Hey guys, want to say a game is shit based on 3 seconds of gameplay? I know I do.
How about around 10 years of shit games.RL Link wrote:
Hey guys, want to say a game is shit based on 3 seconds of gameplay? I know I do.
My English teachers always stressed the introduction sentence having to be a hook.RL Link wrote:
Hey guys, want to say a game is shit based on 3 seconds of gameplay? I know I do.
Those games stand fine on their own, not to mention that they're way too recent to warrant a remake. I have stuff in my fucking fridge older than the Sonic Advance games, remaking them would just be a money-wasting venture on Sega's part.Propeller_Cap wrote:
Still, *hopes for Sonic Advance remake*. That was a good game along with the other two in the series.
I'll pass, since I play games to say if they're shit or not. Since I have yet to play Sonic 2006 and up, I still haven't decided to call them shit.lukewarmholiday wrote:
How about around 10 years of shit games.RL Link wrote:
Hey guys, want to say a game is shit based on 3 seconds of gameplay? I know I do.
Hmm, I guess. Probably the same reason why Nintendo didn't create a Super Mario World remake.Mogsworth wrote:
Those games stand fine on their own, not to mention that they're way too recent to warrant a remake. I have stuff in my fucking fridge older than the Sonic Advance games, remaking them would just be a money-wasting venture on Sega's part.
Those Mario GBA titles were previously released on other systems. They're major Mario titles ported to other systems. With that being said, the Sonic Advance games aren't significant enough to warrant references in a flagship Sonic title.Propeller_Cap wrote:
Still, NSMBWii has references to SMW and the other GBA titles, so StH4 should have references to SAdva1-3.
If it's a flagship Sonic title, I'm going to be expecting the same style of boss fights that were done back in the day.Propeller_Cap wrote:
And I really hope they make the boss battles more interesting... Sonic Rush Adventure did it somewhat right.
In style, not in content. The levels are all-new.Mogsworth wrote:
New Super Mario Bros. Wii is a remake, by the way. =|
'tis a shame that I found the DS levels superior, but that's a completely different thing.K2J wrote:
In style, not in content. The levels are all-new.Mogsworth wrote:
New Super Mario Bros. Wii is a remake, by the way. =|
whoLoginer wrote:
It's being developed by Dimps, not Sonic Team.
The ones who made the 2D Sonics.lukewarmholiday wrote:
whoLoginer wrote:
It's being developed by Dimps, not Sonic Team.
The guys who made the Advance and Rush games.lukewarmholiday wrote:
whoLoginer wrote:
It's being developed by Dimps, not Sonic Team.
That's what I just said, Loginer. >.>Loginer wrote:
The guys who made the Advance and Rush games.
Not even close.Propeller_Cap wrote:
That's what I just said, Loginer. >.>Loginer wrote:
The guys who made the Advance and Rush games.
Lol @ that.K2J wrote:
Finally, a voice of reason says what the fans really want.
Sonic Bayonetta will haunt your dreams
Cliffhanger at the end:>
I found that amusing as welllukewarmholiday wrote:
Cliffhanger at the end:>
I bet you're all going to love Lost Labyrinth Zone Act 2. Jesus, Sega, NO GOD DAMN GIMMICKS!A guy reposting a leak on another forum wrote:
Splash Hill Zone Act 1: http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/4534/8141.mp4
Splash Hill Zone Act 2: http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/2341/7720.mp4
Splash Hill Zone Act 3: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/9246/1090.mp4
Splash Hill Zone Boss: http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/6848/7863.mp4
Lost Labyrinth Zone Act 1: http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/7383/8267.mp4
Lost Labyrinth Zone Act 2: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6210/9209.mp4
Lost Labyrinth Zone Act 3: http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/1030/4362.mp4
Lost Labyrinth Zone Boss: http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/8728/6809.mp4
Act 1: http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2885/4042.mp4
Act 2: http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/955/25547673.mp4
Act 3: http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/5511/1111.mp4
Boss: http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/58/622.mp4
Hahahahahahahahahahaha good on you for that, Sega.K2J wrote:
The game has been delayed to Q4 in an apparent attempt to improve the quality and respond to the negative feedback that the leak got.