Due to the growing population of osu! players, maybe it's time to show the hundred best players of every beatmap.
I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.buny wrote:
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings
personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
em, money?Myke B wrote:
I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.
i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays savedTrash Boat wrote:
em, money?Myke B wrote:
I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.
Simple solution would be to not have ranks 51-100 have an online replay :pMyke B wrote:
plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money
i don't know about everyone, but i barely ever look past the top 8 on the global scoreboard. quite close to just denying this request to be honestbuny wrote:
honestly though, people don't even check the top 50
there's no point of it being in the global rankings for everybody to see if you can't watch the replay thoughdeadbeat wrote:
Simple solution would be to not have ranks 51-100 have an online replay :pMyke B wrote:
plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money
Exactly this, I don't think enough people look past top 8 lol, but I guess we'll let the stars decide.Buny wrote:
i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays saved
honestly though, people don't even check the top 50, and top 100 will just devalue the worth of a top score
osu! is growing though, yet the high score list has only moved from 40 to 50 despite its massive growth of users over time.Myke B wrote:
Exactly this, I don't think enough people look past top 8 lol, but I guess we'll let the stars decide.Buny wrote:
i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays saved
honestly though, people don't even check the top 50, and top 100 will just devalue the worth of a top score
Its easy alright. But how about those people who can't go to the top 50, especially the newbie once. GIVE CHANCE TO OTHERS!buny wrote:
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings
personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
osu! is growing though, yet the high score list has only moved from 40 to 50 despite its massive growth of users over time.yea, but most of the top 50 replays on maps today are all the same mods, DTHD or HDHR. It would just be 50 more of the same replay really lol. Unless people start getting really good, and can do HDHRDT on a lot of maps, then I don't see this changing.
The value of getting a top score has increased heavily from 2011.
If you can't get top 50, you probably can't get top 100 either.Hi_Hello wrote:
Its easy alright. But how about those people who can't go to the top 50, especially the newbie once. GIVE CHANCE TO OTHERS!buny wrote:
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings
personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
why not put a handicap on every map also?Hi_Hello wrote:
Its easy alright. But how about those people who can't go to the top 50, especially the newbie once. GIVE CHANCE TO OTHERS!buny wrote:
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings
personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
buny wrote:
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings
personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
Yea.. maybe on an easy difficulty with low play count lol.Yukiteru Amano wrote:
It really isn't that hard to get into top 50. It's meant to be a challenge, the purpose of top 50 is to show the best. not the mediocre.
Quoting for justice.Yukiteru Amano wrote:
It really isn't that hard to get into top 50. It's meant to be a challenge, the purpose of top 50 is to show the best. not the mediocre.
I agree.Edgar_Figaro wrote:
TBH most people only watch replays of the following:
Top on the map (global rankings work just fine)
Top with certain mod combo (global ranking selected mods)
Top in their country (country ranking)
Their freinds scores (Freind ranking)
Although it does stink that if a replay is outside of top 500 is unwatchable especially for crazy EZ plays for instance. Would simply be better if always the top of ever mod combo and top in every country was always watchable regardless of map rank.
People will almost never go to a map and say “I feel like watching the 30th place score on this map”
The ONLY benefit I can see with this would be for catching more “suspicious” plays