
But oh well
Hope for the best~
Topic Starter
yeah, they are fine, that rules is mostly for unreadable sliders that you can't guess the patchMako Sakata wrote:
I'm talking about manipulating slider speed without having an actual sv change because of the bunch of red nodes, not the slider's path lol
But oh well
Hope for the best~
congratulation Irvin c:
and you guys so thanks for helped me and him > <
happy new year enjoy it!
your hitsounding sucked though, it was a very large chunk of what made this map questionable
Thanks
congrats~ and happy new year >w<
Congratulations! ;3
Topic Starter
I always liked them tbh, your first approach to the map was nice, the rest was a bit not nice >:, anyways thanks for the suggestions tho!Shiirn wrote:
your hitsounding sucked though, it was a very large chunk of what made this map questionable
yeah finally! xDDDDEuny wrote:
congratulation Irvin c:
and you guys so thanks for helped me and him > <
happy new year enjoy it!
ThanksThanks wrote:
Thanks
thanks and happy new year tooNuolong wrote:
congrats~ and happy new year >w<
gracias!HappyRocket88 wrote:
Congratulations! ;3
The map is still a pile of unpolished crap. I was nice the first time because everyone has those moments where they overlook something.
The second time, with the same map, with the same BNs, just tells me you don't give a shit. And that makes me stop giving a shit how you think or feel.
The second time, with the same map, with the same BNs, just tells me you don't give a shit. And that makes me stop giving a shit how you think or feel.
It's a good map shiirn! It's not as bad as you think like, I know you have your opinions about the map, but you know what? Your opinions about the map doesn't have to be real issues, just issues to you.
Topic Starter
You are wrong the map is good LOL, u don't have idea on how much support and nice feedback I have! you don't like it that's fine lol, but isn't like I care. Yes you have your opinions about the map, but that doesn't make them correct! just move on alreadyl since almost no one agree with u here.Shiirn wrote:
The map is still a pile of unpolished crap. I was nice the first time because everyone has those moments where they overlook something.
The second time, with the same map, with the same BNs, just tells me you don't give a shit. And that makes me stop giving a shit how you think or feel.
Have you already played or even autoplayed any BMS ?
As i can see, no.
#free salt
There is nothing that justifies your 1/4 gap between sliders, with the way you use your hitsounds.
As i can see, no.
#free salt
There is nothing that justifies your 1/4 gap between sliders, with the way you use your hitsounds.
It's ranked already stop complaining lol