forum

The Chain Gang of 1974 - Sleepwalking

posted
Total Posts
11
Topic Starter
Behon
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Monday, September 25, 2017 at 11:49:27 PM

Artist: The Chain Gang of 1974
Title: Sleepwalking
Source: Grand Theft Auto V
Tags: rockstar games gta
BPM: 106
Filesize: 21557kb
Play Time: 03:19
Difficulties Available:
  1. Easy (1.43 stars, 147 notes)
  2. Hard (2.09 stars, 236 notes)
  3. Normal (1.89 stars, 193 notes)
Download: The Chain Gang of 1974 - Sleepwalking
Download: The Chain Gang of 1974 - Sleepwalking (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Miss me?

8/10/16: Resurrected and updated with many of Cagrux's suggestions.
9/25/17: Resurrected with many previous suggestions.
Seiga Kaku_old_1
behonkiss is BACK
Akiyama Mizuki
OH MY
Yoges
Nice choice ^^
SoySauce
Oooh a veteran mapper. Somehow I feel a bit different doing a mod for mod with you. Don't ask why :3
Sorry if my mod is not so good but here it is

General
  1. 01:12:755 - until 01:30:868 - Why not put kiai here?
  2. 02:07:094 - until 02:25:207 - Here too
Easy
  1. I really don't think you should use CS5 in Easy diff. Should be around 2 or 3
  2. 00:25:773 (1,2) - Blanket?
  3. 00:29:170 (3,1) - ^
  4. 00:38:509 (3,4) - ^
  5. 00:44:453 (2,3,4) - Change this to a repeat slider. A beat on a blue tick is generally not recommended in Easy or Normal diff
  6. 00:47:566 (2,1) - Blanket this or balance the curve with the center
  7. 00:51:245 (1,2) - Blanket here?
  8. 00:52:660 (2,1) - There should not be more than one repeats in an Easy and Normal diff
  9. 01:36:528 (1,4) - Reduce their angle. Not too important, it's just my suggestion
  10. 01:59:736 - Note here? Since you also put a note here 01:55:207 -
  11. 02:08:792 (3,4) - Wrong spacing
  12. 02:14:453 (5,6) - Blanket?
  13. 02:45:019 (3,4,5) - ^
Normal
  1. Same thing. CS 5 too high for the diff. Go for around 3 to 3.5
  2. DS problem. Although it plays just fine, just slightly touching notes kinda look bad I suggest you avoid this. Some examples: 00:58:604 (3,4,1) - 01:16:151 (2,3,4) - 01:18:981 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - I suggest you use 0.6 DS for more overlap or 1.0 DS to keep it spaced
  3. Three note stacks not recommended in Normal. Although I think you can keep it in the chorus
  4. 00:35:962 (4,1) - Blanket
  5. 00:43:038 (2,3) - Wrong spacing
  6. 00:44:028 (3,4) - Blanket a little off
  7. 00:53:085 (3,4) - ^
  8. 01:01:717 (4,5) - ^
  9. 01:25:207 (2,3,4) - Overlap looks really bad. Using 1.0 DS can fix it.
  10. 02:10:490 (2,3,4) - ^
  11. 02:35:255 (2) - Start this at the white tick
  12. 03:03:698 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS 1.0 for no overlap
  13. 03:08:226 (4,5) - DS 1.0 for no overlap
  14. 03:13:604 (3,4) - After spacing them you can make a blanket here
Hard
  1. 00:38:226 (4,5) - Blanket is a little off
  2. 00:40:773 (10,11) - ^
  3. 00:49:547 (9,10) - ^
  4. 01:01:717 (10) - Although it's fine I suggest you change this to a circle and a 3/4 repeat slider instead of just one repeat slider
  5. 01:12:189 (1) - ctrl+G this
  6. 01:19:547 (6) - NC?
  7. 01:28:604 (6) - ^
  8. 01:29:453 (9,10) - Blanket
  9. 01:30:868 - Note here
  10. 01:32:849 (4,5) - Blanket?
  11. 01:34:830 (8,9) - ^
  12. 02:13:887 (6) - NC
  13. 02:22:943 (6) - ^02:23:792 (9,10) -
  14. 02:45:302 (4) - Move this slider to 02:45:585 - and add a circle here 02:45:302 -
  15. 02:49:830 (4) - Do the same thing
  16. 02:54:924 (4) - Delete this note, put a circle at both of the white ticks
  17. 03:03:981 (4,7) - Blanket?
  18. 03:15:302 (7) - Remove all the repeats, put another 1/2 slider after this slider

I'll end my mod here. Hope this helps in any way and good luck :D Looking forward to your mod ;)
[ Shamwow ]
hi, m4m from my queue!

General


-why is only the last chorus kiai?

easy


-00:21:245 (2,3) - blanket so it looks better
-00:24:641 (3) - i would put this next to 00:24:075 (2) instead of above it diagonally like that
-00:25:773 (1,2) - blanket
-00:33:698 (3) - id move this so that it's under 00:33:132 (2) more
-00:37:094 (1,2) - move these to be right above the end of 00:35:396 (2)
-the gap in between 00:37:660 (2) and 00:38:509 (3) is kind of awkward, same with 00:39:924 (4,5) because now ur only mapping the vocals. I would do something like this instead where it focuses more on the song than just the singing. this goes for the rest of this section until the break
-01:22:943 (2,3) - kind of a nitpick but i wouldn't have that tiny bit of 01:22:943 (2) overlapping 01:23:509 (3)
-01:25:207 (2,3) - ^
-01:36:528 (1,2,3,4) - u randomly switch to mapping the vocals here which looks kind of awkward
-01:48:981 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - focus less on vocals
-02:22:943 (4,5) - these looks really awkwardly placed, I'd put them next to 02:22:377 (3) so it looks smoother
-02:34:264 (1,2) - I'd remove these, doesn't really make sense
-02:38:792 (1) - shorten this to 02:42:755 and add a note at 02:43:321
-02:46:151 (4,5) - these can be blanketed better

Normal


-same issues i pointed out in easy: mapping the vocals feels awkward imo
-02:49:830 (4) - doesnt make sense
-03:10:490 (1) - ^
-03:13:321 (2,3,4) - feels really clumped

hard


-this looks really similar to normal >>
-02:34:264 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - there's nothing going on in the song here so ur mapping notes that aren't there :s
-02:53:509 (2,3) - these can be blanketed better

