forum

ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting

posted
Total Posts
56,184
show more
Naimae
Friends,
Osumans,
countrymen,

Lend me your ears.

Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this internet a new game, conceived in Rhythm, and dedicated to the proposition that pp =/= skill.

Admittedly, there is a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson in history tells us that the greater risk lies in farming, and this is the specter that our well-meaning ranked friends refuse to face that their policy of farming is egotistical, and it gives no choice between pass and fail, only between choke or FC.

In a sense we've come to our game's website to submit a score. When the architects of our Game wrote the magnificent code of osu! stable and the osu! web, they were signing a promissory note to which every Osuman was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all osuthletes - yes, farmers as well as anti-farmers - would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of fun, pp, and the shitposting of the forums.

In the councils of the scoreboards, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted pp, whether sought or unsought, by the pp-farming complex.

No osu player can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 ranked maps of the BNG's recorded history in a timespan of but 11 years.

5 years ago, the proudest boast was "I have 2,000pp". Today, in the world of farm maps, the proudest boast is "I have 10,000pp!" All farmers, wherever they may live, are secretly farmers, and therefore, as farmers, may take pride in the words "I am a farmer!"

This does not mean that you are boring players. On the contrary, the player above all other people prays for pp, for he must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of choking. But always in our ears ring the ominous sounds of shitmiss: *record scratch*.
Vuelo Eluko
Scoreboards are everything to real top players, that is pride. PP just happens.
E m i
I don't know what pp is i only play for high acc on streams can someone fill me in what's a pp
keremaru
a pp is pee pee
Tupsu

Momi wrote:

I don't know what pp is i only play for high acc on streams can someone fill me in what's a pp
E m i
Wow does it taste good
Green Platinum
Those proportions are messed up. It's distracting.
DaddyCoolVipper
Yeah her ass makes no sense there
Vuelo Eluko

Tupsu wrote:

Momi wrote:

I don't know what pp is i only play for high acc on streams can someone fill me in what's a pp
maeshima ryou?
E m i
Maybe you're just noobs I can bend my spine like that easy
_handholding
@momi what was your opinion on this map? https://osu.ppy.sh/s/40499

I saw you post in the thread but couldn't make out if you liked it or not
the proportions in that pic don't look out of place to me
Vuelo Eluko

Kisses wrote:

@momi what was your opinion on this map? https://osu.ppy.sh/s/40499

I saw you post in the thread but couldn't make out if you liked it or not
the proportions in that pic don't look out of place to me


wow that sure was a good map
E m i

Kisses wrote:

@momi what's your opinion on this map? https://osu.ppy.sh/s/40499

I saw you post in the thread but couldn't make out if you liked it or not
Kinda ugly but very much enjoyed it either way, I like those types of streamy maps, slightly hard to read/execute, hard to get good acc on. Not sure why everyone dislikes it but you know :( I always like when there are more complex streamy maps. And semi-relatedly I also like to play maps like this https://osu.ppy.sh/b/246322&m=0 because to me gameplay > mapping
Vuelo Eluko

Momi wrote:

Kisses wrote:

@momi what's your opinion on this map? https://osu.ppy.sh/s/40499

I saw you post in the thread but couldn't make out if you liked it or not
Kinda ugly but very much enjoyed it either way, I like those types of streamy maps, slightly hard to read/execute, hard to get good acc on. Not sure why everyone dislikes it but you know :( I always like when there are more complex streamy maps. And semi-relatedly I also like to play maps like this https://osu.ppy.sh/b/246322&m=0 because to me gameplay > mapping
am i being fucked with right now
he linked literally nothing

E m i
The author "deleted" it
https://puu.sh/zuXW7/051d23b355.jpg
it was a map, i'll try to reupload?
https://puu.sh/zuXYA/04fe569a14.osz Yes i did
Tupsu

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

Tupsu wrote:

maeshima ryou?
I have no idea I just steal memes from the internet

lol @ virgin men not knowing how spines work, the only thing a bit off with that image is the legs'/thighs' length to width ratio
E m i
maybe she's just underweight, i remember my lower thighs being smaller than my calves for a long time which was funny

anime bone structure
Green Platinum
She's basically doing a cat stretch. Although I think her ass is a bit prominent for a child's physique.
abraker


If you start from the neck, you trace out the spine to a different location than starting out on the other side
johnmedina999

Tupsu wrote:

I have no idea I just steal memes from the internet

lol @ virgin men not knowing how spines work, the only thing a bit off with that image is the legs'/thighs' length to width ratio
lmao you're criticizing an image you yourself posted

what's even funnier is the fact that everyone is analyzing it because you brought it back up

y'all make me laugh
Foxtrot

Tupsu wrote:

lol @ virgin men not knowing how spines work, the only thing a bit off with that image is the legs'/thighs' length to width ratio
w h e w imagine being this pretentious
DaddyCoolVipper

johnmedina999 wrote:

lmao you're criticizing an image you yourself posted

what's even funnier is the fact that everyone is analyzing it because you brought it back up

y'all make me laugh
Holy shit John I've never seen such spice from you
abraker

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

johnmedina999 wrote:

lmao you're criticizing an image you yourself posted

what's even funnier is the fact that everyone is analyzing it because you brought it back up

y'all make me laugh
Holy shit John I've never seen such spice from you
He learned from the spiciest individuals here in OT. Maybe I should try to be spicy too sometime
Green Platinum
So any update on the new forum layout replacing the old one?
abraker

Green Platinum wrote:

So any update on the new forum layout replacing the old one?
should be about april/may. Looking at the issues tagged "required for live", some are in the February milestone, but others are in the candidate issues, and there are some high priority ones there too, which may take a month or two to get through.
JELLEY
k
B1rd

abraker wrote:

but score-v2 won't be used, so we win anyway?

It was used in the tournament, so it's still a loss as far as I'm concerned.

Regardless of how bad regular users can be. doesn't excuse the shitty mods, of which there are many. As Green Platinum has mentioned, mods who enforce a practical set of rules consistently and without bias on their part or fine - but not very common. I've known plenty of mods who are completely adverse to any common sense or logic. For example, if I explain why a certain rule - one of their own at that - does not justify one of their actions, the will deny that it doesn't - they won't even admit it and then amend the rule set to exclude the undesirable behavior as I have suggested. Things like rules are felt by them as much a hindrance to those mods' uninhibited powers as it is to the users.




Aurani wrote:

I mean of course you'd support anarchy (despite clear evidence of it being complete shit here) than some form of authority and order.
This place was a hundred times more active and lively when the kiddies didn't have the balls to post shitty threads about suicide or some other equally meaningless thing because they feared being shunned by the regulars and molested by the mod.

Won't comment on your Tuuba thing since it's clear that at this point it's far too late for you to realise anything.
When I talk about anarchy, it's not some stupid lefty conception of the word in which they they disavow any form of hierarchy or authority (which is an amazingly stupid and goes against nature itself, any sane person can see that). To explain the Libertarian idea of anarchy would require a long technical discussion which I don't think anyone is interested in, but rest assured, it doesn't exclude authority or hierarchy.
abraker

B1rd wrote:

Regardless of how bad regular users can be. doesn't excuse the shitty mods, of which there are many. As Green Platinum has mentioned, mods who enforce a practical set of rules consistently and without bias on their part or fine - but not very common. I've known plenty of mods who are completely adverse to any common sense or logic. For example, if I explain why a certain rule - one of their own at that - does not justify one of their actions, the will deny that it doesn't - they won't even admit it and then amend the rule set to exclude the undesirable behavior as I have suggested. Things like rules are felt by them as much a hindrance to those mods' uninhibited powers as it is to the users.
man will you love this
B1rd
soulfear has always been one of my favourite mappers- really nice flowy cs5 maps. Probably driven to quitting by QAT drama.
E m i

B1rd wrote:

soulfear has always been one of my favourite mappers- really nice flowy cs5 maps. Probably driven to quitting by QAT drama.
I agree 100% because i covered my ears during the word between "flowy" and "maps"
B1rd

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/badscience/comments/7nltbx/a_response_to_mouthy_buddhas_race_realism_video/?utm_source=reddit-androi

Thoughts? @b1rd
What do you expect me to think? I think that it's probably a bunch of sophistry, preaching to the choir on a circlejerk site that can't tolerate dissent (hence the race realism Subreddits taken down), but I myself don't understand the science nor do I have the inclination to educate myself to the degree that taking part in the that debate would require.

If your friend wants a serious discussion he should post his argument on Youtube not Reddit, JF is an unrelenting with response videos. However it seems the leftist gang have been routed from Youtube and have to recover by lurking in such place as Reddit since the hilarious exposé on Kraut and Tea and his gang of conspirators, which was made up of "scientists" of trans people and the like. For all their efforts to completely failed to debunk his arguments on an intellectual level, even after trying so hard and recruiting so many people intent on debunking race realism. If JF was such a moron as your Reddit man claims, unattested in his Reddit safe space, then such criticisms could have been brought up months ago, in which there were no shortage of left-inclined scientists to dispute JF's claims.

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:




b1rb should watch this video
-the problem with rail networks is that regulation makes free-market competition and innovation impossible and creates local monopoly
-this regulation is needed because otherwise trains would crash (and produce would rot on the shelves, and toasters would explode, et cetera)
-this is why the free-market fails

Hardly a scathing rebuttal on privitisation when the system was newly-privitised system had heavy state involvement from the get-go, and has been held up from bankrupcy by heavy state subsidies, and was never a product of natural market formations in the first place. The assumption is that all this meddling in necessary otherwise trains would crash, et cetera (because it happened under Railtrack, and the failure of one business under a convoluted system and that proves the incompetency of all the whole market) while neglecting to mention that the British rail was in fact pioneered by private business, and was maintained with minimal government interference for over a hundred years and only nationalised in WW2.

However is the same ideological fervour that is accused as being the basis of privatisation that is the basis of the hatred of Uber. If they don't bow down to use and follow our arbitrary rules, they can go and the consumer be damned, they say. Oh no, they say, we can't allow two consenting individuals on their own free-will enter into an arrangement or contract without our oversight, they say, otherwise, we will get people with guns to stop it with force. This is the reality of collectivist thinking in economics, and you can see it clearly when there aren't theories of local monopolies and market failures to use as justification. Indeed, they would rather the actual monopoly of taxi companies to the impudence of a company functioning successfully without the pretence of being enabled by the state.


Meah wrote:

Filipino best race
East-Asian women are generally the most attractive (and they seem to dress better too), though good looking White men are generally more attractive than most Asian men, though there are a lot more ugly White men than ugly Asian men. Though I think that Japanese and Korean men are generally a lot more better than Chinese men, which makes me wonder if societal health in a relatively short term has a lot significant effect on the general attractiveness of the population. Also, happas generally look worse than both Asians and whites. The Amerimutt meme is a reality. That is my ponderings on the different races.

Zain Sugieres wrote:

burn anyone whos not a 100% white heterosexual catholic protestant cis male

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

Hey look, Jordan Peterson reiterated his batshit insane claims in a video call. Maybe they're not just twitter shitposts?

https://twitter.com/S_Saeen/status/955889027957297152
Your constant attacks on Peterson just show how much he is a threat to you.
E m i

B1rd wrote:

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

Hey look, Jordan Peterson reiterated his batshit insane claims in a video call. Maybe they're not just twitter shitposts?

https://twitter.com/S_Saeen/status/955889027957297152
Your constant attacks on Peterson just show how much he is a threat to you.
that was hardly an attack, it's just funny how people like him (though actually maybe people on the opposide side of the argument as well) fail to realize that tendencies are tendencies. If muslims mistreat women 648%(example) as often as non-muslims (in an unspecified way) because of easily recognizable things like culture and religion (of which they only MAY be a part), it's easy to support their rights.

Why?

Because the percentage never reaches 100%, it's just a "tendency".
DaddyCoolVipper
I thought most people hated Uber because their company has a track record for having extremely sexist attitudes towards its female employees?

Also, I honestly can't understand how we see things so differently. When you read over a thorough debunking of JF's ideas, and your response is to dismiss it all as "sophistry" in a "safe space"- it just baffles me. You're obviously not against looking into arguments; you seem to have watched that Shaun&Jen video. Oh, and on that topic I guess I'll just chime in that I think the post-nationalisation rail service existed in a VERY different world to pre-WW2 Britain; it's been around for so long that I think you can give it credit for its own success.
DaddyCoolVipper


Just found a new youtube channel to subscribe to. Excellent videos
BrokenArrow
Apprently the new website has a new search and I couldn't help but search for my nickname. I got really sad, 2012/2013 were simpler times.
I honestly miss a lot of you guys, is anyone still in contact with Kanye West?

If you wanna check out the new search: https://osu.ppy.sh/home/search

EDIT: I also found out that 4 people voted for my map in the "Best of 2013" ranking. Good confidence boost, better late than never I guess
DJ Enetro
At least search works on the new website tho, for me search does not work on the old one.
Hasn’t been for a couple of months now, I wonder if anyone else has the same problem too...
abraker

DJ Enetro wrote:

At least search works on the new website tho, for me search does not work on the old one.
Hasn’t been for a couple of months now, I wonder if anyone else has the same problem too...
everyone

they nuked the old search
Zain Sugieres

B1rd wrote:

Zain Sugieres wrote:

burn anyone whos not a 100% white heterosexual catholic protestant cis male
heretic scum
B1rd

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

I thought most people hated Uber because their company has a track record for having extremely sexist attitudes towards its female employees?

Also, I honestly can't understand how we see things so differently. When you read over a thorough debunking of JF's ideas, and your response is to dismiss it all as "sophistry" in a "safe space"- it just baffles me. You're obviously not against looking into arguments; you seem to have watched that Shaun&Jen video. Oh, and on that topic I guess I'll just chime in that I think the post-nationalisation rail service existed in a VERY different world to pre-WW2 Britain; it's been around for so long that I think you can give it credit for its own success.
Your group thinks everything is sexist, so no surprises there.

I didn't say everything was sophistry, I was everything was probably sophistry given the circumstances, but I wasn't going to invest the large amount of time needed to actually educate myself in that specific field to be able to address the points. But you have a lot of temerity to expect me to respond to the post when the post itself was never intended as an argument to engage in any sort of dialogue or discussion, but was merely for the purpose of preaching to the choir of people illiterate in that field but who were looking to gulp down any plausible scientific-sounding argument that validated their pre-conceived opinions founded in the first place on political disposition and not scientific truth.

Indeed the whole thing is just a diatribe that goes on insulting JF and his credentials as a scientists, spending as much time inferring intent and motivations (so this is where you learn it from) as it does addressing points. The author then states many times his refusal to engage with JF in any sort of debate whatsoever, the former of which is more than happy to respond to his critics in live debates or other means of their choosing. I hardly doubt that the people who are right would scamper from confrontation so readily and rely on confusing argument largely incomprehensible to the layman. And JF did, in fact, rebut the post in the comments below.

Apart from the pointed-out scientific fallacies like the continuum fallacy that keeps popping up ad-nauseam, which I might address later if I feel like it, I'd comment on the alarmist tone in which race realism, a.k.a science is constantly lumped in with the Nazis, the KKK and the genocide of 11 billion Jews and Gypsies, as if that is the logical conclusion from the realisation that some groups of humans are different from others. I'd like to point out that Nazi racialism is indeed pseudo-science; modern race-realism is much closer to the scientific understanding of the allies' on the subject of human biology at the time of WW2, before it essentially became a taboo subject as a result of Nazis. No, it's not any particular scientific truth that inevitably leads to genocide, but rather denying truth to fit some specific ideological agenda is more more dangerous.
I've been on JF's Discord which had quite a lot of intelligent and interesting people, from White nationalist to unashamed homosexuals, (you should go on there and escape from your bubble, in fact) pretty much everyone was on board with race realism, but there were a lot of different political conclusions drawn from that fact, with nationalists, globalists, Libertarians, et cetera there. One guy there was quite ardently in favour of race mixing and had an Asian girlfriend.


Momi wrote:

that was hardly an attack, it's just funny how people like him (though actually maybe people on the opposide side of the argument as well) fail to realize that tendencies are tendencies. If muslims mistreat women 648%(example) as often as non-muslims (in an unspecified way) because of easily recognizable things like culture and religion (of which they only MAY be a part), it's easy to support their rights.

Why?

Because the percentage never reaches 100%, it's just a "tendency".
I really have no idea what you're trying to say, but I think that calling someone batshit insane constitutes an attack. Furthermore, just look at the type of people who posted the Tweet.



I don't know what these people's obsession with attacking someone's credentials is - apparently a PhD, over a hundred published papers, thousands of citations and even teaching at Hardvard for half a decade isn't good enough for them, and in fact, can easily be bested by a 20 year old. Apparently they have never heard the phrase "give the Devil his due".

Watching people like this fester in their safe spaces is really quite amusing, you wouldn't believe how malicious these people supposedly driven by compassion can be.


Zain Sugieres wrote:

heretic scum
Repent, papist.
DaddyCoolVipper

B1rd wrote:

Your group thinks everything is sexist, so no surprises there.
I'd like to specifically address this false equivalency.

"Some social justice warriors throw false accusations of sexism, so that means that any and all accusations of sexism should be thrown away" is such a fucking stupid argument that it disappoints me to see anyone who isn't a young child use it. You can do much, much better than that, B1rd.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply