Take a drink every time the map gets unqualified
Of these 6 notes, the only one with true impact is 02:52:306 - , therefore there must be a start here (which there is).
The rest of it is ambiguous and can be done however, so I chose to do it like 00:50:592 - .
So if you meant the first one, then that's pretty understandable, but this is how the pattern is meant to be played.
http://puu.sh/hvFst/c87e48b78c.jpg Move down and to the right, pause on the orange dot and wait for the slider to finish, then start moving back up.
You're not supposed to actually follow the slider closely (you can if you want but it would make it more difficult, hehehe)
That would need some serious pattern reworking though, and I think the extra emphasis given to 1-2 wouldn't be enough to warrant a redo of the entire part.
So I guess tl;dr no change, but thanks for looking it over, those were some good things to consider
02:52:306 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis is put on wrong points with wrong objects. I would have just left six circles here, 2x3 circles (as in, 2 combos à 3 circles). Maybe like this. It really doesn't matter what way you arrange (triangles or unfinished squares) or space them (3 circles even, jump, 3 circles even, another jump to next combo).And such is the dilemma of emphasis patterns.
Of these 6 notes, the only one with true impact is 02:52:306 - , therefore there must be a start here (which there is).
The rest of it is ambiguous and can be done however, so I chose to do it like 00:50:592 - .
02:58:306 (1,1) - I dislike playing this pattern due to the second slider ending waaay somewhere else, as in, not anywhere near the next slider start.I uh, you mean the first slider not being way somewhere else? Because the second one is a close dropoff.
So if you meant the first one, then that's pretty understandable, but this is how the pattern is meant to be played.
http://puu.sh/hvFst/c87e48b78c.jpg Move down and to the right, pause on the orange dot and wait for the slider to finish, then start moving back up.
You're not supposed to actually follow the slider closely (you can if you want but it would make it more difficult, hehehe)
02:59:163 (1,2,3) - TBH, Ctrl G on this plays better imo.Oh huh that's really interesting, I see what you're getting at, although I'd just reverse the 2 and 3.
That would need some serious pattern reworking though, and I think the extra emphasis given to 1-2 wouldn't be enough to warrant a redo of the entire part.
So I guess tl;dr no change, but thanks for looking it over, those were some good things to consider