Write a 6-page essay on how I suck to disprove it.
Get banned for being slightly mean.
Get banned for being slightly mean.
forum
I am the best.
posted
Total Posts
28
Font Size?
Because many of the things I'm about to say regarding Wojjan have already been beaten into the ground, I will try to keep this letter short. Let me begin by saying that Wojjan's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. On a similar note, my love for people necessitates that I build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance. Yes, I face opposition from Wojjan. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. I maintain I am not alone when I say that her ability to capitalize on the economic chaos, racial tensions, and social discontent of the current historical moment can be explained in large part by the following. Nepotism is the leitmotif of Wojjan's sound bites. Stated differently, last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince Wojjan that "stupid" is the least offensive adjective that accurately describes her. As I expected, Wojjan was thoroughly unconvinced.
I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that Wojjan would not hesitate to punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death if she felt she could benefit from doing so. She is typical of smarmy, licentious slackers in her wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize her accusations. Wojjan fully deserves the bitter fruit of the fury of her persecutors, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that she plans to take credit for others' accomplishments. The result will be an amalgam of feckless insurrectionism and brazen antidisestablishmentarianism, if such a monster can be imagined.
As we all know, Wojjan, in her typical dereliction-of-duty mode, is trying hard to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. She likes saying that the Universe belongs to her by right. Okay, that's a parody—but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Wojjan keeps telling us that adversarialism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. Are we also supposed to believe that she holds a universal license that allows her to institutionalize militarism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science? I didn't think so.
Before you know it, Wojjan's poison will infect us, sicken us, and destroy us. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that Wojjan swims in a sea of oligarchism, the waters of which roil with anger and resentment. Most of that anger and resentment is directed towards people like me who make a genuine contribution to human society. Can you believe that she actually stated that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years? I, not being one of the many inaniloquent kooks of this world, was stunned until I remembered that Wojjan has gotten a bit too palsy-walsy with scabrous malefactresses. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why far too many people tolerate Wojjan's bromides as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that Wojjan thinks that she is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of what I call villainous wheeler-dealers. However, she feeds on our goodwill like worms feed on buried corpses.
Plan to join Wojjan's camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. A long time ago I wrote that "Wojjan isn't as smart as she thinks she is". Today I might add that if you think that the Earth is flat, then think again. If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being sufficiently open-minded to understand that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep.
I've managed to come up with a way in which Wojjan's essays could be made useful. Her essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that Wojjan insists that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands she perpetrates. If you were to tell her that no matter how much she squirms and wriggles, she will never escape the fact that all I ask is that she play by the same rules as the rest of us, she'd just pull her security blanket a little tighter around herself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. Wojjan's thralls have the power to work hand-in-glove with gloomy pothouse drunks whenever they feel like it. To cap that off, the problem with Wojjan is not that she's bloody-minded. It's that she wants to brandish the word "theologicohistorical" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that her way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't.
In keeping with all of their inner unprofessional brutality, Wojjan's shock troops deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. It is no news that Wojjan has been trying to trick people into believing that she is a master of precognition, psychokinesis, remote viewing, and other undeveloped human capabilities. Apparently, she has succeeded beyond her wildest dreams with foolish proponents of imperialism; they're now fully convinced that Wojjan's reportages are Holy Writ. You're probably thinking, "The lascivious and disagreeable nature of Wojjan's diatribes should indicate to us that something needs to be done." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that she is a woman utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism. That's why I say that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that Wojjan will develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to turn her raving catch-phrases to our advantage in the blink of an eye. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will help you reflect and reexamine your views on Wojjan. Only then can we criticize Wojjan's complicity in the widespread establishment of statism.
Wojjan has been trying for quite some time to convince us that her shenanigans prevent smallpox. I suggest she take this rotting ordure and dump it where she and her fellow short-sighted control freaks congregate. At least then we could offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem—without having to worry that she will force us to bow down low before beer-guzzling con artists. A word to the wise: She truly believes that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. It is just such neo-vengeful megalomania, myopic egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Wojjan to glamorize drug usage. She alleges that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
I never used to be particularly concerned about Wojjan's principles. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that if we do nothing, Wojjan will keep on increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can direct your attention in some detail to the vast and irreparable calamity brought upon us by Wojjan. I must ask that her spokesmen lend support to the thesis that her tactics include personally attacking various individuals for whom I have a great deal of respect. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. I am not going to go into too great a detail about sullen, prodigal authoritarians, but be assured that someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Wojjan. The memo spells out her plans to clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Wojjan keeps saying that everything will be hunky-dory if we let her make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely contentious. For some reason, Wojjan's operatives, who are legion, actually believe this nonsense.
What Wojjan doesn't realize is that to Wojjan's mind, ignorant, obscene insurrectionists aren't ever impractical. So that means that bombarding me with insults is essential for the safety and welfare of the public, right? No, not right. The truth is that when all discoverable facts and experience fly in the face of Wojjan's debauched world view, Wojjan stubbornly holds onto her ignorance as her birthright. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of her representatives about whether or not Wojjan's writings are complete and total offal, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that I, for one, surely hope you're not being misled by the "new Wojjan". Only her methods and tactics have changed. Wojjan's goal is still the same: to change the course of history. That's why I'm telling you that by Wojjan's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a brutal individual. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from hers. For instance, I, speaking as someone who is not an invidious quiddler, avouch that Wojjan and I disagree about our civic duties. I insist that we must do our utmost to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. Wojjan, on the other hand, believes that hanging out with unconscionable pedants is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. Summa summarum, I was personally offended—and I don't easily offend—by the value Wojjan places on making me have an identity crisis.
I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that Wojjan would not hesitate to punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death if she felt she could benefit from doing so. She is typical of smarmy, licentious slackers in her wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize her accusations. Wojjan fully deserves the bitter fruit of the fury of her persecutors, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that she plans to take credit for others' accomplishments. The result will be an amalgam of feckless insurrectionism and brazen antidisestablishmentarianism, if such a monster can be imagined.
As we all know, Wojjan, in her typical dereliction-of-duty mode, is trying hard to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. She likes saying that the Universe belongs to her by right. Okay, that's a parody—but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Wojjan keeps telling us that adversarialism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. Are we also supposed to believe that she holds a universal license that allows her to institutionalize militarism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science? I didn't think so.
Before you know it, Wojjan's poison will infect us, sicken us, and destroy us. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that Wojjan swims in a sea of oligarchism, the waters of which roil with anger and resentment. Most of that anger and resentment is directed towards people like me who make a genuine contribution to human society. Can you believe that she actually stated that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years? I, not being one of the many inaniloquent kooks of this world, was stunned until I remembered that Wojjan has gotten a bit too palsy-walsy with scabrous malefactresses. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why far too many people tolerate Wojjan's bromides as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that Wojjan thinks that she is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of what I call villainous wheeler-dealers. However, she feeds on our goodwill like worms feed on buried corpses.
Plan to join Wojjan's camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. A long time ago I wrote that "Wojjan isn't as smart as she thinks she is". Today I might add that if you think that the Earth is flat, then think again. If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being sufficiently open-minded to understand that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep.
I've managed to come up with a way in which Wojjan's essays could be made useful. Her essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that Wojjan insists that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands she perpetrates. If you were to tell her that no matter how much she squirms and wriggles, she will never escape the fact that all I ask is that she play by the same rules as the rest of us, she'd just pull her security blanket a little tighter around herself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. Wojjan's thralls have the power to work hand-in-glove with gloomy pothouse drunks whenever they feel like it. To cap that off, the problem with Wojjan is not that she's bloody-minded. It's that she wants to brandish the word "theologicohistorical" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that her way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't.
In keeping with all of their inner unprofessional brutality, Wojjan's shock troops deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. It is no news that Wojjan has been trying to trick people into believing that she is a master of precognition, psychokinesis, remote viewing, and other undeveloped human capabilities. Apparently, she has succeeded beyond her wildest dreams with foolish proponents of imperialism; they're now fully convinced that Wojjan's reportages are Holy Writ. You're probably thinking, "The lascivious and disagreeable nature of Wojjan's diatribes should indicate to us that something needs to be done." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that she is a woman utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism. That's why I say that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that Wojjan will develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to turn her raving catch-phrases to our advantage in the blink of an eye. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will help you reflect and reexamine your views on Wojjan. Only then can we criticize Wojjan's complicity in the widespread establishment of statism.
Wojjan has been trying for quite some time to convince us that her shenanigans prevent smallpox. I suggest she take this rotting ordure and dump it where she and her fellow short-sighted control freaks congregate. At least then we could offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem—without having to worry that she will force us to bow down low before beer-guzzling con artists. A word to the wise: She truly believes that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. It is just such neo-vengeful megalomania, myopic egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Wojjan to glamorize drug usage. She alleges that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
I never used to be particularly concerned about Wojjan's principles. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that if we do nothing, Wojjan will keep on increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can direct your attention in some detail to the vast and irreparable calamity brought upon us by Wojjan. I must ask that her spokesmen lend support to the thesis that her tactics include personally attacking various individuals for whom I have a great deal of respect. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. I am not going to go into too great a detail about sullen, prodigal authoritarians, but be assured that someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Wojjan. The memo spells out her plans to clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Wojjan keeps saying that everything will be hunky-dory if we let her make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely contentious. For some reason, Wojjan's operatives, who are legion, actually believe this nonsense.
What Wojjan doesn't realize is that to Wojjan's mind, ignorant, obscene insurrectionists aren't ever impractical. So that means that bombarding me with insults is essential for the safety and welfare of the public, right? No, not right. The truth is that when all discoverable facts and experience fly in the face of Wojjan's debauched world view, Wojjan stubbornly holds onto her ignorance as her birthright. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of her representatives about whether or not Wojjan's writings are complete and total offal, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that I, for one, surely hope you're not being misled by the "new Wojjan". Only her methods and tactics have changed. Wojjan's goal is still the same: to change the course of history. That's why I'm telling you that by Wojjan's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a brutal individual. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from hers. For instance, I, speaking as someone who is not an invidious quiddler, avouch that Wojjan and I disagree about our civic duties. I insist that we must do our utmost to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. Wojjan, on the other hand, believes that hanging out with unconscionable pedants is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. Summa summarum, I was personally offended—and I don't easily offend—by the value Wojjan places on making me have an identity crisis.
no u
Topic Starter
Grow a pairNachoPiggy wrote:
Summa summarum, I was personally offended—and I don't easily offend—by the value Wojjan places on making me have an identity crisis.
Wojjan wrote:
Grow a pairNachoPiggy wrote:
Summa summarum, I was personally offended—and I don't easily offend—by the value Wojjan places on making me have an identity crisis.
wat.
It's Friday, you ain't got no job, and you ain't got shit to do but write an essay about Wojjan's douchery.
Shut up wojjan you aren't deep and complex like I am.
You suck.
Wojjan is bestest.
mekadon_old
Topic Starter
- - - - - - - - - Why I Hate NachoPiggy - -
Where to start? His testimony the other
day has holes everywhere! I really don't
know what he meant sometimes
I also really don't like the way he butchers
this very thread with that response he wrote.
He didn't even write it himself, sheesh.
I always plan ahead when I make threads,
so no one can do anything but agree with
me wholehartedly.
And that Miyamoto avatar is stupid!
This testimony is ROCK FUCKING SOLID
Where to start? His testimony the other
day has holes everywhere! I really don't
know what he meant sometimes
I also really don't like the way he butchers
this very thread with that response he wrote.
He didn't even write it himself, sheesh.
I always plan ahead when I make threads,
so no one can do anything but agree with
me wholehartedly.
And that Miyamoto avatar is stupid!
This testimony is ROCK FUCKING SOLID
You grammar nazi me and yet you start a sentence with "and".
http://editingpublishing.suite101.com/a ... _with_and_
You're still young, kid. One day, you'll understand that you don't have to believe every little shit your teacher tells you.
You're still young, kid. One day, you'll understand that you don't have to believe every little shit your teacher tells you.
mekadon_old
Maybe you should've listened to them.mekadon95 wrote:
Stupid lecturers deny that using "and" to start a sentence is acceptable.
Yea, protop: don't ever try being creative and outsmarting teachers at school if you want good grades.
I believe you are right and your testimony is correct.Wojjan wrote:
- - - - - - - - - Why I Hate NachoPiggy - -
Where to start? His testimony the other
day has holes everywhere! I really don't
know what he meant sometimes
I also really don't like the way he butchers
this very thread with that response he wrote.
He didn't even write it himself, sheesh.
I always plan ahead when I make threads,
so no one can do anything but agree with
me wholehartedly.
And that Miyamoto avatar is stupid!
This testimony is ROCK FUCKING SOLID
I accept de feat. Akon
You're not supposed to start a sentence with "Because", either.
mekadon_old
"[G]rammar nazi" isn't a verb phrase.WeegeevsWeegee wrote:
You grammar nazi me and yet you start a sentence with "and".
"[A]nd yet" isn't an appropriate conjunction.
Most teachers are such egotists. I've outsmarted 1 teacher and that was the only time I got a C on a report card. Besides second grade. And first grade.Ph0X wrote:
Yea, protop: don't ever try being creative and outsmarting teachers at school if you want good grades.
Not necessarily.Rokodo [RL] wrote:
You're not supposed to start a sentence with "Because", either.
"Because it rained outside, the picnic was canceled"
WRONG!RemmyX25 wrote:
Not necessarily.Rokodo [RL] wrote:
You're not supposed to start a sentence with "Because", either.
"Because it rained outside, the picnic was canceled"
You're supposed to say: "As a result of the recent liquid precipitation in the vicinity, the management made the decision to postpone the alfresco dining event until further notice."
You are incorrect.nardi11011 wrote:
WRONG!
You're supposed to say: "As a result of the recent liquid precipitation in the vicinity, the management made the decision to postpone the alfresco dining event until further notice."
You were supposed to say, "You are incorrect.".
WRONG!strager wrote:
You are incorrect.nardi11011 wrote:
WRONG!
You're supposed to say: "As a result of the recent liquid precipitation in the vicinity, the management made the decision to postpone the alfresco dining event until further notice."
You were supposed to say, "You are incorrect.".
your WRONG !!