Redownload. Sectionpass has been skinned out.0_o wrote:
-Could you get rid of the sectionpass/fail noises and images? They kind of ruin the astmosphere imo.
If you get Sectionfail in this map, though, you deserve the buzzer
Redownload. Sectionpass has been skinned out.0_o wrote:
-Could you get rid of the sectionpass/fail noises and images? They kind of ruin the astmosphere imo.
yes.NotShinta wrote:
So I saw this was pending.
no I think it's good.RandomJibberish wrote:
best map ever
Spinner needs more fire
yes.Charles445 wrote:
Wait
What
I like to think I did the best I could with what I had to work withJarby wrote:
The timing on this is not even remotely close. You cannot compensate for this by setting the OD to 2.
Er, that is, at least in the first pattern. The rest doesn't seem to be that bad, but that one's a nightmare.
At the very least, the first pattern should be changed. It's so very noticably off.LuigiHann wrote:
I like to think I did the best I could with what I had to work with
Granted the map was kind of a joke to begin with but it came out kind of nice
All this talking and you're not actually giving me bpm and ms offset values so what is the pointJarby wrote:
At the very least, the first pattern should be changed. It's so very noticably off.LuigiHann wrote:
I like to think I did the best I could with what I had to work with
Granted the map was kind of a joke to begin with but it came out kind of nice
yes.TKiller wrote:
uh
Because I have the funny idea that you'd be better off placing a new offset on every note. In any case, 00:10:317 (2,4) - Move 1/8 back and it sounds drastically better.LuigiHann wrote:
All this talking and you're not actually giving me bpm and ms offset values so what is the point.
The timing, which is off. The spacing, which is really bad. The whole map is the reason.NotShinta wrote:
No srsly, don't mind you disliking this but I would like to start getting reasons.