feld is it really necessary to give away every single account you make
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
56,186
seinfeld?Static Noise Bird wrote:
feld
god blessSeiuji wrote:
Ja, du penner <3<3<3<
gevulde vis
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
Yet the system ought to be prioritizing the quality of scores. Quantity simply proves consistency, and in Andrea's case it only proves consistency up to a certain level, where that level isn't all that high. I mean yeah sure, Andrea is a good player, but certainly not one deserving top 10. At the very least, there are many other players that set much better scores consistently enough.
rrtyui isn't consistent because he's playing the hardest maps, and despite that he's still capable of setting some of the best scores in the game. I agree consistency ought to mean something, but only as much as the skill it's backing. That said, Andrea hardly deserves the rank ppv2 says, and the same can be said of countless others.
It's not as if Andrea could've beaten Taiwan. If rrtyui were as consistent as Andrea then sure, but the only guy that had that much skill and consistency got himself purposefully banned.Mr Color wrote:
rrtyui
rrtyui isn't consistent because he's playing the hardest maps, and despite that he's still capable of setting some of the best scores in the game. I agree consistency ought to mean something, but only as much as the skill it's backing. That said, Andrea hardly deserves the rank ppv2 says, and the same can be said of countless others.
go back to skype or something pleaseSeiuji wrote:
me irl ?!?!?! :-)
The thing is that skill is largely irrelevant in this. You have to understand how it plays out first. If you were to get a performance that is considered as groundbreaking, what would you get, 50pp tops? Probably exaggerating there, even. You do this on one map, two maps, ten maps, it's enough to be in the top 100.
On the other hand, you go play a regular map. You S it, maybe SS, perhaps top 50. You get 2-3 pp. you repeat the process until there are no more maps to play. You'll get a huge rank for it whether you like it or not. Is it faulty? No, you did decent on those score and are rewarded for them (a little bit, but you're rewarded still).
You're not farming, you're not drilling, you're just playing. You're not doing anything that could possibly weigh things in your favor.
And this is exactly it: the only reason why Andrea is so high is because he's gotten those ever so small rewards over and over and over. We're literally talking 1pp per 100 maps. If that's too much, I fear for the non pro players of this game. Give perfs the bigger chunk of the cake and everyone is stuck at 0pp forever except for a few 100/200 players.
On the other hand, you go play a regular map. You S it, maybe SS, perhaps top 50. You get 2-3 pp. you repeat the process until there are no more maps to play. You'll get a huge rank for it whether you like it or not. Is it faulty? No, you did decent on those score and are rewarded for them (a little bit, but you're rewarded still).
You're not farming, you're not drilling, you're just playing. You're not doing anything that could possibly weigh things in your favor.
And this is exactly it: the only reason why Andrea is so high is because he's gotten those ever so small rewards over and over and over. We're literally talking 1pp per 100 maps. If that's too much, I fear for the non pro players of this game. Give perfs the bigger chunk of the cake and everyone is stuck at 0pp forever except for a few 100/200 players.
Jarby wrote:
http://puu.sh/6sNIV.mp3
That's not how it works.Mr Color wrote:
the only reason why Andrea is so high is because he's gotten those ever so small rewards over and over and over. We're literally talking 1pp per 100 maps. If that's too much, I fear for the non pro players of this game. Give perfs the bigger chunk of the cake and everyone is stuck at 0pp forever except for a few 100/200 players.
PP's value changes as it piles up. If you keep setting the same kind of score over and over again you'll eventually hit a cap. That's the magic behind it. Just think about it: getting 100 pp at rank #30000 isn't the same as 100 pp at rank #200. It's exponential, not linear. That's why people aren't stuck at 0pp. That's why non pros can rise up; to a certain degree.
The thing is that skill is largely irrelevant in this.And that would be the greatest flaw. Otherwise, what criteria is this ranking system based on? Like I said, we already have the score ranking for checking track record or—if you want to call it that—effort. What's pp out there for, then? What's the point when worse players are ranked higher than players better than them? How's that fair?
ppv2 is apparently there to show progression, not skill. what progression in this case is, how it is measured, why andrea does progress more than rrtyui, we don't know. we also never will know that because peppy won't ever reveal how his precious system works.Brian OA wrote:
That's not how it works.Mr Color wrote:
the only reason why Andrea is so high is because he's gotten those ever so small rewards over and over and over. We're literally talking 1pp per 100 maps. If that's too much, I fear for the non pro players of this game. Give perfs the bigger chunk of the cake and everyone is stuck at 0pp forever except for a few 100/200 players.
PP's value changes as it piles up. If you keep setting the same kind of score over and over again you'll eventually hit a cap. That's the magic behind it. Just think about it: getting 100 pp at rank #30000 isn't the same as 100 pp at rank #200. It's exponential, not linear. That's why people aren't stuck at 0pp. That's why non pros can rise up; to a certain degree.The thing is that skill is largely irrelevant in this.And that would be the greatest flaw. Otherwise, what criteria is this ranking system based on? Like I said, we already have the score ranking for checking track record or—if you want to call it that—effort. What's pp out there for, then? What's the point when worse players are ranked higher than players better than them? How's that fair?
why you would need a progression system if you have a score ranking is also beyond me.
whatever, it's all speculah at this point. Nobody knows what the hell they're talking about and that's the main reason why peppy is being very caustic on the matter.
I'll be laughing when people realize that 99% people that are mad that pp is disabled is because they farmed maps to get pp in the first place
I'll be laughing when people realize that 99% people that are mad that pp is disabled is because they farmed maps to get pp in the first place
can i just ask why those two niggers aren't banned yet
Static Noise Bird wrote:
can i just ask why those two niggers aren't banned yet
wtf failed.
"Eureka Seven" is an anagram of "Keanu Reeves"
you mean some people haven't realized that yet?Mr Color wrote:
whatever, it's all speculah at this point. Nobody knows what the hell they're talking about and that's the main reason why peppy is being very caustic on the matter.
I'll be laughing when people realize that 99% people that are mad that pp is disabled is because they farmed maps to get pp in the first place
I thought Silynn was the one who gave it away for everyone to realize
it is incredibly hard andrea best playerGladiOol wrote:
So playing a lot of maps and getting consistent ranks on it = skill ¿
Man, that Tarantino account of mine would be #1 then. Fucking getting consistent SS ranks #1 everywhere like a true boss. I guess PP was accurate after all. Because it's so hard to get an SS on a random map.
no, ryuu is the best playerthelewa wrote:
you mean some people haven't realized that yet?Mr Color wrote:
whatever, it's all speculah at this point. Nobody knows what the hell they're talking about and that's the main reason why peppy is being very caustic on the matter.
I'll be laughing when people realize that 99% people that are mad that pp is disabled is because they farmed maps to get pp in the first place
I thought Silynn was the one who gave it away for everyone to realizeit is incredibly hard andrea best playerGladiOol wrote:
So playing a lot of maps and getting consistent ranks on it = skill ¿
Man, that Tarantino account of mine would be #1 then. Fucking getting consistent SS ranks #1 everywhere like a true boss. I guess PP was accurate after all. Because it's so hard to get an SS on a random map.
"Average IQ of indigenous populations according to Lynn (2006)"Sethlied wrote:
oh I was wondering what that diagram meant.Apex wrote:
"Average IQ of indigenous populations according to Lynn (2006)"Sethlied wrote:
FixedApex wrote:
"Average IQ of indigenous populations according to Christopher Poole (2006)"Sethlied wrote:
He must be Chinese.Mr Color wrote:
FixedApex wrote:
"Average IQ of indigenous populations according to Christopher Poole (2006)"