Nakata Yuji wrote:

Vote: mashley

dat fool

Mashley wrote:

I'm not a fool

^ being cute, relevant later if you read the rest

then,

Nakata Yuji wrote:

''Wojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on''

she wants the kill

unvote
vote:Wojjan

gogogoogog

Nakata Yuji wrote:

''Wojjan wrote:
Could you maybe, you know, read my other post?''

i just want the day to end, actually
also i would consider that a facade

so I voted for him, and was followed by nohitter and mashley; mashley's post was:

Mashley wrote:

Yeah, this is very suspicious. Nataka seems anxious to get the day over with and have someone out. Here's a PM I recieved from her:
Quote:
change your vote to wojjan or 0_o and I'll change mine to what you do

Now, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?
Unvote, Vote Nataka Yuji

In retrospect, there are several things about this post that rub me the wrong way. The first is the, by itself, innocent fact that they voted as part of a bandwagon. The next part most people will probably disagree with me on, but it's "Yeah, this is very suspicious". Stating things as fact actually is a very effective way to persuade people, as they take it in subconsciously. It's similar to how people say the person's name that they're talking to in order to gain control of a conversation. I think that it was deliberately stated that way, and this is backed up by the last bit, "Now, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?", where he tries to influence the game's perception of not only Nakata, but of Wojjan, 0_o, and himself. Making people believe that x cannot be y because x is opposite of z is extremely valuable for wolves/mafia/whatever, since it allows one of their members to go unsuspected and coast to the finish line.

Then, Mashley posted a screenshot of the pm that Nakata sent him. He had to remove it, but this is what was said in response:

Mashley wrote:

"Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent."

What exactly are you suggesting? >_<

^ ">_<" is acting cute/innocent again

and again...:

Mashley wrote:

Want to explain how telling people about a suspicious PM you sent me is suspicious? Or are you just accusing me for the hell of it? And didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago? >_<

Only this time he not only tries to effect your perception with ">_<", but by stating "didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago?"

later he posted:

Mashley wrote:

This is confusing We don't even know if there is a joker

again trying to be perceived as ignorant/innocent

and finally:

Mashley wrote:

People realise Nataka is acting Jester - Nataka stops acting Jester

Cause and effect, NoHItter

This is the post that made me go back and look. It's so painfully ignorant that it's on the same level as Wojjan's troll post. It's to the point where there just has to be an ulterior motive behind it. Yeah the motive could be good, but go back and find evidence in his posts that supports that, cause I couldn't find it.