Happens quite a lot on songs that have no spinners, and especially on easy diff levels that have are easy to 100%. (also, why would the ideal world not have so many ties? that would mean that people sucked at the game)Gemi wrote:
when there are loads of tied scores in a song.Shouldn't happen in an ideal world.
Person who achieved the score first should be number 1, and any other people who tie the score should descend on the list. I like the way it is now.This takes away the possibility for a new player to rank 1st on a particular song, and I find this unfair.
I agree, the names should be listed in the order of when the score was received. However, I think it would make more sense to show the position number as the same for all of the tied players, ie. if there are a few players tied to spot 3 then all of them are shown as player rank #3. This is especially important when the scores don't fit on the same page of the in-game scoreboard when there are loads of tied scores in a song.Yes.
Happens quite a lot on songs that have no spinners, and especially on easy diff levels that have are easy to 100%. (also, why would the ideal world not have so many ties? that would mean that people sucked at the game)That's the problem: easy songs should have spinners so ties don't happen as much.
What's bad about ties?Gemi wrote:
Happens quite a lot on songs that have no spinners, and especially on easy diff levels that have are easy to 100%. (also, why would the ideal world not have so many ties? that would mean that people sucked at the game)That's the problem: easy songs should have spinners so ties don't happen as much.
Also, spinners are stupid. ;P Tbh I think that the maximum score of a song in a rhythm game should be able to be determined somehow, and with spinners that is not possible.It is possible if you spin as fast as auto play!!!
