Spit the truth. You really don't understand this? Some of BNs just don't give much firetruck about nominating and that's their ultimate right. About your bubble - you didn't stated clearly enough in the thread that you are going to apply more changes, so I don't see why there should be any drama about this, just selfpop, not a big deal.Lally wrote:
Bubble post: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/4053926
Map link ; https://osu.ppy.sh/s/155266
I wanted to ask you why certain BN are really bubbling without reading the mapper posts (in this case me) when the map is not ready and i specified that i was going to do changes,and i didn't aspect to have bubble.
I would like to hear some opinions regarding that
You can't say nobody, apparently most of us care, also QAT is getting more strict lately, you can expect BNG will follow. In general, quality degrading is one of the downsides of the whole new system but hey, anyways, things are much better for the community than they were back then.Lally wrote:
is really sad that nobody gives a ship about what they're doing,personally i feel silly after thinking about that,degrading this group in this way is bad imo.
while I don't agree with them not granting pp, mainly because I dont care about ppZantaria wrote:
Call it nominated then. Not qualified. Because qualified meant a different thing in the past.Okoratu wrote:
can you calm down and read what the qualification process means?
Beatmap Nominators nominate beatmaps they think are worthy of being ranked.
This is what the qualified section's for. once a set is nominated the QAT will have to check if it really should be ranked.
If they find issues which should be addressed they will disqualify (reject the nomination). The amount of disqualifications will most likely not decrease in the future so get used to that it's really not much of a deal.
In addition to that make nominated / qualified maps not grant pp.
I think this could improve the ranking process by a lot.
same thing happen in my map p/4040516 (same BN), I was a bit mad I must admit, since he/she dont know if the mod is helpful or not, maybe removing that option could help or talking with this BN so he/she can avoid doing this in future.Lally wrote:
I mean the second point like i said in my post, why other certain BN are giving Kudos for not even replied mods? Is mapper choose to do so, if you see that the mapper is afk or doesn't want to give Kudos after 1-2 weeks i could agree but in this case i'm really asking myself what is wrong guys? Really acting like that makes no sense,
I would like to hear some opinions regarding that
I think the main thing here is in fact the clarity of a BN's job.Natsu wrote:
same thing happen in my map p/4040516 (same BN), I was a bit mad I must admit, since he/she dont know if the mod is helpful or not, maybe removing that option could help or talking with this BN so he/she can avoid doing this in future.Lally wrote:
I mean the second point like i said in my post, why other certain BN are giving Kudos for not even replied mods? Is mapper choose to do so, if you see that the mapper is afk or doesn't want to give Kudos after 1-2 weeks i could agree but in this case i'm really asking myself what is wrong guys? Really acting like that makes no sense,
I would like to hear some opinions regarding that
Shouldn't be doing that imo, should wait until both mapper and nominator agree that the map is ready (as Loc said contact him tooLally wrote:
I mean the second point like i said in my post, why other certain BN are giving Kudos for not even replied mods? Is mapper choose to do so, if you see that the mapper is afk or doesn't want to give Kudos after 1-2 weeks i could agree but in this case i'm really asking myself what is wrong guys? Really acting like that makes no sense,
I would like to hear some opinions regarding that
)Let them calm down, just ignore them for some time since we all humans don't stop thinking in our lives.Okoratu wrote:
I wanted to hear some opinions on if people think renaming a section would make random players less angry about dqs.
simply because I thought the argument is interesting and this is a public discussion thread.
I personally think people should just take the 5 seconds it takes to read what qualified means, btw.
"Note gap" "rule" (I internationally marking it with ") have absolutely poor wording and unacceptable, confusing & unclear standards, I hope it can be simple denied as noone can suggest anything better than the current poor wording.Rakuen wrote:
Yea agree, need the "note gap after spinner" and a few common rules applied. A few QATs say they're discussing this (I asked too tho) but nothing really came up
Didn't really get what you mean, but don't have to use so many negative words (or point at someone else).Kodora wrote:
"Note gap" "rule" (I internationally marking it with ") have absolutely poor wording and unacceptable, confusing & unclear standards, I hope it can be simple denied as noone can suggest anything better than the current poor wording.
I honestly think that it would be 1000 times better if CDFA won't start this topic at all.
Lol, yea. I'm like:Kibbleru wrote:
to be fair i feel like most ppl are mad at the dq reason rather than their loss in pp.
It's just, "make sure you know what you're doing". And then, nothing bad will happen to you.Rakuen wrote:
I just don't like DQs that make me can't get it qualified again, everyone knows what I mean
who needs rules?Kodora wrote:
I wish announced QAT rule revision could be done faster orz
That should solve at least majority of questionable DQs