ClariS - STEP [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
34
show more
Nardoxyribonucleic

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda's Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.

box=1st coming/box
Later I will mod other diffs.~


[Kantan]
  1. 00:08:998 (13) – delete? plays more easy? And can linked…00:12:697 (18,19,20) - ? mapping the snare seems to be fine imo. I don't put note at 00:12:286 - because the previous 00:11:670 (18) - is a big don.
  2. and, 00:12:697 (18) - k? nope, the music has a lower pitch than 00:12:492 -
  3. 00:14:752 (22) - , 00:18:040 (26) - delete? vocal begins ,yes. but not too strong vocal, so not important these notes on this density. fixed
  4. 00:31:190 (46) – move…? 00:32:834 (49) -. I think this Splash sounds is not important on this density. fixed, and changed to don.
  5. 00:52:149 (82) - k? backpitch is down… but, rhythm is little confusing..? Simple is better? keeping this as d could have a better emphasis on the next K.
  6. 00:54:204 (84) – delete , unnecessary on this density. Umm... The cymbal-like sound starting from 00:52:766 - stops at 00:54:204 - , so I think it is fine to put a note there.
  7. 01:03:451 (100,104) – swap …? nope, the vocal at 01:05:505 - has a higher pitch than 01:03:451 -
  8. 01:22:971 (135) -, 01:26:669 (141) – same as 1st phrase. same as above.
  9. 01:28:725 (145,150) – delete? little noisy… I guess. fixed
  10. 01:45:162 (171) – move to 01:46:807 (174) - ? fixed like 00:31:190 (46) -
  11. 01:57:080 (192) – don ? lol same as 1st prhase. fixed
  12. 02:06:122 (207) – k? same as 1st phrase. refer to the explanation at 00:52:149 (82) -
  13. 02:08:176 (209) – delete? same as 1st phrase. ^ , refer to 00:54:204 (84) -
  14. 02:17:423 (225,229) – swap? same as 1st phrase. same as 01:03:451 (100,104) -
  15. 02:45:574 (272) – uum, k? fixed
  16. 03:21:738 (331) – move to 1/2 left? for vocal. The vocal there is too soft compared to the loud instrument sound at 03:21:738 (334) - . No change here.
  17. 03:25:026 (336) -^ ^
  18. 03:42:286 (17) – move 1/2 left and change k , sounds the best. fixed
  19. and, 03:43:519 (19) – k? no change, the music is quiet there.
  20. 03:45:779 (24) - unnecessary on this density… ? This note follows the vocal well, no change.
  21. and,, 03:46:396 (24) – change k? avoid to 03:44:546 (21) - ~~~ dkd dkd dkd.. lol no change as d could follow the music in a better way.
  22. 03:52:971 (37) - k? fixed
  23. 04:02:012 (53) - d? k could fit the vocal pitch better imo.
  24. 04:04:067 (57) – delete…? retained for following the music.
  25. and,, 04:05:711 (59,60) –(59>delete),(60 >k)? remained unchanged, ^
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:12:081 (40) - change to finisher don? also fit as music imo. The instruments are different, so k would be better.
  2. 00:18:861 (58) – d ? same as 00:14:957 (48,49,50,51) – kkkd~~ k fits the vocal well imo.
  3. 01:03:040 (211) – delete? fixed
  4. 01:15:368 (256) – add note no change for the sake of consistency as the previous 01:02:218 -
  5. and, 01:15:574 (257) - k? for vocal stress. d seems to be fine as the vocal there has a lower pitch than 01:15:779 (257) -
  6. and, 01:16:807 (262) – delete , or move? to 01:17:012 -. deleted
  7. 01:26:053 (294) - same as 1st phrase. same as 00:12:081 (40) -
  8. 01:44:649 (358,359) – …delete the triplet? Not strong sounds, and I’m not sure why suddenly triplet using. On this part , I think no using 1/4 triplet is clean . :Dremain unchanged, as I want to make the 2nd phrase a bit harder than the 1st one.
  9. 02:02:629 (423) – delete ? can be linked 02:00:368 (416,417,418) – 1/1 notes for vocal :3 um... retained for consistency.
  10. 02:28:724 (520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
  11. 03:06:738 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - dkkdkd, or dkddkd … or,,, kkdkdd.? Anyhow , 03:06:738 (1,5) - same color is weird for me. uum, why… lol nope, the current pattern follows both the instrument and the vocal well imo.
  12. 03:21:635 (673) - , 03:23:279 (679) – delete ? same as 01:44:649 (358,359) – . It will be too easy if triplet is not used here...
  13. 03:24:204 (682) - finisher? lol fixed
  14. 03:36:327 (11,12) – swap ? same as pitch follow , like… 03:36:327 (11,12) -. refer to 03:06:738 -
  15. 03:38:588 (19,20,21,22) – ^ The current pattern follows the piano nicely, so no change here.
  16. 03:41:670 (29) – delete, this . more fit as music. nope, I can hear a sound there.
  17. 03:54:204 (75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
  18. 04:03:142 (106) – move 1/4 left. unnecessary this rhythm, imo. fixed
Generally , Nice diffs~ :D
however on the few points that put on 1/4(or 1/2, 1/1) triplet , I’m scared to sounds weird a bit. That’s the reason that there’re removing suggestions.
I think Kantan & Muzukashii can make up more cleaned. :3

Good Luck~~~ >w<//
Thanks for your long mod JuDa~ :)

Latest Update: http://puu.sh/acBBt.rar
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

mingmichael wrote:

hey! sorry for the lateness


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================

[Futsuu]

change HP and OD to be 4. why did you make it same with Kantan? hm
your futsuu seems like a mini muzu IMO. it has a long 1/1 and 1/2 patterns there (for the example like 00:05:300 - until 00:16:807 - ). try to read the guide again about futsuu diff here. at least give some 1/1 breaks there. if you still want to keep yours, tbh the spread diff. for the example again like this (from 03:47:218 - until 03:50:916 -)

kantan


futsuu

well i will try to give some suggestions later on the Notes box to give some breaks there and simplify the patterns a bit
• just delete these 00:01:190 - ; 00:02:834 - ; 00:04:478 - . seriously i don't get those notes's function there o.o OK

• delete this 00:07:355 - . to give that little break OK

• change 00:08:998 - to be don and change 00:09:820 - to be kat. it will give a strong pitch sound to follow that increasing pitch sound there OK for 00:08:998 -, but I prefer keeping 00:09:820 - as show the increase in pitch to 00:10:026 -

if i were you, i would delete 00:13:930 - ; 00:14:341 - ; 00:14:752 - . seriously they don't follow any sounds there. you can hear it too that the song doesn't give any sounds there, it's empty. okay maybe you want give some creation by yourself, but seriously it means nothing OK

• delete 00:18:040 - too OK

• change 00:19:272 - to be kat. it's perfect with a kat for the increasing vocal sound OK

• delete 00:27:081 - . at least give a break plz there after the finisher comes out OK

• delete 00:30:368 - ^ OK

• 00:33:656 - ^ OK

• move 00:39:615 - to 00:39:409 - and change 00:39:204 - to be don. i don't get why you put a kat on 00:39:615 - . do you want try to emphasize a finisher on 00:39:820 - with a kat? hmm sounds nice, but it will be better to emphasize a snare sound on 00:39:409 - with a kat only sound nice, ok

• bahh a note on 00:53:998 - ? delete it. seriously, the song just gives 1/1 notes for the vocals there OK

• delete 01:02:218 - . at least give a break there

• delete 01:18:861 -

• 01:24:615 - ^

• 01:27:903 - ^

• 01:41:053 - ^

• 01:44:341 - ^

• 01:47:629 - ^

• 01:50:916 - ^

• 01:57:492 - ^

• 02:00:779 - ^

• 02:08:382 - ^ All ok

• move 02:10:437 - to 02:10:642 - and change it to be kat. seriously why is it a 1/2 note there? @@ OK

• move 02:13:725 - to 02:13:930 - and delete 02:14:135 - ^ OK

• don on 02:15:163 - . to emphasize that low vocal OK

• move 02:23:588 - to 02:23:793 - OK

• delete 03:09:409 - OK

• 03:22:766 - ^ OK

delete 03:35:916 - . be consistent please. which sounds that you want to follow? vocal or instrument? if you followed vocal, delete 03:35:916 - OK

• move 03:49:067 - to 03:49:272 - OK

• change 03:50:094 - to be kat and 03:50:505 - don and also delete 03:50:300 - if you use the previous mod ^ OK

• move 03:52:355 - to 03:52:560 - and delete 03:52:766 - OK

• delete 03:54:820 - and 03:56:464 - OK


====================


[Oni]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
try this. move 00:01:190 - to 00:01:396 - and delete 00:01:807 - . move 00:02:834 - to 00:03:040 - and delete 00:03:451 - and move 00:04:478 - to 00:04:683 - . they will follow the song better with that kind of patterns OK

delete 00:16:293 - . seriously the song doesn't give any 1/4 notes there, just a simple 1/1 and 1/2 notes only OK

delete 00:19:581 - ^ ^

00:22:868 - ^ ^

• move 00:25:848 - to 00:25:642 - . your current pattern is too late to follow the instrument sounds there OK

from 00:53:382 - until 00:54:615 - . okay it's a bit overmapped here. why? you can hear the song again there. the song just give 1/1 notes for the vocals only there. there isn't any sounds come out except 1/1 vocals there. well yah it's up to you on here I may consider it as I think it is a good transition for getting into kiai

• don 01:53:588 - ? k seems better

from 02:07:355 - until 02:08:588 - . same like the previous part too ^

from 03:34:067 - until 03:45:368 - . okay same like your futsuu diff. please be consistent again, which sound that you want to follow. vocals?or instruments? make it sure again please


====================


okay that's all from meh!
futsuu needs some work again there and try to catch some modders again to ensure your futsuu
goodluck!
Thank for you mod, I really not familiar with mapping futsuu

I will check JuDa's mod later

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda's Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.

box=1st coming/box
Later I will mod other diffs.~


[Futsuu]
  1. 00:00:368 (1,2,3,4) - (k,dk,d) ? or(k,dk,k) ? or(k,kk,d)? anyhow, k starts better if you follow to percussion. OK
  2. 00:06:122 (16) – move to 1/2 left for instrument hits. And I suggest to change k. fine for me
  3. 00:07:355 (20) – delete. unnecessary this. OK
  4. 00:12:697 (35) – k sounds better, for violin. :3 OK
  5. 00:13:519 - ~~~~Same as Oni . on 1st part, no bass drums sounds.(comparing with 01:27:492 - ~) So, I suggest many removing notes. OK
    00:13:930 (38) –
    00:14:752 (39) –
    00:18:040 (45) –
    00:22:149 (53) –
    00:22:971 (54) - ?
  6. 00:27:081 - , 00:30:368 - , 00:33:656 - …. Delete? anyhow, 00:33:656 – delete is better for vocal . OK
  7. 00:34:067 (81) – k , same as previous 00:32:423 (76) – OK
  8. 00:36:944 (88,89,90) – kkd ? previous d k d k pattern… OK
  9. 00:43:108 – delete finisher? not loud sound. OK
  10. 00:49:683 (110) – finisher? OK
  11. 00:51:533 (119,120,121) – change to k. snare sounds. OK
  12. and , 00:52:560 (122) – move to 1/2 left ..? OK
  13. 00:53:382 (124,125,126,127) – make the same as Nardo’s Muzu …or nothing place.? I think players need to little break time. I think those note is necessary, may consider it under further mod
  14. 00:56:670 (129) - k? d seems better
  15. 01:02:218 (145) – delete, and 01:02:423 (145) - k , 01:02:629 (146) – add k? OK
  16. 01:10:231 (166) – don ? OK
  17. 01:15:985 (183) - k? OK
  18. 01:20:300 (195) – k? for vocal and, 01:20:505 – ‘s snare follow. OK for k, I want to reduce 4 notes pattern for keeping it easy
  19. 01:23:998 (204) – add k? OK
  20. 01:27:903 (216) – delete?1 OK
  21. 01:28:725 (217) – delete. OK
  22. 01:32:012 (224) – move to 01:31:190 (223) -. OOO, OOO, (1/1) rhythm pattern… OK
  23. 01:34:889 (231,232,233) – (d,d,k) >>(d,ddk) ? OK
  24. and, 01:36:533 (236,237,238,239) – (k,dkd)>(k,k,d)? OK
  25. 01:41:053 (249,251) – (delete,k). make same as 1st phrase. OK
  26. 01:44:341 (257,259) - ^, 01:47:629 (266) -^ OK
  27. 02:07:355 (323,324,325,326) – same as 1st pattern. ^
  28. 01:53:793 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) –
    Uum, try to compare with 1st phrase.
    00:39:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) –
    I think you should decide to decreasing the notes.. OK
  29. 02:09:820 (333,334,335,336) – (kk,d,k) >(kk,dk)? Fix in another way
  30. 02:11:670 (339) – add note here. Backsound hits. OK
  31. 02:14:135 (346) – move to 1/2 left. ^
  32. and, 02:13:930 (346) - k? d is better imo
  33. 02:15:163 (349) – don ? sounds better . OK
  34. 02:18:451 (357) - k? OK
  35. 02:21:327 (365) – k. OK
  36. 02:19:889 (361,364) – swap? sound strange
  37. 02:26:875 (380) – add don, can link previous dk kd pattern. some changes for that
  38. 02:27:903 (383) – k OK
  39. 02:31:190 (391) - k? OK
  40. 02:32:834 (395) – move 1/2 left. and change k? OK
  41. 02:34:272 (399) – k OK
  42. 02:40:437 (407) – delete, unnecessary for Futsuu. OK
  43. 02:45:368 (416) -^ OK
  44. 03:05:094 (8) – k OK
  45. 03:20:916 (42,44,49,51) – finisher? OK
  46. 03:22:766 (45) delete. OK
  47. 03:26:053 (51) delete. OK
  48. 03:28:725 (57) - sounds bass drums. but 57 don sounds … weird for vocal. So 03:28:930 (58) - don ? instead of 57 change don. color=#00FF00]OK[/color]
  49. 03:32:834 (1) –k d seems better for fitting the vocal imo
  50. 03:42:081 (22) – add d? I prefer less note at that period, seems to heavy
  51. 03:46:807 (32) – k for splash sound.. OK
  52. 03:48:451 (36,37,38,39) – (kd,d,dk)>(kd,dk,k) ? change in another way
  53. 03:50:094 (41,42,43) – kkd .. ? OK
  54. 03:52:766 (49) – move to 1/2 left and, k? OK
  55. 04:03:245 (10) - k? d seems better
  56. 04:00:779 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - ~~~ uum,I suggest this pattern. not bad, OK

  57. 04:06:122 (18) – k sounds better imo. OK

  58. I’m scared that players feel to play hard… Taiko Futsuu needs more modders.
    Example, many OO,O,OO, rhythms are.
    Players prefer to OO,OO,O (1 back beat) than OO,O,OO (2 back beats) on kiai.I guess. cuz rhythm is clean.
    and, you should try to complile to the density on each part. I think Futsuu should make the manyparts that no put over 2/1 , like 00:27:081 (62) - delete suggestion.
[Oni]
  1. 00:01:190 (4) - , 00:02:834 (10) - , 00:04:478 (16) - , delete ? unnecessary notes,imo. OK
  2. and, 00:01:807 (5) - ,move to 00:01:396 (4) - ? OK
  3. 00:03:040 (9) - add k? OK
  4. 00:04:683 (15) - ^ OK
  5. 00:06:122 (21) – change k?
  6. 00:12:492 (50,51,52,53,54,55) – I suggest 2 patterns. I hope you to choose the either.
    A. 00:12:492 (50,51,52,53) – (kkd,* ,d) >>( kkkkd)? cool highpitch sounds following. And smoothly , I guess. I use kkddd instead
    B. 00:13:108 (54) – finisher , and 00:13:314 (55) – delete? this suggestions are linked previous finisher pattern (00:11:670 (48) -).
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  7. 00:13:519 (56) - ~~~~on 1st part, no bass drums sounds.(comparing with 01:27:492 - ~) So, I suggest many removing notes. OK
    00:13:930 (58) - ,
    00:14:752 (59) -?
    00:17:218 (67) –
    00:18:040 (68) - ?
    00:20:505 (76) -
    00:22:355 (82) -
  8. 00:22:971 (84) - change to k? OK
  9. 00:26:361 (100,101) – delete? sounds better imo, cuz previous pattern( 00:25:745 (96,97,98,99) - ) (kk,d,k) are drums follow ? Fix in another way

  10. 00:41:259 (174) – d sounds better for back sound stress. OK
  11. 00:43:108 – delete finisher? not loud sound. OK
  12. 00:52:766 (226) – finisher 2nd part is put, lol OK
  13. 00:53:177 (227) – delete? OK
  14. 00:55:231 (239) – add k? splash sounds here. OK
  15. and, 01:00:163 (267) – add don? OK
  16. 01:08:382 (312) - ^ Use a k
  17. 01:10:848 (327,328) – how about swap? OK 01:10:231 (323) -~~ 1/2 kdkkd~~~ I prefer kdk d
  18. 01:16:190 (356,357) – how about delete? for vocal that is stopped. OK
  19. and, 01:16:396 (356,357,358) – change to (k,d,k)? OK
  20. 01:25:231 -, 01:25:334 – add k? OK
  21. 01:26:464 (403,404,405,406,407,408,409) – same as 1st phrase. ^
  22. 01:29:546 (419,420) – don ? no piano sounds. And vocal pitch isn’t changed. OK

  23. 01:40:334 (460,461) – delete? same as 1st phrase. change a little
  24. 01:53:588 (533) – how about change d? instead of change 01:53:382 (532) – don. OK
  25. 01:54:820 (536,537,538,539,540) - 539 needs don sound I guess. So I suggest (kkk,d,k) OK
  26. and, 01:55:848 (541) - k? OK
  27. and…01:56:053 (543) – how about add d? OK
  28. 02:00:163 (557) – k? OK
  29. 02:03:861 (573,574) – (573>>d),(574>delete). same as 1st phrase. Anyhow, triplet is little hard, imo. OK
  30. 02:07:149 (588) - delete? OK
  31. 02:13:930 (623) – k sounds better, almost sounds higher. OK
  32. 02:16:601 (639,640) - dk? for back sound pitch, emphasize to 02:18:451 (651) – don sounds. OK
  33. uum, if you can accept, 02:09:204 (596) -, 02:22:355 (672) - , change k? OK
  34. 02:20:403 (665) – how about change thek? more smoothly , I guess. not bad
  35. and, 02:20:711 (667,668) – swap? OK
  36. 02:33:040 (734,735,736) – (k,d,d) >(d,k,k)? back sound stopped. So fit as music imo. OK
  37. 02:39:409 (753) - k? piano is high. OK
  38. 02:41:875 (760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767) – (kdk,kdkdk)>>(k,kdkdk,k)? backsounds hits, yes. But,,, I suggest other pattern. piano can hear easiler? OK
  39. 02:43:519 (1,3,4) – (k,d,k)>>(d,k,d) ? ?

  40. 02:53:177 (800,801,802) – how about removing (800 and,802) or(800,801)? Plays not too hard I guess. Linked 02:50:814 (789) -. remove 800, 801
  41. 02:56:053 (813) – add don? drums hit. OK
  42. 02:59:957 (830) - k? for vocal. OK
  43. 03:06:533 (29) - k? sounds better imo. OK
  44. 03:08:998 (39,40,41) – (40>remove) (41> delete?) triplet is… weird a bit..? OK
  45. 03:09:820 (43) - k? for vocal. OK
  46. 03:18:861 (82) - k? same as 03:15:574 (69) -. OK
  47. 03:21:327 (92,93,94,95) – (dd,dK) >(ddk,K) ? or kd,dK? ddk K
  48. 03:24:615 (106,107,108,109) - ^ anyhow , 109 needs finisher, . OK
  49. 03:24:204 (105) – finisher lol. OK
  50. 03:25:848 (110,111,112,113,114,115) - Either
    A. how about? for vocal.http://puu.sh/ab3qG/e901c27e1b.jpg OK
    B. 03:26:772 (116) – add k? instead of additional 03:26:567 -.
    └―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  51. 03:30:574 (133) – delete? OK
  52. 03:32:834 (1,2,3) – uum,,, delete? or ….kkk? anyhow, don sounds don’t need for violin slar…. ._. This three notes are following vocal
  53. 03:34:272 (5) – move to 1/2 right. . ~~~03:43:930 - no put rhythm pattern.(like,, 03:37:560 - , 03:40:848 - noput.) OK
  54. 03:35:711 (9) – how about move 1/2 left ? for emphasize next kk,kd pattern :3 OK
  55. 03:42:286 (33) – move to 1/2 right? OK
  56. and, 03:43:108 (36) – delete? OK
  57. 03:49:683 (67,68,69) – kkd… ? OK
  58. 03:51:738 (80) – d? or 03:51:635 (79) – d? 79 one
  59. 03:55:231 (103) – how about change to k? if yoy like.. current one is ok
  60. 04:01:396 (7,8) – d,k ? OK
  61. 04:05:094 (26,27,28,29) – if you choose 1st, 2nd pattern kkkkd, I also suggest to change kkkkd. not fit imo
  62. 03:59:135 (2,3,4,5) – I suggest kkkd or kkdk, reason is near 03:32:834 (1,2,3) - . don sounds feels … noisy..? it is fine imo

  63. lol, very many suggestions :? but not bad! I like this. Oni can make up more quality!! :D

Good Luck~~~ >w<//
Thank for your long mod :)Tired XD
bbj0920
WHOA YES THIS SONG
FROM MY MODDING QUEUE

Nardo's Taiko Kantan
Kantan has same OD as Futsuu? Consider OD -1
00:12:697 (19,20) - k d (the pitch goes down)
00:23:382 (33) - k
00:29:135 (43,44) - reverse
01:37:354 (159) - k
01:51:327 (184) - ^
01:59:957 (198) - d
02:06:121 (209) - k
02:19:066 (231) - ^
02:39:820 (266,267) - reverse
02:45:574 (275) - d
03:45:368 (23) - K
04:02:012 (53) - d

Taiko Futsuu
00:06:738 (15) - k
00:28:724 (60) - ^
00:36:533 (79,80) - reverse
00:40:437 (90) - k
00:42:286 (92,93) - reverse
00:51:122 (110) - K
01:11:053 (164) - d
01:12:286 (167,168) - reverse
01:38:177 (232) - k
01:38:793 (234) - d
01:41:875 (242) - k
01:45:574 (251) - ^
02:03:656 (289) - K
02:05:094 (294) - ^
02:08:998 (304,305) - reverse
02:13:314 (316) - k
02:26:464 (351) - ^
03:14:341 (27) - D?
03:17:218 (33) - d
03:42:697 (22,23) - reverse
04:05:094 (13) - K

Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii
00:02:012 (6) - k
00:05:505 (17) - D
00:20:094 (62) - k
00:33:451 (103) - Moving to 00:33:245 -
00:37:355 (116) - k
00:50:916 (167) - D
00:52:766 (175) - K
00:57:286 - Adding a note (d)
01:20:711 (274) - k
01:47:423 (368) - Moving to 01:47:218 -
01:49:272 (375) - k
01:56:875 (404,405) - reveeeeerse
02:04:888 (433) - D
02:11:259 - Same as 00:57:286 -
02:14:957 (470) - k
02:31:395 (530) - ^
02:47:218 (564) - ^
03:37:149 (15) - ^

Taiko Oni
00:05:505 (17) - k
00:06:327 (21) - ^
00:10:231 (41) - D
00:12:800 (53) - k
00:14:957 (59) - ^
00:18:245 (67,68) - reverse
00:46:190 (196) - k
00:47:629 (201,202,203) - k k d
00:50:300 (213) - K
00:50:916 (215) - D
01:20:711 (380) - k
01:23:793 (393) - ^
02:01:807 (566) - ^
02:04:889 (577) - D
02:44:341 (768) - k
03:14:341 (63) - D
03:41:464 (28) - I think this note isn't really needed
03:41:875 (30) - k
03:47:834 (54,55) - reverse
04:05:094 (26) - D
mintong89
Hi, mod request from my queue.

[General]
Disable "Widescreen Support" at the Design panel on Song Setup? This isn't used on Taiko.
[Taiko Oni]

00:02:012 (6,7,8,9,10) - How about d k k _ d k for the various? It's makes more fun to the beatmap!
00:05:505 (17) - It should be k here because the sound of drum snare is just like 00:05:711 (18) - this and you put as k.
00:09:204 (35) - Hmm, how about k here to emphasize the high pitch of violin? If you accept please 00:09:409 (36) - make this to d.
00:09:615 (37) - k here to make some different to previous pattern (ddk before and kdk after.)
00:10:231 (41) - I'm suggest you put as big note because cymbal at here is really loud just like 00:11:670 (48) - here.
00:12:286 - Add a note here? I hear there's still has a drum kick at here.
00:34:683 (141,142) - If you hear the song carefully actually here's 1/4 but not 1/2, so ddk?
00:49:683 - , 00:50:300 - , 00:50:916 - , 00:51:122 - Actually I'm suggest you to put all these 4 notes as big note because the cymbal at here is really loud but you did it at last note only. So put it at previous three note?
00:56:875 (247) - k here because the vocal is quite high pitch at here.
01:23:177 (389) - Same as above suggestion, k here to emphasize the high pitch of violin.
01:26:259 - Add a note because drum kick at here.
03:57:697 (116) - How about D here to just like you do at 03:57:081 (112) - here?
03:59:135 (2,3,4,5) - How about delete this four notes to emphasize there isn't have any instrument and just have only vocal at here?
[Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii]

00:10:848 (35) - Delete this note? I can't hear anything at here.
Solid diff.

Futsuu and Kantan seem fine.
Good Luck!
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

bbj0920 wrote:

WHOA YES THIS SONG
FROM MY MODDING QUEUE

Taiko Futsuu
00:06:738 (15) - k OK
00:28:724 (60) - ^ no
00:36:533 (79,80) - reverse no, following the drum sound there
00:40:437 (90) - k no
00:42:286 (92,93) - reverse OK
00:51:122 (110) - K OK
01:11:053 (164) - d OK
01:12:286 (167,168) - reverse OK
01:38:177 (232) - k OK
01:38:793 (234) - d no
01:41:875 (242) - k OK
01:45:574 (251) - ^ OK
02:03:656 (289) - K OK
02:05:094 (294) - ^ OK
02:08:998 (304,305) - reverse no, following the pitch
02:13:314 (316) - k no, the pitch is going down there
02:26:464 (351) - ^ ^
03:14:341 (27) - D? OK
03:17:218 (33) - d no, following the high pitch there
03:42:697 (22,23) - reverse OK
04:05:094 (13) - K no

Taiko Oni
00:05:505 (17) - k OK
00:06:327 (21) - ^ no
00:10:231 (41) - D OK
00:12:800 (53) - k no
00:14:957 (59) - ^ no, trying to emphasis the upbeat
00:18:245 (67,68) - reverse no, following the pitch
00:46:190 (196) - k OK
00:47:629 (201,202,203) - k k d no
00:50:300 (213) - K no, seems too strong for that
00:50:916 (215) - D ^
01:20:711 (380) - k OK
01:23:793 (393) - ^ no
02:01:807 (566) - ^ no
02:04:889 (577) - D no
02:44:341 (768) - k no, trying to emphasis the higher pitch of next note
03:14:341 (63) - D OK
03:41:464 (28) - I think this note isn't really needed OK
03:41:875 (30) - k no
03:47:834 (54,55) - reverse no
04:05:094 (26) - D not really that strong
I will check mint's mod later :)

mintong89 wrote:

Hi, mod request from my queue.

[General]
Disable "Widescreen Support" at the Design panel on Song Setup? This isn't used on Taiko. OK
[Taiko Oni]

00:02:012 (6,7,8,9,10) - How about d k k _ d k for the various? It's makes more fun to the beatmap! not bad, OK
00:05:505 (17) - It should be k here because the sound of drum snare is just like 00:05:711 (18) - this and you put as k. OK
00:09:204 (35) - Hmm, how about k here to emphasize the high pitch of violin? If you accept please 00:09:409 (36) - make this to d. OK
00:09:615 (37) - k here to make some different to previous pattern (ddk before and kdk after.) OK
00:10:231 (41) - I'm suggest you put as big note because cymbal at here is really loud just like 00:11:670 (48) - here. OK
00:12:286 - Add a note here? I hear there's still has a drum kick at here. OK
00:34:683 (141,142) - If you hear the song carefully actually here's 1/4 but not 1/2, so ddk? OK
00:49:683 - , 00:50:300 - , 00:50:916 - , 00:51:122 - Actually I'm suggest you to put all these 4 notes as big note because the cymbal at here is really loud but you did it at last note only. So put it at previous three note? OK
00:56:875 (247) - k here because the vocal is quite high pitch at here. OK
01:23:177 (389) - Same as above suggestion, k here to emphasize the high pitch of violin. OK
01:26:259 - Add a note because drum kick at here. OK
03:57:697 (116) - How about D here to just like you do at 03:57:081 (112) - here? OK
03:59:135 (2,3,4,5) - How about delete this four notes to emphasize there isn't have any instrument and just have only vocal at here? not really for now, it is too empty for me if I delete them, maybe I will consider it later

Futsuu and Kantan seem fine.
Good Luck!
Thank for your mod :)
Nardoxyribonucleic

bbj0920 wrote:

WHOA YES THIS SONG
FROM MY MODDING QUEUE

Nardo's Taiko Kantan
Kantan has same OD as Futsuu? Consider OD -1 Umm... OK.
00:12:697 (19,20) - k d (the pitch goes down) I followed the snare at 20.
00:23:382 (33) - k d would be fine, as the music is lower-pitched than 00:21:738 (30) -
00:29:135 (43,44) - reverse No change as the vocal pitch drops.
01:37:354 (159) - k same as 00:23:382 (33) -
01:51:327 (184) - ^ No change as the vocal pitch drops.
01:59:957 (198) - d k would be better, as the vocal pitch of 02:00:368 (199,200) - is lower.
02:06:121 (209) - k d could result in a better flow imo.
02:19:066 (231) - ^ d could fit the vocal pitch better.
02:39:820 (266,267) - reverse Nope. 266 is higher-pitched than 267.
02:45:574 (275) - d Nope, it has a higher pitch than 02:46:396 (276) -
03:45:368 (23) - K I think D would be enough, as the vocal pitch is not extremely high.
04:02:012 (53) - d Nope, the vocal is higher-pitched than 04:02:834 (54) -

Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii
00:02:012 (6) - k d is used for diversifying the patterns.
00:05:505 (17) - D The sounds are identical imo, so K would be better.
00:20:094 (62) - k d would be fine as the vocal pitch is low.
00:33:451 (103) - Moving to 00:33:245 - Using even notes at times could make the map more fun.
00:37:355 (116) - k similar to 00:20:094 (62) -
00:50:916 (167) - D I think adding finish at 00:51:122 (168) - is already enough.
00:52:766 (175) - K The music is not as strong as ^, do k would be enough.
00:57:286 - Adding a note (d) I tend to make the 1st kiai time less dense, so no change.
01:20:711 (274) - k I use k for the snare at 273 only.
01:47:423 (368) - Moving to 01:47:218 - Same as 00:33:451 (103) -
01:49:272 (375) - k Nope, the vocal pitch is the same as the previous note.
01:56:875 (404,405) - reveeeeerse d k could follow the vocal pitch well.
02:04:888 (433) - D Same as 00:50:916 (167) -
02:11:259 - Same as 00:57:286 - Same.
02:14:957 (470) - k The vocal pitch is low among 02:14:340 (468,469,470,471) - , so d could fit.
02:31:395 (530) - ^ No change for the sake of pattern consistency as 01:17:423 (262) -
02:47:218 (564) - ^ I prefer using more dons in silent parts of the song, so I used d even at 02:45:574 (561) -
03:37:149 (15) - ^ Nope, it has the same vocal pitch as 03:37:355 (16) -
Thanks for the mod~ :)

mintong89 wrote:

Hi, mod request from my queue.

[General]
Disable "Widescreen Support" at the Design panel on Song Setup? This isn't used on Taiko.
[Nardo's Taiko Muzukashii]

00:10:848 (35) - Delete this note? I can't hear anything at here. No change, as I can hear a beat there.
Solid diff.

Futsuu and Kantan seem fine.
Good Luck!
Thanks for the mod and the comment~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/aK5TK.rar
qoot8123
from queue :)


[ Kantan]

  1. 01:00:368 (96) - try change this note to k, the vocal's pitch is a bit higher than 00:55:437 (87) -
  2. 01:13:519 (120) - ^
  3. 02:14:340 (222) - ^
  4. 02:27:491 (246) - ^
  5. 01:35:710 (156,157) - reverse? seems better for vocal
  6. 01:49:683 (181,182,183,184) - here is a bit different with the first part, try to follow vocal precisely?
  7. 02:50:094 (283) - this note could be removed,though there is drum sound , but it is a bit awkward when i playing
  8. 03:28:725 (345) - move to 03:29:135 - i think this rhythm is more clear
  9. 03:32:834 (1,2,3) - i think you can remove these three notes to make a break, because there is only vocal here, if you remove these notes, it may be better when playing
  10. 03:46:396 (25) - remove and move 03:45:779 (24) - to 03:46:190 - , i think it is better by following vocal, and also make a break after big note



[ Futsuu]

  1. 00:17:629 (39) - try to remove this note? to make consistency with 00:14:341 -
  2. 00:22:971 - add note here? to reflect 00:20:916 (45,46,47) - this pattern
  3. reverse 00:34:067 (73) - and 00:36:533 (79) - ? the drum's power on 00:36:533 (79) - is a bit more than 00:34:889 (75,77) - and the vocal's pitch is also high
  4. 00:57:081 (125) - change to k? more fit the next pattern 00:57:492 (126,127,128) - imo
  5. 01:31:190 (214) - remove? to make a consistency with 01:32:423 (216,217,218,219,220,221,222) -
  6. 02:45:985 (389) - remove? to follow the instrument as you followed on 02:44:752 (387) - and 02:43:108 (384) -
  7. 03:15:574 (29) - remove? to make a consistency with 03:02:834 (3,4,5,6) -
  8. 03:43:930 (25) - this slider is a bit weird to me, try remove slider and add some notes here



[ Muzukashii]

  1. 00:10:848 (35) - remove? the instrument has a long tone here
  2. 01:24:820 (288) - ^
  3. 00:33:451 (103) - move to 00:33:245 - is better to me by following drum
  4. 01:47:423 (368) - ^
  5. 01:34:067 (320,322) - reverse? by following vocal's pitch
  6. 01:44:546 (356,357,358) - this triple is occurred suddenly, try to remove 01:44:546 (356,357,359) -
  7. 02:20:916 (492) - move to 02:21:122 - would be better imo
  8. 03:46:396 (45) - ^
  9. 02:42:286 (552,553,554,555,556) - this pattern also occurred suddenly , try to make another pattern
  10. 03:35:916 (10) - ,03:39:204 (21,22) - this part is calm, so remove them to make the note less intensive



[ Oni]

  1. 00:25:848 - add note here? there is an obvious drum sound
  2. 00:30:574 - ^
  3. 00:45:779 (195) - ^
  4. 01:44:546 - ^ also make a consistency with 01:41:259 (469,470,471,472,473) -
  5. 00:45:779 (195) -the drum sound here is not so clear, so i think you can remove it
  6. 02:36:533 - ~ 02:48:040 -this part is calm ,so try to make some 2/1 break
  7. 03:22:971 (97) - remove and move 03:22:560 (94,95,96) - to 03:22:766 - to follow the music precisely
  8. 03:43:930 - same as futsuu


that's all~
good luck~ :)
Nardoxyribonucleic

qoot8123 wrote:

from queue :)


[ Kantan]

  1. 01:00:368 (96) - try change this note to k, the vocal's pitch is a bit higher than 00:55:437 (87) - fixed
  2. 01:13:519 (120) - ^ ^
  3. 02:14:340 (222) - ^ ^
  4. 02:27:491 (246) - ^ ^
  5. 01:35:710 (156,157) - reverse? seems better for vocal fixed
  6. 01:49:683 (181,182,183,184) - here is a bit different with the first part, try to follow vocal precisely? The current pattern fits the vocal pitch well.
  7. 02:50:094 (283) - this note could be removed,though there is drum sound , but it is a bit awkward when i playing Okay.
  8. 03:28:725 (345) - move to 03:29:135 - i think this rhythm is more clear I prefer following the vocal at 03:28:725 -
  9. 03:32:834 (1,2,3) - i think you can remove these three notes to make a break, because there is only vocal here, if you remove these notes, it may be better when playing fixed
  10. 03:46:396 (25) - remove and move 03:45:779 (24) - to 03:46:190 - , i think it is better by following vocal, and also make a break after big note The current pattern could follow both the vocal at 03:45:779 - and the piano at 03:46:396 - , so no change here.


[ Muzukashii]

  1. 00:10:848 (35) - remove? the instrument has a long tone here fixed
  2. 01:24:820 (288) - ^ ^
  3. 00:33:451 (103) - move to 00:33:245 - is better to me by following drum fixed
  4. 01:47:423 (368) - ^ ^
  5. 01:34:067 (320,322) - reverse? by following vocal's pitch As the vocal pitch is the same, I prefer following the guitar at 01:34:067 (318) - and the increasing trend of vocal pitch among 01:34:889 (320,321,322,323) - by mapping the two notes as k and d respectively.
  6. 01:44:546 (356,357,358) - this triple is occurred suddenly, try to remove 01:44:546 (356,357,359) - I followed the background music there.
  7. 02:20:916 (492) - move to 02:21:122 - would be better imo fixed
  8. 03:46:396 (45) - ^ The current pattern suits the background music more by making 03:46:807 (46) - stand alone.
  9. 02:42:286 (552,553,554,555,556) - this pattern also occurred suddenly , try to make another pattern I followed the piano sound purely in this part.
  10. 03:35:916 (10) - ,03:39:204 (21,22) - this part is calm, so remove them to make the note less intensive I found it a bit weird to break the pattern in this way, so I would like to keep this atm.


that's all~
good luck~ :)
Thanks for your mod~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/b5ypf.rar
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

qoot8123 wrote:

from queue :)

[ Futsuu]

  1. 00:17:629 (39) - try to remove this note? to make consistency with 00:14:341 - no, there is a significant sound which different from the previous part
  2. 00:22:971 - add note here? to reflect 00:20:916 (45,46,47) - this pattern OK
  3. reverse 00:34:067 (73) - and 00:36:533 (79) - ? the drum's power on 00:36:533 (79) - is a bit more than 00:34:889 (75,77) - and the vocal's pitch is also high OK
  4. 00:57:081 (125) - change to k? more fit the next pattern 00:57:492 (126,127,128) - imo OK
  5. 01:31:190 (214) - remove? to make a consistency with 01:32:423 (216,217,218,219,220,221,222) - OK
  6. 02:45:985 (389) - remove? to follow the instrument as you followed on 02:44:752 (387) - and 02:43:108 (384) - OK
  7. 03:15:574 (29) - remove? to make a consistency with 03:02:834 (3,4,5,6) - OK
  8. 03:43:930 (25) - this slider is a bit weird to me, try remove slider and add some notes here OK



[ Oni]

  1. 00:25:848 - add note here? there is an obvious drum sound OK
  2. 00:30:574 - ^ OK
  3. 00:45:779 (195) - ^ Contrast with the below one =="
  4. 01:44:546 - ^ also make a consistency with 01:41:259 (469,470,471,472,473) - OK
  5. 00:45:779 (195) -the drum sound here is not so clear, so i think you can remove it OK
  6. 02:36:533 - ~ 02:48:040 -this part is calm ,so try to make some 2/1 break OK
  7. 03:22:971 (97) - remove and move 03:22:560 (94,95,96) - to 03:22:766 - to follow the music precisely OK
  8. 03:43:930 - same as futsuu OK


that's all~
good luck~ :)
Thanks for your mod :)
mingmichael
Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Kantan]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
• change 00:52:149 - to be kat. this kat will follow the similar drum hits (00:51:738 - ~ 00:52:766 - actually)

• okay delete this one 01:04:067 - . well yah i know you wanted to add some notes there rather than break. but actually this break is really useful to give a break on those pattern from 01:00:368 - ~ 01:05:916 - (if you delete this). first, the vocal doesn't come out there and actually you follow the vocals during the kiai.
it looks like 00:59:957 - a bit when the vocal doesn't come out there and you gave a break on there

• hah delete this. it's a bit similar like 00:54:204 - and 00:54:615 - and you didn't add any notes before those two notes

• kat too on 02:06:122 -

and also delete 02:18:040 - and 02:34:067 -

• you can add a note (don) on 02:50:916 - and change 02:51:327 - to be don there. a don on 02:51:327 - is for the lower instrument sound (it's just a bittt lower) than 02:50:505 - . so to make it a bit different, i change 02:51:327 - to don

• add a note (don) on 02:57:492 - if you change above ^

• move 03:11:875 - to 03:11:670 - . make it consistent for following the vocal

a missing note on 03:13:108 - . add this with don to follow the vocal there

• move 03:28:725 - to 03:29:135 - so it will be o o o o o. it looks a bit weird for having xx-xxxx pattern there when you mostly map with xxx-x patterns. i remember that i ever mentioned this too in my previous mods before haha. so then just consider about this more

move 03:35:300 - to 03:35:505 - . vocal :c same like 03:38:793 - hue

• well i know that you followed the piano tune on 03:43:519 - by using a note. nice idea but it would be better if you just focus on one thing only. here from 03:34:067 - until 03:47:218 - mostly you follow the vocal but suddenly you add a note on 03:43:519 - when the vocal disappears. well just make it more consistent which pattern that you want to follow

• actually these notes on 03:45:779 - and 03:46:396 - because actually they don't follow any particular sounds (it's just 03:45:779 - follow the instrument hue) and basically you followed the vocal (the proof is you map vocals on 03:44:546 - ; 03:44:957 - ; 03:45:368 - :v). okay try to deleted those notes and add a note on 03:46:190 -


====================


[Futsuu]

☞ okay!
☞ okay, i am a bit confused when i checked your whole of your futsuu patterns. sometime you follow the vocals and sometime you follow the instrument sounds too and it makes a bit confusing patterns too. well i'll try to help you by giving some suggestion on the Notes box

☞ from 00:39:820 - until 00:49:683 - , try to make some improvement there. as you can see, your patterns are almost same like nardo's Kantan. look here


Kantan~Futsuu

☞same on 01:53:793 - until 02:03:656 - like above
i really recommend you to remove the finisher on 00:05:300 - . well i know that you wanted to emphasize the cymbal sound which is given from the song, didn't you? it's nice~ but after considering again this finisher is quite difficult because the Futsuu players who will play your map will be confused because they must still press 1/2 notes again after it. well it's different if we compare 00:05:300 - with 00:06:944 - . on 00:06:944 - after the finsiher comes out you gave a break there. nah of course the player will be a bit relax and can see the next pattern clearly. but it's different with the finisher on 00:05:300 -

• kat on 00:09:820 - . make it just a normal pattern for the 1/2 triplet. i know that don is for the lower pitch sound, but just ignore it because o o O is more confusing than o o O

• don on 00:10:642 - . the pitch sound is still low (as low as 00:10:231 - actually)

• lets have a break please. try to delete 00:12:492 - . you wanted to follow the violin sound by using that note, but consider again about the breaks. this is such more important

• here again. change 00:25:642 - to be kat and delete 00:26:464 - . you put it suddenly with 1/2 patterns there. actually i was a bit confused when i test played it. so then just change 00:25:642 - to be kat (for having a same colours like 00:25:437 - and 00:26:053 - ) and delete 00:26:464 - for the break again

• don on 00:32:834 - . the vocal is already down and it actually has a similar low pitch sounds like 00:33:040 - and 00:33:245 - which you used dons

• move this note 00:37:149 - to 00:36:327 - and change 00:36:327 - and 00:36:533 - to be dons. don't forget to delete 00:36:944 - . i changed and deleted it to make a similar patterns for the notes like 00:27:492 - ~ 00:29:957 - and 00:30:779 - ~ 00:33:245 -

• nah here. delete 00:50:094 - and 00:51:533 - . change 00:50:916 - and 00:51:122 - to be o O. kay i changed and moved them to give a break again and it flows better IMO

• you can move 00:52:355 - to 00:52:560 -

• from 01:19:067 - ~ 01:20:916 - , try this

it flows better than yours because these dons on 01:19:067 - and 01:19:272 - actually follow the low vocals really well. and then the o o o o pattern on 01:19:683 - ~ 01:20:505 - follow the vocal+instrument really well too (when the snare comes on 01:20:505 - , the kat can emphasize it really well)

• finisher on 01:24:204 - . this finisher will emphasize the strong cymbal sound
you put a finisher too on 00:10:231 - anyway

• move 01:26:875 - to 01:26:670 - . i moved this to follow the drum hit (which comes out on 01:26:670 -) and ofc this note will follow the instrument sound better too

• change 01:35:300 - ~ 01:35:711 - to be o o o. this notes will follow the vocal much better. the vocals actually are high on 01:35:300 - and it drops a bit (becomes a bit lower) on 01:35:505 - . so to make that dropping pitch sound, i change it to be o o

delete 01:37:971 - . don't make a suddent doublet pattern there. actually this's quite confusing since you just use a simple pattern from 01:27:492 - , and suddenly you used 1/2 doublets on 01:37:971 - . i know that you wanted to follow the vocals, but actually it's not a good idea

• how about to delete 01:40:437 - . yeah i know that you wanted to follow the vocals again, but for following the vocal isn't a good way on there because actually the part becomes silence a while (just vocal and the instruments stop)

• 01:43:519 - ~ 01:43:930 - change to be o o o. this pattern will give a good dropping pitch sounds

kat on 01:45:163 - and don on 01:45:574 - . make it consistent for the pattern like you did on 01:41:875 - and 01:48:451 - with kats. it's actually same on 01:45:163 - for the kat

• don on 01:46:807 - . much better to follow the vocal by using o o o

• again, move 01:53:588 - to 01:53:382 - and change 01:53:177 - and 01:53:382 - to be o o. it suits better to follow the snare sound which comes out on 01:53:382 - with a kat (and actually it's not really particular to emphasize the finisher on 01:53:793 - by using a not on 01:53:588 - )

• same like the previous part. delete 02:04:067 - , change 02:04:889 - and 02:05:094 - to be o O and also delete 02:05:505 -

• move 02:06:327 - to 02:06:533 - and change 02:05:711 - until 02:06:738 - to be o o oO

• try to change 02:11:464 - ~ 02:11:875 - to be o o o, like your previous part kiai (00:57:492 - ~ 00:57:903 - ). actually it's much better to follow the pitch sounds (vocals) than using o o o

• move 02:23:998 - to 02:24:820 - and change to be kat. the reason is same like above ^

• don on 02:33:040 - . actually the vocal is already low (and has a same pitch like 02:33:245 - too)

• again here. move 02:34:683 - to 02:34:478 - and change 02:33:656 - ~ 02:34:478 - to be oo oo in 1/2 bsd. here :

it's much better than you put a note on 02:34:683 - to emphasize the finisher on 02:34:889 - . try to follow the snare sound again on 02:34:478 - because it's more interesting too than a note on 02:34:683 -

• you can add a note (kat) on 02:42:903 - to follow the piano sounds there. much better than you just give a 1/1 pattern like nardo's Kantan

• try to add a note (don) on 02:50:916 - . much better than a break there

• add a note on 03:07:560 - and change 03:07:355 - ~ 03:07:766 - to be o o o. actually it'll be much better to follow the vocal (dropping vocals) on there

• delete 03:11:464 - and 03:12:286 - to make the vocals clearly by deleting them

• change 03:22:971 - and 03:23:382 - to be o o. much better to follow the snare sound with kat on 03:23:382 -

• change 03:35:505 - to be kat. a same notes will be much better and avoid the confusing doublets pattern on the calm part

• don on 03:37:355 - (for the low vocal) and change 03:37:766 - to be kat, and also change 03:38:588 - and 03:38:793 - to be o o. the pitch sounds are totally different if we compare it with 03:35:300 - and 03:35:505 - because the vocal is lowerrr on 03:38:588 - and 03:38:793 -

• change 03:40:642 - to be don here. vocal has dropped

• change 03:41:875 - and 03:42:286 - to be o o

• what is the function of the note on 03:43:519 - ? there's not any sounds come out there. okay try to move it to 03:44:341 - and change 03:44:341 - and 03:44:546 - to be o o

• again and again. delete 03:58:519 - and change 03:58:108 - and 03:58:314 - to be o o. i think you know the reason because i have mentioned it twice before

• again too on 04:00:163 - . move it to 03:59:957 - and change 03:59:752 - and 03:59:957 - to be o o

• delete 04:04:067 - to make the break. okay i know that you wanted to follow the instrument sounds again there, but consider again for having the breaks on the patterns

• change 04:05:505 - to be don (because the instrument has dropped here yeah) and delete 04:06:327 - and change 04:06:533 - to be don. okay this is the last part and maybe you wanted to make the patterns a bit denser. okay nice idea but consider again for the Futsuu players who will play your map and they will be a bit shocked when they see the last part which is a bit hard


====================


[Muzukashii]

☞ okay!
☞ a solid muzukashii :3 really nice job, nardo~
• try to delete 00:25:848 - so it'll give a oo-doublet pattern :P ofc this doublet will follow the drum hits from the song and it's more interesting to be played

i would recommend you to delete this note. well i deleted this one because it would be muchh better to follow those single vocals on 00:58:314 - and 00:58:724 - without any notes in the middle of it. actually there's not any notes come out on 00:58:519 - , so it's just an additional note

same on 01:11:670 - and 01:12:081 - . delete them like above ^

• it feels like something missing note on 01:38:588 - . try to add it with a note and this note will follow the beat of the song which is on 1/1 beatsnapdivisor

• same like the first reason. delete 01:39:820 -

delete 02:12:903 - . the reason is same like the previous kiai part

same on 02:25:642 - and 02:26:053 - ^

• try kat on 02:47:218 - . this kat really really supports the piano sound which becomes a bit higher on there (higher than 02:46:807 -

• this additional note on 02:50:916 - doesn't mean anything and it disturbs the 1/4 drum hit on 02:50:814 - and makes that 1/4 note not clearly anymore. try to focus it with the drum hit on 02:50:814 - . trust me, it'll be much better and interesting than using oo-doublet

• same 02:57:492 - ^

03:51:122 - and 03:51:533 - delete too

• change 04:03:245 - to be kat. the violin sound has increased here (becomes higher than 04:03:040 - )


====================


i'm going to mod the oni soon
Nardoxyribonucleic

mingmichael wrote:

Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Kantan]

☞ okay!
☞ okay!
• change 00:52:149 - to be kat. this kat will follow the similar drum hits (00:51:738 - ~ 00:52:766 - actually) fixed

• okay delete this one 01:04:067 - . well yah i know you wanted to add some notes there rather than break. but actually this break is really useful to give a break on those pattern from 01:00:368 - ~ 01:05:916 - (if you delete this). first, the vocal doesn't come out there and actually you follow the vocals during the kiai.
it looks like 00:59:957 - a bit when the vocal doesn't come out there and you gave a break on there => Okay.

• hah delete this. it's a bit similar like 00:54:204 - and 00:54:615 - and you didn't add any notes before those two notes fixed

• kat too on 02:06:122 - fixed

and also delete 02:18:040 - and 02:34:067 - Fixed the latter. I kinda like to make a slight variation from the 1st kiai.

• you can add a note (don) on 02:50:916 - and change 02:51:327 - to be don there. a don on 02:51:327 - is for the lower instrument sound (it's just a bittt lower) than 02:50:505 - . so to make it a bit different, i change 02:51:327 - to don I would like to keep the part simpler, so no change here.

• add a note (don) on 02:57:492 - if you change above ^ same as ^

• move 03:11:875 - to 03:11:670 - . make it consistent for following the vocal As the vocal appears at both 03:11:464 and 03:11:670 - , following the snare rhythm would be better rather than following either of the vocal.

a missing note on 03:13:108 - . add this with don to follow the vocal there fixed

• move 03:28:725 - to 03:29:135 - so it will be o o o o o. it looks a bit weird for having xx-xxxx pattern there when you mostly map with xxx-x patterns. i remember that i ever mentioned this too in my previous mods before haha. so then just consider about this more changed the note to k instead for following the vocal better.

move 03:35:300 - to 03:35:505 - . vocal :c same like 03:38:793 - hue fixed

• well i know that you followed the piano tune on 03:43:519 - by using a note. nice idea but it would be better if you just focus on one thing only. here from 03:34:067 - until 03:47:218 - mostly you follow the vocal but suddenly you add a note on 03:43:519 - when the vocal disappears. well just make it more consistent which pattern that you want to follow deleted the note.

• actually these notes on 03:45:779 - and 03:46:396 - because actually they don't follow any particular sounds (it's just 03:45:779 - follow the instrument hue) and basically you followed the vocal (the proof is you map vocals on 03:44:546 - ; 03:44:957 - ; 03:45:368 - :v). okay try to deleted those notes and add a note on 03:46:190 - As the music pattern becomes quite different especially the drums after 03:45:368 - , switching the mapping mode to kiai-like would help players get ready for the kiai.


====================


[Muzukashii]

☞ okay!
☞ a solid muzukashii :3 really nice job, nardo~
• try to delete 00:25:848 - so it'll give a oo-doublet pattern :P ofc this doublet will follow the drum hits from the song and it's more interesting to be played I would like to follow the drum hit at 00:25:848 - as well.

i would recommend you to delete this note. well i deleted this one because it would be muchh better to follow those single vocals on 00:58:314 - and 00:58:724 - without any notes in the middle of it. actually there's not any notes come out on 00:58:519 - , so it's just an additional note fixed

same on 01:11:670 - and 01:12:081 - . delete them like above ^ fixed

• it feels like something missing note on 01:38:588 - . try to add it with a note and this note will follow the beat of the song which is on 1/1 beatsnapdivisor added k there.

• same like the first reason. delete 01:39:820 - same as 00:25:848 -

delete 02:12:903 - . the reason is same like the previous kiai part Similar to Kantan, I would like to make a slight variation from the 1st kiai.

same on 02:25:642 - and 02:26:053 - ^ deleted 02:25:642 - only.

• try kat on 02:47:218 - . this kat really really supports the piano sound which becomes a bit higher on there (higher than 02:46:807 - fixed

• this additional note on 02:50:916 - doesn't mean anything and it disturbs the 1/4 drum hit on 02:50:814 - and makes that 1/4 note not clearly anymore. try to focus it with the drum hit on 02:50:814 - . trust me, it'll be much better and interesting than using oo-doublet It's definitely a good idea. But I still think that the background beat at 02:50:916 - is noticeable that could be mapped as well.

• same 02:57:492 - ^ same as ^

03:51:122 - and 03:51:533 - delete too deleted 03:51:122 -

• change 04:03:245 - to be kat. the violin sound has increased here (becomes higher than 04:03:040 - ) fixed


====================


i'm going to mod the oni soon
Thanks for your mod michael~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/b9Vs4.rar
Senritsu
hi.
modding because ming asked me to mod the oni only :P

[Oni]
• 00:28:519 (110,115,125) - try changing them to d, follows the drum beat well imo
•00:36:944 (158,159) - swap, follows the music and vocal which has beat at 00:36:944 (158) - , while the vocal is high here 00:37:149 (159) -
• 00:42:183 (181) - change to d also, for following the beat drum.
• 00:53:793 (229,230) - swap, for following the vocal. 00:53:793 (229) - is higher than 00:54:204 (230) - :P
• 00:54:409 (231) - remove this? well i personally don't like this note being here, since it follows nothing. @@
• 00:56:259 (239) - try removing this, you're following the vocal. it stops there
• 00:58:108 (250) - ^
• 00:59:341 ~ 00:59:546 make this kkd, follows the vocal well ww
• 01:00:368 try making it something like this. imo follows the vocal and music more ww
• 01:02:834 (277) - change to d, follows the beat drum well.
• 01:03:656 (282) - sounds weird having it here, since you're following the vocal, and there's nothing can be heard there. suggest removing this note
• 01:03:964 (283) - change to d for following the song, idk if it's piano or string or whatever
• 01:04:478 (286,290,293) - add finish there, the music is pretty strong. should be emphasized with finish :P
• 01:07:252 add a note here, since it's empty, and the music is still playing, which increasing from a low density to a high one
• 01:09:204 ~ 01:10:848 try something like this. 01:10:231 (316,317,318) - and 01:10:642 (319,320,321) - has the same vocal, but different pitch. so making them mirroring like this is better, and sounds good. as for the pattern before it, because the string ends at 01:09:204, so stop it there, and begin another new pattern with following the vocal now.
• 01:12:697 (332) - remove, because vocal ends at 01:12:492
• 01:13:930 (337) - move to 01:14:033 for following the vocal and music
• 01:15:163 (344,349) - remove, because you're following the vocal. >w>
• 01:16:602 (349,350) - swap, then del the 01:16:807 (350) - . no vocal there, and 01:16:396 (348,349) - has the same pitch, and almost the same accent. xD
• 01:20:094 ~ 01:20:711 - try using this as the pattern? well, suits the music and vocal well tho. 01:20:814 (374) - is optional, you may add it or no, but i suggest adding it because leaving it empty is weird :P
• 01:26:978 add d, then remove the finish at 01:27:081 (405) -, doesn't need to be emphasized, the different between 01:26:875 (403,404,405) - itself has identify that the last note is strong and different from the others.
• 01:29:135 (412) - change to k to suits the vocal's pitch, and 01:29:957 (414) - to d for the same reason as that.
• 01:34:889 ~ 01:36:122 i'm sorry i remapped this part www try making it simpler like this, follows the music and vocal :P
• 01:40:026 (455) - change to d, because it has the lower vocal pitch than 01:39:615 (453,454) -
• 01:41:670 (465,466) - swap, to make 01:41:875 (466) - follows the music, as well as for k rhyhtm consistency
• 01:42:183 ~ 01:43:930 - got this pattern by accident, but it sounds actually good. lols https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1972184
• 01:44:957 (482) - change to d for a better pattern.
• 01:49:067 remove the note here, since there's nothing on the music. try changing the pattern to this?
• 01:55:437 (535) - remove, because no music or vocal can be heard making a new sound there
• 01:54:820 ~ 01:55:231 kdd k for following the music and vocal. remove 01:55:437 because nothing can be heard
• 01:58:724 (546) - remove, as the same reason as above
• 01:59:957 (553) - move to 02:00:060 and change to d, as the previous mod aboveee idk where, for following the vocal and music better
• 02:08:382 (583) - remove, same reason as somewhere above
the kiai part is also the same as before, need to emphasize on vocal and music more, not making own forced pattern ww i will leave it to you ;3
• 02:57:800 probably add a d here for following the music? the violin one lols
• 03:05:300 (23) - remove, because no sound can be heard. 03:05:505 (24) - change to k for following the bass. 03:05:916 (26,27) - change both to d for following the bass too.
• 03:07:971 (35) - remove because of the same reason as above
• 03:12:697 (53,54) - swap. on 53, can be heard that the beat is pretty loud, while 54 can be heard that the vocal starts on a high pitch
• 03:22:765 (92,93,94,95,96,97) - change to kkd d k d k k d for bettern pattern, and also follows the music
• 03:29:135 (121) - remove, as the reason is stated almost there
• 03:37:766 (16) - definitely change to k, because it has higher pitch than 03:38:177 (17) -
the following kiai may also look at my mod at the first kiai. too tired to re-mod, i will leave ming with them wwww

good luck!
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

mingmichael wrote:

Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================

[Futsuu]

☞ okay!
☞ okay, i am a bit confused when i checked your whole of your futsuu patterns. sometime you follow the vocals and sometime you follow the instrument sounds too and it makes a bit confusing patterns too. well i'll try to help you by giving some suggestion on the Notes box

☞ from 00:39:820 - until 00:49:683 - , try to make some improvement there. as you can see, your patterns are almost same like nardo's Kantan. look here


Kantan~Futsuu

☞same on 01:53:793 - until 02:03:656 - like above
i really recommend you to remove the finisher on 00:05:300 - . well i know that you wanted to emphasize the cymbal sound which is given from the song, didn't you? it's nice~ but after considering again this finisher is quite difficult because the Futsuu players who will play your map will be confused because they must still press 1/2 notes again after it. well it's different if we compare 00:05:300 - with 00:06:944 - . on 00:06:944 - after the finsiher comes out you gave a break there. nah of course the player will be a bit relax and can see the next pattern clearly. but it's different with the finisher on 00:05:300 - OK

• kat on 00:09:820 - . make it just a normal pattern for the 1/2 triplet. i know that don is for the lower pitch sound, but just ignore it because o o O is more confusing than o o O OK

• don on 00:10:642 - . the pitch sound is still low (as low as 00:10:231 - actually) OK

• lets have a break please. try to delete 00:12:492 - . you wanted to follow the violin sound by using that note, but consider again about the breaks. this is such more important OK

• here again. change 00:25:642 - to be kat and delete 00:26:464 - . you put it suddenly with 1/2 patterns there. actually i was a bit confused when i test played it. so then just change 00:25:642 - to be kat (for having a same colours like 00:25:437 - and 00:26:053 - ) and delete 00:26:464 - for the break again OK

• don on 00:32:834 - . the vocal is already down and it actually has a similar low pitch sounds like 00:33:040 - and 00:33:245 - which you used dons OK

• move this note 00:37:149 - to 00:36:327 - and change 00:36:327 - and 00:36:533 - to be dons. don't forget to delete 00:36:944 - . i changed and deleted it to make a similar patterns for the notes like 00:27:492 - ~ 00:29:957 - and 00:30:779 - ~ 00:33:245 - OK

• nah here. delete 00:50:094 - and 00:51:533 - . change 00:50:916 - and 00:51:122 - to be o O. kay i changed and moved them to give a break again and it flows better IMO OK

• you can move 00:52:355 - to 00:52:560 - seems better currently due to the more significant sound

• from 01:19:067 - ~ 01:20:916 - , try this

it flows better than yours because these dons on 01:19:067 - and 01:19:272 - actually follow the low vocals really well. and then the o o o o pattern on 01:19:683 - ~ 01:20:505 - follow the vocal+instrument really well too (when the snare comes on 01:20:505 - , the kat can emphasize it really well) seems really better, OK

• finisher on 01:24:204 - . this finisher will emphasize the strong cymbal sound maybe I miss this one, OK
you put a finisher too on 00:10:231 - anyway

• move 01:26:875 - to 01:26:670 - . i moved this to follow the drum hit (which comes out on 01:26:670 -) and ofc this note will follow the instrument sound better too OK

• change 01:35:300 - ~ 01:35:711 - to be o o o. this notes will follow the vocal much better. the vocals actually are high on 01:35:300 - and it drops a bit (becomes a bit lower) on 01:35:505 - . so to make that dropping pitch sound, i change it to be o o OK

delete 01:37:971 - . don't make a suddent doublet pattern there. actually this's quite confusing since you just use a simple pattern from 01:27:492 - , and suddenly you used 1/2 doublets on 01:37:971 - . i know that you wanted to follow the vocals, but actually it's not a good idea OK

• how about to delete 01:40:437 - . yeah i know that you wanted to follow the vocals again, but for following the vocal isn't a good way on there because actually the part becomes silence a while (just vocal and the instruments stop) OK

• 01:43:519 - ~ 01:43:930 - change to be o o o. this pattern will give a good dropping pitch sounds OK

kat on 01:45:163 - and don on 01:45:574 - . make it consistent for the pattern like you did on 01:41:875 - and 01:48:451 - with kats. it's actually same on 01:45:163 - for the kat OK

• don on 01:46:807 - . much better to follow the vocal by using o o o OK

• again, move 01:53:588 - to 01:53:382 - and change 01:53:177 - and 01:53:382 - to be o o. it suits better to follow the snare sound which comes out on 01:53:382 - with a kat (and actually it's not really particular to emphasize the finisher on 01:53:793 - by using a not on 01:53:588 - ) OK

• same like the previous part. delete 02:04:067 - , change 02:04:889 - and 02:05:094 - to be o O and also delete 02:05:505 - OK

• move 02:06:327 - to 02:06:533 - and change 02:05:711 - until 02:06:738 - to be o o oO OK

• try to change 02:11:464 - ~ 02:11:875 - to be o o o, like your previous part kiai (00:57:492 - ~ 00:57:903 - ). actually it's much better to follow the pitch sounds (vocals) than using o o o OK

• move 02:23:998 - to 02:24:820 - and change to be kat. the reason is same like above ^ OK

• don on 02:33:040 - . actually the vocal is already low (and has a same pitch like 02:33:245 - too) OK

• again here. move 02:34:683 - to 02:34:478 - and change 02:33:656 - ~ 02:34:478 - to be oo oo in 1/2 bsd. here :

it's much better than you put a note on 02:34:683 - to emphasize the finisher on 02:34:889 - . try to follow the snare sound again on 02:34:478 - because it's more interesting too than a note on 02:34:683 - OK

• you can add a note (kat) on 02:42:903 - to follow the piano sounds there. much better than you just give a 1/1 pattern like nardo's Kantan OK

• try to add a note (don) on 02:50:916 - . much better than a break there OK

• add a note on 03:07:560 - and change 03:07:355 - ~ 03:07:766 - to be o o o. actually it'll be much better to follow the vocal (dropping vocals) on there OK

• delete 03:11:464 - and 03:12:286 - to make the vocals clearly by deleting them OK

• change 03:22:971 - and 03:23:382 - to be o o. much better to follow the snare sound with kat on 03:23:382 - OK

• change 03:35:505 - to be kat. a same notes will be much better and avoid the confusing doublets pattern on the calm part OK

• don on 03:37:355 - (for the low vocal) and change 03:37:766 - to be kat, and also change 03:38:588 - and 03:38:793 - to be o o. the pitch sounds are totally different if we compare it with 03:35:300 - and 03:35:505 - because the vocal is lowerrr on 03:38:588 - and 03:38:793 - OK

• change 03:40:642 - to be don here. vocal has dropped OK

• change 03:41:875 - and 03:42:286 - to be o o OK

• what is the function of the note on 03:43:519 - ? there's not any sounds come out there. okay try to move it to 03:44:341 - and change 03:44:341 - and 03:44:546 - to be o o OK

• again and again. delete 03:58:519 - and change 03:58:108 - and 03:58:314 - to be o o. i think you know the reason because i have mentioned it twice before OK

• again too on 04:00:163 - . move it to 03:59:957 - and change 03:59:752 - and 03:59:957 - to be o o OK

• delete 04:04:067 - to make the break. okay i know that you wanted to follow the instrument sounds again there, but consider again for having the breaks on the patterns OK

• change 04:05:505 - to be don (because the instrument has dropped here yeah) and delete 04:06:327 - and change 04:06:533 - to be don. okay this is the last part and maybe you wanted to make the patterns a bit denser. okay nice idea but consider again for the Futsuu players who will play your map and they will be a bit shocked when they see the last part which is a bit hard OK


====================


i'm going to mod the oni soon
Thanks for your detail mod :)

I will check Senritsu's mod soon

Senritsu wrote:

hi.
modding because ming asked me to mod the oni only :P

[Oni]
• 00:28:519 (110,115,125) - try changing them to d, follows the drum beat well imo OK
•00:36:944 (158,159) - swap, follows the music and vocal which has beat at 00:36:944 (158) - , while the vocal is high here 00:37:149 (159) - OK
• 00:42:183 (181) - change to d also, for following the beat drum. OK
• 00:53:793 (229,230) - swap, for following the vocal. 00:53:793 (229) - is higher than 00:54:204 (230) - :POK
• 00:54:409 (231) - remove this? well i personally don't like this note being here, since it follows nothing. @@ OK
• 00:56:259 (239) - try removing this, you're following the vocal. it stops there no, I am not preferring a break here
• 00:58:108 (250) - ^ ^
• 00:59:341 ~ 00:59:546 make this kkd, follows the vocal well ww not really fit imo
• 01:00:368 try making it something like this. imo follows the vocal and music more ww I can't see it
• 01:02:834 (277) - change to d, follows the beat drum well. nope, I use k to represent the drum here
• 01:03:656 (282) - sounds weird having it here, since you're following the vocal, and there's nothing can be heard there. suggest removing this note I beat can be heard here
• 01:03:964 (283) - change to d for following the song, idk if it's piano or string or whatever I prefer a k here
• 01:04:478 (286,290,293) - add finish there, the music is pretty strong. should be emphasized with finish :POK
• 01:07:252 add a note here, since it's empty, and the music is still playing, which increasing from a low density to a high one OK
• 01:09:204 ~ 01:10:848 try something like this. 01:10:231 (316,317,318) - and 01:10:642 (319,320,321) - has the same vocal, but different pitch. so making them mirroring like this is better, and sounds good. as for the pattern before it, because the string ends at 01:09:204, so stop it there, and begin another new pattern with following the vocal now.
• 01:12:697 (332) - remove, because vocal ends at 01:12:492 OK
• 01:13:930 (337) - move to 01:14:033 for following the vocal and music No, missing a beat if I remove it
• 01:15:163 (344,349) - remove, because you're following the vocal. >w> Indeed, I am not really following the vocal
• 01:16:602 (349,350) - swap, then del the 01:16:807 (350) - . no vocal there, and 01:16:396 (348,349) - has the same pitch, and almost the same accent. xD OK
• 01:20:094 ~ 01:20:711 - try using this as the pattern? well, suits the music and vocal well tho. 01:20:814 (374) - is optional, you may add it or no, but i suggest adding it because leaving it empty is weird :Pok
• 01:26:978 add d, then remove the finish at 01:27:081 (405) -, doesn't need to be emphasized, the different between 01:26:875 (403,404,405) - itself has identify that the last note is strong and different from the others. ok
• 01:29:135 (412) - change to k to suits the vocal's pitch, and 01:29:957 (414) - to d for the same reason as that. current one is fine imo
• 01:34:889 ~ 01:36:122 i'm sorry i remapped this part www try making it simpler like this, follows the music and vocal :POK
• 01:40:026 (455) - change to d, because it has the lower vocal pitch than 01:39:615 (453,454) - OK
• 01:41:670 (465,466) - swap, to make 01:41:875 (466) - follows the music, as well as for k rhyhtm consistency OK
• 01:42:183 ~ 01:43:930 - got this pattern by accident, but it sounds actually good. lols https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1972184 OK
• 01:44:957 (482) - change to d for a better pattern. OK
• 01:49:067 remove the note here, since there's nothing on the music. try changing the pattern to this? OK
• 01:55:437 (535) - remove, because no music or vocal can be heard making a new sound there OK
• 01:54:820 ~ 01:55:231 kdd k for following the music and vocal. remove 01:55:437 because nothing can be heard OK
• 01:58:724 (546) - remove, as the same reason as above OK
• 01:59:957 (553) - move to 02:00:060 and change to d, as the previous mod aboveee idk where, for following the vocal and music better OK
• 02:08:382 (583) - remove, same reason as somewhere above OK
the kiai part is also the same as before, need to emphasize on vocal and music more, not making own forced pattern ww i will leave it to you ;3
• 02:57:800 probably add a d here for following the music? the violin one lols OK
• 03:05:300 (23) - remove, because no sound can be heard. 03:05:505 (24) - change to k for following the bass. 03:05:916 (26,27) - change both to d for following the bass too. OK
• 03:07:971 (35) - remove because of the same reason as above OK
• 03:12:697 (53,54) - swap. on 53, can be heard that the beat is pretty loud, while 54 can be heard that the vocal starts on a high pitch OK
• 03:22:765 (92,93,94,95,96,97) - change to kkd d k d k k d for bettern pattern, and also follows the music
• 03:29:135 (121) - remove, as the reason is stated almost there
• 03:37:766 (16) - definitely change to k, because it has higher pitch than 03:38:177 (17) -
the following kiai may also look at my mod at the first kiai. too tired to re-mod, i will leave ming with them wwww

good luck!
Thanks for you mod :)
MidSoul
hiy from taiko modding queue, thanks!
and sorry for this late ;w;

[Nardo's kantan]
really good diff but I think it could be futsuu diff.
00:54:204 (85) - del
02:08:176 (209) - del
・from vocals.. but its not neccecery?

[Taiko Futsuu]
00:35:711 (76,77,78,79) - d_kdd > kkd_d or kkk d
・from back guitar, or and vocal.

00:50:916 (106) - del ?
02:04:889 (284) - del ?
・for difficulty, its good for Oni, better for Muzu, but in futsuu..

01:06:327 (146,147,148) - kkd
03:45:779 (29,30,31) - kkd
・for vocal pitch, and some pattern.

03:28:930 (55) - k
-1 03:29:546 (56) - d
-2 03:30:368 (58) - k
・for drum and vocal.

03:51:327 (44) - k ?

03:59:752 (4) - del
・I think its better for this scilence.

[Nardo's Muzukashii]
00:56:259 (186) - move to 00:56:464 - .
・like 00:59:546 - , for this 1/1 step.

02:10:231 (449) - same as ^

01:04:889 (215,216) - kd
(-1 01:05:505 (217) - d?)
-2 01:05:916 (218) - k
・for vocal tone.

[Taiko Oni]
00:08:896 (33) - move to 00:08:690 - .
・because clearly sound on 00:08:690 -.
or pick this warmer sound here, try 00:08:588 (31) - k.

00:26:464 (100) - del
・its from vocal, but delete for good accente,

01:10:026 (316,317,318,319) - k kkd ?
・for piano, vocal fall.

01:10:642 (320) - k ?
-1 01:10:745 (321) - move to 01:10:951 - .

01:17:115 (356) - d
・there're many long tone but its no pitch change, so this dkk is not recommenede

01:20:197 - add k
or 01:20:403 (375) - del

01:46:807 (499) - k
・as equals to 01:47:012 (500) -.

01:48:656 (508,509) - kd ?

01:51:738 (524,525) - kd ?

02:06:019 - add d?

02:14:546 (623) - move 1/4 >

02:17:731 (642) - del

02:42:903 (756) - k ?

good map~~ ☆ GLL))
Nardoxyribonucleic

MidSoul wrote:

hiy from taiko modding queue, thanks!
and sorry for this late ;w;

[Nardo's kantan]
really good diff but I think it could be futsuu diff.
00:54:204 (85) - del
02:08:176 (209) - del
・from vocals.. but its not neccecery? Both are fixed.

[Nardo's Muzukashii]
00:56:259 (186) - move to 00:56:464 - .
・like 00:59:546 - , for this 1/1 step. It seems nice, fixed.

02:10:231 (449) - same as ^ ^

01:04:889 (215,216) - kd
(-1 01:05:505 (217) - d?)
-2 01:05:916 (218) - k
・for vocal tone. The current pattern could result in a better flow of notes imo. Moreover, don at 01:05:916 (218) - could show a sharper contrast to the higher-pitched 01:06:327 (219,220,221) -

good map~~ ☆ GLL))
Thanks for your mod~ :)

Update: http://puu.sh/brNdq.rar
Topic Starter
meetmeetdee

MidSoul wrote:

hiy from taiko modding queue, thanks!
and sorry for this late ;w;

[Taiko Futsuu]
00:35:711 (76,77,78,79) - d_kdd > kkd_d or kkk d I use kkk d
・from back guitar, or and vocal.

00:50:916 (106) - del ? I think it is acceptable
02:04:889 (284) - del ? ^
・for difficulty, its good for Oni, better for Muzu, but in futsuu..

01:06:327 (146,147,148) - kkd kdk seems better following the vocal pitch
03:45:779 (29,30,31) - kkd ^
・for vocal pitch, and some pattern.

03:28:930 (55) - k no, it is different in pitch with 03:28:725 (54) -
-1 03:29:546 (56) - d ^
-2 03:30:368 (58) - k no, want to show the decrease in pitch
・for drum and vocal.

03:51:327 (44) - k ? OK

03:59:752 (4) - del fine for me
・I think its better for this scilence.

[Taiko Oni]
00:08:896 (33) - move to 00:08:690 - . No, the current one is better
・because clearly sound on 00:08:690 -.
or pick this warmer sound here, try 00:08:588 (31) - k. OK

00:26:464 (100) - del not for now
・its from vocal, but delete for good accente,

01:10:026 (316,317,318,319) - k kkd ? OK
・for piano, vocal fall.

01:10:642 (320) - k ? No as it is in relatively low pitch
-1 01:10:745 (321) - move to 01:10:951 - . No

01:17:115 (356) - d OK
・there're many long tone but its no pitch change, so this dkk is not recommenede

01:20:197 - add k
or 01:20:403 (375) - del Fine for me now

01:46:807 (499) - k OK
・as equals to 01:47:012 (500) -.

01:48:656 (508,509) - kd ? OK

01:51:738 (524,525) - kd ? there is a drum sound in 01:51:738 -

02:06:019 - add d? no, the stream seems too long at that part

02:14:546 (623) - move 1/4 > OK

02:17:731 (642) - del no

02:42:903 (756) - k ? No, there is a change in pitch

good map~~ ☆ GLL))
Thanks for your mod :)
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply