O!record only does ( at least for me) replays with 4:3 screen, adn standard skin, I dont know how to change those, also I think its a good idea, since the O!record its bussy more or less... 99.99% of the time :cOinari-sama wrote:
osu!record already does a great job in that.
Upload your replay file to osu!record server and it'll spit out a youtube link for you. Simple as that.
Wait, I thought the service had been discontinued... ?Oinari-sama wrote:
osu!record already does a great job in that.
Upload your replay file to osu!record server and it'll spit out a youtube link for you. Simple as that.
Ah ? I don't remember having read anything of the sort.It might just be me making things up.Oinari-sama wrote:
Eh has osu!record been discontinued? I thought it's just offline until the hardware issues are fixed?
osu!record is not running or something has gone horribly wrong.
Actually you're right about the discontinuation. I didn't see the 2nd part of Darkimmortal's message:PyaKura wrote:
Ah ? I don't remember having read anything of the sort.It might just be me making things up.Oinari-sama wrote:
Eh has osu!record been discontinued? I thought it's just offline until the hardware issues are fixed?
which is a real shame to see such a good service goDarkimmortal wrote:
Unfortunately it's likely I will have to discontinue this service as the server it was running on has failed, and the replacement server I am building will probably not have a good enough GPU.
Edit: Confirmed - definitely not powerful enough, sorry
I don't think adapting the code would be that easy, or at least something worth, it'd need an entire rewrite. (osu!record was some kind of 'hacking' around with PHP, Autohotkey and way more stuff, since osu! was running with Wine on that server)Oinari-sama wrote:
Let's see if peppy is interested in adapting the code for osu...
There's no need to allocate servers for a built-in exporter for replays, which is the request here. But still, I guess it would need 1. a whole lot of coding work and 2. a powerful/good computer to actually do that, which makes it kinda useless (in fact you could record it yourself then).boat wrote:
Considering how many more would probably use this service if it was officially bundled with the client I imagine you would have to allocate a whole lot of servers, otherwise the queue times would be incredibly long, most probably too long to be worthwhile of a service when you got the alternative to either do it yourself or ask a friend to do it for you.