1. Prologue (6.85 stars, 1463 notes)

1. 無音のslider tickと無音のslider-slideを、同じパートで両方使用するのは原則Unrankableだったと思います。どちらか削除を検討してみては。
2. tagの'ゴールデンタイム'をSourseに持ってくると良いです

1. 02:23:700 (3) - unsnappedです。上のtimelineをちょっと動かせば直ります
2. 04:31:450 (2) - sliderの終点ですが、普通に赤線に置いた方が、drumと合ってる気がします。

P o M u T a wrote:

#modreqs

[General]

1. 無音のslider tickと無音のslider-slideを、同じパートで両方使用するのは原則Unrankableだったと思います。どちらか削除を検討してみては。
2. tagの'ゴールデンタイム'をSourseに持ってくると良いです

[EDITED]

1. 02:23:700 (3) - unsnappedです。上のtimelineをちょっと動かせば直ります
2. 04:31:450 (2) - sliderの終点ですが、普通に赤線に置いた方が、drumと合ってる気がします。

nice map
おしまい

Rilene wrote:

AESTHETIC MODDING QUEUE
____________________________________________

EDITED
Since you said "EDITED" is for ranked so I'll mod this.

00:08:711 (5) - It would look better if it is curved like this.
I like current pattern
00:28:950 (3) - Make it slightly curved downwards?
done
00:32:950 (3) - Make it curved more? It looks bit too straight.
I like current pattern
00:34:450 (5,6) - Bit too far.
done
00:35:700 (1,2) - Looks bit bad, maybe make it like this?
done
00:37:950 (2) - Make it more curve, in a same direction.
I like current pattern
00:38:450 (5,6) - Bit too near.
done

00:39:700 (1,2) - Make it like this?
I like current pattern
00:41:950 (2) - Make it more curved downward.
I like current pattern
00:42:887 (2,3) - Move them a bit away from 1.
done
00:47:200 (4,6) - Not a perfect blanket.
done
00:48:325 (4) - Move it to (x: 220 / y: 228) then move - 00:48:450 (5) - to (x: 446 / y: 255)
I put (5) to (463,274)
01:04:950 (3,4) - Slighty not a perfect blanket but not sure does this matter or not since it is spaced out.
I like current pattern
01:14:700 (1,3) - For some reason, they look quite weird but it is ok, maybe it is better to use this slider.
I like current pattern
01:18:700 (5) - Maybe a NC?
I like current pattern
01:50:200 (1) - Move them up? Just to prevent it touching the slider below.
This is on accord
02:09:200 (1) - Make it like this?
I like current pattern
02:14:575 (3) - Looks ok but can be better IMO by moving the points to more centered.
done
02:14:950 (4) - Almost a perfect triangle, try move to (x: 444 / y: 108).
done
02:40:700 (3) - Bit too straight, IMO.
I like current pattern
03:00:200 (3,5,1) - Why not just use the same slider, copy paste it and rotate it 120 degrees?
This digree is beautiful IMO.
03:06:200 (1) - Slider art looks pretty weird, on the crooked part.
done
03:09:200 (4) - The curve between the crooks looks strange, maybe move it to nearer the center of them?
done
03:31:700 (3,4,5,6,7) - You should have use this mini stream to blanket the 2.
I like current pattern
03:36:575 (2,3) - Make the mini jumps between these? It both looks and play bit strange. Even moving just not to let the circles touch each other is already good, IMO.
done
03:44:200 (1,3) - I love how you did this.
<3
03:56:200 (1) - Bit too straight, I guess.
I like current pattern
04:45:450 (2) - Move this down, just not to prevent slider overlaps with 1.
This is on accord
05:01:700 (3,4,5,6,7) - How about just make the 1/2 jumps? It feels better IMO, to emphasize the ending.
done

Good luck on getting ranked!

arnoldusj wrote:

honestly very difficult to find fault on this map, but I find some mistakes like 01:53:825 (2) - the distance is not in accordance with 01:54:075 (4)
and also please improved there is some distance off the line, example 05:01:700 (3)

1. 00:18:950 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - 正六角形作ってもいいかも？見栄えは良くなると思います
   
   img

   
   code

   [HitObjects]
   435,109,18950,2,0,L|339:117,1,90,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   149,96,19200,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   306,26,19325,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   190,187,19450,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   208,16,19575,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   289,198,19700,6,0,P|329:214|441:206,1,135,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:29:450 (6) - 00:29:950 (2) - にblanketさせるなら↓
   
   code

   [HitObjects]
   207,321,29450,2,0,P|239:354|281:360,1,90,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:45:700 (1,2) - 配置の提案です 同じメロディが続く後半は意図的に流れに反したスライダーを置いているのはわかりますが、前半部分はここだけが外れたように見えます
   
   img

   
4. 01:07:200 (3,4,5) - 16分連打で流れを殺すくらいなら、末端2つをキックに変えた方がいいんじゃないかなとも思います、あくまで私の好みです！
5. 01:16:200 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - cool
6. 02:20:700 (3,4,5) - 直角二等辺三角形(響きが懐かしい)にすればより綺麗に見えます
   
   img

   
   code

   [HitObjects]
   81,232,140700,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   240,89,140825,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   232,240,140950,1,8,0:0:0:0:

7. 02:58:200 (1) - ギリギリ切れてます
   
   img

   

sionKotori wrote:

m4m

[Extra]

1. 00:18:950 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - 正六角形作ってもいいかも？見栄えは良くなると思いますdone
   
   img

   
   code

   [HitObjects]
   435,109,18950,2,0,L|339:117,1,90,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   149,96,19200,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   306,26,19325,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   190,187,19450,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   208,16,19575,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   289,198,19700,6,0,P|329:214|441:206,1,135,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:29:450 (6) - 00:29:950 (2) - にblanketさせるなら↓00:29:950 (2) - を動かす形で解決しました
   
   code

   [HitObjects]
   207,321,29450,2,0,P|239:354|281:360,1,90,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:45:700 (1,2) - 配置の提案です 同じメロディが続く後半は意図的に流れに反したスライダーを置いているのはわかりますが、前半部分はここだけが外れたように見えます done
   
   img

   
4. 01:07:200 (3,4,5) - 16分連打で流れを殺すくらいなら、末端2つをキックに変えた方がいいんじゃないかなとも思います、あくまで私の好みです！01:06:700 (1,2) - あたりからの流れがすきなのでこのままで！
5. 01:16:200 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - cool
6. 02:20:700 (3,4,5) - 直角二等辺三角形(響きが懐かしい)にすればより綺麗に見えますdone
   
   img

   
   code

   [HitObjects]
   81,232,140700,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   240,89,140825,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   232,240,140950,1,8,0:0:0:0:

7. 02:58:200 (1) - ギリギリ切れてますdone
   
   img

   

ひたすら難しそう！グッドラック！

xDarxen wrote:

Hullo, here is my (late) mod

• 
  

  General

1. The current BG file is 1081x768, please change it to 1024x768.
   done
2. Increase the Audio LeadIn to 2000ms. To fix this you go to the osu. file and look for audio leadin and write it down 2000 and that's it.
   We already have 1700+ms before first note, so don't need more IMO.

• 
  

  EDITED

1. The stack leniency is set to 0.2, which is below the recommended of 0.3. Please make it 0.3, the effect will be the same though.
   No. The difference between 0.2 and 0.3 is serious for the beautiful.
2. 00:58:200 (3,6) - This overlap seems unintentional. Either stack them or move 00:58:575 (6) more left.
   done
3. 01:33:700 (1) - This touches the health bar. Lower 01:33:700 (1,2) both of them.
   done
4. 01:36:700 (1,2) - The spacing between those is completely different than 01:34:700 (1,2) and they are all 3/4 sliders, which is really confusing. Maybe lower the spacing a little bit?
   No. They are not so problem IMO.
5. Same with 01:38:700 (1,2)
   So, same it is.
6. 02:58:575 (2,3) - This looks kinda ugly. Maybe move 02:58:575 (2) up and left so that 02:58:700 (3) blankets it? Or change the shape of 02:58:700 (3) idk.
   Uh, I think they are not so. If others point this again, I'll do something
7. 03:24:700 (3) - Move a little down for perfect blanket.
   done
8. 03:55:950 (7,1) - These two are nearly touching. Move or curve 03:56:200 (1) a little up.
   done
9. 05:01:950 (5) - Add NC, since it's the last note?
   add NC on 05:01:700 (1) -

• 
  

  Feedback

  
  You did a great job on this, it is really enjoyable and it is noticable that you gave a lot of effort. Good luck! Take a star

EvilElvis wrote:

quddle dls

Dreamtwolf wrote:

Hi!!! noob modder approaching

Edited
----------------------------------------------------------------------
00:10:211 - insert spinner here to here 00:11:211?no reason
00:19:575 (6) - Touches Healthbar and I use fullscreen.no reason
AiMod says: "stack leniency is larger than 0.9 or smaller than 0.3."no reason
Switch difficulty name to "End?" If not then "Edited?"k
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Such a good map also soz for short mod. I'm copy pasting the keys that I cannot use cause broken keyboard .
Good Luck on Map Getting Ranked!

SPOILER

Broccoly wrote:

Higher AR would feel more fitting since 240 BPM and jumpy

Urushi38 wrote:

Broccoly wrote:

Higher AR would feel more fitting since 240 BPM and jumpy

AR9.7 is enough high to read this map IMO although I can't pass this map.

1. 01:07:700 (1,2) - Visually, they are not farther than previous patterns, but when i was playing this pattern, it was surprising and not really comfortable to play (as you can see i thought the sliderstart was at 123|338. It could be better if you reduce the distance between these sliders.
2. 01:27:700 (1,2) - The distance between them may be too large, due to previous pattern you don't really expect a 1/4 gap between them, the SV is slow and it's not really intuitive to play, there should be less distance between 01:27:700 (1,2) -
3. 01:29:700 (1) - Why this kick slider ? there is nothing really audible on 1/4 ticks
4. 01:54:700 (1,2,3,4) - This kind of pattern is really difficult to aim, only the approach rate helps the player, nothing more, it's just because of the low distance between 01:54:700 (1,2) - and the low distance here too 01:55:200 (3,4) - that are both difficult to play due to the high jump between 01:55:075 (2,3) - . This pattern is like antijump - jump - antijump, which is a little difficult to play and aim, and may be not comfortable to play. Consider remaking this pattern, for a better playability.
5. 01:57:575 (1,2) - There should be more distance between them, there is almost 95% of jumps in the whole map, and having a low spacing between a slider and a circle, when the part is intense, doesn't really make sense.
6. 02:21:950 (5,6,1) - There are too much spacing change in this pattern, especially for this kind of triangle, and the player could miss easily if he cares about distance, when you have a lot of circles without the same distance between them, it is easier to miss and not comfortable to play, it should be better if there is the same distance between 02:21:950 (5,6,1) -
7. 04:59:200 (1,2,3) - This kind of pattern should really be avoided, visually, the spacing between 04:59:200 (1,2) - and 04:59:450 (2,3) - is a little different, just a little, but the gap between them is different, and the player could play 04:59:450 (2,3) - as 1/4 when it's not, and when it's just 1/2. And the other way around concerning 04:59:200 (1,2) - .
8. 05:00:200 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - In my opinion, this is overdone, and i really doubt if it will pass the ranking process, 1/4 240BPM is hell for players, there is nothing more powerful than other kiai parts on this song, which allows you to do something like this.

MillhioreF wrote:

Reading maps is a skill, too. It's not worth any pp, and it's not useful in the current meta, but it's a skill nonetheless, which can be trained exactly the same as speed, aim and accuracy. I'm tired of people complaining that maps with more than 3 circles on screen at once are unplayable trash just because it's not part of the current meta. If you don't like it, don't play it, god damn!

Kyubey wrote:

Toumei Elegy has sections with a lot of continuous huge jumps. I played this map, and it felt totally readable for me. People really should learn not only speed, but reading too.
Though I can't hear the sounds well due to broken left speaker, I want to help you somehow even if I can't bubble due to that.
But if this map won't get bubbled/qualified till I get working headphones, I'll come to icon it. But don't expect much, probably I won't get ones till the end of February.
[General]
As I can see on this page, unicode title should be ≪The?World's?End≫. Romanized title seems better to be as it now, ≪The World's End≫.
done
soft-hitfinish2.wav is unused, delete it.
done
Your very first section, 00:01:711 this one, is totally off. I can't distinguish the right timing here, so just find someone who's good at timing and change it.
I feel this isn't off...
01:16:700 - this place doesn't need the BPM change, i can hear 240 bpm there, speed of upbeats and downbeats is same to other places, so just delete this section and 02:07:200 - this one, since it won't change anything, and just use 0.75 greenline here 01:59:200
Though I don't really understand why you used 120 BPM sections in few calm places and left
03:06:200 - this one with 240, when actually it's 120. Use a 120 BPM section here for consistency too, and use 240 BPM section 03:38:200 here.
Disagree. They are certainly 120BPM. Btw I added 120BPM section at 03:06:200
And probably using a short 120 BPM section 02:32:200 here for consistency will be good too, with starting 240 BPM again 02:34:200 on this place.
Also your hitsounds have some issues, soft-hitclap2 had a 4ms delay, and both silent soft-sliderslides didn't use the right 44-bytes blank wav files, which should be used as it mentioned in ranking criteria. I fixed these hitsounds for you, replace them with files from this archive: http://kyubey.s-ul.eu/3pNZxiDT.rar
done
Are you sure you don't want to use combo colours?
done
And why you don't use 192 kbps mp3? 128 kbps has pretty poor quality compared to 192, I hardly suggest you to replace it. If you need my help with searching the mp3, just ask me.
And that diffname, please... Are you sure you want to keep it? Using a part of title as diffname is kinda poor decision, like ≪sorry but I'm way too lazy to create something original here≫, and when it's np'ed, it looks just strange. Horie Yui - The World's End [End], repeating the last word looks weird.
diffname done mp3 no change now

[End]
00:40:575 (7) - this whistle sounds pretty strange compared to other whistles you used, did you place it on purpose here?
done
01:03:575 (6) - 01:11:575 (6) - how about using 1/1 slider in these places? sounds better imo and gives some variety, like you did there 03:41:075 (1) -
no change because they are to fit song.
02:06:075 - why don't you add a note here, as you did 02:02:075 (5) - there? http://kyubey.s-ul.eu/NU29Gtr1.jpg
no change. There is no sound I took
02:19:075 (1) - 02:27:075 (6) - same suggestion about 1/1 sliders
no change for same reason.

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Hello
BNs told me to give some feedbacks on this map.

Testplay : http://puu.sh/mRTsg/3099e849ab.osr
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4448482

1. 01:07:700 (1,2) - Visually, they are not farther than previous patterns, but when i was playing this pattern, it was surprising and not really comfortable to play (as you can see i thought the sliderstart was at 123|338. It could be better if you reduce the distance between these sliders.
   done
2. 01:27:700 (1,2) - The distance between them may be too large, due to previous pattern you don't really expect a 1/4 gap between them, the SV is slow and it's not really intuitive to play, there should be less distance between 01:27:700 (1,2) -
   done
3. 01:29:700 (1) - Why this kick slider ? there is nothing really audible on 1/4 ticks
   there sounds some drum rolls IMO... btw done
4. 01:54:700 (1,2,3,4) - This kind of pattern is really difficult to aim, only the approach rate helps the player, nothing more, it's just because of the low distance between 01:54:700 (1,2) - and the low distance here too 01:55:200 (3,4) - that are both difficult to play due to the high jump between 01:55:075 (2,3) - . This pattern is like antijump - jump - antijump, which is a little difficult to play and aim, and may be not comfortable to play. Consider remaking this pattern, for a better playability.
   done
5. 01:57:575 (1,2) - There should be more distance between them, there is almost 95% of jumps in the whole map, and having a low spacing between a slider and a circle, when the part is intense, doesn't really make sense.
   done
6. 02:21:950 (5,6,1) - There are too much spacing change in this pattern, especially for this kind of triangle, and the player could miss easily if he cares about distance, when you have a lot of circles without the same distance between them, it is easier to miss and not comfortable to play, it should be better if there is the same distance between 02:21:950 (5,6,1) -
   no change.I don't think these are serious problem
7. 04:59:200 (1,2,3) - This kind of pattern should really be avoided, visually, the spacing between 04:59:200 (1,2) - and 04:59:450 (2,3) - is a little different, just a little, but the gap between them is different, and the player could play 04:59:450 (2,3) - as 1/4 when it's not, and when it's just 1/2. And the other way around concerning 04:59:200 (1,2) - .
   done
8. 05:00:200 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - In my opinion, this is overdone, and i really doubt if it will pass the ranking process, 1/4 240BPM is hell for players, there is nothing more powerful than other kiai parts on this song, which allows you to do something like this.
   done

Good Luck ~

-Nishiki- wrote:

This is a really good hard map.The only things I can find for this is that 00:10:044 (6) could have a finish.The only problem with that is it's too loud,so I would also add a timing point that softens the finish,but I think that could be added.Also,00:20:700 (1) could be moved up a bit to differentiate it with the stream.
That's it though.No real big problems I could find.Good luck with rank!

Harrharrqi wrote:

cool map

02:01:200 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i would just make it a star, right now 02:01:450 (2) - looks weird :/
done
03:29:700 (5,6,7,8) - this part here is asking for pretty, make it a square for visual
none. square will kill flow
03:54:200 (1) - i think a 1/1 slider then a note at 03:54:700 - would more have more impact. if you do this, nc the note
none. I like this repeat.
05:01:762 (2,4) - i can't seem to hear beats here, but it plays alright. i would consider removing them though and making it a 3 note jump
none. you know, this map doesn't care that.

1. 00:26:450 (5,6,1) - Can you put more emphasis here? I think 5>6 and 6>1 can both be bigger, especially since theres two la's here xD.
2. 00:57:200 (4,6) - Blanket could be neater.
3. 01:13:825 (1,3) - I kept messing up here because its so hard to catch this 180 degree angle change. 01:14:200 (3) - stack this with 01:13:325 (4) - and it flows a lot better imo.
4. 01:27:700 (1,2) - I'd rather you make the spacing even. When they are only touching by slider-border it looks kinda bad xP> Also you dont use these 1/4 jumps elsewhere in this section (the next 5 note stream is stacked) so this feels out of place.
5. 01:56:950 (1) - Unnecessary NC i think.
6. 02:02:700 (7) - I would make this two circles instead since the drum hit on 02:02:825 - sounds really different from the head. It feels like it deserves its own click xD.
7. 02:09:200 (1,2) - Just an idea, but maybe try this blanket arrangement. Looks cool imo.
   
   ~

   
8. 02:31:700 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This sounds really overmapped for me ;c i can't even hear any 1/4's.
9. 02:35:325 (1,2) - Ctrl+G'ing the rhythm sounds better. I think 02:35:450 - clickable and 02:35:575 - slider-tail just works really well with the violins at 02:35:700 (3,4,5,6) -
10. 03:07:200 (2,3) - The overlap seems slightly off.
11. 03:42:825 (4,6) - Improve this blanket too
12. 03:54:200 (1) - I would do 1/1 gaps here instead of a slider. The instruments completely disappear so I think you can show this emptiness better by using 1/1 gaps instead of a slider. You have to hold on a slider so it implies a held note, but nothings being held here.
13. 04:33:950 (5,6,1) - I think emphasis here should be directed more towards 1. right now the jump is onto 6 so you end up not making 1 that impactful. Actually, is this 180 degree flowbreak being used as emphasis? When I paly it seems fine hmh *shrugs*. Let me know what you were thinking here xD. I guess it works.

Monstrata wrote:

[Prologue]

1. 00:26:450 (5,6,1) - Can you put more emphasis here? I think 5>6 and 6>1 can both be bigger, especially since theres two la's here xD.
   done
2. 00:57:200 (4,6) - Blanket could be neater.
   done
3. 01:13:825 (1,3) - I kept messing up here because its so hard to catch this 180 degree angle change. 01:14:200 (3) - stack this with 01:13:325 (4) - and it flows a lot better imo.
   done
4. 01:27:700 (1,2) - I'd rather you make the spacing even. When they are only touching by slider-border it looks kinda bad xP> Also you dont use these 1/4 jumps elsewhere in this section (the next 5 note stream is stacked) so this feels out of place.
   I keep them to make symmetry,
5. 01:56:950 (1) - Unnecessary NC i think.
   fixed
6. 02:02:700 (7) - I would make this two circles instead since the drum hit on 02:02:825 - sounds really different from the head. It feels like it deserves its own click xD.
   keep them to respect for bell sound.
7. 02:09:200 (1,2) - Just an idea, but maybe try this blanket arrangement. Looks cool imo.
   
   ~

   
   done
8. 02:31:700 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This sounds really overmapped for me ;c i can't even hear any 1/4's.
   fixed
9. 02:35:325 (1,2) - Ctrl+G'ing the rhythm sounds better. I think 02:35:450 - clickable and 02:35:575 - slider-tail just works really well with the violins at 02:35:700 (3,4,5,6) -
   Umm keep them...
10. 03:07:200 (2,3) - The overlap seems slightly off.
    fixed
11. 03:42:825 (4,6) - Improve this blanket too
    fixed
12. 03:54:200 (1) - I would do 1/1 gaps here instead of a slider. The instruments completely disappear so I think you can show this emptiness better by using 1/1 gaps instead of a slider. You have to hold on a slider so it implies a held note, but nothings being held here.
    I thinks sliders best for music.
13. 04:33:950 (5,6,1) - I think emphasis here should be directed more towards 1. right now the jump is onto 6 so you end up not making 1 that impactful. Actually, is this 180 degree flowbreak being used as emphasis? When I paly it seems fine hmh *shrugs*. Let me know what you were thinking here xD. I guess it works.
    little changed

[]

Call me back when you're ready! I almost passed the map. It's the streams that kill me actually, not the jumps lol.

Cyllinus wrote:

05:00:200 (1) - missing soft-hitfinish?
05:00:950 (7) - ^