Nice song!
-------------------------------
00:12:382 (3,4) - It would be quite confusing because the spacing of 1/4 here is similar to 00:10:617 (6,1) - ,which is literally 1/2. I'd strongly recommend making the spacing less jumpy with the 1/4. Same for 00:21:205 (2,3) - It could be easily regarded as 1/2 since it's quite similar to the spacing between 00:15:911 (1,2) - . Same for 00:23:558 (2,3) - 00:32:382 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 00:46:499 (1,2,3) - 01:03:558 (2,3,4) -
There are many more spaced 1/4 notes, I guess they should ALL be fixed. Otherwise you could increase all your 1.00x 1/2 spacings.
00:20:029 (7,8) - The jump here is too large, actually the music here hardly supports an extremely large jump. Same for 00:37:970 (2,3) - 00:28:264 (2,3) - 00:37:970 (2,3) - 00:42:676 (2,3) - (At least Reduce them to less than 2.00x)
00:43:852 (5) - Dont think it's a nice choice to place a strong beat on a slider-end. You should make it clickable. Also the jump is too large 00:43:852 (5,1) - .
00:46:205 (6,1) - Should be a jump here
01:05:029 (6,1) - Though a jump fits with the music there, it's just too large. Reduce it to 2.00x
01:07:676 (1,2,3,4) - Not recommend such pattern for the inconsistency in spacing between each two of these 4 notes would confuses the player a lot.
01:17:088 (1,2,3,4) - Do you make patterns like this. AR is quite low, it's hard to read them properly.
01:22:970 (5,6) - Should be in lower spacing to keep consistency with 01:21:793 (1,2) -
01:28:117 (7) - Remove, such overmap could not be tolerated.
01:30:911 (7,1) - Why not jump here?
01:32:970 (6,2) - Do not hide a note under a slider.
01:37:676 (6,1) - Make the spacing a little larger.
02:03:852 (7,1) - You need a jump here.
02:10:911 (6,1) - Reduce to 2.3x or so
02:17:970 (5,1) - Use larger spacing to prevent it being read as 1/4.
02:20:617 (1,2,3,4) - That's why I strongly recommend lower the spacings of 1/4. 02:20:617 (1,2) - is 1/4 and 02:21:205 (3,4) - is 1/2 yet they are almost identical in spacing.
02:26:793 (5,1) - Why not a jump here?
03:02:676 (8,9,1,2,3,4) - It's really awful to have this pattern. It's pretty hard to read with such a low AR. Do not use anti-jumps right after a stream.
03:24:440 (2,3) - Too close.
03:26:499 (1,2) - The spacing is really like your 1/2 rhythms. Same for 03:54:735 (1,2,3) -
03:36:499 (2,3,4) - Jump should be between 2 and 3 for the high-pitch vocal instead of 3 to 4.
04:07:381 (2,3,4,6) - The overlap here doesnt make much sense. Don't do that.
04:20:029 (3,1) - Why not make a jump here?
04:29:146 (6,7) - Too close. It feels quite weird since 04:28:264 (2,3,4) - here you use large spacings.
04:37:088 (1,2) - Make them further from each other. It looks exactly the same as 04:38:264 (4,5) - , which is a 1/4.
04:43:264 (5,1) - Make the spacing further.
-----------------------------------------
Call me back if you fix the spacing issues!
-------------------------------
00:12:382 (3,4) - It would be quite confusing because the spacing of 1/4 here is similar to 00:10:617 (6,1) - ,which is literally 1/2. I'd strongly recommend making the spacing less jumpy with the 1/4. Same for 00:21:205 (2,3) - It could be easily regarded as 1/2 since it's quite similar to the spacing between 00:15:911 (1,2) - . Same for 00:23:558 (2,3) - 00:32:382 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 00:46:499 (1,2,3) - 01:03:558 (2,3,4) -
There are many more spaced 1/4 notes, I guess they should ALL be fixed. Otherwise you could increase all your 1.00x 1/2 spacings.
00:20:029 (7,8) - The jump here is too large, actually the music here hardly supports an extremely large jump. Same for 00:37:970 (2,3) - 00:28:264 (2,3) - 00:37:970 (2,3) - 00:42:676 (2,3) - (At least Reduce them to less than 2.00x)
00:43:852 (5) - Dont think it's a nice choice to place a strong beat on a slider-end. You should make it clickable. Also the jump is too large 00:43:852 (5,1) - .
00:46:205 (6,1) - Should be a jump here
01:05:029 (6,1) - Though a jump fits with the music there, it's just too large. Reduce it to 2.00x
01:07:676 (1,2,3,4) - Not recommend such pattern for the inconsistency in spacing between each two of these 4 notes would confuses the player a lot.
01:17:088 (1,2,3,4) - Do you make patterns like this. AR is quite low, it's hard to read them properly.
01:22:970 (5,6) - Should be in lower spacing to keep consistency with 01:21:793 (1,2) -
01:28:117 (7) - Remove, such overmap could not be tolerated.
01:30:911 (7,1) - Why not jump here?
01:32:970 (6,2) - Do not hide a note under a slider.
01:37:676 (6,1) - Make the spacing a little larger.
02:03:852 (7,1) - You need a jump here.
02:10:911 (6,1) - Reduce to 2.3x or so
02:17:970 (5,1) - Use larger spacing to prevent it being read as 1/4.
02:20:617 (1,2,3,4) - That's why I strongly recommend lower the spacings of 1/4. 02:20:617 (1,2) - is 1/4 and 02:21:205 (3,4) - is 1/2 yet they are almost identical in spacing.
02:26:793 (5,1) - Why not a jump here?
03:02:676 (8,9,1,2,3,4) - It's really awful to have this pattern. It's pretty hard to read with such a low AR. Do not use anti-jumps right after a stream.
03:24:440 (2,3) - Too close.
03:26:499 (1,2) - The spacing is really like your 1/2 rhythms. Same for 03:54:735 (1,2,3) -
03:36:499 (2,3,4) - Jump should be between 2 and 3 for the high-pitch vocal instead of 3 to 4.
04:07:381 (2,3,4,6) - The overlap here doesnt make much sense. Don't do that.
04:20:029 (3,1) - Why not make a jump here?
04:29:146 (6,7) - Too close. It feels quite weird since 04:28:264 (2,3,4) - here you use large spacings.
04:37:088 (1,2) - Make them further from each other. It looks exactly the same as 04:38:264 (4,5) - , which is a 1/4.
04:43:264 (5,1) - Make the spacing further.
-----------------------------------------
Call me back if you fix the spacing issues!