wish i could say more about Hard but u have an old mapping style and it's really similar to normal and i'd just be repeating the same things about mapping vocals lol. good luck though! also kudos to u for being here since the beginning :o
_vanity
Hello. I posed in your M4M queue.
[Normal]
  1. Check AiMod.
  2. 00:27:189 - Unmapped vocal. Try turning 00:26:906 (4) - into a 1/2 slider.
  3. 00:40:773 (3) - Try using a rhythm where this slider end is clickable.
  4. 00:54:641 (1) - ^
  5. 00:47:000 - Map something here. Unmapped vocal.
  6. 00:53:085 (3,4) - Blanket.
  7. 01:01:717 (4,5) - ^
  8. 00:56:340 (2) - Reduce this slider to 00:57:472 - and add a 1/2 slider to 00:58:038 -
  9. 01:50:679 (2,3) - Change this to a 1/2 slider for the sake of reading.
  10. 01:55:207 (1,2) - ^
  11. 01:59:736 (2,3) - ^
  12. Starting from 02:43:321 - it is unclear if you are prioritizing the rhythm or the vocals. Try mapping this section in a way where both work.
  13. 03:05:962 - Unmapped sound. Watch out for all of these. They really help out with consistency/flow. This is especially important in easier maps.
  14. 01:52:094 (5) - Reduce this slider to the white tick. Add a note to the red tick.
  15. 03:13:604 (3,4) - Fix your blanket, or don't use a curved slider.
[Hard]
  1. 00:30:868 (8) - Using this slider doesn't really make any sense. It would make more sense to map the vocals, just like you did before. Replace this with a 1/2 slider. Add a second 1/2 slider at 00:31:434 - These parts should really be clickable.
  2. 00:35:396 (8) - Unmapped vocals.
  3. 00:29:170 (4,5,6) - It's very important to keep a consistent flow. I'm not saying this is wrong, but I think using a 1/2 slider, followed by a single note would feel way better. Just like you did at 00:24:641 (4,5) -
  4. 00:33:698 (4,5,6) - ^
  5. 00:39:924 (7) - NC
  6. 00:40:773 (10,11) - Fix your blanket.
  7. 00:47:566 (5,6) - There's an issue with flow here. Trying moving 00:48:415 (6) - to around x: 232 y: 340. Adjust your spacing afterwards.
  8. 01:12:189 (1) - I think this would do better as a burst stream.
  9. 01:16:717 (8,1) - Awkward flow. Trying moving (1) a bit lower.
  10. 01:18:981 (4,5) - Try using a 1/2 slider instead?
  11. 01:28:038 (4,5) - ^
  12. 01:19:547 (6) - NC
  13. 01:32:849 (4,5) - Awkward flow. Move 01:33:698 (5) - to around x: 160 y: 72
  14. 02:11:056 (8,1) - Move (1) upwards.
  15. 02:13:321 (4,5) - Refer to what I said before for the rest of the map.
  16. 02:23:792 (9,10) - Fix your blanket.
  17. 02:22:943 (6) - NC
  18. 02:34:264 (1) - At this green tick, you should decrease the volume by at least 40%. This sounds you mapped aren't very loud. Appy this to all difficulties.
  19. 02:37:094 (7) - NC
  20. 02:44:453 (3,4) - Blanket.
  21. 02:48:981 (3,4) - Once again, check all of your blankets. I don't know if this one was intended, but it would make things look a lot neater.
  22. 03:08:226 (5,6) - Try using a 1/2 slider for better flow.
  23. 03:16:434 (1) - This spinner doesn't make too much sense. It would be better if you mapped this section.
  24. 01:03:698 - 01:40:490 - You should map everything in between these breaks. Breaks are used for cool down points in the song, I guess you could say. There is plenty of stuff going on in the music, since the song is still going. This goes for all difficulties.
  25. 02:25:207 - This break is okay.
Ataraxia
Hi, sorry for Late !

Easy

I think the NCs Need to be something like This (each upbeat = NC)

00:39:924 (4) - do a correct blanket, like this see a little overmap

00:54:641 (1) - its not good making 2 repeats in 1 slider ( i see many BNs saying about this)

01:22:943 (2,3) - in not like the "overlap" her :s (x:74 y:51 is good for me)

01:25:207 (5,6) - ^ (not the same x and y xD)

01:50:679 (2,3) - do not do Stacks In Easy's (BNs things)

01:55:207 (2,3) - ^

In easy, spinners need at least 1 second for the next object, you can delete this 02:07:660 (1,2) - notes

02:10:490 (5) - Let lined with 02: 09: 924 (4) -

02:38:792 (1) - same thing

I Will stop the mod here, i don't know if you don't know the actual criteria or if to BE like this, revive the old style, i see things only have in 2007 maps they are unrankeable now ;-;

If you want to know more about, PM with me xD
Topic Starter
Behon
Guess I have a lot of modding to do. No one add any more mods until I've updated this, please.

I messaged Atraxia. I really doubt that my style is "unrankable" just because it's easy.
BounceBabe

Behonkiss wrote:

Guess I have a lot of modding to do. No one add any more mods until I've updated this, please.

I messaged Atraxia. I really doubt that my style is "unrankable" just because it's easy.
Guess i'll not be modding this any time soon. And lol, your style is definitely rankable.
milr_
Wow
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply