Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. osu!
  3. Gameplay & Rankings

Your biggest pet peeves

posted
Total Posts
94
Mvsk
87 posts
Joined August 2014
Topic Starter
Mvsk
Hello. Post your biggest Osu pet peeves here!

Mine are-
-Beatmap creators who randomly hide notes behind sliders.
-When windows decides to exit osu for no reason.
- When my fingers don't listen to my brain ( i fully intend to triple on a triple but sometimes my fingers will do a double instead.)
N_Studios
17 posts
Joined November 2015
N_Studios
- When all of the sliders move at the same speed for the entire beatmap, except for one.
- Beatmaps with 1.5 difficulty stars that take me 10 tries just to get an A Rank on.
- Having osu! out of sync between both of my computers.
- Getting 300 for everything except the last item, when I get 100.
- Not having the triangles in osu!
- This beatmap specifically: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/58539?m=0 (Don't get me wrong. It's pretty well-made. I just had a REALLY bad time with it while I was trying to get A Rank on it.)
Last edited by N_Studios , edited 3 times in total.
KanoSet
906 posts
Joined October 2014
KanoSet
wait why is this here and not in GD
Mvsk
87 posts
Joined August 2014
Topic Starter
Mvsk

KanoSet wrote:

wait why is this here and not in GD
These are pet peeves limited to Osu gameplay not pet peeves in general. At least, that was my reasoning for posting it here. Am i wrong?
KanoSet
906 posts
Joined October 2014
KanoSet

Mvsk wrote:

Am i wrong?
i'm not even sure anymore tbh
Sayorie
975 posts
Joined December 2014
Sayorie
-bad slider art
Zalaria
138 posts
Joined January 2013
Zalaria
Retries
TMiracle
167 posts
Joined December 2011
TMiracle
Spinners ;^;
Saphirshroom
627 posts
Joined May 2013
Saphirshroom
missing
TheRealNick24
18 posts
Joined November 2015
TheRealNick24
-fast sliders (or I call them "Sanic sliders")
-hard spinners
-huge jumps
-long streams
-failing near at the end
-mouse turning off sometimes for no reason
-jumps and streams at the same time
Last edited by TheRealNick24 , edited 2 times in total.
silento
298 posts
Joined June 2015
silento
The current triangle mapping meta. I can handle everything else.
Mahogany
2,684 posts
Joined August 2014
Mahogany

Mvsk wrote:

KanoSet wrote:

wait why is this here and not in GD
These are pet peeves limited to Osu gameplay not pet peeves in general. At least, that was my reasoning for posting it here. Am i wrong?
No, if it's related to osu!, it belongs in here. You posted in the right place.

-people asking for advice when the answer is "play more"
-my own inability to be good
-my currently very fucking dead index finger meaning I can't play
KanoSet
906 posts
Joined October 2014
KanoSet

Mahogany wrote:

No, if it's related to osu!, it belongs in here. You posted in the right place.
i guess it's just me not used to this kind of topics here in GnR.. my bad :|
OT: my incapability of streaming
DeathHydra
652 posts
Joined November 2015
DeathHydra
- Sudden change on slider velocity (like 1 slider on a map has different SV compared to the others)
- Every long stream, high or low bpm
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd
-too high AR

-niggers

-being a failure as a player and a human being
Sayorie
975 posts
Joined December 2014
Sayorie

TheArchist wrote:

The current triangle mapping meta. I can handle everything else.
I can only do triangles.

B1rd wrote:

-being a failure as a player and a human being
I feel you.
I Give Up
1,648 posts
Joined January 2014
I Give Up
Never lucky
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
People who use the term cancer tonrefer to low ar old maps I love
N0thingSpecial
2,355 posts
Joined November 2015
N0thingSpecial
when people look at technical maps and say it's trash, and say the big black is a master piece
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd
But Big Black is technical as hell. And I don't think there are that many people who'd say that map is a masterpiece, the mainstream thing these days is to not like and of BD's old maps and say they're crap.

Oh yeah, and one thing that also annoys me is in MP when people ignore the rules of the lobby. And then they'll say stuff like 4-6* means 4-6.99*.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

N0thingSpecial wrote:

when people look at technical map and say it's trash, just because they cant play it
DeathHydra
652 posts
Joined November 2015
DeathHydra

B1rd wrote:

Oh yeah, and one thing that also annoys me is in MP when people ignore the rules of the lobby. And then they'll say stuff like 4-6* means 4-6.99*.
I told you already. From my experience in multi, most room titles are misleading. Room title is 4-5*, yet all they play is higher than 5*. Every room I visit is just like that.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva
You probably play with scrubs who will pick big blek even tho they cant even pass a normal, they tend to be like that
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

DeathAdderz wrote:

B1rd wrote:

Oh yeah, and one thing that also annoys me is in MP when people ignore the rules of the lobby. And then they'll say stuff like 4-6* means 4-6.99*.
I told you already. From my experience in multi, most room titles are misleading. Room title is 4-5*, yet all they play is higher than 5*. Every room I visit is just like that.
4 to 5 star is 4.00 to 5.99

4.00 to 5.00 is 4.00 to 5.00

5.99* is still a 5 star map. Almost 6. Almost. Not quite. Almost
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd

Khelly wrote:

People who use the term cancer tonrefer to low ar old maps I love
What low AR maps do you love? I don't recall you ever liking low maps, except for Emerald Sword.

DeathAdderz wrote:

I told you already. From my experience in multi, most room titles are misleading. Room title is 4-5*, yet all they play is higher than 5*. Every room I visit is just like that.
It's not that the titles are misleading, it's that people are incapable of following simple rules. Because they want to play their 7* ar10 meme maps.
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

B1rd wrote:

Khelly wrote:

People who use the term cancer tonrefer to low ar old maps I love
What low AR maps do you love? I don't recall you ever liking low maps, except for Emerald Sword.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/3990
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/3556
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/19012 +++
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/25953 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/27035
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/23282 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/18170 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/33695 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/18577 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/25580 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/31906
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/19990
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/60941
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/26726
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1147
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/38007 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/26153
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/62589
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/49206 ++
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/21010
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/89362
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/41313
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/16266 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/50354
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/76663 ++
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/50892
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/28065 ++ but edited to ar7
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/49101 +
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/32570 ++
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/66246 ++
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/39825 ++
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/41044

More +'s = more special
Last edited by Yuudachi-kun , edited 1 time in total.
DeathHydra
652 posts
Joined November 2015
DeathHydra

Khelly wrote:

4 to 5 star is 4.00 to 5.99

4.00 to 5.00 is 4.00 to 5.00

5.99* is still a 5 star map. Almost 6. Almost. Not quite. Almost
I will assume it's a 4.00-5.99 if the room title is like "4 stars and 5 stars". But if "4 to 5 stars" I will assume that it's a 4.00-5.00.

Idk. Seems like everybody has different opinions on this.
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
Why can't they just be like 4.25 to 5.5 or something
N0thingSpecial
2,355 posts
Joined November 2015
N0thingSpecial
Oh yea I get real salty when people skip you in a rotation lobby
DeathHydra
652 posts
Joined November 2015
DeathHydra

Khelly wrote:

Why can't they just be like 4.25 to 5.5 or something
Even with that room title, someone still pick higher than 5.5. Usually that person is high rank people who come to this room to practice using mods
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

DeathAdderz wrote:

But if "4 to 5 stars" I will assume that it's a 4.00-5.00.

Idk. Seems like everybody has different opinions on this.
You will assume that because its right.

if 4-5* = 4-5.99999999999999999999999999999999* was right
then 4-5* would also mean 3.00000000000000000000000000000000000000001-5*
and that makes 0 sense, just like the first one

N0thingSpecial wrote:

Oh yea I get real salty when people skip you in a rotation lobby
Thats just you
Last edited by Deva , edited 1 time in total.
N0thingSpecial
2,355 posts
Joined November 2015
N0thingSpecial

DeathAdderz wrote:

Khelly wrote:

Why can't they just be like 4.25 to 5.5 or something
Even with that room title, someone still pick higher than 5.5. Usually that person is high rank people who come to this room to practice using mods
Real high rank players put on barusa in a 4.25 - 5.5* lobby
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

HK_ wrote:

DeathAdderz wrote:

But if "4 to 5 stars" I will assume that it's a 4.00-5.00.

Idk. Seems like everybody has different opinions on this.
You will assume that because its right.

if 4-5* = 4-5.99999999999999999999999999999999* was right
then 4-5* would also mean 3.00000000000000000000000000000000000000001-5*
and that makes 0 sense, just like the first one
Why would that also mean 3.00001 to 5*? 4 stars is a map whose first digit starts with 4.

4.00 is where that begins.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Khelly wrote:

4.00 is where that begins.
And 5.00 is where it ends
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

HK_ wrote:

Khelly wrote:

4.00 is where that begins.
And 5.00 is where it ends
5* isn't 5.00

It's 5.00 to 5.99
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva
4-5 means four UP TO five

And if you want that really accurately it means 4.00000000000000000000000000000000...1-4.99999999999999999999999999999999999...*
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
4-5 is ambiguous
4.00 to 5.00 is 4.00 up to 5.00
4* to 5* is 4.00 to 5.99
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva
4.00 = 4
5.00 = 5
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
5 star = all maps that have at least 5 stars and no more than 6

5* = 5 star

5.00 = 5 but people can read just 5 as 5 star
Saphirshroom
627 posts
Joined May 2013
Saphirshroom

HK_ wrote:

4-5 means four UP TO five

And if you want that really accurately it means 4.00000000000000000000000000000000...1-4.99999999999999999999999999999999999...*
If you want that really accurately there is no number such as 4.00000...1 so that makes no sense. Just use 4.0 if anything.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Saphirshroom wrote:

HK_ wrote:

4-5 means four UP TO five

And if you want that really accurately it means four point infinite zeros followed by one-4.99999999999999999999999999999999999...*
If you want that really accurately there is no number such as 4.00000...1 so that makes no sense. Just use 4.0 if anything.
four point infinite zeros followed by one

Happy now?
Endaris
5,282 posts
Joined June 2010
Endaris

HK_ wrote:

four point infinite zeros followed by one

Happy now?
No, the limes of that function is exactly 4.0 which is why your number doesn't exist.
Bence
147 posts
Joined November 2014
Bence
4-5 = 3.5-5.5

When you group maps by difficulty, osu! will tell you that 5* is 4.5-5.5 so I use this as a rule of thumb in multi, unless its specified like 4.00-5.2
+-0.5 difficulty shouldn't really matter anyway
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

Bence wrote:

4-5 = 3.5-5.5

When you group maps by difficulty, osu! will tell you that 5* is 4.5-5.5 so I use this as a rule of thumb in multi, unless its specified like 4.00-5.2
+-0.5 difficulty shouldn't really matter anyway
Osu just decides to round those numbers, though. I'm really pissed at it when I have to go into the 6 star collection to play some 5.7* maps or whatever.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva
In that case 4-5 = 4.00-5.00
stop trying to turn my life into a meme
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd
Khelly, 5* is literally 5.00000000000000000000*

No one uses 5* to refer to 5-6*. For example no one says 'I can fc 5* maps', referring to everything below 6*

And those are some good low AR maps.
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

B1rd wrote:

Khelly, 5* is literally 5.00000000000000000000*

No one uses 5* to refer to 5-6*. For example no one says 'I can fc 5* maps', referring to everything below 6*

And those are some good low AR maps.
If I say I am playing 5* (Read as 5 star) maps, what kinds of maps do you imagine? Do you think I'm referring to 5.00* and maybe +- 0.1? Really? Because when anyone says that I imagine they're playing anything like 5.2 5.4 5.8 whatever.
Mahogany
2,684 posts
Joined August 2014
Mahogany
IMHO

4-5* means starting at 4.0 and ending at 5.0

5* means exactly 5*. Most people don't mean this. Most people mean around.

Around 5* means 4.5-5.5*

I don't know why I felt I needed to add my worthless opinion to this thread.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva
When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
But that cant be applied here
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

HK_ wrote:

When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
But that cant be applied here
So basically everyone means different things but assumes everyone means exactly what they say.

When I say I'm playing 5* I am playing 5.00 to 5.99
Mahogany
2,684 posts
Joined August 2014
Mahogany

HK_ wrote:

When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
Why don't you say you're playing 5-6* maps instead of saying you're playing 5* maps
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

Mahogany wrote:

HK_ wrote:

When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
Why don't you say you're playing 5-6* maps instead of saying you're playing 5* maps
If everyone was as specific as 5.50 to 6.00 we wouldn't have this problem
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Mahogany wrote:

HK_ wrote:

When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
Why don't you say you're playing 5-6* maps instead of saying you're playing 5* maps
Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd

Khelly wrote:

]If I say I am playing 5* (Read as 5 star) maps, what kinds of maps do you imagine? Do you think I'm referring to 5.00* and maybe +- 0.1? Really? Because when anyone says that I imagine they're playing anything like 5.2 5.4 5.8 whatever.
I would assume they're playing something around 5*, like 4.8 to 5.4*. You tend to round numbers to a whole, like you do with time. But circumstantial implications doesn't change the definition.
Yuudachi-kun
5,434 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

HK_ wrote:

Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
DOES THIS MEAN I CAN SAY I HAVE 7* FCS NOW
Endaris
5,282 posts
Joined June 2010
Endaris
Just keep using decimals. Everyone using decimals is your dream anyway right?
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Khelly wrote:

HK_ wrote:

Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
DOES THIS MEAN I CAN SAY I HAVE 7* FCS NOW
Of course it does
doesnt actually mean you did that but if you get caught you will have an excuse
Mahogany
2,684 posts
Joined August 2014
Mahogany

HK_ wrote:

Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
Then why not say that then?
Sayorie
975 posts
Joined December 2014
Sayorie
I like to categorize my star ratings based from the leading integer (or floor operation) of a star rating value.

I also don't want to get cocky either, just because I passed Highscore [Extra] 6.01* and tell everyone that I passed a 7* map.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Mahogany wrote:

HK_ wrote:

Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
Then why not say that then?
Because its wrong?
Bence
147 posts
Joined November 2014
Bence
Thread perfectly derailed
OT: when my cursor hits the note but click just late enough to miss
Mahogany
2,684 posts
Joined August 2014
Mahogany

HK_ wrote:

Mahogany wrote:

Then why not say that then?
Because its wrong?
Then don't lie?
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Mahogany wrote:

Then don't lie?
No.
Mvsk
87 posts
Joined August 2014
Topic Starter
Mvsk
I personally view the difficulty above .5 the next star.
Above 2.5 = 3
Above 3.5 = 4
Above 4.5 = 5.

Regardless of what it actually is i notice a bigger difference in overall difficulty between say 3star and 3.5 star rather than 3.5 to 4.

But that's just me. I know once you reach 4 - 5 maps some seem like they deserve a 6 star rating while some seem like they deserve a 3 star rating.
Lunniet
33 posts
Joined August 2015
Lunniet
Uh... I think I hate this.

Mvsk
87 posts
Joined August 2014
Topic Starter
Mvsk
New pet peeve.

When you're playing a map that is above your current skill rank ( 4.5 star for me) and you come so close to clearing it but then get fkt from a sudden spike in difficulty, timing and pattern in the end T.T
Oatmeal
17 posts
Joined July 2014
Oatmeal
- when the map doesn't even go to the main beat in the song
- short sliders that go fast
- when rrtyui trolls and misses the last note
Sayorie
975 posts
Joined December 2014
Sayorie
oh there's one more thing. High-bpm hold sliders. The ones that go bzzzzzzzzz.
Deva
2,343 posts
Joined December 2014
Deva

Oatmeal wrote:

- when rrtyui doesnt troll and misses the last note anyway
Senko-san
824 posts
Joined November 2012
Senko-san
Shitmisses in general
Needlessly high SV (Looking at you two maps)
TV Size maps that are nothing but large, unfitting jumps
Risa
435 posts
Joined January 2014
Risa
When people randomly blame mappers instead of admitting that they are bad at the game
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 94