anyone like my namechange?
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
56,186
yes fuck toe hoes
mommy 👀Momi wrote:
anyone like my namechange?
Mario videogames are weeb shit now?Tupsu wrote:
that is absolutely not the one I meant but I shouldn't be surprised you're suggesting some weeb shit
no, minor tidbits from Mario games that were only ever added to the Japanese version areGreen Platinum wrote:
Mario videogames are weeb shit now?Tupsu wrote:
that is absolutely not the one I meant but I shouldn't be surprised you're suggesting some weeb shit
I like mario games
Do we know who the father is?
But why?Momi wrote:
anyone like my namechange?
E m i
it's also less than 100% unoriginal which is good
my name riince evolved from rincevent after like 3-4 permutations
my name riince evolved from rincevent after like 3-4 permutations
Well, I am not
me neither
same here. heck, i'm already almost gone.silmarilen wrote:
So apparently the old forum layout is going to disappear soon. Was nice knowing you all, i'll probably be gone with it.
has peppy ever explained why he's so strongly opposed towards the old forums?
This is why every other piece of software is bloated in high ram usage now-a-days. Garbage collection is only good on paper
Seph
because its a forum long due to be wastelandedFoxtrot wrote:
same here. heck, i'm already almost gone.silmarilen wrote:
So apparently the old forum layout is going to disappear soon. Was nice knowing you all, i'll probably be gone with it.
has peppy ever explained why he's so strongly opposed towards the old forums?
or its wastelanded and is actually public?
conspiracy
Post count, Titles, viewing old post
I can't seem to find them, they're missing
I can't seem to find them, they're missing
Okay, wait wait wait.
Many of the “oldies” here are saying that “mindless shitposting” = “absolute nonsense”, am I right?
(For clarity’s sake, let’s define an “oldie” as a person that has been on the forums for 3+ years.)
Many of the “oldies” here are saying that “mindless shitposting” = “absolute nonsense”, am I right?
(For clarity’s sake, let’s define an “oldie” as a person that has been on the forums for 3+ years.)
The very fact that you'd try to defend genuinely and absolutely asocial and autistic behaviour (also known as shitposting) makes that post nonsensical.
E m i
he might be defending but definitely not yet as it's just a question... but not that i understand the question either
and i don't really care if it's absolute 100% nonsense or only 80% nonsense or whatever other possible consideration i can have for it, all i can say is that it's preferable if people make posts with actual substance... i should be doing that too
and i don't really care if it's absolute 100% nonsense or only 80% nonsense or whatever other possible consideration i can have for it, all i can say is that it's preferable if people make posts with actual substance... i should be doing that too
When you say autism, do you mean this?
(Edited upon john’s suggestion. Took a while because imgur copy buttons don’t work on mobile...)
(Edited upon john’s suggestion. Took a while because imgur copy buttons don’t work on mobile...)
E m i
no, this definitionDJ Enetro wrote:
When you say autism, do you mean the 6th Urban Dictionary definition?
use this link for reference
SPOILER
i don't think that way i just wanted to do it
Most definitely, considering who you're talking to.DJ Enetro wrote:
When you say autism, do you mean the 6th Urban Dictionary definition?
use this link for reference
For the record, you shouldn't reference Urban Dictionary entries by number, because that can easily change in the future if the ratings shift. It's better to just take a screenshot of the entry you are referencing. Just sayin'.
I’m still confused.Aurani wrote:
The very fact that you'd try to defend genuinely and absolutely asocial and autistic behaviour (also known as shitposting) makes that post nonsensical.
I’ve asked Hwa about how would you know if your behavior is autistic or not, and she said: (hope you don’t mind)
From other people's viewpoint of you? If multiple people share the same opinion, surely they can't be wrong?
But just because multiple people are saying that something is right, that alone does not make it correct, does it?posting the definition of autism here from urban dictionary was the most autistic thing you could have done
I think you're all losers for having this discussion
How so? I think it was okay: since I didn’t know what it meant, I make sure what the heck you guys were talking about before moving on.lol wrote:
posting the definition of autism here from urban dictionary was the most autistic thing you could have done
Well it’s sure better to force this into ITT than making a new thread, no?Kisses wrote:
I think you're all losers for having this discussion
I think these discussions are important because they might help prevent future shitty behavior from happening on the forums. My goal is to... accept the bare reasoning behind common forum etiquette by comparing the mindsets of an arrogant and a smart person.
this sounds like one of those bullet points you read over many times but is so complex or weirdly worded that you can't make heads nor tails of itDJ Enetro wrote:
accept the bare reasoning behind common forum etiquette by comparing the mindsets of an arrogant and a smart person.
hmm...
“accept forum etiquette by comparing a smart and a stupid person”. Does that make more sense?
“accept forum etiquette by comparing a smart and a stupid person”. Does that make more sense?
Don't drag my name into this, thanks.
A bunch of randoms on the internet are the perfect authority to determine you are autistic, didn't you know that?
I mean, if the "multiple people on the internet say it's so so it must be so" thing actually worked we'd be living on a flat earth right now.
I mean, if the "multiple people on the internet say it's so so it must be so" thing actually worked we'd be living on a flat earth right now.
Green Platinum wrote:
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_of_the_crowd
A large group's aggregated answers to questions involving quantity estimation, general world knowledge, and spatial reasoning has generally been found to be as good as, and often better than, the answer given by any of the individuals within the group.Diagnosing someone with autism does not fall under those things afaik.
Also that system is pretty bad if all the people in the crowd believe in something that is proven to be not true.
General world knowledge is so vague it honestly could be.
How so? If we do pick a bunch of randoms on the internet, there’s always the possibility that some of the people that you pick won’t have proper judgement, no?silmarilen wrote:
A bunch of randoms on the internet are the perfect authority to determine you are autistic, didn't you know that?
>being autistic enough to take that claim seriouslyDJ Enetro wrote:
How so? If we do pick a bunch of randoms on the internet, there’s always the possibility that some of the people that you pick won’t have proper judgement, no?silmarilen wrote:
A bunch of randoms on the internet are the perfect authority to determine you are autistic, didn't you know that?
lol