1. Easy (1,23 stars, 183 notes)
2. Hard (2,87 stars, 414 notes)
3. Normal (1,61 stars, 251 notes)

340 wrote:

я уже писал, что это классная мапа, но напишу ещё раз
доделаешь - напишу мод, если я доживу до этого времени
кстати, поставь AR8.5 или 8 на инсейне, а то девятка выглядит как-то не ок
no kd

Ага, спасибо
И за звёзды тоже.

1. 01:29:804 (2,3) - Аймод жалуется на спейсинг.
2. 00:42:201 (2,3) - Бланкет можно чуть лучше
3. 00:51:127 (3) - По мне слишком много реверсов, не интересно. Убери его и поставь вместо него круг и подправь все по спейсингу. Должно выйти что-то такое.
4. 00:56:581 (6) - Пропустил клэп?
5. 01:27:821 (3,1) - Не очень хорошо расположены. Новичок тыкнет на конец (1). У меня получилось что-то такое, можешь не принять этот вариант, но обязательно поменяй его!
6. 02:47:160 (3,1) - ^
7. 03:34:763 (3,1) - ^
8. 03:50:631 (3,1) - ^ и еще, копипаста же неинтересна :<
9. 02:15:920 (6) - Миссед клэп?
10. 02:27:325 (6,1) - Немножко бланкет.
11. 03:26:829 (5,1) - Может тут как-то бланкет организовать? Выглядит как будто ты начинал делать его, а потом передумал.

1. В первой части первого киая неравномерный комбоинг. Предлагаю внести изменения:
   01:08:978 - нк
   01:12:945 - ^
   01:16:912 - ^
2. 02:22:367 (1,2,3) - Разный спейсинг, подправь визуально.

1. Я бы тут 01:04:019 (3,4,1) - и тут 02:23:358 (3,4,1) - продолжала мапать с уменьшенным спейсингом. Вышло бы что-то такое.
2. И снова копи-паста во втором киае :с Я понимаю, многие это используют и это не запрещено, но играть как-то скучно с копи-пастой.

1. 01:20:879 - 02:40:218 - 03:27:821 - 03:43:689 - фонтанчики? C:
2. 03:57:573 (1) - по-моему он не в тему

1. 00:53:110 (1,2) - зацепился глаз, и наверное это придирка, но. Но серкл лежит за 1/1 слайдером + вокальная часть не совсем четко на тике - могут быть проблемы, наврное.
2. 01:16:912 (1,4) - не понравилась эта пара хитсаундов, даже толком объяснить не могу, почему. Короче попробуй забить на драм финиш или хотя бы его addition'ом сделать, а не сетом.
3. скорее всего я не прав, и вообще весьма узко делаю хс, но 01:21:623 (2,1,2) - первый вроде находиться не на месте и должен быть смещен на тик вперед, вроде как. И вообще мне кажется, что эти свистки как-то не в тему, они вроде и есть, но как-то их мало. Мб каждый такт их лепить? И еще я бы подчеркнул как-нибудь более выразительно конец 01:29:804 (2) -
4. 01:27:821 (3,1) - двоякое ощущение, по флоу грубо говоря, ты делаешь 2 реверса, но по ритму 1. Мне кажется стоит раздвинутьЮ что бы избежать недоразумений. Хотя наверное я перегибаю палку.
5. 01:28:813 (1,3) - мбс делать их параллельными? ._.
6. 01:32:284 (6) - подчеркнуть ть бы конце свистком или финишем. далее там на этот 02:51:623 (6) - забить можно, а вот следующий аналогично сделать
7. 01:40:218 (4) - мне кажется, что слайдер тут лишний
8. 01:48:152 (6) - ^
9. 01:52:614 (1) - так понимаю тут софтвый висл пропущен
10. 02:14:433 (4) - я бы на два серкла заменил. Ты подчеркиваешь виолончель 02:15:424 (5,6) - ,но при этом забиваешь, на предыдущем конце слайдера.
11. 03:07:986 (1) - чего там по паузе после спиннеров? спроси батов, мб мало. Просто слайдер появляется, еще до того, как спиннер закончился

1. Мое нубское мнение, что часть 00:33:275 (1) - 00:48:647 (5) - перенасыщенном не правильными хс. Да вроде они подходят, под этой милый звук синтезатора, но такими слайдерами 00:37:242 (1,4,1) - ты отходишь от идеи подчеркивать этот звук полностью, по сути получается путаница. На 100% скорость без детального рассмотрения карты тяжело уловить последовательность хс. Сам по себе ритм вокала\перкуссии весьма четки и стройный, а ты фигачишь хс на красные\синие тики. Скорее всего я не правильно смотрю на этот вопрос, но меня дико сбивают с толку хс и даже немного раздражают.
2. 00:53:110 (1) - с2 со slider-tick'ом в виде клепа. 00:56:333 (4) - 01:02:036 (4) -
3. и вообще это наверное дикая предирка, но в начале ты так ярко подчеркивал этот характерный звук, а потом взял и забил, начиная с 00:51:127 (1) - . Имею ввиду вот эти 00:55:094 (1) - . Опять же это дизориентирует: ритм
4. 01:19:887 (2,3,4,5) - имхо, неудачный выбор ставить сюда 1/4 слайдеры, хочешь подчеркнуть это звук, то начинай с 01:18:895 (1) - , а так получается немножко овермап с точки зрения битов, на которые ты упирался раньше( НО с технической точки зрения, это не овермап). Не могу совсем правильно донести свою идею, надеюсь ты понял.
5. 01:32:780 (1) - взаимно с изей
6. 02:52:119 (1) - вообще не слышно ноту, чуть добавь громкости ибо после 02:51:623 (6) - может быть тяжело тапнуть на слух.
7. 03:55:590 (1,2,1) - на мой взгляд это все лишнее

1. Короче тут ничего я толком не нашел, важно толко эти хс на синих тиках. Суть в том, что, лично на мой взгляд, обилие 1/4 в киаи, а так вроде все ок.
2. ну так же, имхо не стоит ставить хс на синие тики здесь
3. 01:17:904 (2,3) - не вижу особого смылса сюда тыкать 1/4 слайдеры. 01:22:614 (7) -
4. 01:07:986 (3,4) - думаю лучше сделать в русле 01:09:970 (3,4) -. Same 01:11:953 (3,4) -
5. 01:49:391 (2,3,4,5) - такие джампы мне больше нравятся по ритме (related to frightmare)
6. 03:55:590 (1,2,1) - аналогично забить как и в харде и ляпнуть серл на большой тик.

sharinganeye wrote:

Hi !!

With You

00:34:267 (3) - its better to replace it into a slider as the previous and to keep following vocals at this part ... think so

00:38:854 (6,7) - i suggest to replace those with a slider to fit both vocal and music I think it will confuse players

00:42:697 (5) - it feels better if it would be a 1.5x velocity slider / 02:02:036 (5) - I emphasize individual sound, and I think that there must be jump

00:45:176 (1,2,3,4) - i think the piano sounds are a bit different what make sliders feels better instead o circles ... / 02:04:515 (1,2,3,4) - Same ...changed

what about a sinuous sliders here since there a shaking sounds inside of it 00:55:094 (1) - / 01:03:028 (1) - / 02:14:433 (1) - / 02:22:366 (1) -
changed
01:15:920 (3,4) - i suggest a slider for vocal too / same 02:35:259 (3,4) - I think it will confuse players

01:25:342 (4,5,6) - a slider till the white tick that read that ... sound because i don't think there any sound here 01:25:590 - / same 02:44:680 (4,5,6) - / 03:32:284 (4,5,6) - / 03:48:152 (4,5,6) - I really think that here must be jumps

01:58:069 (5,6) - a slider maybe Nope

02:06:499 (1,2,3,4,5) - replace all with one slider to follow violin sound here it looks better I prefer synthesizer

02:25:590 (4) - to next blue tick followed by a slider to fit vocal and music simultaneously fixed

02:41:953 (7) - i think circle would fit that part better ... I don't think so, but I'll see what next modders will say

03:07:986 (1,2,3,4) - i like the way u started this part but i suggest to make it a bit jumpy fixed

