Blue Dragon wrote:

damn man... it's disheartening to see this ;_;

the map definitely has its 2013-14 styled charm, while it's not fit to today's standards i don't see how it's unrankable

and having you remap it entirely after so much trouble... damn dude, i'm just so sorry >:

good luck with this map, really

Zak wrote:

I don't want a remap though I want the original ranked

Kenterz wrote:

I won't have the time to search again for BNs so except if they notice the map by themselves, I don't think it'll be ranked for 1 year
(also I couldn't even find BNs when I had time)

Zak wrote:

Kenterz wrote:

I won't have the time to search again for BNs so except if they notice the map by themselves, I don't think it'll be ranked for 1 year
(also I couldn't even find BNs when I had time)

There's a list of every single BN here which also lists what modes they are for, maybe just check profiles to see who is too busy for requests due to exams or school and send requests to them one by one over time?

Mazziv wrote:

is it rip again?

Bonsai wrote:

just in case you don't find anyone and wanna get it Loved after all: http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/549835

Kenterz wrote:

Mazziv wrote:

is it rip again?

It has always been rip
(maybe it'll be Loved ?)

MrSergio wrote:

Spoiler: I haven't even downloaded the map yet, I just got a PM.

Seeing the comments above I just got the urge to say that going for loved after whatever effort you went through it's sort of a cheap shot.
Imo Loved category should be for maps with clear problems that go against RC. Making it a loved map where the only problem is "I can't find people" is a little lame if you ask me, but well... you have the SP and you have the favourites, so no one stops you.

With that aside...
I currently have like... 6 maps to check before yours, idk how long it will take and your map is also pretty long (which means even more time to check)

I promise I will take a look, but I do not promise an icon (in fact, I can always pop if something's particularly wrong :p).
I hope you'll be patient

fieryrage wrote:

wait is the ctb score issue not an issue anymore

1. 10:45:073 (2,3,4,5) - This is the only combo in the map that really threw me off when playing, and even in the editor I can't quite get my head around it. The rhythm of (3,4,5) is extremely counterintuitive to play and doesn't really fit to the song, because that brzzz-noise is already starting again at 10:45:473 - (and probably ending at 10:45:673 -), so I would find it really great if you changed the beat-placement here so you can let the second buzz-slider start there.
   Right now, the spacing of these objects is rather confusing / not helping the already hard to understand rhythm, and you are also not leaving any buffer between the buzz-sliders and the following objects which makes it very likely to break combo here (which I did ;_;) - Here's a guideline from the soon-to-be-amended RC-draft about this, I strongly urge you to at least remove the last reverse from those two buzz-sliders, regardless of whether you change the rhythm of this combo or not.
2. The timing-transitions that are coming up at the section at 09:54:807 are partially extremely off, have some wrong timing-signatures and should all be halved in BPM too (none of this affects nomod-gameplay but there's a bunch of other reasons to time it properly in order to ensure rankability), so here's a proper timing for this:
   
   code of red lines for this section

    596140,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0
   609473,642.85943878371,4,2,1,80,1,0
   610758,620.693935820247,4,2,1,80,1,0
   611378,571.428571428571,4,2,1,80,1,0
   611949,545.454545454546,4,2,1,80,1,0
   613585,521.739130434783,4,2,1,80,1,0
   614106,476.190476190476,4,2,1,80,1,0
   615296,461.538461538462,4,2,1,80,1,0
   615988,428.571428571429,4,2,1,80,1,0
   616845,413.793103448276,4,2,1,80,1,0
   617673,400,4,2,1,80,1,0

   (Yes, the first of these sections is two beats later in order to have correct timing signature, as you can hear now the 'melody' is changing pitch on the start of every measure, and it also aligns with the first of the heavy beats at 10:09:473 and everything else from there on)
3. While we're at timing, I'd also raise the BPM of the section at 13:51:921 to 170, and add a new section at 13:52:626 with 174,5 BPM, this way it aligns perfectly with the following section and the quiet notes in-between.
4. Just something minor for the SB in case you would agree and could fix it easily: The flashes at 20:54:439 and 21:15:772 kinda killed the mood for me a bit because they are so strong, in my opinion that doesn't fit in this very calm ending section (I actually got goosebumps in the break prior to this section =w=) so I would suggest to make it a bit smoother, weaker.. But that's just my opinion, if you disagree with this I'm totally fine with it ^^

Bonsai wrote:

Hey there! Don't be scared of the icon, I am going to rebubble this as soon as you've replied to these few points - I've changed my mind about this map, it should have been ranked years ago and just had bad luck (no I'm just so bad at ranking xD), I'm really sorry for almost killing it a few months ago, please forgive me 🙈 Anyways, I ignored stuff I would usually mod and only pointed out a few issues which I find to be unrankable in their current state, but they should be easily fixable:

1. 10:45:073 (2,3,4,5) - This is the only combo in the map that really threw me off when playing, and even in the editor I can't quite get my head around it. The rhythm of (3,4,5) is extremely counterintuitive to play and doesn't really fit to the song, because that brzzz-noise is already starting again at 10:45:473 - (and probably ending at 10:45:673 -), so I would find it really great if you changed the beat-placement here so you can let the second buzz-slider start there.
   Right now, the spacing of these objects is rather confusing / not helping the already hard to understand rhythm, and you are also not leaving any buffer between the buzz-sliders and the following objects which makes it very likely to break combo here (which I did ;_;) - Here's a guideline from the soon-to-be-amended RC-draft about this, I strongly urge you to at least remove the last reverse from those two buzz-sliders, regardless of whether you change the rhythm of this combo or not.
2. The timing-transitions that are coming up at the section at 09:54:807 are partially extremely off, have some wrong timing-signatures and should all be halved in BPM too (none of this affects nomod-gameplay but there's a bunch of other reasons to time it properly in order to ensure rankability), so here's a proper timing for this:
   
   code of red lines for this section

    596140,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0
   609473,642.85943878371,4,2,1,80,1,0
   610758,620.693935820247,4,2,1,80,1,0
   611378,571.428571428571,4,2,1,80,1,0
   611949,545.454545454546,4,2,1,80,1,0
   613585,521.739130434783,4,2,1,80,1,0
   614106,476.190476190476,4,2,1,80,1,0
   615296,461.538461538462,4,2,1,80,1,0
   615988,428.571428571429,4,2,1,80,1,0
   616845,413.793103448276,4,2,1,80,1,0
   617673,400,4,2,1,80,1,0

   (Yes, the first of these sections is two beats later in order to have correct timing signature, as you can hear now the 'melody' is changing pitch on the start of every measure, and it also aligns with the first of the heavy beats at 10:09:473 and everything else from there on)
3. While we're at timing, I'd also raise the BPM of the section at 13:51:921 to 170, and add a new section at 13:52:626 with 174,5 BPM, this way it aligns perfectly with the following section and the quiet notes in-between.
4. Just something minor for the SB in case you would agree and could fix it easily: The flashes at 20:54:439 and 21:15:772 kinda killed the mood for me a bit because they are so strong, in my opinion that doesn't fit in this very calm ending section (I actually got goosebumps in the break prior to this section =w=) so I would suggest to make it a bit smoother, weaker.. But that's just my opinion, if you disagree with this I'm totally fine with it ^^

And that's it from my side! I do have to pop jonathan's bubble since timing-changes have to be made and I'd call that buzz-slider-thing rather unrankable too, but as soon as those things have been addressed I'll be glad to rebubble! <3

Lunicia wrote:

please please please please let this get ranked

Kenterz wrote:

I hope I'll rank it in 2 days, then it'll exactly have 3 years old

Bonsai wrote:

Kenterz wrote:

I hope I'll rank it in 2 days, then it'll exactly have 3 years old

but then the ranked-date will be seven days too late

Kenterz wrote:

(NO)

Bonsai wrote:

Kenterz wrote:

(NO)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO