This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 2:44:52 PM

Artist: Treyarch Sound
Title: 115
Source: Call of Duty: Black Ops
Tags: kino der toten world at war elena siegman kevin sherwood zombies
BPM: 200
Filesize: 6626kb
Play Time: 02:57
Difficulties Available:

1. Easy (1.5 stars, 173 notes)
2. Extra (5.58 stars, 918 notes)
3. Extreme (5.83 stars, 951 notes)
4. Hard (3.32 stars, 528 notes)
5. Insane (4.58 stars, 709 notes)
6. Normal (2.06 stars, 329 notes)

Download: Treyarch Sound - 115
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
who would have thoutgh that thae MDT was cadocabpte of tioamet trablev. ? ? ?
how mayh staitonsat watosdet hsi gropa oe hava??
wehrta diwd taht ltiaheh giurlr dissatpaeripar to ??
olny tiaom wil tealtw waht nwe queteaions aawuita uste int thuihs.. (message truncated)
!

wwww

calm down

it's just a prank bro

What am I modding?

folder inside your .osz file is a good start.

In all honesty though. Ignoring the technical stuff. I do have to say that your Easy diff feels a bit lacking on my end, like it was made in 20 minutes. Makes me sad. Did you want a list? Also many pointless green lines you can remove... so yeah.
00:14:693 (1) - 1/1 repeat to maintain the rhythm?
00:23:693 (3) - missing clap on end?
00:26:693 (1) - could kinda flow better into 00:27:893 (2) -
00:43:493 (1,2,3,1,2) - it really just looks like on big mess to me >_<
00:55:493 (1) - bit more of a curve would be great
01:24:293 (1) -
01:45:893 (1,2,1) -
02:13:493 (2) - this would almost make more sense as a straight slider... or maybe something else.
02:36:893 (1,1) - ugly overlap, though it isn't really in game, it could still be a bit more clean imo.
02:48:293 (1,2) - matching?
02:55:493 (1) - NCs are real.

half these things are pointless? or all of them.

Yeah.. Idk, it just feels rushed. I really hope this isn't the final product!

Normal was good from what I saw.
01:33:368 - break yes?
02:18:293 (3) - to be honest, this would play better as a 1/1 slider, especially for the upcoming part.

The gap between normal and hard though. You need something between it lol.


time for dinner. rest looks very pishifat (which is a good thing.. right?)

oh

all stuff applied in some way. you're right about easy being made in like 20 minutes lol, but the normal was made in the same amount of time so
nice

and gap between normal and hard was taken care of but i had the proper hard diff on another computer so you got to see some old thing

Pishi pro normal mapper

"World at War" in tags oh man

Wo, wo!

[Easy]

00:48:143 (1,2) - Sexy spacing mistake.
00:25:493 (2) - 00:49:493 (2) - 00:54:293 (2) - etc. A whistle on head for that sound wouldn't be that bad. In fact, it would highlight it way better.

[Normal]

00:53:693 (2,3) - Basically another spacing mistake, but this one isn't sexy ok? oko
01:18:293 (1) - 01:54:293 (1) - You didn't want to NC these, right?

------------

I didn't even open the other diffs, just a super quick check. That means I owe you a mod now, dammit.

http://i.imgur.com/J4Ejm2m.png

lol the combo colors looks so alike it's hard to tell them apart
countdown enabled at 0 seconds nice
00:07:493 (1) - useless green line tho. there are more, but not sure if these things are important
you only silenced normal slide 1 and missed the 2nd one
some diffs have widescreen support some don't

[hardest]

00:09:743 (1) - improve shape?
00:13:943 (4,5) - 01:23:543 (4,5) - these kinda throw me off the rhythm
00:23:693 (1,2,3,4) - 00:52:493 (1,2,3,4) - well it plays like cancer but since it emphasizes the next note really well...
00:37:493 (1,3) - 00:47:093 (1,3,5) - 01:27:893 (1,3,5) - etc. kick sliders?
02:09:443 (2) - ehh just have it as circle, idk what you follow here with it, unless the sss what sound, and then can use the 1/2 slider on white tick if it feels too empty
02:28:418 (4) - possibly delete and space 02:28:493 (1,2,3,4) - more
02:38:243 (4,5,6) - here you get it xd
02:53:093 (1) - this part isn't that calm imo, that you use that sv for the whole section

no deathstream for this song lol???
[less hard than the hardest]

00:08:693 (1,3,5) - same as hardest diff
00:13:943 (1,2) - same aswell
00:37:493 (1,2,3) - wow you actually did it here
01:12:293 (1,2,3,1,2) - bugs me a bit but everywhere you map this as 3 and 2 instead of 5 when it's kind of the same sound except for the clap thing coming up there on top of the guitar
01:47:093 (1,2,3,4) - rather stick with 01:42:293 (1,2,3) -
02:31:343 (5,1) - eee
02:56:693 (1,2) - ctrl g them seperately or 02:56:993 (3) - move more down

[even less hard than the hardest]


00:08:693 (1,2,3,1) - fuk lines
00:42:293 (1,2) - huh you're not following the guitar thing anymore
01:33:893 (1) - lol, in this part it's so easy to see when mapping to vocals is a bit off time. that kinda goes to all diffs

[hard]

00:37:493 (1) - move more down so the number is atleast visible and evens out the patern 00:36:893 (1,2,1) -
02:53:993 (4) - might be misleading to have 1/1 overlap gap, could also just use 02:53:693 (3) - as a slider

[less hard]

00:54:293 (3) - nice ds
02:17:093 (1,2,3) - blanket?

[the least hardest]

00:49:493 (2) - ds, notsure whether was it suppose to be blanketed or what xd



7 star gd pls

thanka!

Hello! Modding on Milan-'s request ~

This song brings back so many sweet memories, thank you for mapping this <3

Easy

00:20:693 (2) - This could be made into a more symmetrical shape if adjusted a bit but if you intended it like that then ignore this
00:27:893 (2,1) - If you care these could be made so that they're in a straight line by moving (2) a X:468 Y:61
00:48:143 (1,2) - Maybe make these the same shape?
01:15:893 (3) - Again, I'll stop pointing these out since there are some more on this and the other difficulties aswell
01:28:643 (4) - I would end this on the red line since the music ends there aswell. No point of making this 1/8 longer than it needs to be
01:53:093 (1,2) - Call me nazi but these aren't symmetrical, it's like one pixel off. Quick ctrl+h+j will fix this
02:01:493 (3,1) - Maybe consider removing the curve on 02:02:693 (1) - since it doesn't seem to have any purpose and looks random. Just making it straight instead of curving it a tiny bit works really well. If you do this then make sure that 02:02:693 (1,2) - point the same way
02:41:093 (1,2) - These arent perfectly aligned. It's off by 1 pixel or so (I don't even know how I notice these things) Move the lower sliderpoint to X:37 Y:376
to fix this

It always gets like this when modding easy diffs. Really only one thing that you SHOULD fix ( 01:28:643 (4) - ) and the others you can fix if you care

Normal

00:25:793 - Consider adding a circle here since this feels like it could use one and this is the only empty space in the entire part

That's the only thing that caught my eye besides of a blanket at 02:17:693 (2,3) - but yeah I'm not going to do a blanket mod haha

Hard

01:37:943 (3,4) - This rhythm feels weird. You should remove (3) and make the slider start from there and add the circle after the slider (where the slider currently ends)
01:52:493 (3,4) - I'd make these symmetrical since they are so close to eachother. It's just something that bugs me xD

Insane

02:08:993 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe consider to move the (3) because currently the pattern looks a bit funny. I think a small jump could fit here nicely.

These diffs are so far really well done rhythmically and the style that you have keeps me from noticing anything unusual

Extra

Consider making approach rate 9,3 instead of 9,2. I think it would fit really well here.

While playtesting this there was only one issue and it was that 01:42:743 (1) - has a too slow slider velocity in my opinion. Make the slider a bit faster to avoid players having 100's here.

Extreme

To compensate the big cs maybe add a little bit more hp drain? I'd go for 6,3 atleast but I could see 6,5 or even higher working well here too. (Also bigger hp drain as the difficulties get harder to make players feel like they're playing wave 40+ and failing is an option Kappa)

00:37:943 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This a bit too overmapped imo. If you make 00:37:943 (1,2,3) - into a 1/4 slider then you can keep 00:38:243 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - without it feeling out of place. This is also to make this part more consistent with the others since most of the parts like this you have 3 sliders instead of a stream anyways.
01:26:693 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,1,1) -This works really well. You could maybe make the earlier thing I pointed out to be like this!
02:53:093 (1) - Such a dramatic sv change with such a big distance is a perfect combination for sliderbreaks. I'd definetly make this slider either faster or be more closer to the slider before

I guess that does it for the mod. Modding this made me feel like a teenager again so thank you for that

normal
00:25:793 - Consider adding a circle here since this feels like it could use one and this is the only empty space in the entire part would rather just leave the low density stuff here since that's kinda what the song supports. did the same thing 4 other times when it repeats too
extreme
00:37:943 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This a bit too overmapped imo. If you make 00:37:943 (1,2,3) - into a 1/4 slider then you can keep 00:38:243 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - without it feeling out of place. This is also to make this part more consistent with the others since most of the parts like this you have 3 sliders instead of a stream anyways. i tried some stuff and just ended up being worse lol. only technically overmapped stuff is sliderends there so i hope it's okay. the 1:26 section doesnt have any 1/4 there while here it does so using that rhythm would be weird lol

did everything else thanks!!!!!!!!!

hei

make a 7 star diff where you map that doublebass the whole map lol

very hard CS3
00:23:093 (1,2,3) - i'd ctrl+g this. because i'd like to play it like that and since it's just the same doublebass triple like before
00:58:493 (1) - you could do something like http://puu.sh/muds1/b44b8b1d98.jpg to indicate that (1) is not like the others in that doublebass spam (my version looks hella ugly though)
01:27:293 (1) - i think this should be at the place of (2) (and (2) at somewhere else). man i can't explain this really well but now it kinda feels like you're emphasizing (2) which is just some random doublebass sound and (1) is a snare sound.
01:41:093 (1) - this is kinda ehh imo that you decided to go with almost the same spacing as 01:33:893 (1) - when 01:41:093 (1) - has more stuff going on and is more powerfull
02:20:093 (3) - wow this was sharp wow
ok keewl

pretty hard CS4.2
00:58:493 (1) - here too you could do that what i pointed out earlier asd
01:41:093 (1) - same as CS3 here too
i like this diff more

harder than actual hard CS4
00:07:643 (2,3,4) - i wasn't really expecting this kind of introduction to 1/4 in insane
00:58:493 (1) - lol here too that what i mentioned earlier twice already

hey you map nice songs and i bring bad mods

i tried making a nonstop stream diff and it was so baddddddd

did everything from the mod tho thanks!

song title


Elena Siegman - 115?

p/4365681 too many people worked on the song so giving all credit to vocalist kinda eh

my 5 rounds on 5 before hitting 10 fps and ending my steam

this song is like screamo heavy metal combined with clusterfuck holy shit

Hi hi M4M

Easy

1. 00:37:943 - 00:38:243 - 00:38:543 - I would prefer if you mapped finishes here like what you did here 00:09:143 (3,1) to match the guitar. I also think you should do the same thing here 00:13:943 - I know there aren't any finishes in the music, but it would go along nice with the guitar.
2. 01:23:543 - Same thing here with the guitar. There are other places with the same thing but I will stop mentioning it.
3. 00:19:043 - Why not put a note on this strong beat?
4. 00:47:843 - Same thing here. Also have a lot of unused green points here.
5. 01:09:443 - Useless green point
6. 02:57:893 - 02:52:643 - Should check for un-used timing sections. Got a lot of them lyin around everywhere

Normal

1. 00:13:943 - 00:14:243 - 00:14:543 - For some reason my ears really want to hear finishes on these notes, to match these 00:09:143 (2,3,1) 00:18:743 (2,3,1) . I know there aren't any finishes in the music there, that's why you didnt put any. But I still think it will be a nice addition to the beatmap if you add them. I'll stop talking about those finishes now lol
2. 00:20:693 (3) - You should make this a slider that extends to here 00:20:693 (3) - so you can at least somewhat hit that triple drum in the music.
3. 00:25:493 (3) - Same thing can be done here
4. 01:02:693 (1) - Extend this to here 01:03:143 - so it matches this 01:05:093 (1,2) -
5. 01:12:293 (1,2) - Same thing here
6. 01:29:093 (1) - I would just delete this note
7. 01:33:893 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Since this is a relatively mellow part compared to the other parts of the song, I would do a rythm thats easier, like this: http://puu.sh/mJL0U/78ed646c41.jpg
8. 01:37:493 (1,2,3) - Move the 3 over a 1/2 note, like this http://puu.sh/mJL8w/e193c1ef98.jpg
9. 01:48:143 (1) - This slider feels better to me if you extened it another 1/2 note. I think its because of the scream.
10. 01:49:493 (3) - This should be a slider that ends here 01:49:943 -
11. 02:58:493 (2) - I would just make this a hit circle, or lower the tail volume as much as you can.

Hard

1. 00:38:543 (3,4,1) - Why the triple here? Sounds kinda weird to me
2. 00:55:343 (5,1) - Did you increase spacing here to emphasize the finish? Or was it an accident....I'm pretty sure you do it on purpose but im just making sure
3. 01:41:093 (1,2,3,4) - This feels so cramped. I don't really like when reverse sliders are so squished together like that. Give them some room to breath. Makes it more readable imo as well. And if you decide not to, at least give this guy more space 01:42:293 (1) He deserves it
4. 02:16:343 (1) - Strange NC imo
5. 02:13:943 (1) - ^

Insane

1. 00:09:143 (1,2,1) - Why do you lower the sv on these sliders? If anything I feel like you should raise the SV on these 3 finishes. If you don't want to increase the SV, I think you should at least increase the distance between the sliders, something like this: http://puu.sh/mJNmY/72c036bb4a.jpg (Same recommendations for the other parts where you do the same thing)
2. 00:08:618 (4,1) - Giving some distance here helps increase the readability of this pattern imo because it signals more of a change in the music, which the kick sliders are going to. It just helps with the change into the kick sliders http://puu.sh/mJNIj/30739f2005.jpg
3. 00:18:218 (7,1) - You could increase the distance of these to emphasize the finish: http://puu.sh/mJNpQ/bb40594399.jpg
4. 00:37:943 (1,2,3) - Why the triple here. Feels out of place to me, I can't hear any triple in the music there.
5. 00:38:393 (4) - Same with this, feel pretty out of place
6. 00:37:943 - Without removing the triple, here is my recomendation for that section: http://puu.sh/mJNZc/0a63d4d529.jpg
7. 01:17:693 (4,5,1) - Maybe make these sliders a little crazier? To go with the sreaming. Like add a few red slider anchors in there or somethin
8. 01:37:793 (3,4,5,6,1,2) - Should this part really be that crazy? This is what the music sounds like to me: http://puu.sh/mJObP/c4a96016b1.jpg

Extra

1. 00:36:743 (5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This stream really fooled me, because you made the first part of it look identical to the previous triple, so I thought it was going to be a triple and then into the stream, so my fingers got all confused when it was all part of one big stream lol

Extreme too extreme for me