[Meta Data]
[C-Class]Lanturn wrote:
Was there ever metadata discussion on this?
Some pages:
http://www.voxmakers.fr/archives/7387#topresque
http://www.starrysky.fr/video/
Title:
The MP3 file name from the youtube video is called "ONE-PUNCH MAN FOREVER"
http://www.starrysky.fr/video/ | This website which seems to be properly affiliated in some way or another with Tai Shindehai also uses "ONE-PUNCH MAN FOREVER"
Artist:
Personally I'd captialize SHINDEHAI from his youtube channel and profile
https://www.youtube.com/user/SHINDEHAI
http://www.voxmakers.fr/#qsn (3rd from end)
Edit: Did a bit more research. Honestly I don't think it'll matter what you use for the artist field Shindehai, Tai Shindehai, SHINDEHAI, TAI SHINDEHAI etc... He credits himself in many ways so anything can work. I mean, the original video for this song uses Tai Reflections (his channel thingy) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl0gRhqrOFM | Have fun QATs :3 Yeah Gezo said the same I'm going to just stick with "Shindehai" cause that's what's on the youtube video and I don't like the way all caps looks.For the Title field of the song I'm sticking with just "ONE PUNCH-MAN" (Going to add hyphen)because the only place I see the "FOREVER" bit added on is in that website you linked, starrysky, which I believe aren't even related to tai ref or shidehai at all. And also "ONE PUNCH-MAN" is what's used in the title of the video and in the MV itself. Like at the very beginning 5 seconds in it says "ONE PUNCH-MAN".
Edit: ONE-PUNCH MAN FOREVER it is
Double check the metadata with a QAT before changing this, but hopefully this'll help prevent another DQ in the future
Irreversible wrote:
Additionally worth mentioning is the density and overall difficulty of the lowest diff. From my point of view this is nowhere near a suitable easiest diff, let me point you up why, please keep in mind that this is 190 BPM we are talking about: 1) 03:36:021 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - The amount of density there is at times 2) The high amount of usage of 1/2 02:18:022 (1,2,3,4,5) - . I am not judging this map about the SR - but rather about the length and the density of this map.
I guess a beginner diff is definitely needed with way less density, to offer a comfortable map for everyone.
Good luck!
I've nerfed 03:36:021 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - slightly and about the 1/2s, I discussed it with Irre ingame and he said they become negligible in the presence of an easier diff.
Yuii- wrote:
Let's talk about the lowest difficulty. Okey
First things first. From my point of view, density-wise this is kinda hell for newbie players. This is nowhere suitable for the lowest difficulty of the set. Too many 1/2 patterns, not to mention some circles-spam sections such as 03:36:021 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - are quite... weird or "must fix", especially at this BPM. Apart from that, there are some heavy parts which contain a high amount of usage of 1/2 slider patterns like 02:18:022 - . Reffer to my response to Irre above ^
On a side note, I want to add to the discussion that your NCs are completely random and have no kind of patternship at all... at least not one that I can understand, mind explaining? u fokin w0t? All right then I will.
Throughout the song I alternate between following the music and following the vocals, depending on which is more prominent. Hence different parts of the song will have different NC patterns because they're following different parts of the music. After a quick inspection I've found that 01:47:076 (1) - this section and 03:21:181 (1) - this section was a bit spammy and have hence salvaged them. Idk wtf you're on about for the rest of the song because the NCs are pretty fucking consistent.
- Intro 00:01:603 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is the pre-intro so it's NCd differently from the rest of the intro.
- After that there's an NC every time these guitar sound appears 00:05:234 (1) - 00:10:287 (1) -
- Let me break down the lyrics for the first verse to show you the NC pattern. Here I'm mostly following the drums but I'm also accenting the really strong parts of the vocals. Bold = NC
Kore ga saigo no machidesu
Kare no atam ni wa ke ga aremasen
Pawa ha kare no te ni aru
One punchi de kare wa akuma to tatakau- Then it's on to the pre-chorus at 00:45:181 (1) - which is NCd differently from the main chorus
- And then the chorus. I'm doing something similar to what I did with the first verse. Drums + Vocals
Sokode Kare wa yozora ni tobu
Karewa seijyaku o shihai
Fly away Kare wa hitoridearu, sora ni
Kare wa watashitachi no saiko no herodesu
Wanpanman Forever
The music changes in the underlined bit so hence different NC pattern. It's the same for the rest of the song apart from sections in the middle like 02:18:024 (1) - 02:48:181 (1) - 03:11:076 (1) - but the NC patterns on those should be blatantly obvious.
Last, and the most important point about this whole difficulty. Spacing. There's no clear path whatsoever. Your 1/1 spacing looks so similar to the 1/2, even when the 1/2 patterns are overlapped. By using a spacing of 1,2x you can make things way more clear and thus easier for newbie players to recognise different kind of "rhythms".I see what you're trying to do but increasing the spacing wouldn't have as much of an effect as you'd think and I'm just going to make an easier diff for the song anyway so not point in creating extra work for myself. Also while increasing DS might make it easier to read it will make it harder to play, and the star rating will go up which I don't want, the diff is already 1.86 stars.
Decided to use this suggestion to buff my diff and replace Alpha's diff.
That's all for me.
Good luck with further work!