forum

Typical Mathematics.

posted
Total Posts
71
Topic Starter
maal
I want to start a flamewar<3

So, answer this question: I have two children. One child is a boy, born on a Tuesday. What is the probability, that I have two boys?

Yes, I want you to take this seriously.
GladiOol
25%

?
Randy96

GladiOol wrote:

25%

?
dNextGen
urrrr....

???
Topic Starter
maal
To answer with a question; Why 25%?

To answer with an answer: No.
Starrodkirby86
50%?

Since we already know what one child's gender is, we can eliminate that possibility. So the only possible outcomes for this other child's gender would be a boy or a girl, a 50/50 chance. Though...I'm assuming there aren't any other outside variables that influence this probability. @_@

There's a small feeling that I had that the day of the week might have significance, but for now, I'm just going to consider it as nothing important.

Did I fall into one of your traps? D:
Lybydose
33.333333333333333%

/topic
James2250
(I'm with kirby on this one)
Topic Starter
maal
50 % = No.
33% = Some say, most don't. Around 5% says 1/3 chance.


You have to consider the Tuesday part. I do have the most correct answer, while no answer really is right. But even the mathematics guy, that made this question, says that it's right, the result I have. Which I got from him.
dNextGen
i cant follow this thread properly

i suck at maths >.>
Randy96
0.481481481 or 13/27
Rantai
0.035714 (1/28)?

Just a guess.

Edit: simplifying
Lybydose
edit: error in programming logic, answer is 48% by simulation of ~million samples, screw probability

edit2: file is 14MB, not uploading THAT
Topic Starter
maal

Lybydose wrote:

wait, sec
lol I was about to post the explanation.
Mashley
13/27
Topic Starter
maal

Mashley wrote:

13/27
Oh you.


Explanation:

SPOILER
Here is a calculation of all outages. Notation:

d = boy, born Tuesday.
D = boy, not born Tuesday.
P = girl.

As we know, seven days of the week. All unknown distributions are assumed to be equal, and no correlations assumed.

We count the pairs of children with the oldest date first.

Dropouts in everything without restrictions: (2 (sex) * 7 (days)) ^ 2 (since the two children assumed independent) = 196th

Outcomes:

dd = a * 1 = 1
dD = 1 * 6 = 6
Dd = 6 * 1 = 6
DD = 6 * 6 = 36

dP = a * 7 = 7
Pd = 7 * 1 = 7
DP = 6 * 7 = 42
PD = 7 * 6 = 42

PP = 7 * 7 = 49

Number of outages that may occur are: dd, dD Dd dP, Pd = 1 +6 +6 +7 +7 = 27.
Number of successes is: dd, dD, Dd = 1 +6 +6 = 13th

Probability = favorable / possible = 13/27.
Randy96
You must be disappointed, no flame war loool
Topic Starter
maal

Randy96 wrote:

0.481481481
Your Knowledge fails.
Rantai
Ahh damn I had the right thinking... missed the fact that the Tuesday boy could be either and not just the first born >.<

Thanks for rekindling my love for maths.
Topic Starter
maal

Rantai wrote:

Ahh damn I had the right thinking... missed the fact that the Tuesday boy could be either and not just the first born >.<

Thanks for rekindling my love for maths.
You my man, are welcome.
Powerdrone

Emaal wrote:

Rantai wrote:

Ahh damn I had the right thinking... missed the fact that the Tuesday boy could be either and not just the first born >.<

Thanks for rekindling my love for maths.
You my man, are welcome.
Fuck. You.

Math is the worst thing I have ever done in my entire life.
Mismagius

Powerdrone wrote:

Fuck. You.

Math is the worst thing I have ever done in my entire life.
I didn't expect that from someone with a Sho avatar.
Rantai

Powerdrone wrote:

Fuck. You.

Math is the worst thing I have ever done in my entire life.
:(

I always found English to be the most painful class to sit through, especially when it wants to start talking about old literature.
Lybydose
But sho doesn't do math, he just spouts mathematical nonsense
Mismagius

Lybydose wrote:

But sho doesn't do math, he just spouts mathematical nonsense
"Do the math." - Sho Minamimoto
:o
GladiOol
I hate kids who are born on tuesdays, they only give fucking math problems.
NotShinta
No.
Arusha Shuna

GladiOol wrote:

I hate kids who are born on tuesdays, they only give fucking math problems.
:(
Shellghost

Emaal wrote:

But even the mathematics guy, that made this question, says that it's right, the result I have. Which I got from him.
Hay guise! I made a question involving math that has an undetermined number of variables, but i'm not going to collect the answers given to me by several other mathematicians whom i befriend/respect to reach an agreed answer, i'm just going to assume i'm right! xD
Shellghost
Also, you adopted the second child.
Jarby
You don't have any boys because I castrated them both before you got a chance to respond to my answer.
TKiller

strager wrote:

Let's put it this way.

I have two coins. I have flipped both.

On Tuesday, I flipped one coin (coin A). It was heads.

What is the probability the other coin (coin B) was heads? (Coin B was flipped on any unspecified day (which could be Tuesday).
TKiller
I'd kill anyone who'd answer this with 13/27
dNextGen
13/27
Lybydose

TKiller wrote:

strager wrote:

Let's put it this way.

I have two coins. I have flipped both.

On Tuesday, I flipped one coin (coin A). It was heads.

What is the probability the other coin (coin B) was heads? (Coin B was flipped on any unspecified day (which could be Tuesday).
50%, because that's a different question.
TKiller

strager wrote:

How is it different exactly?
Lybydose

TKiller wrote:

strager wrote:

How is it different exactly?
Let's assume the problem does not specify Tuesday.

There are four possible ways you could have 2 kids:

BB
GG
BG
GB

You might think "hey why does order matter?" The reason is because you have to account for the fact that there are 2 times as many BG pairs as there are BB or GG. (For reference, flip a coin twice. You have a 50% chance to get HT/TH and a 50% to get 2 of the same)

Now, the problem states that one of the kids is a boy. That eliminates GG from the 4 possibilities, leaving us with:

BB
BG
GB

In 33% of those cases, the other child is a boy, in the other 66% it's a girl. Therefore, the answer to this question (when Tuesday is removed) is 33%.

strager's question is different because he specified the first coin as heads. Had the original question specified the first child as a boy, we would only have two possibilities:

BG
BB

Leaving us with 50% of course, even with Tuesday in there.

Now, the specification of a date in the original problem (Tuesday) alters the probability because it removes more BG pairs than it does BB pairs. This is because a BB pair has two chances at hitting a Tuesday birth date, while a GB/BG pair only has one shot.
Xgor
As far I heard it's 51% that it is a boy and 49% that it's gonna be a girl so 51% would be a more correct answer.
Shinde
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic ... look_wrong

"Everything depends, he points out, on why I decided to tell you about the Tuesday-birthday-boy. If I specifically selected him because he was a boy born on Tuesday (and if I would have kept quiet had neither of my children qualified), then the 13/27 probability is correct. But if I randomly chose one of my two children to describe and then reported the child’s sex and birthday, and he just happened to be a boy born on Tuesday, then intuition prevails: The probability that the other child will be a boy will indeed be 1/2. The child’s sex and birthday are just information offered after the selection is made, which doesn’t affect the probability in the slightest."

The answer is whatever Emaal wants it to be, since the original post was very lacking, badly phrased, and provided no information on how the selection of the boy was approached. (Which makes all the difference.) I don't really feel like explaining this statement further as you can just read the above link which explains it in detail. Correct answers may include 1/3, 13/27, and 1/2.

You can't just say the correct answer is exlusively 13/27 though Emaal, because your first post doesn't permit you to. You didn't provide enough information to determine which rationale would be used to calculate the probability.

/thread

Go away.
NoHitter
/alternative question

I have an aunt who has two children. One is male. What is the chance that the other is female?
Answer
0%. My aunt has two male children.
Shellghost

NoHItter wrote:

/alternative question

I have an aunt who has two children. One is male. What is the chance that the other is female?
Answer
0%. My aunt has two male children.
I don't like this post very much.
Loginer
Ugh, here we go.

strager wrote:

How is it different exactly?
Relevance and order. Example:

Alice holds a coin in each hand. Either coin could be either golden or silver. She holds a gold coin with the heads side face-up in her left hand. What is the probability that the other hand contains a gold coin?
Here's a list of all possible combinations.

Go = Gold, heads. Gx = Gold, tails. So = Silver, heads. Sx = Silver, tails.
Go Go
Go Gx
Gx Go
Gx Gx


Go So
So Go
Go Sx
Sx Go

Gx So
So Gx
Gx Sx
Sx Gx

So So
So Sx
Sx So
Sx Sx
Since we know the left hand holds a gold coin with heads facing up, any combination that doesn't have "Go" on the left side is impossible. This gives us a probability of 1/2. Note that the way the coin is facing is considered a relevant detail in this example. Next:

Bob holds a coin in each hand. Either coin could be either golden or silver. Bob holds a gold coin with the heads side face-up in one hand. What is the probability that the other hand contains a gold coin?
And then the combinations.

Go Go
Go Gx
Gx Go
Gx Gx

Go So
So Go
Go Sx
Sx Go

Gx So
So Gx
Gx Sx
Sx Gx

So So
So Sx
Sx So
Sx Sx
Note that "Go" can be either the left or the right coin in this example; we don't know which coin is in which hand. The probability in this case would be 3/7. This example is a simplified version of the problem in the first post. Now look at this example:

Charlie holds a coin in each hand. Either coin could be either golden or silver. Bob holds a gold coin in his left hand. What is the probability that the other hand contains a gold coin? The previously mentioned coin has the heads side facing up.
And here are the combinations:

G G
G S
S G
S S
The important thing here is why the detail about the face-up side was given. In the first two examples, the coin in question was (presumably) picked out because of both its material and face-up side. In this example, it was picked out only because of its material, with its face-up side being an additional detail that won't affect probability for the next pick. As for your specific example, saying "the coin was flipped on any day" is not even a detail at all.

In short, probability is a faggot, and the puzzle is basically a more advanced version of the boy or girl paradox.
Natteke
why did I open this thread
Topic Starter
maal
What is this I have woken up to.
IppE
:words:
xsrsbsns
There's logic in OT?
Shinde
"I have two children. One is a boy, born on a Tuesday. What is the probability that I have two boys?"

The problem with 13/27 in this question is that by introducing Tuesday and an unrelated younger/older scheme, you cause probability overlap which results in the 13/27. Let me rephrase it.

"I have two children. The younger is a boy, born on a Tuesday. What is the probability that I have two boys?"

1/2

By stating the younger is a boy, this causes Tuesday to become irrelevant and eliminate the probability overlap that causes the false 13/27. You could bullcrap your way into arguing some other factor like the tallest/shortest even with this sentence and still and get a probability chart that shows 13/27. I could even make a grid with this sentence replacing youngest/oldest with shortest/tallest for the X-axis (or Y, whatever you wanted to use previously in your younger/older probability chart) and get 13/27. How does that make ANY sense? It isn't natural to introduce random factors just because you can. And it's the act of doing that that results in 13/27 anyways.

The fault in 13/27 explanations lie in the fact that the grid location where the Tuesdays intersect should be considered independent of each other, and are not in such examples.

The question wording just makes you analyze the wrong things. I revoke my earlier statement, 13/27 is false no matter how you look at it. (As is 1/3, but I never thought it was 1/3 with the original post's wording.)

I hope that suffices because I'm sleepy and don't feel like getting into more detail, or thinking.
Shellghost
I thought it was quite clear the mention of Tuesday was irrelevant since the start of this thread.
Loginer
You know what, fuck it. I'm not having another one of these endless arguments.

[quote="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_or_Girl_paradox":e7e14]The paradox has frequently stimulated a great deal of controversy. Many people, including professors of mathematics, argued strongly for both sides with a great deal of confidence, sometimes showing disdain for those who took the opposing view.Both sides are right in their own way, end of story.
Shellghost
"Mr. Smith has two children. At least one of them is a boy. What is the probability that both children are boys?"

How did he initially get 1/3 with this? It's already clearly stated that one child is a boy. The answer depends entirely on the sex of the second child.

[quote="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_or_Girl_paradox#Second_question":a1de2]A big misconception in this problem is that the outcomes of BG and GB are counted as two separate outcomes, when in reality, they are only one.The question only asks the number of boys. It doesn't ask about the birth order.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply