Better lock this and re-open after definitive rank or QAT post :/
No. Silencing discussion is an awful idea.Nozhomi wrote:
Better lock this and re-open after definitive rank or QAT post :/
" appropriate people" you are one of them. Don't forget that.Cherry Blossom wrote:
Do you feel ridiculous when you're complaining about some ms and some circles and slider ?
Please, close this discussion and let appropriate people do their job.
i could say manual edition of mp3 is more suitable here, like was done there https://osu.ppy.sh/s/217628 and https://osu.ppy.sh/s/139525 thereCherry Blossom wrote:
Before saying that something is offbeat, you should rather say what is the most suitable thing here
thank you! well, ranking such a hard diff isn't that... easy. :^)Syfou wrote:
Congratz old friend !
still remember when u said "i'll never be able to rank that"
I'm pretty sure that pishi's answer will be pretty similar to mine if he doesn't want to break the whole playability with timing every note and using 1/8 or 1/6 stuff in the 1/3 part.Aka wrote:
a
notelock, manMikakage wrote:
OD 9.4 is a bit overkill.
Fanrir wrote:
I don't think my heart can take the next seven days constantly fearing that this will get unranked.
Fanrir wrote:
I don't think my heart can take the next seven days constantly fearing that this will get unranked.
wendao wrote:
oh my
TicClick wrote:
Hello,
I am going to disqualify this due to the following:
[Top three difficulties]Well, I've talked to Ekoro, hope you'll appreciate the new version! Should be the only thing that has to be changed.
- 02:20:225 ~ 02:23:225 and 02:30:225 ~ 02:31:225 — first two beats of the first section are clearly not 1/3, and the rest is kind of floating, so I guess you shouldn't use that for snapping.