[ Zzz ] wrote:

Hi~ Pho

Modreqs

Walpurgisnacht

1. 01:11:923 - Delete Whistle It is there for the E-guitar.
2. 01:14:570 - 01:14:747 - Delete Whistle It is there for the E-guitar.
3. 01:33:276 (5) - Clap change the Whistle :3 ( 01:34:159 (3) - Same beat ) Claps feel more authentic at these beats to me.
4. 02:36:629 (5,6,1,2) - Missing Whistle :3? Oh yeah, I missed some here.
5. 02:44:041 - Same :3 Whoops.
6. 02:46:688 (7) - Add Whistle ( 02:46:865 (1) - Adequate? ) 02:55:335 (1) - If you think it's appropriate here
7. 02:52:335 (8,9) - I think better I prefer the current circles at these parts to fit the hit-hats
8. 03:05:041 (5) - Clap Change Whistle See reason above.
9. 03:28:070 (2) - x358 y41 It seems comfortable Repositioned it differently.
10. 05:03:806 (1) - Like the photo ( Is bent to )
11. 05:09:100 (1) - NC? I don't think it's necessary for this stream.
12. 05:10:688 (4) - Clap Change Whistle See reasoning above.
13. 05:30:982 (2) - Add Clap? Added drumwhistles instead!
14. 05:33:100 - Here 05:33:453 (1) - It sounds like a hit sound like this. Yes, that's intended.
15. 06:03:806 (1) - NC? Feels unnecessary.
16. 06:10:865 (4) - Clap change Whistle

302,189,337688,6,0,L|315:58,1,113.999996520996,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
100,153,338041,2,0,L|88:39,1,113.999996520996,8,0:0,0:0:0:0:
411,153,338394,2,0,L|422:39,1,113.999996520996,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
210,189,338747,2,0,L|198:75,1,113.999996520996,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

pkhg wrote:

hiya :3/ :3/

[Walpurgisnacht]
Move the preview point to 01:32:835 - sounds better imo

00:36:629 (5,6) - Maybe you can ctrl+g them, feels better to have something clickable on the downbeat (also it mess with your comboing :p) Also the placement after ctrl+g looks good :3 I prefer the current one as it follows the violing strings strictly.
00:39:453 (6,7) - or 00:39:806 (1,2) - ^ but the placement thing doesnt work here :d ^
00:59:218 (5) - What about moving it to x180 y328 ? creates a nice jump imo :3
01:17:218 (5) - nc for sv change? I think it's unnecessary and still easy to follow. Will think about it.
01:26:394 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - omg nice squares ;3 <3 <3 <3
01:36:806 (1) - Remove nc
01:43:335 (1,1,1,1,1) - <3 <3 <3 <3
01:54:453 (1) - finish on head for consistency with 03:26:218 (1) -
02:38:394 (1,2) - stack :p
02:44:041 (1) - whistle on head :p Fixed from the previous one
03:19:865 (3) - ctrl+g maybe? I prefer the current setup.
03:28:070 (2,3) - looks a bit weird, what about http://puu.sh/gg3ai/ee90d55857.jpg ? Changed, but I prefer zzz's version here.
04:22:688 (1) - change additions to auto and add a whistle
04:49:688 (1) - change slider's head addition to auto
05:04:512 (5) - use a clap instead, on head :p
05:05:041 (1) - whistle on head
05:06:629 (1) - slider's head addition to auto
05:08:747 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - wow x.x
05:31:865 (1) - finish on head for consistency with 03:26:218 (1) -
05:37:688 (1,2,3,4) - Try this, its pretty cool :3 Lemme think about that.

302,189,337688,6,0,L|315:58,1,113.999996520996,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
100,153,338041,2,0,L|88:39,1,113.999996520996,8,0:0,0:0:0:0:
411,153,338394,2,0,L|422:39,1,113.999996520996,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
210,189,338747,2,0,L|198:75,1,113.999996520996,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

05:43:335 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - would be cool if you increase progressively the volume through this section, like you did 01:43:335 (1,1,1,1) - and 03:15:100 (1,1,1,1,1) -
06:10:865 (4) - put a whistle instead Fixed from previous
06:19:865 (1) - finish on head
06:22:512 (6,6,8) - drum whistle (on head) just suggestion Nah, it isn't necessary
06:29:218 (1) - drum whistle on tail and 06:29:570 (2) - drum whistle on head instead I prefer what I have currently, drumwhistles feel too stronk
06:40:512 (1,2) - ^ ^

Most of them are just suggestions but i'll be happy if you fix the hitsound errors :3
I really liked the song and map <3
Good luck :3

Pho wrote:

We need more Taishi

1. I probably spelled that difficulty name wrong even when copying it straight off of osu letter for letter
2. Holy these sliders are amazing
3. 00:53:747 (6,7) - How about perhaps switching/ctrl+g'ing these two? For a more... pretzel like flow that leads into 00:54:276 (1) - better. Image of before and after ctrl+g to 6 and 7. Which I think would fit better since this is the relatively calm part of the song.
4. 01:43:335 (1,1,1,1) - You're doing a same length slider with longer and longer slider thing, which is cool, but the last one is a little bit too fast based off of how much the others are speeding up. Red is a rough outline of how the sliders are currently going in comparison to eachother, blue is how it would be if made more even. (with blue circle to represent where the slider could possibly start instead while ending at the same spot!)
   > Same thing goes for 05:20:747 (1,1,1,1) - Image #2
5. 05:02:218 (1) - Why the whistle? And, most of the other times you had symmetrical sliders they would still start at the same end, so it seems strange and a bit out of pattern that this a ctrl+h AND ctrl+g of 05:01:688 (5) - . Consider doing ctrl+g to this slider. Also, it'd have the potential to flow more nicely, with the red line representing the current way and the blue line representing what it would be if the change is applied.
6. 05:08:747 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - It's a bit weird that the first three notes are all the same distance from eachother then this to become a gradually more spaced stream. Perhaps start gradually spacing them more apart from the beginning rather than the third note.
   >Maybe something more gradual/constant like 06:13:159 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
7. 05:14:923 (6) - How about moving this somewhere like x:174 y:129 so that it can go like this instead of this

dorothy3242 wrote:

I'll attempt to mod
selfishly
because a friend of mine will kill me if she found out I failed to fulfill a madoka related map mod request (I don't want to die)

So
Hello with a (poor?) mod requested from the Banana Queue! owo/
PM me anytime anywhere if something doesn't make sense because of my poor explanations for reasonings :<
and it's also really short (99% is me trying to explain myself) because I like stuff too much and overall think everything in this map is good q~q
I'll throw a star and run away now

[Walpurgishnacht]

1. I probably spelled that difficulty name wrong even when copying it straight off of osu letter for letter It's a german word dw, it's a difficult language~
2. Holy these sliders are amazing Thanks!
3. 00:53:747 (6,7) - How about perhaps switching/ctrl+g'ing these two? For a more... pretzel like flow that leads into 00:54:276 (1) - better. Image of before and after ctrl+g to 6 and 7. Which I think would fit better since this is the relatively calm part of the song. I prefer the current motion, 7 and 8 are more intense notes here and i want them to have better emphasis by increasing pressure here.
4. 01:43:335 (1,1,1,1) - You're doing a same length slider with longer and longer slider thing, which is cool, but the last one is a little bit too fast based off of how much the others are speeding up. Red is a rough outline of how the sliders are currently going in comparison to eachother, blue is how it would be if made more even. (with blue circle to represent where the slider could possibly start instead while ending at the same spot!)
   > Same thing goes for 05:20:747 (1,1,1,1) - Image #2 The increasing distance between the sliderheads is intended for further emphasis, and I don't feel like it goes off the rails. I'll gather more opinions on this.
5. 05:02:218 (1) - Why the whistle? And, most of the other times you had symmetrical sliders they would still start at the same end, so it seems strange and a bit out of pattern that this a ctrl+h AND ctrl+g of 05:01:688 (5) - . Consider doing ctrl+g to this slider. Also, it'd have the potential to flow more nicely, with the red line representing the current way and the blue line representing what it would be if the change is applied. Allright, swapped sliderhead/-tail, it actually works better here. My whistle patterns at this section follow the chorus strictly, so no change to that.
6. 05:08:747 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - It's a bit weird that the first three notes are all the same distance from eachother then this to become a gradually more spaced stream. Perhaps start gradually spacing them more apart from the beginning rather than the third note.
   >Maybe something more gradual/constant like 06:13:159 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I feel the current placement is fine, no need to do it for the first three notes here.
7. 05:14:923 (6) - How about moving this somewhere like x:174 y:129 so that it can go like this instead of this Ahh, i prefer the current pattern more, gonna keep for now.

Xinely wrote:

hi pho ~
from m4m in my queue

• 
  Walpurgisnacht

1. OD9 looks so cruel here with cs5 lol, idk if you do it intentionally but i'd say use OD 8,5 instead Yeah, I was thinking of that too xD Allright, fixed
2. 00:11:924 - until 00:34:865 - imo 40% sounds a little bit loud for this time, i'd say to use 30% but that's just my taste K.
3. 00:22:865 - how about add whistle here? both piano and violin fit with whistle It feels too much for me, neither the violin nor piano beat aren't too dominant that i'd set a HS for it at this point.
4. 00:27:101 (1,2) - replace whistle on tail and add it in circle instead, the piano sounds at red tick here I'm pretty sure it lies on the previous white tick as it is right now.
5. 00:31:336 - same as 00:22:865 - (because the violion music) K.
6. 00:32:748 - ^ Disagree here, both piano and violin are faint at this beat.
7. 00:35:571 (1) - maybe you forgot to add finish on head? it has cymbal sound here
8. 00:40:335 (3,4) - according the angle from this pattern, imo they have different angle level with 00:39:982 (1,2) - , to make them more balance, how about move (2) to 248,360
9. 00:41:659 (3) - imo this sounds like overmapped, i cant hear music on this time, how about remove them instead? Hmm k.
10. 00:45:100 - how about add drum whistle here? i know the hitsound isnt best suggestion here, i just want to say that i feel a little bit empty w/o hitsound on this time
11. 00:46:335 - 00:46:512 - 00:46:688 - how about add drum whistle here to emphasize the violin musics?
12. 00:48:276 - 00:49:688 - 00:51:100 - 00:55:335 - how about add whistle for them to emphasize the vocal? and then 00:53:923 - 00:55:335 - 00:56:747 - maybe add whistle as well for them because the hitsounds feel a little bit plain here I like it as it is right now since this is one of the calmer sections of the music. Using whistles too much makes it sound overloaded, and I want to avoid that.
13. 00:52:512 - imo it should be uses S:C2 whistle here because the music is similar with 00:52:159 -
14. 01:03:276 (4,5) - looking not consistent spacing in here a little bit weird imo. i'd say make them consistent or move 01:03:276 (4) - 320,44 to make jump (at least it will fix the flow here)
15. 01:06:276 (5,6) - a normal spacing after little jump from 01:05:923 (3,4) - feels a little bit weird for me to play, i'd say ctrl+g 01:05:923 (3,5) - so you will get jumping flow instead here I'd like to keep what I currently have. 01:06:100 (4,5) - are notes with high dominance in the track for me while 01:06:453 (6) - is rather weak, that's why there are jumps between 3-4-5 and not 5-6.
16. 01:13:335 (8) - personally i get the flow still can improved here, hmm how about ctrl+g this slider and arrange like http://puu.sh/gj1Bv.jpg ? The effect would be too weak, did something different.
17. 01:17:218 (5) - idk if this needed or not but maybe NC to give a mark of SV changes here? I don't think it's necessary, it feels natural enough for me to play.
18. 01:40:865 (2) - for emphasize the vocal on redtick, imo it should have a distance between this circle and next slider. how about move this circle to 372,236?
19. 01:47:923 (2,3) - imo the design looks a little bit bad because the low spacing on this pattern, for me it would be better if you move 01:48:100 (3) - to 344,28 to you will make a consistent spacing instead here
20. 02:29:218 (3) - imo the 1/8 starts on 02:29:394 -, only can hear 1/4 of vocal's breathe from 02:29:218 - >< I can hear noise in the background intensifying though
21. 02:52:335 (8,9) - hmm imo this pattern a little bit tricky to catch, personally i prefer 1/4 slider but i guess you did this intentionally lol Yes :3 I'll see how other BNs will think about it, I actually like it.
22. 03:13:688 (1) - low spacing works not really good here imo. well this is stanza too so i prefer to make it a jump actually. how about move to 340,28? if you agree so you can move 03:14:041 (2) - to 104,148 Found another solution.
23. 03:24:806 (6,1) - a low spacing for cymbal works not really good too here, i'd expect something jump for the (1) example https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2841097
24. 04:07:335 (1) - forgot finish on head? it has cymbal sound w
25. 04:18:629 (1) - same as above
26. 04:39:365 (6) - imo this slider doesnt work properly here because skip the snare of guitar sound at 04:39:453 - , i'd like to make this slider become 1/2 and start on that time I know what you mean, but I feel this rhythm pattern works exceptionally well here since it follow the most vital beats and the string at said position is negligible to me. I agree it's not a good rhythm in most cases, but in this one, I feel it does a good job.
27. 04:46:865 (1) - same as 04:07:335 (1) -
28. 05:10:865 (1) - im sure you forgot to add finish on here lol
29. 05:14:218 (3) - nazi but i think the design would be better if you try to blanket this slider with previous slider, move to 212,272? Not too much of a fan of blankets. Did another thing.
30. 05:33:453 (1) - same as 05:10:865 (1) - lol
31. 05:58:865 (1) - forgot finish on head? im sure i hear cymbal sound here lol Those cymbals are too weak for me to hear D:
32. just wondering why 01:33:453 - uses 80% whenever other kiais time only use 70% here? but i think it'd be better to use 80% for them and make them consistent each other Yup, my fault, this wasn't intended. Fixed!

great map :3
before i move this forward, could you give me the link of metadata? too busy to find it,#blameUniversity

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Gratz.
Nice speedrank



You're lucky.

Anxient wrote:

congrats >.>

why did this get approved so fast what the hell

CSLM wrote:

Anxient wrote:

congrats >.>

why did this get approved so fast what the hell

i know, i take 3 month for rank my first app u.u
pho is always fast lol...
gratz~

pkhg wrote:

Prho ;p

Anxient wrote:

CSLM wrote:

i know, i take 3 monthS for rank my first app u.u
pho is always fast lol...
gratz~

-stabs CLSM-