This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on mercredi 19 octobre 2016 at 16:36:32

Artist: Gareth Coker
Title: Light of Nibel (feat. Aeralie Brighton)
Source: Ori and the Blind Forest
BPM: 80
Filesize: 7286kb
Play Time: 04:14
Difficulties Available:

1. Easy (1,44 stars, 208 notes)
2. Hard (3,29 stars, 420 notes)
3. Normal (1,78 stars, 261 notes)
4. Radiance (3,92 stars, 524 notes)

Download: Gareth Coker - Light of Nibel (feat. Aeralie Brighton)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
#15

We need more Ori

Nice map, nice background, nice song, nice storyboard, what else? o/

Ekoro wrote:

Nice map, nice background, nice song, nice storyboard, what else? o/

Thx dude ♥

I love the map

Anorth wrote:

I love the map

I love all. :3

Can i help by giving something shiny to you Nozhocchi~ ?

wuzzat wrote:

Can i help by giving something shiny to you Nozhocchi~ ?

You can mod it now XD

Map is ready to be modded !!!

• cc
  
  
  [Normal]

1. 00:29:255 (6) - le son mappé ne mérite d'avoir un objet cliquable, il n'est pas assez puissant puis c'est bizarre car juste avant avant 00:27:755 (5) - la fin du slider est mappé sur un son bien plus fort
2. 00:48:005 (1) - fais le finir sur le tick rouge précédant pour mieu fit la musique
3. 00:57:755 (2,3,4) - ces slider ne fit très mal avec la musique, essaie ça http://puu.sh/qTL4q.jpg , ça sonne mieu.
4. 01:52:505 (3,1) - cet overlap rend bien dans l'éditeur, mais en jeu je le trouve boff
5. 01:54:005 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - tu pourrais faire une meilleure symétrie ici. c'est plus joli si 01:58:130 (2,3) - est symétrique avec 01:54:005 (1,2) - par rapport a l'axe
6. verticale. Actuellement c'est un peu bizarre car 01:57:005 (1,3) - la tu as presque un overlap alors qu'ici 01:54:005 (1,3) - pas du tout
7. 02:42:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - pas hyper cool à jouer imo, tu devrais essayer de placer ce rythme de temps en temps
8. 03:27:005 (1) - ce slider me parait un peu trop phallique
   
   [Hard]
   
9. 00:23:630 (4) - j'ai l'impression que ce cercle est overmapped
10. 01:39:380 (2,4) - pas très joli cet overlap
11. 01:55:880 (2,4) - pareil ici
12. 02:04:880 (2,3) - le 2 est mal stack
13. 02:36:005 (1) - stack ce cercle sur le début ce ce slider 02:31:505 (3) - pour être dans la continuité de ton pattern, oublie pas de fixe le spacing si tu le fais kek
14. 03:27:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - peut être un peu trop de cercle ici xd
    
    [Insane]
    
15. 03:27:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - l'idée de réduire le spacing est bonne (tu pourrais le faire dans hard aussi btw) mais les premiers cercles trop espacés alors que la musique est toute douce.
16. 03:47:117 (2) - c'est un peu moche ça http://puu.sh/qTR7H.jpg imo retravaille un peu ce slider

:v

ty for modding

[normal]
01:17:630 (3) - being picky cause the map seems so nice but what about removing that red dot here or adding on (2) to seem more visually equilibrated
01:23:630 (3,1) - you should consider removing the stack here as there is a strong sound and you didnt stacked 1/1's, so that can seem a bit hard for beginners
03:00:005 (1,2) - flow would be smoother here if you put (2) somewhere in front of (1) like that http://puu.sh/qU8bq/2d6d48febd.jpg also it would be more consistent with your overall flow zzz
03:24:005 (1,2,3) - this is kinda bad tbh I would try to stack (3) with (2) so the flow would be more friendly, like that http://puu.sh/qU8q5/db12e0161d.jpg
03:36:732 (1,1) - would add nc on both so it can be consistent with your other ncs for readability

lovely ?

[hard]
00:51:755 (3,4) - i'd say that having to wait like that to click on (4) seems a bit boring and uncorfotable, also for consistency, it would be better if you just separate (4) more.
01:09:755 (3) - remove the nc here would be great to consistency!
01:53:255 (3) - add jump here aswell you did here 01:50:255 (3).

pretty well made ;3

[nozhomi's pro hardest diff cs 5 desu]
00:21:755 (2,3,4) - the triples already gives a emphasy to the beat, I guess you could put a normal distance on those and just make a jump on (5).
03:33:005 (1) - the patterning starts to gets boring here , some sliders to make the slower beats feel nicer would be great instead of just clicking on 1/2's.

my skills get even worse in insanes, but this map is pretty well made already so I had to be picky sometimes

good luckie!

Ovoui wrote:

• cc
  
  
  [Normal]

1. 00:29:255 (6) - le son mappé ne mérite d'avoir un objet cliquable, il n'est pas assez puissant puis c'est bizarre car juste avant avant 00:27:755 (5) - la fin du slider est mappé sur un son bien plus fort Il l'est bien assez, et fait transition entre les autres objects.
2. 00:48:005 (1) - fais le finir sur le tick rouge précédant pour mieu fit la musique - Ca colle mieux au long son sur le début de cette section.
3. 00:57:755 (2,3,4) - ces slider ne fit très mal avec la musique, essaie ça http://puu.sh/qTL4q.jpg , ça sonne mieu. - J'ai fix à ma façon.
4. 01:52:505 (3,1) - cet overlap rend bien dans l'éditeur, mais en jeu je le trouve boff - il est très bien
5. 01:54:005 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - tu pourrais faire une meilleure symétrie ici. c'est plus joli si 01:58:130 (2,3) - est symétrique avec 01:54:005 (1,2) - par rapport a l'axe verticale. Actuellement c'est un peu bizarre car 01:57:005 (1,3) - la tu as presque un overlap alors qu'ici 01:54:005 (1,3) - pas du tout - Fix
6. 02:42:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - pas hyper cool à jouer imo, tu devrais essayer de placer ce rythme de temps en temps - pas compris.
7. 03:27:005 (1) - ce slider me parait un peu trop phallique - c'est ton cerveau qui est phallique.
   
   [Hard]
   
8. 00:23:630 (4) - j'ai l'impression que ce cercle est overmapped - dommage essaye encore.
9. 01:39:380 (2,4) - pas très joli cet overlap - Fix
10. 01:55:880 (2,4) - pareil ici - Celui là est ok tout simplement parce que il fini entre les 2 autres éléments.
11. 02:04:880 (2,3) - le 2 est mal stack - les 2 solutions étaient cool enfin bon why not.
12. 02:36:005 (1) - stack ce cercle sur le début ce ce slider 02:31:505 (3) - pour être dans la continuité de ton pattern, oublie pas de fixe le spacing si tu le fais kek - Oui
13. 03:27:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - peut être un peu trop de cercle ici xd - Non.
    
    [Insane]
    
14. 03:27:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - l'idée de réduire le spacing est bonne (tu pourrais le faire dans hard aussi btw) mais les premiers cercles trop espacés alors que la musique est toute douce. - Non parce que justement cette partie gagne un peu en intensité par rapport au moment ou elle commence, donc ça colle bien.
15. 03:47:117 (2) - c'est un peu moche ça http://puu.sh/qTR7H.jpg imo retravaille un peu ce slider - Oui blablabla.

:v

MkGuh wrote:

ty for modding

[normal]
01:17:630 (3) - being picky cause the map seems so nice but what about removing that red dot here or adding on (2) to seem more visually equilibrated - Fix
01:23:630 (3,1) - you should consider removing the stack here as there is a strong sound and you didnt stacked 1/1's, so that can seem a bit hard for beginners- Fix
03:00:005 (1,2) - flow would be smoother here if you put (2) somewhere in front of (1) like that http://puu.sh/qU8bq/2d6d48febd.jpg also it would be more consistent with your overall flow zzz - It's fine, flow is good and I like this pattern ^^
03:24:005 (1,2,3) - this is kinda bad tbh I would try to stack (3) with (2) so the flow would be more friendly, like that http://puu.sh/qU8q5/db12e0161d.jpg - This triangle is flow friendly tbh, also I don't want to rekt rest of this pattern just to stack it.
03:36:732 (1,1) - would add nc on both so it can be consistent with your other ncs for readability - Fix

lovely ?

[hard]
00:51:755 (3,4) - i'd say that having to wait like that to click on (4) seems a bit boring and uncorfotable, also for consistency, it would be better if you just separate (4) more. - More spacing between them.
01:09:755 (3) - remove the nc here would be great to consistency! - Fix
01:53:255 (3) - add jump here aswell you did here 01:50:255 (3). - Fix

pretty well made ;3

[nozhomi's pro hardest diff cs 5 desu]
00:21:755 (2,3,4) - the triples already gives a emphasy to the beat, I guess you could put a normal distance on those and just make a jump on (5). - Fix
03:33:005 (1) - the patterning starts to gets boring here , some sliders to make the slower beats feel nicer would be great instead of just clicking on 1/2's. - Ok ;w; I'm sad now.

my skills get even worse in insanes, but this map is pretty well made already so I had to be picky sometimes

good luckie!

Thx both~

Sorry if my mod is bad (no modding experience), I like the song and wanted to give it a shot x)
The mapset is already really good though with nice flow and shapes.


[Normal]
02:42:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2) & 03:12:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Boring pattern, mixing sliders & circles is more interesting

[Hard]
00:53:630 (7,8) & 01:05:630 (7,8) - Flow feels better with spacing between them, because of the triples after them.
03:27:005 - Is a little boring, maybe add some sliders

[Radiance]
00:25:505 (4) - In my opinion, it would feel smoother if the end of the slider would make a curve to the right.
01:12:567 (3) & 01:14:067 (3) & 01:18:942 & 01:20:442 - The pause after them feels weird, I'd also make those two sliders go back to fill the void.
01:17:442 - Same as above, if you move 01:17:630 (4,5) to this timepoint, it feels and sounds better.

Right
Check! - Means it's been checked and nothing wrong has been found
Please ignore my note/slider placement on the timeline, i do that to show make my point more clearer
Sent by Asserin

[General]

1. Fix widescreen support in Hard

[Timing]

1. one thing i would change is 03:45:856 - this to 76bpm since that fits better with the slider and musicly

[Hitsounds]

1. Check!

[Normal]

1. 00:09:005 (3) - with this slider you break the consistency of copy pasted sliders, you do this slider a straight one like the previous one since they kinda don't change in intensity what so ever and it will aesthetically look better
2. 00:16:130 - you miss this sound that you placed a note at here 00:14:630 (3) - , why is this, same sound and i would actually say that the one you left out is stronger than the one you placed a note at. I do understand you are trying to make this a easy piece, sure but like sounds so similar to each other just make me fail to realise why they are missed out (I also checked this and adding a circle here doesn't add any *'s what so ever so you could consider this)
3. 00:20:630 - ^
4. 00:31:505 (3) - you use a sharp slider here for the second part of the given of sounds that's pretty cool adds some variety, but why didn't you do it here in that case 00:25:505 (3) -
5. 00:46:505 (6,1) - DS, kinda feels weird being smaller since the section is kinda building up here
6. 00:56:442 (5,1) - pixel blanket fix if you want
7. 01:15:567 (2,1) - could fix this blanket, again it's sort of a small change
8. 01:50:255 (4,1) - blanket needs fixed, and i don't know if I'm wrong about this but i read something about not recommending such overlaps in easier diffs since that might confuse players a little. Correct me if I'm wrong please
9. 01:54:005 (1,3) - blanketing this slider-end woudn't be a bad idea tbh, always something little but small things matter a lot imo
10. 01:57:005 (1,3) - ^
11. 02:06:005 (1,3) - could blanket this
12. 02:42:755 (2) - you could place this somewhere else in the open space to get rid of that somewhat awkward overlap imo with 02:41:255 (5) -
13. 02:49:505 (3,4) - this woudn't be a bad idea
14. 03:36:732 (1) - is this NC necessary?
15. 03:39:782 (3) - pretty long slider so why not NC, you done it here 03:47:117 (1) -
16. 03:45:856 (1) - please remove
17. 03:52:667 (1) - ^
18. 03:52:667 (1,1) - remove these NC's, i don't understand this maybe it's just me but such small bpm changes don't deserve NC's
19. 04:00:308 (1,1) - like this is understandable