03:27:077 (6,7) - a slider here maybe ... Nope

03:27:325 (8,9) - what about to convert it to one slider for violin sound Fixed

Hard

00:47:160 (1,2,3) - try to reverse the directions of this sliders / 01:19:887 (2,3,4,5) - same / 02:39:226 (2,3,4,5) - same Don't think so

00:55:094 (1) - the same as (with you) diff and all sliders mentioned in it alike fixed

02:06:499 (1,2,3) - one slider that correlate to violin sound till the white tick slower velocity ... I'll think about it

03:21:375 - slider instead of 2 circles No

Normal

replace this circle with a slider from here 00:48:399 - till 00:48:647 (4) - It's normal. Players could be confused

samething for this sliders 00:55:094 (4) - /...

01:41:705 (2,3) - its better to keep a slider here fixed

03:26:829 - what about a 3 circles here I'll think about it

Really a Good map/song ... Gluck

TicClick wrote:

нормально всё, сдвинь только на 00:17:408, чтобы иконка осу в главном меню пульсировала

ну ещё эти добавь (для красоты и пульсации)

819,521.739130434783,4,2,1,60,1,0
16912,495.867768595041,4,2,1,60,1,0

кд не давай

Спасибо за помощь

1. why is there so much time in the beginning? :c it's totally mapable so kinda a waste if you don't.. consider mapping the whole song!
   don't tell me you're too lazy! :b
2. please think about using some custom finish hitsound instead of drum finish on your downbeats, this really sounds improveable to me ;w;
3. the grey combo colour doesn't match with the others, how about using light blue instead of light grey? it fits so much better, imo!
   especially cause grey looks so depressing but the song's rather lively, so.. owo
   example

   
   

   [Colours]
   Combo1 : 189,235,238
   Combo2 : 255,119,28
   Combo3 : 32,143,255
   Combo4 : 254,201,16

4. overall the spread looks a bit unbalanced. the gap from Normal to Hard is a bit high, maybe you can try to lower Hard's difficulty slightly?

1. your NCing feels inconsistent sometimes, try to keep your combos between 4~6, but not lower
2. 00:35:259 (4) - rotate a bit (around -26°) so the movement to 00:36:747 (5,1) - is improved
   alternatively you could place 00:36:747 (5,1,2) - differently
   example (moved objects on timeline so they fit on one screen, pls ignore. XD)

   
3. 00:38:234 (2) - already included in ^, to improve movement rotate by 21°
4. 00:40:218 (5,1) - also for movement, move the whole pattern, starting with (1) further to the left, so the movement isn't as abrupt
   screen + confusing alternative for following objects

   
   
5. 00:53:110 (1) - consider moving this to 208|264, it destroys the polygon pattern from before but moves far better, imo
6. 01:24:598 (6) - replace with two circles? having a sliderend on the downbeat is meh ;-; it deserves more empasis!
   also, you could move NC from 01:25:837 (1) - to the circle you could place at 01:24:846! :3
7. movement from ^ to 01:25:837 (1) - is not that great either, I'd prefer if you re-place the blue pattern
   example

   
8. 01:29:804 (2,3,4,5) - this is the pattern which might be too hard for the easiest diff. I know it's still N diff, but so many objects at once don't turn out enjoyable to play for beginners ~ :c try a different rhythm?
   
   examples

   
   
   
9. 02:22:862 (4) - if you move this to 332|240 (it's blanketed by 02:20:383 (1) - then) and adjust placement of 02:22:367 (3) - you can improve movement by a lot!
   screen

   
10. 03:16:912 (3,4) - you definitely can improve movement here, try to move 03:14:928 (5,1,2,3) - further to the bottom left, so you can blanket (3)'s end with (4)
    screen

    
11. 03:43:193 (6,1) - bend (1) in the opposite direction, so it matches the movement 03:42:201 (5,6) - indicate
12. spinner at the end is rather short so I'd suggest to replace 03:55:093 (6) - with a circle and let the spinner start at 03:55:589 instead.
    

1. try AR6 ~ 6.5 and OD5.5 to get a better balanced spread?
2. 00:34:763 (4,5,1) - the jump you used should be from (5) to (1), not from (4) to (5). it matches the pattern atm, not the rhythm, try to rearrange it so it matches better!
   example

   
3. 00:35:755 (3,4) - the usual DS feels off here, because you use such high DS before with 00:35:259 (1,2,3) -
   I agree they shouldn't overlap, but it makes this feel weird, some people might even hit it too early
   maybe using DS around 1.5 feels better? (place 3 at 160|212 )
4. 00:41:705 (3) - why don't you amphasize the beat on the red tick better? you could just shorten the slider and add a reverse or circle
5. 01:06:499 (4,5,1) - similar to 00:34:763 (4,5,1)
6. 03:57:325 (x) - add circle or let the spinner start here? it feels a bit empty. :c

1. since this is the hardest diff, Without You sounds better to me. up to you of course!
   but it does make more sense,...! xD
2. 00:40:714 (5,1) - I didn't expect a stack here. doesn't really match with the liveliness of the song, imo. please unstack?
3. 00:46:664 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - the stream should move in the exact opposite direction for better movement, atm is feels kinda discomforting
4. 01:04:019 (3,4) - I'd prefer if you move 4 slightly closer to 3 to, just to visualize players that it's an anti-jump. it looks like it's the same distance as 01:02:036 (4,5,6) - atm, which is a bit confusing. (It actually should be readable for Insane players.. but I'm not one of them so that's just my opinon. XD)
5. 01:07:490 (2) - ah, not sure about this, I think another rhythm sounds better -
   
   you could as well use both and alternate just this part ~ :3 moar variety! <3
6. 03:57:325 (x) - same as in Hard, add circle? ;w;

Squirrel wrote:

hi there!
mod as per your request ~ :3
I'm just making suggestions, feel free to ignore

General

1. why is there so much time in the beginning? :c it's totally mapable so kinda a waste if you don't.. consider mapping the whole song!
   don't tell me you're too lazy! :b it's pulsation
2. the grey combo colour doesn't match with the others, how about using light blue instead of light grey? it fits so much better, imo!
   especially cause grey looks so depressing but the song's rather lively, so.. owo
   example

   
   

   [Colours]
   Combo1 : 189,235,238
   Combo2 : 255,119,28
   Combo3 : 32,143,255
   Combo4 : 254,201,16

   cnanged

Normal
looks really nice overall. some rhythms are too hard for the easiest diff (imo!), but oh well. ;v;
sidenote: everything I say applies to copy-pasted / flipped sections, too. :3

1. your NCing feels inconsistent sometimes, try to keep your combos between 4~6, but not lower I do NC each 8/1 bit
2. 00:35:259 (4) - rotate a bit (around -26°) so the movement to 00:36:747 (5,1) - is improved
   alternatively you could place 00:36:747 (5,1,2) - differently
   example (moved objects on timeline so they fit on one screen, pls ignore. XD)

   
3. 00:38:234 (2) - already included in ^, to improve movement rotate by 21° Sry, but I want to save this moment
4. 00:40:218 (5,1) - also for movement, move the whole pattern, starting with (1) further to the left, so the movement isn't as abrupt
   screen + confusing alternative for following objects

   
   
   some changed
5. 00:53:110 (1) - consider moving this to 208|264, it destroys the polygon pattern from before but moves far better, imo changed
6. 01:24:598 (6) - replace with two circles? having a sliderend on the downbeat is meh ;-; it deserves more empasis! This mini-slider allocates sounds
   also, you could move NC from 01:25:837 (1) - to the circle you could place at 01:24:846! :3
7. movement from ^ to 01:25:837 (1) - is not that great either, I'd prefer if you re-place the blue pattern
   example

   
   I think, that pattern is good
8. 01:29:804 (2,3,4,5) - this is the pattern which might be too hard for the easiest diff. I know it's still N diff, but so many objects at once don't turn out enjoyable to play for beginners ~ :c try a different rhythm? kk, changed
   
   examples

   
   
   
9. 02:22:862 (4) - if you move this to 332|240 (it's blanketed by 02:20:383 (1) - then) and adjust placement of 02:22:367 (3) - you can improve movement by a lot!
   screen

   
   I don't think so
10. 03:16:912 (3,4) - you definitely can improve movement here, try to move 03:14:928 (5,1,2,3) - further to the bottom left, so you can blanket (3)'s end with (4)
    screen

    
    - ^
11. spinner at the end is rather short so I'd suggest to replace 03:55:093 (6) - with a circle and let the spinner start at 03:55:589 instead.
    changed

Hard
as I mentioned above, this diff is slightly too hard, imo. it should be a tiny little bit easier

1. try AR6 ~ 6.5 and OD5.5 to get a better balanced spread? changed
2. 00:34:763 (4,5,1) - the jump you used should be from (5) to (1), not from (4) to (5). it matches the pattern atm, not the rhythm, try to rearrange it so it matches better!
   example

   
   I think, it's normal jump
3. 00:35:755 (3,4) - the usual DS feels off here, because you use such high DS before with 00:35:259 (1,2,3) -
   I agree they shouldn't overlap, but it makes this feel weird, some people might even hit it too early
   maybe using DS around 1.5 feels better? (place 3 at 160|212 ) I use this in order to avoid overlap
4. 00:41:705 (3) - why don't you amphasize the beat on the red tick better? you could just shorten the slider and add a reverse or circle hmm, I'll think about it
5. 01:06:499 (4,5,1) - similar to 00:34:763 (4,5,1) - ^
6. 03:57:325 (x) - add circle or let the spinner start here? it feels a bit empty. :c

If I add circle, it will confuse players

With You

• 
  aah, I sck with Insanes and such, so apologies. this will turn our rather short. ;n

1. 00:40:714 (5,1) - I didn't expect a stack here. doesn't really match with the liveliness of the song, imo. please unstack? changed
2. 01:04:019 (3,4) - I'd prefer if you move 4 slightly closer to 3 to, just to visualize players that it's an anti-jump. it looks like it's the same distance as 01:02:036 (4,5,6) - atm, which is a bit confusing. (It actually should be readable for Insane players.. but I'm not one of them so that's just my opinon. XD) changed
3. 01:07:490 (2) - ah, not sure about this, I think another rhythm sounds better -
   
   you could as well use both and alternate just this part ~ :3 moar variety! <3
4. 03:57:325 (x) - same as in Hard, add circle? ;w;

- ^

Okay, that's all. Hope I was of some help ~
Good luck to you!
*squee*

Mati123 wrote:

Congratulations, your map is awesome, and a beautiful interpretation of the song. Hard is especially great on DT. Please continue working on it/get it approved!

1. 01:18:895 (4,1) - make them in the same shape (1's shape is better because it's soft)
2. 01:40:217 - add note (01:44:184 (4) - same case and there is a note)
3. 01:48:151 - ^ you are not consistent
4. 02:33:027 - try this rhythm http://puu.sh/cjCnQ/d97ef5b23b.jpg it was a bit weird when you missed that sound at 02:33:027 -

1. 00:35:259 (1,2) - make it like these two 00:39:226 (1,1) - it is too big change of speed in my opinion
2. 00:41:209 (1,2) - http://puu.sh/cjCQU/2bff4aa4c8.jpg this rhythm sound better because yes there is a sound in 00:41:333 - but the rest of map seems to be mapping to the vocal (and this pattern is slower than 1/4 sliders)
3. 00:47:654 (3,4) - here is really bad distance. its the same as 00:47:408 (2,3) - but its longer break in the timeline. 00:47:903 - here is a sound (hi-hat? i dont know all these professional terms) i suggest to repeat 00:47:654 (3) - and replace 00:48:027 (4) -
4. 01:06:995 (1) - 02:26:333 (1,2) - better pattern for this
5. 01:52:614 - to the end of chorus. you copied almost all of the first part of song lol. (its not bad but quite boring. only my thoughts)
6. 02:07:614 - http://puu.sh/cjE5i/69b47385bd.jpg this rhythm fits better to the music

Celizavia wrote:

clean mapset, luv the song.

also please map it from 00:16:912, it felt really awkward just jump into the middle
take my star o/

Hi_Hello wrote:

nice beatmap! waiting for rank

Sey wrote:

Great song, grats ♥