forum
Post your CPU (CPU-Z)
posted
Total Posts
48
Topic Starter
Under load:
Yea no.
Bunch of useless information.
Also, GPU-Z
Bunch of useless information.
Also, GPU-Z
Topic Starter
Ph0X wrote:
Yea no.
Bunch of useless information.
Also, GPU-Z
Yea no.
Got the model of my GTX 260 wrong, won't recognize core 216 it seems.
ZScreen doesn't seem to like to capture CPU-Z...
CPU-Z for some reason had some errors on initialization, so I guess it couldn't load some (useless) information.
4GHz from 2.5GHz on a budget proc, woo! :D/
ZScreen doesn't seem to like GPU-Z, either...
CPU-Z for some reason had some errors on initialization, so I guess it couldn't load some (useless) information.
4GHz from 2.5GHz on a budget proc, woo! :D/
ZScreen doesn't seem to like GPU-Z, either...
bagnz0r
Strager, your host doesn't like me.strager wrote:
ZScreen doesn't seem to like to capture CPU-Z...
CPU-Z for some reason had some errors on initialization, so I guess it couldn't load some (useless) information.
4GHz from 2.5GHz on a budget proc, woo!/
ZScreen doesn't seem to like GPU-Z, either...
*stragerBagnoGamer wrote:
Strager, your host doesn't like me.
*nameserver
Yeah. =|
bagnz0r
broXero_HT wrote:
AMD
Normally 4x 2,83 GHz, but overclocked to 4x 3,4 GHz. So altogether13,6 GHz ^^
Google's DNS<3, easy to memorize
8.8.8.8
8.8.4.4
and it doesn't redirect you to shitty opendns search
Again, speccy shows more than anyone here needs to know, these are useless info no one will ever look at.
8.8.8.8
8.8.4.4
and it doesn't redirect you to shitty opendns search
Again, speccy shows more than anyone here needs to know, these are useless info no one will ever look at.
If only I had the money to get a fancy i7 or Phenom. Then again, my setup isn't that bad
Mine is an old machine...
Pentium 4 - 2.4GHz
1280 MB RAM DDR1
GeForce FX5500 256MB, AGP 8x
40GB HDD
17 inch CRT Monitor....
Run osu well with this, even sometimes laggy...
Pentium 4 - 2.4GHz
1280 MB RAM DDR1
GeForce FX5500 256MB, AGP 8x
40GB HDD
17 inch CRT Monitor....
Run osu well with this, even sometimes laggy...
and now someone explain me the difference between my and metroid's CPUs, I didn't follow any hardware news for a goddamn long time
also, gpu-z (as if someone is interested, meh)
also, gpu-z (as if someone is interested, meh)
Topic Starter
TKiller's CPU: C0 stepping, x 12 multiplier.TKiller wrote:
and now someone explain me the difference between my and metroid's CPUs, I didn't follow any hardware news for a
Metroid's CPU: D0 stepping, x 20 multiplier.
Metroid and I have the more recent version of the chip.
since he posted in this thread that died off quite a while back...
it gets me through...
it gets me through...
Rena-chan
I'm about to post the most pathetic graphics card in this entire thread. Brace yourselves for integrated chipsets.
Topic Starter
Xanek wrote:
Rofl underclocking/volting.
I smell a notebook. Or at the very least a nettop. Also that isn't oldass, I've got a Tyler one which predates Griffin in my notebook.IppE602 wrote:
Turion
This thread makes my poor little core2 duo want to die :<
Here's GPU
@Harris What skin is that? :O and where can I get it?
Here's GPU
@Harris What skin is that? :O and where can I get it?
When did i say dis, or are you commenting on thatXanek wrote:
Rofl underclocking/volting.
Topic Starter
From your extremely low multiplier and GHz it appears obvious that the processor is underclocked.Xanek wrote:
When did i say dis, or are you commenting on thatXanek wrote:
Rofl underclocking/volting.
IppE
You smelled correctly, it be a notebook.Rokodo wrote:
I smell a notebook. Or at the very least a nettop. Also that isn't oldass, I've got a Tyler one which predates Griffin in my notebook.IppE602 wrote:
Turion
And its not the newest turion (Turion II X2 Ultra) so its oldass.
Runs osu! at 150-400 fps so I'm happy with it
that evil which I have some old things!what
^Doomsday93 wrote:
If only I had the money to get a fancy i7 or Phenom. Then again, my setup isn't that bad
Also: The reason some CPUs appear underclocked is because they most likely have Intel Speedstep enabled. This lowers the multiplier when you are not using the CPU.
Topic Starter
sp1ky wrote:
Also: The reason some CPUs appear underclocked is because they most likely have Intel Speedstep enabled. This lowers the multiplier when you are not using the CPU.
Yes, but at the time that had not occurred to me. /facepalm
It later turned out that that AMD had its "Cool'n'Quiet" technology enabled.
Sometimes I forget these things. ^^;
"Cool'n'Quiet" - eww AMD's naming conventions suck. Speedstep sounds so much more badassRokodo wrote:
sp1ky wrote:
Also: The reason some CPUs appear underclocked is because they most likely have Intel Speedstep enabled. This lowers the multiplier when you are not using the CPU.
Yes, but at the time that had not occurred to me. /facepalm
It later turned out that that AMD had its "Cool'n'Quiet" technology enabled.
Sometimes I forget these things. ^^;
Nice OC if that's on air cooling btw
Topic Starter
Zalman 9900 LED (at time of writing).
Topic Starter
IppE602 wrote:
Y'all with them i7's, go get a Bloomfield or Gulftown and not a Lynnfield
Lynnfield has some advantages on the price front still.
Having said that, even running dual channel on a Bloomfield i7 seems to work just fine if you want to save some money by running dual channel DDR3 instead of triple channel.
Then again... motherboard prices can bring up the cost too.
In the real world it is my opinion that Bloomfield doesn't bring many great advantages over Lynnfield for most users. 1156 CPU pins is still hell of a lot considering there are still many power users still rolling along on 775.
Brag factor and knowing QPI link is there though... things like that are nice I guess. I got my 920 system before Lynnfield was released, probably would have invested otherwise if I had waited.