[Hard]

1. 00:29:255 (4) - you could slightly move this up so that there nothinglike this
2. 00:53:630 (7,8,1,2,3) - imo this is wayy too confusing for newer players, you could change these 00:53:630 (7,8) - into a 1/4 reverse slider, since the stacks look too similar and that might put them of as being normal 1/2 clicks
3. 00:57:005 (1) - you could make this straight rather than curvy so that it's parallel with 00:57:755 (3) - , aesthetics ftw
4. 01:05:630 (7,8) - again what said ^
5. 01:42:380 (4) - you could the control point a little down so that it is perfectly parallel with 01:42:755 (5) - . I moved this note just in the y-axis and this is your current state, and this is it moved a little down
6. 01:45:005 (1) - this slider end doesn't perfectly overlap 01:43:880 (2) - this slider end, it's like somewhat off
7. 01:52:317 (4,1) - you could blanket this :^)
8. 02:21:380 - what's the point of the break extention?
9. 02:40:505 (3,4) - hey fix blanket :^)
10. again some notes are really weird in terms of applying NC's

[Radiance]

1. 00:59:630 (7,8,9) - you emphasize these sounds with 1/2 here 01:05:630 (10,11) - , so why do differently? you also 00:53:630 (8,9) - here done it with a jump, although this is some sort of pattern :3
2. 02:21:005 - your break extention vary so much across all the diffs xd, try to make them the same since it is the same break lul, or delete the extentions all together since in such small sounds they are barelly noticable
3. Nc's etc, and this diff has the nicest sliders :^)

[Final Words]
Ori and the Blind Forest best game i ever played by far, such a good story ooooo
Anyways, this looks solid af! Osu! needs more Ori, since osu! is blind lel
Good Luck!!!

hello. OMG ORI <3

Normal
diff looks perfectly, but i thing 01:35:630 (4) - this circle isn't need here, because this tick haven't really strong sound. I think will be good if you extend this slider 01:34:505 (3) -
for example ^ 01:47:255 (4,5) - here, you have same moment, but this moment have additional sounds for support circles
02:12:005 (1) - restack this
03:47:117 (1) - fix curve a bit https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6013697
hard
00:27:005 (1) - looks a bit wierd, imho xd
01:36:755 (3) - can you make this slideend a bit better?
03:12:380 (2,3,4) - this part sound not really good, maybe this rhythm?
radiance
perfect, i can't found something wrond, sry
but 03:56:196 (1) - this slider looks better if have symmerical end https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6013768

its very cool, sry for my little mod, i can't modding perfect maps.
good luck, i like it :3

Zazama wrote:

Sorry if my mod is bad (no modding experience), I like the song and wanted to give it a shot x)
The mapset is already really good though with nice flow and shapes.


[Normal]
02:42:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2) & 03:12:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Boring pattern, mixing sliders & circles is more interesting - Sorry I like them and don't want to change, these sounds are too important and want to use circles for them.

[Hard]
00:53:630 (7,8) & 01:05:630 (7,8) - Flow feels better with spacing between them, because of the triples after them. - Spaced them a little.
03:27:005 - Is a little boring, maybe add some sliders - Same as Normal

[Radiance]
00:25:505 (4) - In my opinion, it would feel smoother if the end of the slider would make a curve to the right. - It's fine with a straight one.
01:12:567 (3) & 01:14:067 (3) & 01:18:942 & 01:20:442 - The pause after them feels weird, I'd also make those two sliders go back to fill the void. - The break is used as emphasis to the song, and work well with drums.
01:17:442 - Same as above, if you move 01:17:630 (4,5) to this timepoint, it feels and sounds better. - Would miss drums and that's not what I want.

C00L wrote:

Right
Check! - Means it's been checked and nothing wrong has been found
Please ignore my note/slider placement on the timeline, i do that to show make my point more clearer
Sent by Asserin - Blame Asserin

[General]

1. Fix widescreen support in Hard - Woops

[Timing]

1. one thing i would change is 03:45:856 - this to 76bpm since that fits better with the slider and musicly - Lol I prefer 74 XD

[Hitsounds]

1. Check!

[Normal]

1. 00:09:005 (3) - with this slider you break the consistency of copy pasted sliders, you do this slider a straight one like the previous one since they kinda don't change in intensity what so ever and it will aesthetically look better - Why I should keep copy pasted sliders ? I wanted to do them different after 2 first one.
2. 00:16:130 - you miss this sound that you placed a note at here 00:14:630 (3) - , why is this, same sound and i would actually say that the one you left out is stronger than the one you placed a note at. I do understand you are trying to make this a easy piece, sure but like sounds so similar to each other just make me fail to realise why they are missed out (I also checked this and adding a circle here doesn't add any *'s what so ever so you could consider this) - It's consistent with 00:13:130 - .
3. 00:20:630 - ^
4. 00:31:505 (3) - you use a sharp slider here for the second part of the given of sounds that's pretty cool adds some variety, but why didn't you do it here in that case 00:25:505 (3) - - Because I don't want to do both alike ?
5. 00:46:505 (6,1) - DS, kinda feels weird being smaller since the section is kinda building up here - It's smaller just because of change of BPM.
6. 00:56:442 (5,1) - pixel blanket fix if you want - Fix
7. 01:15:567 (2,1) - could fix this blanket, again it's sort of a small change - Fix
8. 01:50:255 (4,1) - blanket needs fixed, and i don't know if I'm wrong about this but i read something about not recommending such overlaps in easier diffs since that might confuse players a little. Correct me if I'm wrong please - Fix
9. 01:54:005 (1,3) - blanketing this slider-end woudn't be a bad idea tbh, always something little but small things matter a lot imo - Fix
10. 01:57:005 (1,3) - ^ - Fix
11. 02:06:005 (1,3) - could blanket this - Fix
12. 02:42:755 (2) - you could place this somewhere else in the open space to get rid of that somewhat awkward overlap imo with 02:41:255 (5) - 6 There is no overlap sorry.
13. 02:49:505 (3,4) - this woudn't be a bad idea - No one will see that.
14. 03:36:732 (1) - is this NC necessary? - Fix
15. 03:39:782 (3) - pretty long slider so why not NC, you done it here 03:47:117 (1) - - Fix
16. 03:45:856 (1) - please remove - Fix
17. 03:52:667 (1) - ^ - Fix
18. 03:52:667 (1,1) - remove these NC's, i don't understand this maybe it's just me but such small bpm changes don't deserve NC's - Fix
19. 04:00:308 (1,1) - like this is understandable

[Hard]

1. 00:29:255 (4) - you could slightly move this up so that there nothinglike this - There is no problem.
2. 00:53:630 (7,8,1,2,3) - imo this is wayy too confusing for newer players, you could change these 00:53:630 (7,8) - into a 1/4 reverse slider, since the stacks look too similar and that might put them of as being normal 1/2 clicks - From previous mod, I put a 0.16x spacing to make difference between them.
3. 00:57:005 (1) - you could make this straight rather than curvy so that it's parallel with 00:57:755 (3) - , aesthetics ftw - That's my version of aesthetic.
4. 01:05:630 (7,8) - again what said ^ - :3
5. 01:42:380 (4) - you could the control point a little down so that it is perfectly parallel with 01:42:755 (5) - . I moved this note just in the y-axis and this is your current state, and this is it moved a little down - Fix
6. 01:45:005 (1) - this slider end doesn't perfectly overlap 01:43:880 (2) - this slider end, it's like somewhat off - Fix
7. 01:52:317 (4,1) - you could blanket this :^) - Fix
8. 02:21:380 - what's the point of the break extention? - To trigger you~
9. 02:40:505 (3,4) - hey fix blanket :^) - Fix
10. again some notes are really weird in terms of applying NC's - Fix

[Radiance]

1. 00:59:630 (7,8,9) - you emphasize these sounds with 1/2 here 01:05:630 (10,11) - , so why do differently? you also 00:53:630 (8,9) - here done it with a jump, although this is some sort of pattern :3 - Because on the other one, there is drum sounds.
2. 02:21:005 - your break extention vary so much across all the diffs xd, try to make them the same since it is the same break lul, or delete the extentions all together since in such small sounds they are barelly noticable - Fix
3. Nc's etc, and this diff has the nicest sliders :^) - Fix

[Final Words]
Ori and the Blind Forest best game i ever played by far, such a good story ooooo
Anyways, this looks solid af! Osu! needs more Ori, since osu! is blind lel
Good Luck!!!

Reya wrote:

hello. OMG ORI <3

Normal
diff looks perfectly, but i thing 01:35:630 (4) - this circle isn't need here, because this tick haven't really strong sound. I think will be good if you extend this slider 01:34:505 (3) - - Fix
for example ^ 01:47:255 (4,5) - here, you have same moment, but this moment have additional sounds for support circles
02:12:005 (1) - restack this - Fix
03:47:117 (1) - fix curve a bit https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6013697 - Fix
hard
00:27:005 (1) - looks a bit wierd, imho xd - It's not.
01:36:755 (3) - can you make this slideend a bit better? - I did it on purpose.
03:12:380 (2,3,4) - this part sound not really good, maybe this rhythm? - Fix
radiance
perfect, i can't found something wrond, sry
but 03:56:196 (1) - this slider looks better if have symmerical end https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6013768 - Fix

its very cool, sry for my little mod, i can't modding perfect maps.
good luck, i like it :3

Thx all of you~

slt connar

radiance
i'm a bit disapointed that u use 1,50ds everywhere in a inconsistent way like that in this kind of map that needs piano intensity, and the fact is this is your last diff, so the harder, i think this is really frustrating and lame for the player to play a DS hard / light insane as a last diff, like U can use DS but, some of the piano notes can have more spacing, that's what I wanna point out with you.. But if you disagree it's okay, but I don't understand this way of mapping.

- 00:13:505 (5) - u don't wanna put more spacing here to emphasis this last downbeat ? it will fuck up your star patern but, w/e
- 00:17:630 (5) - listen ton the piano volume, this needs more spacing then 00:17:255 (4) - tbh, and 00:18:005 (1) - this more!!
- 00:20:255 (3) - do smth lilke this to give more intensity to the piano volume, pls i'm tired to say that.
- 00:24:005 (1) - new downbeat space it more!
- 00:34:505 (2) - really sad here that I can't clic the piano sound on the slider end :<
- 00:37:130 (3) - make smth like this better structure and also the spacing will be equal.
- 00:41:255 (5,6) - pls emphasis thanks
- 00:42:005 (1) - do I even need to tell you what to do here ?
- 01:23:630 (5,6) - nice stack 11/10
- 01:32:255 (3) - Like you can't use ds all the time, and suddently do this that has less emphasis then the others I pointed out, rip consistency.
- 01:46:880 (2,3) - & 01:48:380 (5,6) - are same rythmn but different spacing ? so confusing.
- 02:51:005 (1) - after this you can really reduce the ds too 1.30 or 1.20 like u can't keep same DS as a high section in your map, it's nonsense xD

Really nice song and map is pretty cool aswell, but I'm really disapointed about the spacing here.. But who care i'm not a BN so i'm sure u can find BN who agree with DS like that xD

GL~

Sotarks wrote:

slt connar - Bad behavior reported!

radiance
i'm a bit disapointed that u use 1,50ds everywhere in a inconsistent way like that in this kind of map that needs piano intensity, and the fact is this is your last diff, so the harder, i think this is really frustrating and lame for the player to play a DS hard / light insane as a last diff, like U can use DS but, some of the piano notes can have more spacing, that's what I wanna point out with you.. But if you disagree it's okay, but I don't understand this way of mapping.

- 00:13:505 (5) - u don't wanna put more spacing here to emphasis this last downbeat ? it will fuck up your star patern but, w/e - Want to keep pattern, also why I keep ds constant here is simply because this part is calm so spacing too~
- 00:17:630 (5) - listen ton the piano volume, this needs more spacing then 00:17:255 (4) - tbh, and 00:18:005 (1) - this more!! - Up a little
- 00:20:255 (3) - do smth lilke this to give more intensity to the piano volume, pls i'm tired to say that. - Same
- 00:24:005 (1) - new downbeat space it more! - I keep symmetry.
- 00:34:505 (2) - really sad here that I can't clic the piano sound on the slider end :< - I agree.
- 00:37:130 (3) - make smth like this better structure and also the spacing will be equal. - Wat pas compris là.
- 00:41:255 (5,6) - pls emphasis thanks - Fix
- 00:42:005 (1) - do I even need to tell you what to do here ? - Pwet~
- 01:23:630 (5,6) - nice stack 11/10 - Nice oubli de l'empilage des notes 11/10.
- 01:32:255 (3) - Like you can't use ds all the time, and suddently do this that has less emphasis then the others I pointed out, rip consistency. - I'm consistent with stuff like 01:34:880 (2,3) - / 01:39:380 (2,3) - / etc...it works.
- 01:46:880 (2,3) - & 01:48:380 (5,6) - are same rythmn but different spacing ? so confusing. - The second one have a little stream before, that's why I prefer keep standard DS here.
- 02:51:005 (1) - after this you can really reduce the ds too 1.30 or 1.20 like u can't keep same DS as a high section in your map, it's nonsense xD - Even if the section is calm, it goes stronger until 03:27:005 - so it makes sense.

Really nice song and map is pretty cool aswell, but I'm really disapointed about the spacing here.. But who care i'm not a BN so i'm sure u can find BN who agree with DS like that xD - zzz

GL~

Pwet~ :3

placeholder with indonesian mod soon

hello, came from your request

General :
- modding assistant says that your timing isnt consistent Q_Q
- 00:00:005 - i think i cant hear your finish hitsound here. try do something to increase it file volume?
- soft-hitclap2 is less than 100ms. extend it
- also your soft-hitfinish seems like having delay more than 5ms. try to cut the delay?
- not unrankable but you can try fix the unsnapped preview point

Normal :
- 00:00:005 - remove greenline
- 00:08:255 (2) - i think better to remove this for consistency, i cant hear music that following from this circle too
- 00:24:005 - 01:00:005 - 01:12:005 - 01:30:005 - 01:54:005 - i think soft default finish works better here
- 00:27:005 - until 00:45:005 - whistle for each stanza for emphasis the piano?
- 00:27:755 (5) - whistle for all for piano? just like you did for 00:24:005 (1,2,3) -
- 01:07:880 (1) - remove nc for consistency
- 01:24:567 (2) - nice spacing? XD
- 01:33:005 (1,3) - i would say to try avoid the overlap 01:36:005 (1) - also inconsistency spacing 1,33x here
- 02:03:005 (1,3) - try another pattern? i think the tail of 1 is covering a bit to (3)'s tail which a bit hard to read the (3)'s way for newbie
- 02:18:005 (1) - somehow even the bpm is changed but looks like a jump desho? i think 204,112 is better for looking the spacing from design
- 03:21:005 (5) - maybe nc here? for avoid long combo like you did for 03:12:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
- 03:43:851 (1) - 1,31x spacing here? maybe fix it?
hitsound stuff related to all diffs

Hard :
- 00:33:005 (5) - nc for consistency
- 00:45:005 (5) - ^
- 00:48:005 (1,2,3) - not neat design qwq. try 00:48:005 (1) - 460,232 to make the spacing from design look more consistent
- 00:53:630 (7,8) - somehow anti spacing + triplet would make confuse for some players
- 01:00:005 - gg copy pastaa after that so 01:05:630 (7,8) - same with previous xd
- 01:54:005 (1,2) - i think 1/4 of them are overmapped. hard to hear to sound. especially you know my headset is ded
- 01:57:380 (2) - and others, ^
- 00:48:005 - until before kiai, im starting to think if you better nc every stanza here lol (same for insane too)
- 02:15:380 (2) - 1,32x spacing
- 02:17:817 - possible to make triplet :C
- 02:56:630 (3,1) - nice blanket, i gonna cry

Insane :
- err imo AR 8,5 is better here. AR 9 is too fast qwq, if you keep want AR 9 then AR 7,5 for Hard
- 00:59:911 - imo this should not be skipped. it has same sound with 00:59:630 (7,8,9) -
- 01:09:755 (1,3) - swap nc for consistency? :C
- no problem imo

call me back if you want

Xinely wrote:

placeholder with indonesian mod soon

hello, came from your request

General :
- modding assistant says that your timing isnt consistent Q_Q - Fixed
- 00:00:005 - i think i cant hear your finish hitsound here. try do something to increase it file volume? - Just increased volume here, since you said only for this place.
- soft-hitclap2 is less than 100ms. extend it- Fixed
- also your soft-hitfinish seems like having delay more than 5ms. try to cut the delay? - It doesn't https://puu.sh/reJcN/1da2bfaf15.png
- not unrankable but you can try fix the unsnapped preview point- Fixed

Normal :
- 00:00:005 - remove greenline - Fixed
- 00:08:255 (2) - i think better to remove this for consistency, i cant hear music that following from this circle too - There is a slightly piano note here and I prefer not to miss it, since it make great the transition on this part before the melody change.
- 00:24:005 - 01:00:005 - 01:12:005 - 01:30:005 - 01:54:005 - i think soft default finish works better here - Yes for 1st one, no for the other, I prefer keep the bass drum to fit the more intense part of the song.
- 00:27:005 - until 00:45:005 - whistle for each stanza for emphasis the piano? - It's almost the case without on the "boom" but would sounds not right imo, so I prefer keep it like this.
- 00:27:755 (5) - whistle for all for piano? just like you did for 00:24:005 (1,2,3) - - But they are whistled...
- 01:07:880 (1) - remove nc for consistency - Fixed
- 01:24:567 (2) - nice spacing? XD - Fixed
- 01:33:005 (1,3) - i would say to try avoid the overlap 01:36:005 (1) - also inconsistency spacing 1,33x here - Fixed
- 02:03:005 (1,3) - try another pattern? i think the tail of 1 is covering a bit to (3)'s tail which a bit hard to read the (3)'s way for newbie - Tried smth, but rip symmetry.
- 02:18:005 (1) - somehow even the bpm is changed but looks like a jump desho? i think 204,112 is better for looking the spacing from design - Did smth kinda like you said.
- 03:21:005 (5) - maybe nc here? for avoid long combo like you did for 03:12:005 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - - Fixed
- 03:43:851 (1) - 1,31x spacing here? maybe fix it? - 1.40x now.
hitsound stuff related to all diffs

Hard :
- 00:33:005 (5) - nc for consistency - Fixed
- 00:45:005 (5) - ^ - Fixed
- 00:48:005 (1,2,3) - not neat design qwq. try 00:48:005 (1) - 460,232 to make the spacing from design look more consistent - 460:224 to keep spacing with (2).
- 00:53:630 (7,8) - somehow anti spacing + triplet would make confuse for some players - Ok Ok I get it ;w; Fixed
- 01:00:005 - gg copy pastaa after that so 01:05:630 (7,8) - same with previous xd - Fixed
- 01:54:005 (1,2) - i think 1/4 of them are overmapped. hard to hear to sound. especially you know my headset is ded - I listened once again, and yeah 100% sure there is small drums hit here.
- 01:57:380 (2) - and others, ^ - Same
- 00:48:005 - until before kiai, im starting to think if you better nc every stanza here lol (same for insane too) - Fixed
- 02:15:380 (2) - 1,32x spacing - Fixed
- 02:17:817 - possible to make triplet :C - Fixed with a reverse 1/4
- 02:56:630 (3,1) - nice blanket, i gonna cry - Fixed

Insane :
- err imo AR 8,5 is better here. AR 9 is too fast qwq, if you keep want AR 9 then AR 7,5 for Hard - 7.5 for Hard then. I don't want to use something else than AR9 simply because it won't fit the dense part on the 160 BPM section (and I hate AR8).
- 00:59:911 - imo this should not be skipped. it has same sound with 00:59:630 (7,8,9) - - Added a circle and changed the 3 last by a 1/4 reverse to fit more the song. Also add one at 01:11:911 (5) - for consistency.
- 01:09:755 (1,3) - swap nc for consistency? :C - No it's here to emphasis and show the 1/4 reverse section.
- no problem imo

call me back if you want

Thx I'll wait Despe-kyun mod and maybe do a last timing check before move on.

soft-hitfinish, i mean this

Removed 3ms

EDIT : changed 2 timing from Bonsai check.


Updated~

hell yea
judging by the complexity of the normal, an easy diff for this set would be cool

Radiance

1. 00:43:505 (3) - i think this would be cooler as circles because you focus piano a lot and 00:42:005 (1,2) - have two strong hits while 00:43:505 (3,4,5) - have 4 so four objects would fit better
2. 00:45:005 (1,2) - i think the end of 2 shoudl be clicked so i suggest making one reverse and adding a circle
3. 01:12:567 (3,3) - and the likes, not too much of a fan of these because 3/2 clicking breaks can be odd at least for me in this setup lol. i'd recommend keeping rest moment things to 1/1
4. 01:24:005 (1,2,3) - all of a sudden this is a lot harder to read while 01:25:505 (1,2,3) - etc are much more straight forward, would introduce a new mechanic without a reading spike
5. 01:25:130 (5,6,2,3) - these look awfully close and partly overlap how about spacing them more?
6. 02:06:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i believe it'd look better if this was just one smooth curve lol
7. 02:09:755 (9,1) - ew slider (xd) besides that these are kinda too close to notice that this is 1/1 might provoke early hits
8. 03:12:380 (2,3,4,5) - i think a rhythm like https://puu.sh/rwp5B/ac658ccc72.png is more representative of whats going on
9. personally i find sliders with loops look better if the loops are bigger (talking about) 03:39:802 (1) - https://puu.sh/rwpd9/a2baac7aa2.png
10. 03:47:117 (1) - has an odd dent around the red node, is that intentional or an oversight i assume you want a smooth slidershape

hard

1. 00:46:130 (2,3) - this might be more intuitive as triple, mainly cuz it's the "once in a map" kind of readability spike
2. 00:54:005 (1,2,3) - these seem to need nerfs based on how the kiais are mapped imo.
3. 01:33:755 (3,1) - i think you should do this mroe often the idea is nice and could bring more variety into your map
4. 01:55:880 (2,4) - ffs
5. 02:13:505 (1,2) - was this supposed to be sae slider pattern
6. 03:06:005 (1) - this is so much over itself that it bothers me :/

normal
is there a system to when you stack stuff like 00:21:005 (3,4,5) - 00:30:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - etc. maybe alternating that around would be cooler than just doing sth.
01:12:005 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - these could use way more variety, 01:24:005 (1,2,3) - is a good alternative
02:18:098 (1) - distance to spinner 1/4 pls just everything but 1/8
03:27:005 (1) - is this an uterus upside down besides that spread wise it should be more dense aroudn here
04:06:088 - map this maybe
also why are there so many more combos in the end

Okorin wrote:

hell yea
judging by the complexity of the normal, an easy diff for this set would be cool - Easy added!

Radiance

1. 00:43:505 (3) - i think this would be cooler as circles because you focus piano a lot and 00:42:005 (1,2) - have two strong hits while 00:43:505 (3,4,5) - have 4 so four objects would fit better - Sure why not.
2. 00:45:005 (1,2) - i think the end of 2 shoudl be clicked so i suggest making one reverse and adding a circle - Yep I agree.
3. 01:12:567 (3,3) - and the likes, not too much of a fan of these because 3/2 clicking breaks can be odd at least for me in this setup lol. i'd recommend keeping rest moment things to 1/1 - This fit more how the song sounds imo, so I prefer keeping them.
4. 01:24:005 (1,2,3) - all of a sudden this is a lot harder to read while 01:25:505 (1,2,3) - etc are much more straight forward, would introduce a new mechanic without a reading spike - Changed pattern for an easier one.
5. 01:25:130 (5,6,2,3) - these look awfully close and partly overlap how about spacing them more? - Now 1.70x.
6. 02:06:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i believe it'd look better if this was just one smooth curve lol - Tried to change but dunno lol.
7. 02:09:755 (9,1) - ew slider (xd) besides that these are kinda too close to notice that this is 1/1 might provoke early hits
8. 03:12:380 (2,3,4,5) - i think a rhythm like https://puu.sh/rwp5B/ac658ccc72.png is more representative of whats going on
9. personally i find sliders with loops look better if the loops are bigger (talking about) 03:39:802 (1) - https://puu.sh/rwpd9/a2baac7aa2.png - A little bigger but not that much ^^
10. 03:47:117 (1) - has an odd dent around the red node, is that intentional or an oversight i assume you want a smooth slidershape- Aaaaaa fixed.

hard

1. 00:46:130 (2,3) - this might be more intuitive as triple, mainly cuz it's the "once in a map" kind of readability spike - Oki
2. 00:54:005 (1,2,3) - these seem to need nerfs based on how the kiais are mapped imo. - Changed 2 triplets to reverse sliders.
3. 01:33:755 (3,1) - i think you should do this mroe often the idea is nice and could bring more variety into your map - I'll try in the future.
4. 01:55:880 (2,4) - ffs - Fixed
5. 02:13:505 (1,2) - was this supposed to be sae slider pattern - It's done on purpose.
6. 03:06:005 (1) - this is so much over itself that it bothers me :/ - Less over itself.

normal
is there a system to when you stack stuff like 00:21:005 (3,4,5) - 00:30:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - etc. maybe alternating that around would be cooler than just doing sth. - No there is no system, and tbh it would be pain to rework all of this so I prefer keep it if you don't mind.
01:12:005 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - these could use way more variety, 01:24:005 (1,2,3) - is a good alternative - That's why I did it on the second part of this kiai.
02:18:098 (1) - distance to spinner 1/4 pls just everything but 1/8 - K
03:27:005 (1) - is this an uterus upside down besides that spread wise it should be more dense aroudn here - Changed for some 2/1 sliders and circles.
04:06:088 - map this maybe - Oui
also why are there so many more combos in the end - For BPM changes.

Hey thx hi~

I'm wondering about your thoughts on the whistle during the intro of the map. To me, they sound more louder than they should. Would you consider lowering the volume in the beginning of the map to, at least, 50%~?

Easy

1. 01:17:630 (4) - 01:29:630 (4) - Might not be the best idea to use 1/2 patterns on an Easy difficulty at 160 BPM, I'm okay with the ones from the slower parts, though.
2. 01:59:630 (4) - 02:08:630 (4) - I wasn't actually expecting to see these being mapped, considering they have the same music connotation as 01:32:630 - . Especially the second one, that pattern just turns out to be quite long, so having a break somewhere might be a great idea.
3. 02:14:255 (4,2) - These might not be aesthetically pleasent, spacing them further would be nice.
4. 02:18:005 (1) - Too loud, overshadows the music completely, what do you think about lowering the volume to 45%~?
5. 02:47:255 (3,1,2) - Minor, visually speaking these not look like having the same "rhythm", in terms of spacing. It looks like (3,1) is a 1/1 pattern, and (1,2) is 3/2, you know what I am saying?
6. 04:04:693 (2) - 15% volume here instead would be very good. Applies to every difficulty, by the way!

Normal

1. 00:49:880 (4,2) - These are overlapped in-game, looks quite bad.
2. 01:46:505 (3,4) - You know, it might be actually a better idea to merge them into one single slider rather than splitting them. As there's nothing really landing on 01:46:880 - and the instruments extends up to 01:47:255 - , a 2/1 slider would make more sense.
3. 02:18:005 (1) - Same as in Easy, applies to every difficulty actually.
4. 03:21:005 - You know, I actually like this section, but compared to the Easy difficulty, it creates a considerable large gap for such a calm part. Would you actually consider removing one object just to give players a small break?

Hard

1. 01:26:067 (3,4,5,6) - Not really a big fan of this pattern in particular, it can cause some serious readability issues considering it's the only time you are doing it in the entire difficulty. To be honest, I think something less "gimmicky" would be way better, or at least trying to make it more intuitive.
2. 03:12:380 (2,3) - Why a stack, though? This is literally the only stack you are using throughout this section, might be a bit weird also considering they are very distinguished sounds.
3. 03:18:005 - What I said in the Normal also applies here, in fact, the rhythm usage in this section is even denser than the one used in the Insane difficulty. Would be really cool if you'd turn some circles into sliders as well as leaving small breaks between patterns.
4. 04:00:308 (1,2,3) - :OOOOOOOOO These are not aligned properly!! On a serious note, moving (3) a couple of pixels to the right would be appreciated.

Insane

You know, difficulty settings might be a bit too high for what you truly want to achieve. Lowering the AR to 8.5 as well as the OD to 7 makes more sense, to be fair.

1. 00:46:130 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - Personally, I consider these patterns to be a bit "tricky". Actually not even that, is me being picky about it, but spacing 00:46:130 (2,3,4) - more would be hella nice. It'd be consistent along with 00:21:755 (2,3,4) - and it'd make 00:48:005 (1,2,3) - look different.
2. 01:27:192 (2,3,4) - You know that this plays a bit bad due to the linear flow on different rhythm, can be a pain to read. A different transition might work way better!
3. 02:06:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I do believe you can do a smoother curve with this stream
4. 03:12:380 (2,3) - Spacing?

[]

Excellent song, excellent mapset, excellent game, excellent!
Call me back!

Yuii- wrote:

I'm wondering about your thoughts on the whistle during the intro of the map. To me, they sound more louder than they should. Would you consider lowering the volume in the beginning of the map to, at least, 50%~? - Oui

Easy

1. 01:17:630 (4) - 01:29:630 (4) - Might not be the best idea to use 1/2 patterns on an Easy difficulty at 160 BPM, I'm okay with the ones from the slower parts, though. - K
2. 01:59:630 (4) - 02:08:630 (4) - I wasn't actually expecting to see these being mapped, considering they have the same music connotation as 01:32:630 - . Especially the second one, that pattern just turns out to be quite long, so having a break somewhere might be a great idea. - Removed the 1st one, not the second tho since I wanted this part a little more dense, but I removed the circle at 02:13:130 - since the beat is less strong than the one you mentionned.
3. 02:14:255 (4,2) - These might not be aesthetically pleasent, spacing them further would be nice. - Reworked from the previous point.
4. 02:18:005 (1) - Too loud, overshadows the music completely, what do you think about lowering the volume to 45%~? - 50%
5. 02:47:255 (3,1,2) - Minor, visually speaking these not look like having the same "rhythm", in terms of spacing. It looks like (3,1) is a 1/1 pattern, and (1,2) is 3/2, you know what I am saying? - I see what you mean but from my view I don't see this problem here. If you have an idea how to fix that I open for suggestions.
6. 04:04:693 (2) - 15% volume here instead would be very good. Applies to every difficulty, by the way! - Done~

Normal

1. 00:49:880 (4,2) - These are overlapped in-game, looks quite bad.
2. 01:46:505 (3,4) - You know, it might be actually a better idea to merge them into one single slider rather than splitting them. As there's nothing really landing on 01:46:880 - and the instruments extends up to 01:47:255 - , a 2/1 slider would make more sense. - I prefer have them as clickable objects, since the voice getting stronger at this point, and having it on a sliderend would kill the emphasis imo.
3. 02:18:005 (1) - Same as in Easy, applies to every difficulty actually. - Done~
4. 03:21:005 - You know, I actually like this section, but compared to the Easy difficulty, it creates a considerable large gap for such a calm part. Would you actually consider removing one object just to give players a small break? - The speed of this section is really low, and all of these are strong sounds than I can't ignore, so I prefer let them.

Hard

1. 01:26:067 (3,4,5,6) - Not really a big fan of this pattern in particular, it can cause some serious readability issues considering it's the only time you are doing it in the entire difficulty. To be honest, I think something less "gimmicky" would be way better, or at least trying to make it more intuitive. - Did a curved slider to blanket (5).
2. 03:12:380 (2,3) - Why a stack, though? This is literally the only stack you are using throughout this section, might be a bit weird also considering they are very distinguished sounds. - Unstacked.
3. 03:18:005 - What I said in the Normal also applies here, in fact, the rhythm usage in this section is even denser than the one used in the Insane difficulty. Would be really cool if you'd turn some circles into sliders as well as leaving small breaks between patterns. - Don't want to remove strong sounds, but I changed some circles for sliders at 03:30:005 - but keeping the same pattern.
4. 04:00:308 (1,2,3) - :OOOOOOOOO These are not aligned properly!! On a serious note, moving (3) a couple of pixels to the right would be appreciated. - Oki ^^

Insane

You know, difficulty settings might be a bit too high for what you truly want to achieve. Lowering the AR to 8.5 as well as the OD to 7 makes more sense, to be fair.

1. 00:46:130 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - Personally, I consider these patterns to be a bit "tricky". Actually not even that, is me being picky about it, but spacing 00:46:130 (2,3,4) - more would be hella nice. It'd be consistent along with 00:21:755 (2,3,4) - and it'd make 00:48:005 (1,2,3) - look different. - Done.
2. 01:27:192 (2,3,4) - You know that this plays a bit bad due to the linear flow on different rhythm, can be a pain to read. A different transition might work way better! - Moved the circle on the top to make a more curved flow.
3. 02:06:005 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I do believe you can do a smoother curve with this stream - Ja
4. 03:12:380 (2,3) - Spacing? - Woops ^^

[]

Excellent song, excellent mapset, excellent game, excellent!
Call me back!

Thx a lot Yuii ><

We changed a pattern in the Hard difficulty (more specifically 01:49:505 (1,2,3) - ) in order to make the angle less of a pain to play.

Every hitsound lasts for more than 100ms if anyone else is wondering, by the way. They last a tad longer, so they should be fine.

Metadata in case YouareKwaN:

1. http://www.gareth-coker.net/games

Thx Yuii ♥

Recheck

easy : 02:30:005 - unused greenline
03:37:490 (1) - spacing?
03:59:406 - whistle for piano?

normal : 00:14:630 (3) - remove this note? i guess the piano is so low and similar with 00:13:130 - , i think keep the consistency is better
00:29:255 (6) - remove whistle? it doesnt have piano sound

au revoir

@Xinely fixed everything Aritago~

time to rank this shit ye

Xinely wrote:

time to rank this shit ye

osu! needs more shitmaps!

Thx Xinely ><