1. Easy (1.33 stars, 79 notes)
2. Hard (2.99 stars, 212 notes)
3. Insane (3.88 stars, 295 notes)
4. Muzukashii (2.88 stars, 305 notes)
5. Normal (1.88 stars, 135 notes)
6. Oni (4.04 stars, 450 notes)
7. Service (4.46 stars, 360 notes)

modder list, thanks for your "Help"!

1. toara_fict (Taiko)
2. Navy
3. pimpG
4. AnreFM (Standard&Taiko)
5. ReySHeL (Taiko)
6. Satellite
7. Fycho
8. RandomEffect

revived here

1. -NanoRIPE-
2. Riven
3. tasuke912(Taiko)
4. yuzu__rinrin(Taiko)
5. raririn
6. EdamaMe411(Taiko)
7. bjpe0810(Taiko)

tasuke912
Kagetsu
tasuke912

Fycho wrote:

New map

Suzully wrote:

音取りがとても正確で、2連打の使い方も素晴らしいです。同じ曲を作っちゃいましたがお互いに頑張りましょう～

toara_fict wrote:

hi :3
Mod for M4M (Taiko diff)

Mod

[General]

1. D (Big don)
2. d (don)
3. K (Big kat)
4. k (kat)

[Muzukashii]

1. OD6→5　（もしくは4） =>4にしました
2. 00:19:290 (71) - d =>fix
3. 00:25:690 (92) - Del =>ここはリズムをキープしておきたいので、保留
4. 00:27:090 (99,100) - k d=>kが3つ続くのと、あとここはドラム意識なのでnoで

[Oni]

1. OD7は絶対変えるべきだと思います　自分ならOD5にしますが　OD5~6 にするべき！ =>5にしました
   
2. 01:02:190 (30) - move 01:02:090 (30) - ここは2連じゃなくていいかも・・・ =>ここはボーカルに忠実にいきたい、no
3. 01:03:590 (38,39) - 　kd　でもいいかなぁ・・・ =>01:06:690 (59) - からのパターンと被るので……保留
4. 01:07:390 (66) - 　Del　後ろの2連打とくっつけないほうがいいかも！ =>ここは元々迷ってたところでした、fix
5. 01:13:590 (21,22,23,24) - dk k d =>ここを変えると同じパターンが多くなる気がするので保留

譜面のつくり方が自分と違うふめんだなぁと思いました！
2連打の使い方など参考にさせていただきました！
それと自分ではこれ以上のmodをするところが見つかりませんでした・・・
頑張ってください！Good Luck :3

[Navy] wrote:

Hello~~M4M

First, sorry for my bad Enaglish..

[Easy]
01:03:890 (4) - end kiai time

01:04:290 (1) - and restart =>retention.

perfect notes.. but

no spinner in this map

my suggest

00:13:890 (2) - delete reverse slider and
00:14:890 (1) - start at this time and 00:15:890 - end =>I'd like to take a break between 00:14:690 - and 00:16:290 - as considering from 00:08:290 - .

and 01:24:290 (2) - spinner =>It'll be a excessive emphasizing imo. no.

[Normal]

delete 00:56:290 (3) - and drag the spinner to 00:56:290 -

finally 00:57:890
and 00:58:290 - add notes~ Timpani is ringing at 00:56:690 - . no.

01:25:490 (3) - nc =>fix

[Hard]

00:00:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - a little strange..

00:51:490 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I recommend four short slider because they are too difficult.. =>Both will be considered by second opinion. retention.


[Insane]

It looks good but more use rolls like
00:47:890 (5,6,7,8,1) - =>sorry, no.


I like this song~~~
rank it plz

pimpG wrote:

general

• do you have a cd back cover image or another official source to confirm the (TV Size) ?
http://www.servantservice.org/music/ i don't see TV Size here but i don't know if the songs mentioned are the shorter or the longer version... =>no problem. I keep (TV Size)

• source: "SERVANT x SERVICE" just like its shown in the video/website? =>you're right. fix

• inconsistency in combo colours, why only easy and normal has custom colours? =>It's just a my worthless misstake. fix~

• i see you use hitsounds in almost all notes, including slider starts/ends, did you take a look at your standard diff's at taiko mode?
almost all notes are katsu, thats because you use claps on almost all notes (i know you know that since you are taiko mapper)
instead of using claps on every note, you should rename your soft-hitclap2 to soft-hitnormal( or 2,3...) and remove the claps for that hitsound file
=>Hitsounds just following drums. no.

how about muted slider slides? at least for parts like 00:00:290 - 00:16:290 - 00:19:490 -... since the music is more quiet
=>It's on purpose. retention.

easy

• this difficulty has no spinners, consider adding at least one to make the scores vary between the players, thats the only diff without spinners
i suggest the same spinner as normal. and spinner at 00:14:690 - would be suitable too
=>I don't want to raise difficulty by short spinner in Easy. retention.

00:25:890 (1,2) - 1 belongs to previous combo, so please remove the new combo and add on 2 (you are following this logic on your normal) =>fix
00:25:890 (1,2) - the start of 2 is on an "empty" tick and you even added a loud whistle on it.. consider making 2 start at 00:27:690 - where you actually hear the vocals/rhythm is back to normal. and remove the whistle at start.
if you follow this sugestion please remove the whistle at repeat of 1 and maybe add whitle at the end. you will see! I want to keep beat. no.
00:38:690 (1,2) - same as 00:25:890 (1,2) -
00:40:290 - similar as 00:25:890 (1,2) -
01:24:290 (2) - imo removing the repeat and adding a circle at 01:25:490 would be much more interesting. this part is unique in the song, and this pattern is the best representation for it =>If I done it, it's a little hard to see for newbies. retention.

normal

00:14:690 - same as i said in easy about spinner, even if this diff already have a spinner, one more would help to vary the score between the players, that's mostly my own prefference anyways. feel free to ignore =>same as easy, sorry~
01:11:090 (2) - new combo for consistency with 00:03:890 (1) - =>oops. fix~

hard

• why aren't you using whistles at hard? they sounded really nice on your normal, your notes here supports the same whistle usage as normal. what is the point making the hitsounding at normal more complex than the harder diffs? =>Because I could put many claps on Hard/Insane dif. retention please.

00:29:090 (4,1) - new combo would be better on 4 for consistency with 00:41:890 (1) - , i know that the previous combo sounds ends on that tick too, so its up to you =>These are different part. no.
00:17:490 (2,1) - i know you are trying to follow piano here, but this kind of "trap" mapping is not recomended for that hard, you are not using this on insane so this part is tecnically harder than it
plus, this speed change is very confusing at taiko mode because its a small part using speed change and is only 1/4 to hit the next note so its really hard to read
i sugest you remove the slider and make a circle instead, then stack the next slider on it, so the representation of the piano will be a slow down stack
00:20:690 - ^
00:23:890 - ^
00:30:290 - ^
=>OK, I take some arrangement on these parts.

01:00:190 (4) - remove this note? this part is exactly the same pattern as insane, its a good way to make some variation, and this will not make the diff less fun imo
01:06:590 (4) - ^
=>Vocal is ringing at these time. retention.

insane

• same as hard, why no whistle?

00:06:690 (1,2,3) - (2) x164 y164 . (3) x124 y 80 . this arrange fits the music better. will need to re arrange the next notes, but its close to a spinner, so it should be easy =>I tried it but I like mine. no~
00:16:690 (1) - i think this shape is unfitting and random for the sound.. more like own preference anyways. i don't have any better shape in mind atm : / =>Hmm...
00:17:690 (1,2) - between all similar parts, thats the only with this new combo logic. please remove new combo at 1 add at 2 =>it's on purpose no~
00:23:090 (2) - same as 00:16:690 (1) -
00:47:290 (2,3,4,5) - how about following background sound at this part? your insane is mostly jumps, you should not waste the chance to use streams if they really follow something without overmap =>fix
01:06:690 - ^ also i don't think this slider jumps are that fitting in this part. its different than 01:00:290 (6,7) - where you followed the bells and from 01:03:490 (1,2) - where you followed the vocals =>I knew these are different sounds but these are same "timing". I think it's no problem, no.

awesome

Fycho wrote:

BPM=300 imo

pimpG wrote:

Fycho wrote:

BPM=300 imo

i know what you mean. my 1st ranked beatmap has drums on red ticks too

if you think in a 300 bpm song you will think in a challenge that only the highest pp players can win.
so 150 is better because its how actually the song feels. it's the correct bpm anyways

AnreFM wrote:

heyyy m4m from your queue~
Let's do this

[Easy]
00:07:490 (2) - Might be better if you put this sync with the other slider before. Move it to x264 y312 =>move to a little left down.
00:16:290 (1,1) - these shapes.. may be unrankable. Fix those edgy points or make a simpler shape =>why?
00:21:090 (1) - Remove finish on the tail, not necessary
00:21:890 (2) - Same like above =>I think these are necessary, no.
00:27:690 (1,2) - Easy should be clear of jumps and anti jumps, fix the distance =>It's my worthless mistake, fixed.
00:30:690 (1,2) - Make them symmetry, the current one doesn't looked good =>retention
00:32:290 (1) - Here, make it like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/931881 this is also my example of simpler and smoother shape sorry, no.
00:40:490 (1) - Kinda confusing because of rhythm. Try to start the slider in 00:40:488 - and you may keep the circle after it or just extend the slider and replace it =>no, I want to keep beat.

[Normal]
00:01:890 (1) - try this smoother slider shape https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/932945 =>no
00:05:090 (3,4) - Better if you make them up a bit and avoid overlap with 00:03:890 (1) - =>retention
00:07:090 (2,3) - Tweak (2) distance a bit left so (3) can stack with 00:05:490 (4) - =>I didn't stack with 00:05:490 (4) - on purpose, no.
00:21:490 (2) - NC here instead of 00:20:690 (1) - the rhythm is still same there =>But it's same as other places. no.
00:38:690 (5) - NC =>It's on purpose, retention
00:42:690 (3) - Make it more curvy, currently doesn't play and looked really good =>I don't think so.
00:46:690 (1) - a bit right to move that little overlap lol =>fix
00:53:890 (5) - NC here instead of 00:54:690 (1) - rhythm already changed there =>no
00:54:690 (1) - That 4th red dot is not necessary and only making the slider weird. make it smooth =>There's no red dot.

[Hard]
00:10:690 (2) - Since this slider shape doesn't follow a pattern. I suggest to make the turn more cleaner in the same degree as the previous slider, More fit with the vocal =>sorry, I like mine.
00:12:290 (4) - How about encircle 00:11:890 (3) - ? looked better than the current =>It's on purpose, no.
00:13:890 (3) - Raise the tail. Vocal is rising =>I don't want to put a rising slider after a rising slider. no.
00:49:690 (1) - Make it more curvy =>I used same shape as 00:49:090 (3) - . no.
00:58:690 (2,3,4) - I stumbled a bit here, slightly confusing
Consider reducing using that 2 1/4 stacked beat doesn't always necessary =>This song has so many 2 1/4 rhythmes... retention please.

[Insane]
00:04:590 (5) - Stack with 00:04:290 (4) - to increase the difficulty, this doesn't need to be very visible lol =>no
00:08:290 (1) - Move to x160 y252 for more connected with 00:06:090 (5,6,4,5,1) - here =>I don't want to overlap with these, no.
00:21:090 (1,2,3,4,1) - These is better to be in star pattern actually =>It's on purpose, no.
00:29:090 (1) - Stack with 00:28:690 (5) - ? =>no
00:47:890 (6,7,8,9) - Use kick here? would be nice =>I don't think so.
00:58:490 (3) - Why put it here? beside the 1.3 DS(the others are 1.6), the distance with 00:58:090 (1) - also isn't good =>Because I feel it's good. I change DS many many times, so no problem I think.
01:22:690 (5) - Stack with 01:21:590 (7) - for better pattern and higher jumps =>I don't stack these but I add some changes.
01:23:490 (1,2,3,4,5) - lol use better pattern here, this seems random orz =>retention

[Muzu]
00:01:890 (7) - It fits better if you use K here instead of D. The starters are already filled with dons, thus making it better to use big Kat here =>so I used big kat at 00:02:690 (8) - ... no.
00:02:690 (8) - D
00:03:490 (9) - K. Yeah, change the pattern
00:05:090 (15,16,17,18) - Feels a bit weird. Use dkdk here, fit better with the background music =>It follows the vocal.
00:06:690 (22,23,24,25) - ^ =>00:07:490 (26) - is k and I don't want to use k continuously
00:11:490 (40,41,42,43) - ^
00:13:090 (47,48,49,50) - ^
00:21:090 (77,78,79,80) - D K D K =>no
00:05:090 (15,16,125,126,127,128) - ^ =>^
00:48:290 (181) - k. after triplet of dons, k fits better =>fix
00:55:690 (212,213,214,215) - dkdK here. that much dons is boring and doesn't fit really well =>retention.
01:09:090 (57,58,59) - Same as the first part =>same.
01:11:090 (60) - From this point, It is all the same as I earlier stated on the beginning part
Try to add more triplets since currently it is really easy for a muzukashi imo =>I used same pattern as the first part. no.

[Oni]
Same opinion applied on Muzu
All okay actually, try to use less repeating pattern as it would get boring orz
I think this song is configured by many repeating. I just depicted this.

lol that's all, Hope that helps!!
Good Luck with this! star owob

misk703 wrote:

二連打の楽しい譜面ですね！
曲も好きです！！

ReySHeL wrote:

mod as req

[General]

1. diff名の『Taiko』は必要なくなったので削除していいと思います =>fix

[Taiko Oni]

1. 00:50:890 (270) - d? =>良いですね、fix
2. 00:57:690 - spinnerのendをここにして下さい =>fix
3. 01:15:890 - dkddk ドラムをフォローできていいと思います > http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/935905 =>うーん……これでも良いんですがちょっとうるさい気がしたのでno。
4. 01:22:290 - ^ =>^

[Taiko Muzukashii]

1. 00:47:090 - k d k d kkk D sound is better. 自分だったらこのように置きます。 試してみてください > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/935916 =>1個前をkにして、d k k d kkk dにしました。最後のDは00:41:890 (155) - を考えて小さいままで。
2. 00:57:690 - same as Oni

good luck!

_VLaD_ wrote:

Awesome map :3
Star~

Satellite wrote:

Nothing to say~


00:05:890 (5) - 00:07:490 (3) - こちらのスライダーと対象?になるように曲げてみませんか？こちらではきっちり合っているので( 00:12:290 (6,3) - ) =>fix. 00:12:290 (6,3) - の形も実は揃ってなかったのでそちらも合わせました。

SPOILER

00:08:290 (4) - Nc? Hardとパターンを揃えるため =>保留で
00:25:890 (5) - Nc?
00:38:690 (5) - ^ =>フレーズの雰囲気が変わってるのでわざとやっています、保留。
00:50:490 (5) - ぎりぎり3に被っているところが気になりました・・( 00:49:690 (4,5,6) - これを-30度傾けると綺麗になるかも？6は3の後ろにスタックしてます )
その後ろのDSは適当に整えちゃってください。 =>うーん、00:49:090 (3,4) - の垂直はキープしたいので、保留で。

SPOILER

01:14:690 (3) - ctrl+Hした形のほうが 01:13:090 (5) - この位置と対象で綺麗に見えました =>fix

SPOILER

00:20:690 (3,4,1) - これは私が個人的に好きな流れなんですが、このように配置してみるのはどうですか？(その後ろの配置は整えてください)
00:21:090 (1) - ここは 00:19:490 (1) - ココにスタックしてます =>この通りではないですが形を変えました

SPOILER

00:27:090 (3) - どうせならこんな位置にもってきてみたりしてもいいかもしれません =>良いですね、fix

SPOILER

00:29:090 (4) - Nc?　00:41:890 (1) - こっちにはあるので =>fix
00:42:690 (3,4,5) - DSが0.9になってて結構狭く感じました。1.00でもいいとおもいます =>ミスでした、fix
00:44:290 (3) - 2をもっとフォローするようにまげてあげるといいかもしれません =>fix

SPOILER

OD+1 6は低いです =>スピナーがキツくなってしまうので保留
00:02:790 (1) - スピナーでAutoPlayで2000しかでないのは危険だと思います
01:09:990 (1) - ^ =>この曲でどうしてもやりたかったところなので…保留。

全体的に通して、曲が静かになっているところは無音のslider-sideを使うとよりよくなるように思いました =>これはこのままで。slider-slideの音があった方がスライダーを処理しているのが感じられて面白いと個人的に考えています、特にEasyはそれを意識しているので。

Fycho wrote:

hi ~

Black: Suggestions
Blue: Importance.You might consider
Red:Unrank issues. You Must Fix

[general]
Remove anime in Tags.When it get ranked, it will be sort to Janpanese/anime. So it is not necessary =>fix
Audioleadin=1510 is too short. Try to use 1500 or 2000 instead =>fix

[insane]

• 
  Try AR9?.Maybe ar9 is more playable and interesting =>I don't like AR9... retention.
  OD+1 =>It's hard to play spinners... retention
  00:02:790 (1) –the spinner is too short imo =>I want to keep this possibly, no.
  00:17:690 (1,2) –swap NC =>shape will be bad i think. no.
  00:17:890 (1) –add finish on head
  00:24:290 (1) -^
  00:30:690 (1) –^
  00:37:090 (1) -^ =>retention.
  00:41:890 (1) –add finish on head(other diffs were added ;w;) =>fix
  00:44:290 (5) –try this rhythm? =>following the accordion, no.
  
  00:50:490 (3) –I suggest you not follow the vocal here.change this to a note and a 1/2 slider with a whistle at head. This seems better imo =>I'd like to follow the vocal correctly, sorry.
  00:58:790 (5) –cut the slider to 1/4? =>following vocal, no.
  00:59:990 (4) –try to change this to a 1/4 slider and add clap at slider end =>I'm in fear that rhythm will be complicated, no.
  01:17:090 (1,2,3,4) –make a better 平行四边形 =>fix

[hard]

• 
  OD+1 =>same as Insane, retention.
  00:27:690 (1,2) –make sure that they have the same縦座標 =>fix
  00:27:690 (1,1,2,3) –make a diamond =>It's on purpose, no.
  00:32:290 (1) – move to (252,232) to make a small jump =>I don't want to make bigger jump here. no.
  00:49:690 (1) –try this rhythm ? =>following vocal
  00:55:890 (5) –add nc? =>fix
  01:13:090 (4) -try this shape =>add some changes. almost same as your suggestion.
  SPOILER

  
  00:12:290 (4) –same as above =>nope here, sorry.

[normal]

• 
  00:25:890 (5) –add nc?
  00:38:690 (5) -^ =>on purpose. no.
  00:53:690 –add note? =>There's no sound... no.
  01:05:890 (1,1) –avoid this overlap =>I can't find any alternative solution, and I think this overlap is safe for ranked. retention.

[easy]

• 
  00:40:290 (1) –try this rhythm =>It's hard for newbies to play imo. retention.
  add some spinners this diff？or many people‘s score will be the same =>I can't find any places to add spinners. also I think many first place isn't bad, it's peaceful

goodluck<3

1. 00:35:490 (1) - このsliderは左右対称の方が良いと思いました。たとえばこんな感じで
   
   SPOILER

   

   453,200,35490,6,0,B|445:242|419:288|419:288|377:276|342:300|342:300|303:264|285:226,1,270,12|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:51:490 (1) - 最後のreverseをやめて00:53:890にadd a circleの方が好きです

• 
  Good!

1. 00:01:890 (1) - ちょっとSV遅すぎな気がします（01:09:090 (1) - も同じ）
2. 01:01:290- add note か01:01:090 (1) - をsliderにして音をとった方がいいかも
3. 01:23:490 (1,2,3) - ここはDS1.0xが良いと思います

1. 00:01:890 (1) - Hardと同じでもう少し早くてもいいと思います（01:09:090 (1) - も同じ）
2. 00:52:090 (1,2) - x:256 y:192
3. 00:52:990 (3) - ^
4. 00:54:690 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Good!
5. 01:04:690 (3) - stackするなら01:04:290 (1) - より01:05:090 (5) - が好きです

RandomEffect wrote:

Hi~
M4Mしてくれると嬉しいです

[Easy]

1. 00:35:490 (1) - このsliderは左右対称の方が良いと思いました。たとえばこんな感じで =>いいですね、fix
   
   SPOILER

   

   453,200,35490,6,0,B|445:242|419:288|419:288|377:276|342:300|342:300|303:264|285:226,1,270,12|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:51:490 (1) - 最後のreverseをやめて00:53:890にadd a circleの方が好きです =>保留で

[Normal]

• 
  Good!

[Hard]

1. 00:01:890 (1) - ちょっとSV遅すぎな気がします（01:09:090 (1) - も同じ） =>保留
2. 01:01:290- add note か01:01:090 (1) - をsliderにして音をとった方がいいかも =>間がないのはちょっとHardにしては難しいかなと思ったので保留
3. 01:23:490 (1,2,3) - ここはDS1.0xが良いと思います=>0.8で

[Insane]

1. 00:01:890 (1) - Hardと同じでもう少し早くてもいいと思います（01:09:090 (1) - も同じ） =>保留
2. 00:52:090 (1,2) - x:256 y:192
3. 00:52:990 (3) - ^ =>fix. 前後も左右対称に。
4. 00:54:690 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Good! =>thanks
5. 01:04:690 (3) - stackするなら01:04:290 (1) - より01:05:090 (5) - が好きです =>ずっと四角形を作るようなパターンで組んでいるので、ここもそれをキープしておきたいです、no

この曲意外にもranked-mapまだないみたいですね。
ランクト支援します～☆
~Good Luck~

1. please make sure all green timing is snapped :<
2. the timing preview point too xd (its unsnapped)

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

May i help you?
yes
thank you~ >_<

[General]

1. please make sure all green timing is snapped :< okay
2. the timing preview point too xd (its unsnapped) it's intentional, best timing for me when considering preview fade-in.

[Service]

00:23:390 (6) - maybe make this curve same as slider (5)? not bad. but the head of 00:23:390 (6) - is on the best place considering flow from 00:23:090 (5) - imo. sorry~
00:25:490 (7) - ctrl h? this goes to 00:25:890 (1) - . no~
00:30:290 (7) - ctrl j? so it make better flow between 00:29:790 (5,6,7) nice! changed
00:47:490 (1,2,3) - del this and add 1/2 slider instead? for vocal imo (because stream not looks good here) this follows the accordion. I also followed the accordion at 00:41:490 (3) - and 00:44:290 (3,4,5,1) - , additionally, here is my favorite part. sorry~
00:59:990 (4,1) - overlap xd okay, move it

[Insane]
00:07:090 (2,3) - imperfect blanket fixed
00:17:690 (1,2) - swap nc good~ swaped

[Hard]
00:01:490 (4,5,1) - can you make them a perfect blanket (it bug me a lot xd) ok. make a perfect blanket for 00:01:590 (6) -
00:26:490 (2,1) - overlap xd mmm, should be keeped 1.0x distance imo. stack 00:26:490 (2) - and 00:28:290 (1) - instead
00:33:890 (2,3,4,5) - can you make them consistent with 00:21:090 (1,2,3,4) little jump at 00:33:690 (1,2) - , so it may be unnatural to put square I thought. retention plz, sorry~

sorry for short mod xd don't mind. much helpful
because your map looks good ~
and GL !

1. 00:00:890 (1,2,3,4) - This could be a little confusing maybe, so what you could do is ignore 00:01:190 - this vocal and start the slider 00:01:090 - here, and you have a triple.
2. 00:16:190 - End the spinner here and put a hitcircle here 00:16:290 - for a 5 note stream?
3. 00:19:090 (7,8,9,10,1) - Maybe you could unstack this to make it more interesting!
4. 00:24:690 (3,4) - This looks a little hard to play and could be a little confusing maybe? I would stack these two on the (5) and then move 5 somewhere better
5. 00:30:290 (7) - This slider should end 00:30:490 - here in my opinion.
6. 00:44:690 - Strong beat here, why not start the slider here and make 00:44:590 - this a hitcircle?
7. 01:00:090 - Very strong beat here too, start the triple on the red tick and make it a triple maybe? But it seems like you are following vocals with these sliders.
8. 01:00:490 (2) - Ctrl + G?

Riven wrote:

hi

[Service]

1. 00:00:890 (1,2,3,4) - This could be a little confusing maybe, so what you could do is ignore 00:01:190 - this vocal and start the slider 00:01:090 - here, and you have a triple. I know this is difficult, however, it is one of the theme of this diff! so I take same pattern at 01:08:090 (1,2,3,4) - . sorry~
2. 00:16:190 - End the spinner here and put a hitcircle here 00:16:290 - for a 5 note stream? okay, some test player mentioned too about it. I also fixed 00:08:390 (1) - for consistent.
3. 00:19:090 (7,8,9,10,1) - Maybe you could unstack this to make it more interesting! tried it and I succeed to get it more interesting! okay~
4. 00:24:690 (3,4) - This looks a little hard to play and could be a little confusing maybe? I would stack these two on the (5) and then move 5 somewhere better hmm, really intentional here. retention plz~
5. 00:30:290 (7) - This slider should end 00:30:490 - here in my opinion. if I take it, I also must change 00:17:490 (8) - , I'm afraid this map to be boring. sorry
6. 00:44:690 - Strong beat here, why not start the slider here and make 00:44:590 - this a hitcircle? I've been mentioned about it once before though, it's my favorite part... plz allow me to retention more m(._.)m
7. 01:00:090 - Very strong beat here too, start the triple on the red tick and make it a triple maybe? But it seems like you are following vocals with these sliders. yes, this follows vocal. I took same pattern many times (like 00:58:790 (5) - ), so no fix plz.
8. 01:00:490 (2) - Ctrl + G? not bad, however I also feel bad flow to 01:00:490 (2,3,4) - . sorry~

Nice map, good luck!

1. TaikoではHitsound Normalの使用が推奨されています。softはデフォルトの面の音が弱弱しくてアレなので
2. 00:56:690 (1) - Spinnerだけ音量を下げると聞こえがより良くなると思います。最近よく用いられている手法です。
3. アウトロで60-70%くらいの緑線追加してみてはどうでしょうか。

1. 00:08:690 (30) - Delete. Intro.1参照
2. 00:15:090 (55) - ^
   
   
3. 00:18:690 (68) - ここから以下のようなTripletを作って見てはどうでしょう。(Intro.2, 3)
   
4. 00:25:090 (91) - ^ 同様に。更に、上と正反対の色を作ることでパターン化をすることが出来ます。あくまで一例です。
   
   
   
5. 00:26:090 (95) - Delete. (Intro.2)
6. 00:31:490 - 00:37:890 - 00:38:890 - 上記参照
   
   
7. 00:41:890 - このような静かなパートではフォーカスを当てる音を伴奏(主にドラム)にシフトさせることで、譜面も穏やかにすることが出来ます。(Intro.3) ただの手法の一つですが試してみてください。
   
   1. 00:43:290 (161) - Move to 1/2 right
   2. 00:43:690 (162) - Remove
   3. 00:45:690 (170) - Move to 1/2 right
   4. 00:49:690 (186,187) - same
8. 01:03:490 (30,31,32,33) - Intro.3, 少しパターンが長いので区切った方が良さそうです。eg.
   
9. 01:06:290 (44,45,46,47) - 許容範囲内だとは思いますがMuzukashiiの割に少しばかり難しい気がします。Kiai前半同様にTripletを置いて簡易化を図ってみてはどうでしょう。

tasuke912 wrote:

May I help you? yes!!

Muzukashiiのみですが参考にして頂けたら幸いです
[ General]

1. TaikoではHitsound Normalの使用が推奨されています。softはデフォルトの面の音が弱弱しくてアレなので
2. 00:56:690 (1) - Spinnerだけ音量を下げると聞こえがより良くなると思います。最近よく用いられている手法です。
3. アウトロで60-70%くらいの緑線追加してみてはどうでしょうか。 サビ以外の音量を下げました！

[ Muzukashii]

Introduction

1. Muzukashiiでは3/2以上のbreakをパターンに含めることが推奨されています。これはパートごとの区切りをより明瞭にしたり、適正プレイヤーにある程度の余裕を持たせたりするためです。
2. 全体を通して8分音符がかなり長いように見受けられます。それ自体はあまり問題ではないのですが、もう少し短めにカットしてメリハリを付けた方が良さそうです。
3. Bメロの難易度が僅かにAメロを上回っています。より緩急を明瞭にするために、Aメロでもう少し1/4を使用し密度を上げ、逆にBメロでは幾つかのノートを削除してみてください。

参考になりますowo

1. 00:08:690 (30) - Delete. Intro.1参照
2. 00:15:090 (55) - ^
   
   
3. 00:18:690 (68) - ここから以下のようなTripletを作って見てはどうでしょう。(Intro.2, 3)
   
4. 00:25:090 (91) - ^ 同様に。更に、上と正反対の色を作ることでパターン化をすることが出来ます。あくまで一例です。
   自分なりに組み替えてみました！
   
   
5. 00:26:090 (95) - Delete. (Intro.2)
6. 00:31:490 - 00:37:890 - 00:38:890 - 上記参照
   
   
7. 00:41:890 - このような静かなパートではフォーカスを当てる音を伴奏(主にドラム)にシフトさせることで、譜面も穏やかにすることが出来ます。(Intro.3) ただの手法の一つですが試してみてください。
   
   1. 00:43:290 (161) - Move to 1/2 right
   2. 00:43:690 (162) - Remove
   3. 00:45:690 (170) - Move to 1/2 right
   4. 00:49:690 (186,187) - same
   ボーカルをフォーカスするのを維持したかったので、それを残せるようにしつつ簡略化を試みました
   
8. 01:03:490 (30,31,32,33) - Intro.3, 少しパターンが長いので区切った方が良さそうです。eg.
   
9. 01:06:290 (44,45,46,47) - 許容範囲内だとは思いますがMuzukashiiの割に少しばかり難しい気がします。Kiai前半同様にTripletを置いて簡易化を図ってみてはどうでしょう。

以上です。どちらのdiffも基本的に整えられているので、Rankedはあまり難しくないと思います。 頑張ります:3
Good luck!

1. 00:05:690 (18) - delete vocal取りメインにした方が空白もできますし聞こえがいいと思います。
2. 00:12:090 (42) - delete ^
3. 00:19:290 (70) - delete 特に目立った音もないので休憩つくり
4. 00:32:090 (119) - delete ^
   
5. 01:00:090 (13) - delete
6. 01:00:290 (14) - を01:00:190 - に移動
7. 01:00:490 (15) - delete これでvocal取り小休憩ができると思います(青線が好みではない場合keepで；)
8. 01:06:490 (46,47) - 同じですけどここの場合01:06:890 (48) - 削っちゃうと何か違和感...
   
9. 01:12:890 (68) - 最初と同様の理由
10. 01:19:290 (95) - delete

1. 00:02:690 (1) - のスピナーの終点00:03:290 - にしませんか
2. 00:56:690 (1) - のスピナーも00:57:690 - に？
3. 00:43:490 (231) - delete? 自分的にここ切るの好みなんですけどどうですか？
4. 00:49:890 (265) - delete? ^
   
5. 01:09:890 (1) - スピナー01:10:490 -

yuzu__rinrin wrote:

hi~ modreq from twitter :3

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:05:690 (18) - delete vocal取りメインにした方が空白もできますし聞こえがいいと思います。
2. 00:12:090 (42) - delete ^
3. 00:19:290 (70) - delete 特に目立った音もないので休憩つくり
4. 00:32:090 (119) - delete ^
   
5. 01:00:090 (13) - delete
6. 01:00:290 (14) - を01:00:190 - に移動
7. 01:00:490 (15) - delete これでvocal取り小休憩ができると思います(青線が好みではない場合keepで；)
8. 01:06:490 (46,47) - 同じですけどここの場合01:06:890 (48) - 削っちゃうと何か違和感... この辺りは自分なりに組み替えて休憩作ってみました、funnyな曲なので青線patternは却っていいのかも
   
9. 01:12:890 (68) - 最初と同様の理由
10. 01:19:290 (95) - delete

no comment=fixed、mod以外のところもいくらか削りました

[Oni]

1. 00:02:690 (1) - のスピナーの終点00:03:290 - にしませんか
2. 00:56:690 (1) - のスピナーも00:57:690 - に？ 両方okです
3. 00:43:490 (231) - delete? 自分的にここ切るの好みなんですけどどうですか？
4. 00:49:890 (265) - delete? ^ いいですね
   
5. 01:09:890 (1) - スピナー01:10:490 - okay

二連が楽しそうな譜面ですね...　役に立ったかどうか分かりませんがRanked頑張ってください～

1. 00:01:890 (1) - You can make a better blanket here.
2. 00:00:490 (3) - It doesn't make much difference, but moving the 2nd tick a bit lower will make the flow better since 00:00:890 (1) is upper than it.
3. 00:17:890 (1,2,3,4) - 1,2,4 are in the same direction while 3 isn't. I personally suggest ctrl+g on 2,3,4. If you do so, you might move 5 a little lower.
4. 00:16:690 (5) - Also, moving the 2nd tick a bit to the left makes a better flow.
5. 00:17:490 (8) - Perhaps you can make a blanket with 00:16:290 (1), which would make it cleaner.
   
   SPOILER

   
   If so, move it to x:116, y:236 and the last tick to x:84, y:128. After moving, the distance between it and 00:17:890 (1) is 1.64* and is still reasonable here.
6. 00:18:290 (3) - stack with 00:17:290 (7)
7. 00:23:390 (6) - move to around x:436, y:300 for better flow. no need to move 7 if so.
8. 00:48:690 (2) - x:288, y:60. move 5 too if so.
9. 01:00:890 (4) - I prefer keep 2.2* spacing here, so consider x:340, y:0?
10. 01:02:890 (2) - I'd like to stack it with 01:02:290 (5), which makes the pattern more challenging.

raririn wrote:

kinda old map :/// yea, over 3 years ago lol


Normal = nazi
Red = Unrankable stuff
Blue = Suggestions

[Service]

1. 00:01:890 (1) - You can make a better blanket here. okay
2. 00:00:490 (3) - It doesn't make much difference, but moving the 2nd tick a bit lower will make the flow better since 00:00:890 (1) is upper than it. good
3. 00:17:890 (1,2,3,4) - 1,2,4 are in the same direction while 3 isn't. I personally suggest ctrl+g on 2,3,4. If you do so, you might move 5 a little lower. Ctrl+g on 1~
4. 00:16:690 (5) - Also, moving the 2nd tick a bit to the left makes a better flow. these are much near so np for flow here imo~
5. 00:17:490 (8) - Perhaps you can make a blanket with 00:16:290 (1), which would make it cleaner.
   
   SPOILER

   
   If so, move it to x:116, y:236 and the last tick to x:84, y:128. After moving, the distance between it and 00:17:890 (1) is 1.64* and is still reasonable here. made better flow to ctrl+g-ed next (1).
6. 00:18:290 (3) - stack with 00:17:290 (7) okay
7. 00:23:390 (6) - move to around x:436, y:300 for better flow. no need to move 7 if so. oh, nice
8. 00:48:690 (2) - x:288, y:60. move 5 too if so. since these are clearly different part from 00:23:390 (6) - , no need to change here i think~
9. 01:00:890 (4) - I prefer keep 2.2* spacing here, so consider x:340, y:0? hmm, move it right a bit
10. 01:02:890 (2) - I'd like to stack it with 01:02:290 (5), which makes the pattern more challenging. tried it but weird stacking with 01:03:290 (4) - appeared, sorry.

I can hardly hear the softwhistle1, but the hitsound overall sounds good to me. made it louder a bit~...a bit lol it's suitable for the song the softwhistle1 is hardly to hear.


That's all from me. Good luck on getting ranked!

EdamaMe411 wrote:

お待たせいたしました。ほぼ半年ぶりのmoddingデス。
何かと至らないと思いますが少しでも耳を傾けてくれれば、と思います

general

muzuとoniを単体で見た場合だといわゆる『ノリ』の良い譜面をしていて非常に面白いと思いました。
ただ、spreadという観点から見ていくと少々離れてるのかなと思いました。
Muzuが2.9くらいなのでoniのめやすは3.5～3.8がいいかと。
それかmuzuのＳＲ挙げるのもありですが、これ以上あげるとoniと類似してしまいそうなのであまりお勧めできません、そのため今回はoniの密度の緩急をつけ、かつSRを下げていく提案を中心とさせてもらいます。Muzuも軽く見ます
rogerです！ muzuちょい上げoniだいぶ下げな感じで調整してみます

Muzu

00:05:090 (15) - delete....前のノーツのはねリズムが死んでしまうので、ｄは切ってもいいでしょう。また音をつけるにしても最後のリフに残しておくべきだと考えました。
00:06:890 (21) - delete....00:03:490 (9,10,11,12) - こことの統合性を図るため
00:11:490 (36) - (15）と同じです。
00:13:290 (42) - ^　まあこの4つはVo.中心の音取意識と思ってもらって構いません

00:18:090 - add d....バスドラが00:17:890 (56) - から8部で入ってきてるので、ここに隙間があるのは少ないと思いました
00:19:290 (64) - delete？....^で増やした分、ノーツライン調整のために切るイメージ。Vo.も息継いてるので、大丈夫かと思ったんですが、バスドラム続いてるからおまかせします。

00:26:890 (90) - delete....なんかここ気持ち悪いと思ったら、いままで1/2で休拍が置いてあったのにここだけなったから違和感だったと思いました。

00:31:490 (105,106,107) - ここ、Apartのリフ部分で、前とかぶらないように00:31:290 - からddd始めるのはどうでしょう。声ともマッチするのでありかと
00:32:090 (109) - （^に賛成した場合、これをdに変え、00:31:690 - に入れる？）

00:37:690 (127,128,129,130,131) - ここも上と同じ意味でd kkk dを kkk d k　にするのどうでしょう

00:44:590 (155) - これを00:43:890 - に入れdにする。ちょっと急にリズム変えてきた感が強いので、スタンダードに行きましょう
00:44:690 - にdついか この辺りの裏音かなり好きなのでちょっとkeep。
00:47:390 - add k?、、、00:47:890 (166,167,168,169) - ここに16分入れるよりかは声にうねりがあるここに短いノーツラインでかつ16部を入れるのはアリです （ムズカシイは声に合わせているノーツが多いので）

00:47:890 (167,168,169) - ddk パイプオルガン的な音程取り ちょっとここは自己流に組み替え

Oni

00:04:390 (7) - delete..密度の調整
00:10:790 (48) - ^

00:05:990 (17) - ^?
00:07:590 (27) - ^?　前半の4連打はまだなくていいかもです、だから切ってもいいかなって思いました、、、自信ないです 後半との統一性は取っておきたいかなぁ、この辺はkeepで

00:16:590 (81) - 密度調整のため削除。
00:19:790 (99) - ^
00:22:990 (111) - ^
00:29:390 (144) - ^
00:32:590 (163) - ^
00:35:790 (175) - ^

00:19:190 (97) - delete...『ま～ん～ぞ～く』に合わせるため切ったほうがいいです。

00:25:590 (129) - delete 単純に密度が、、、

00:25:890 (130) - この大音符がよくわかりません。次の偶数配置に対してのスイッチにするとしても大音符が目立ちすぎるのでNG

00:26:390 (133) - を00:26:190 - に。単にこっちのリズムのほうがしっくり来たので

00:38:690 (198) - Dいらない？
00:38:890 (199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208) - こことか、前partと同じなので、少しリズム変えてあげるといいかもです

00:44:690 - d追加。kだけじゃ音が浮いてます直前をvocalに削ったので現状で違和感ないかな？ということで一旦keepです

00:45:290 (224) - 次の音にため込むという意味で削除。2連+3連叩け勢多後の休憩もかねて

00:46:190 - d追加

00:47:790 (244) -～静かなパートで急に7連は焦ります。提案ですが、、、、
・00:47:790 (244) - 削除
・00:47:890 (244,245,246,247,248) - ddkkk　パイプオルガンの音程取り ドラム感残しておきたかったのでkkkkd
でどうでしょう

00:50:990 - d追加。単調すぎます、サビにもっていく盛り上がり準備を！ 統一性との狭間でゆらゆら……試行錯誤してみます

01:00:790 (21) - 削除。ちょっと難しいかも、、、
01:02:990 - 音追加&01:03:990 (42) - 削除
01:06:390 (56) - kにする&　01:06:490 (57) - を01:06:590 - に移動&　01:07:190 (63) - 削除。すいません、これてゃ難しいですかね。でもリズム的にはアリ? 結構いい感じ:3

思ったよりSR下がらなかった、、、ｗｗ
つたないmod見てくれてありがとうございます
すごくまとまってて直すところが少ないと感じました。また終わったら見てみたいと思います。ランクド頑張って！
☆1つ～

bjpe0810 wrote:

M4M via discord
thank you~

Muzukashii

00:06:890 (22) - delete? 前のフレーズとパターン化が出来ます　あとこの提案を受けた場合、00:13:290 (45) - で密度が上がっている部分へ向けて自然な流れが生まれます

00:15:790 (53,54) - delete? この付近ではこのリズムが多用されています。それに加え、この次の小節でも同じリズムが使われているので、単調さを防ぎたいです。休憩を持たせることでパートの区切りもつくと思います ここ削ってしまうのは統一性の観点で不安が……ちょっとkeepで

00:19:290 (67) - delete? Muzuでは1/4を強調させるためにもほかの音符から独立させた方がプレイ感いいと思います

00:32:090 (114) - ^

00:39:490 (141) - delete?　僕の好みもあります(

00:43:690 (157,158,159,160,161) - 直前までボーカル拾ってるのにここだけ後ろの音拾うのに違和感を感じました。画像はあくまでも一つの提案ですが、こちらの方がリズムが単純で纏まりが生まれるかなーと思います　参考程度に ボーカルがないので別の目立ってる旋律を・・・・・という感じです、何度か言われてるのですがone more keep


00:46:690 (167) - change to d? 表拍はdという統一性と、こっちの方があってる気がしました

00:47:090 (168) - change to k → 00:47:290 (169) - change to d → 00:47:390 - add d　こっちの方が、ボーカルを拾ってきている流れに合っていると思います。ボーカルが1/4なのでこちらの方が合っていると思います

00:47:990 (172) - delete? 上の提案を受けた場合

00:50:090 (181) - change to d → 00:50:290 - add k ^x3 ここはno changeで、Bメロはあまり難しくさせない方が良いという解釈

00:55:890 (205,206) - change to k配色シンプルにしたければkeepで、カラフルにしたいなら採用という形で、好みに合わせてください シンプルで行きます！（本家でもリズム同じでパターン変えるの常套手段だよなぁとか思ったりして）

00:58:290 (2) - change to k and 00:58:490 (3) - delete? こっちの方が1/4の強調が出来ていいと思います＆このフレーズの2回目が後に出てきますが、その時の密度の上昇を図って譜面に流れを生み出すため

01:01:690 (19) - delete? ^ また上の提案を受けた場合、パターン化のために推奨します

01:02:690 (25) - change to d and 01:02:890 (26,27) - Ctrl+g? ボーカルの音の高低に合わせる目的

01:14:090 (68) - delete ? これは00:06:890 (22) - を受けた場合は統一したほうがいいと思います

Oni

00:20:690 (113) - delete finish? 次の小節のDDKKを強調するために

00:25:290 (133,134) - ctrl +g?突然チョイムズイかなって思いましたっていうのと、00:31:690 (169,170,171,172,173) - とあべこべの配置になって綺麗なパターンが生めます

00:38:090 (202,203) - ^

00:46:090 (243) - delete? 譜面の流れからしてここの1/2はいったん区切った方がよさそう

00:47:390 - add k? ボーカル合わせの流れがあるのでここもボーカルの1/4拾いたい。っていうのと00:47:690 (250,251,252) - と対称配置になって綺麗だと思います

00:48:190 (255) - delete? ゆったりしている地帯＆唐突なので

00:50:690 (267) - delete? この次の小節で異なったフレーズに入るので、ここでいったん区切りをつけてから次のフレーズを叩かせるようにした方がプレイ感が上がります

01:00:390 (17) - move to 01:00:190 - and 01:00:490 (18) - change to k and 01:00:790 (21,22) - ctrl + g?
こっちの方が譜面の展開と、ボーカル合わせに合っていると思います。　でも好みもあると思うので、判断は任せます

01:06:290 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) - 上の提案を受けた場合、上のパターンにそぐった配置に変更することをお勧めします

初心者なのでよいModが出来たとは思えませんが、参考になればうれしいです

曲が本当に大好きなのでranked期待してます 　good luck!

tasuke912 wrote:

Taiko diffs are ready to be ranked.

Taiko'd!

2016-10-23 03:45 tasuke912: 00:18:290 (56,57,58,59,60,61) - / 00:24:690 (77,78,79,80,81,82) - / 00:31:090 (101,102,103,104,105,106) - / 00:37:490 (122,123,124,125,126,127) - 
2016-10-23 03:46 tasuke912: tripletの色はddd-kkk交互かddd統一, ddd*2 > kkk*2などのようにパターン化した方が良さそうです
2016-10-23 03:46 tasuke912: kkkが若干浮き気味にも見えるので
2016-10-23 03:47 thzz: Muzukashiiの方ですか？
2016-10-23 03:47 tasuke912: Muzukashiiです
2016-10-23 03:48 thzz: なるほど、試してみます
2016-10-23 03:49 thzz: ddd/kkk/ddd/kkk　で行ってみます
2016-10-23 03:50 tasuke912: okです
2016-10-23 03:51 tasuke912: ddd/kkkの場合は各tripletの前の1/2を逆の色にすると綺麗になると思うんですがそこはお好みで
2016-10-23 03:51 thzz: そこも含めて調整してみたので、updateした際合わせて確認いただけると助かります
2016-10-23 03:53 tasuke912: 00:05:090 - / 00:11:490 - / 01:12:290 - 
2016-10-23 03:53 tasuke912: ノート追加しても良いかもしれない
2016-10-23 03:54 thzz: 置けるならおきたかったとこですね、難易度下げること中心に考えて削ったところです……ｗ
2016-10-23 03:54 tasuke912: 結構テンポ良い部分なので濃くしても問題ないと思います
2016-10-23 03:54 tasuke912: 休憩は既に十分にあるので難易度面は問題ないかと
2016-10-23 03:55 thzz: okです、追加しました
2016-10-23 03:56 tasuke912: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/288508 Yamagami ruushii(ryaku), Miyoshi Saya, Chihaya Megumi - May I Help You? (TV Size) [Oni]]
2016-10-23 03:57 tasuke912: 00:30:690 (155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164) - 
2016-10-23 03:57 tasuke912: ここは00:17:890 (90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98) - からtripletを追加する形にすれば
2016-10-23 03:57 tasuke912: 一貫性を保てるかつ難易度を軽く上げられるのでオススメです
2016-10-23 03:58 tasuke912: 具体的にはd-kkd-k-ddk-d-k等
2016-10-23 03:59 thzz: なるほど、組み換え中……
2016-10-23 04:00 tasuke912: A-B-B-Bのリズム構成をA-B-A'-B'-にするイメージ
2016-10-23 04:00 thzz: d-k-ddk-d-kdd-k-
2016-10-23 04:00 thzz: なるほど
2016-10-23 04:01 tasuke912: 00:43:890 - Oniならここのドラム拾えそうな気がします
2016-10-23 04:01 thzz: なるほどです、そうすると他にも何ヵ所か出てきますよね
2016-10-23 04:02 thzz: （難易度下げようと躍起になって消したところ第二弾です……）
2016-10-23 04:02 tasuke912: 2拍目と4拍目を拾うだけで十分かと
2016-10-23 04:03 thzz: 了解です、とするとここだけですね
2016-10-23 04:03 tasuke912: あと00:44:690 - こういう場所で意図的に抜くのはアリです
2016-10-23 04:03 tasuke912: そうですね
2016-10-23 04:04 thzz: そこ２度ほど突っ込まれたんですが、裏の音優先でキープしといて良かった……
2016-10-23 04:04 thzz: OKならそこはそのままで行きます
2016-10-23 04:05 tasuke912: 01:06:290 (54,55) - dk-kdが2回続いているのでkk-kd使ってみてはどうでしょう
2016-10-23 04:05 tasuke912: そのままでも大丈夫ですが
2016-10-23 04:05 thzz: 言われてみれば確かに、って感じです
2016-10-23 04:06 thzz: 01:05:890 - から、d-d-kk-kdが割としっくりきたのでこっちにしてみます
2016-10-23 04:06 tasuke912: okです
2016-10-23 04:07 tasuke912: 01:22:290 (77,78) - ここだけddなのは意図的でしょうか?
2016-10-23 04:08 thzz: 「ここだけ」というと、どこと比較してのここだけですか？
2016-10-23 04:08 thzz: dddの方が良いのでは？という感じ？
2016-10-23 04:08 tasuke912:  00:08:690 (36,37) - / 00:15:090 (76,77) - / 
2016-10-23 04:08 tasuke912: a
2016-10-23 04:08 tasuke912: kk - kk- dd - dd -の構成でしたか
2016-10-23 04:08 tasuke912: ddで大丈夫です
2016-10-23 04:09 thzz: あーまあその解釈でもあながち間違ってないのですが、
2016-10-23 04:09 thzz: そもそもドラムのニュアンスが違うので、完全な別物として考えてます
2016-10-23 04:09 tasuke912: いずれにせよ一貫した方法で組まれてるのでgoodです
2016-10-23 04:10 tasuke912: 他に特に気になるところはないですね
2016-10-23 04:10 tasuke912: アプデお願いします
2016-10-23 04:10 thzz: 了解です、少々お待ちを
2016-10-23 04:11 tasuke912: 一つ言い忘れてたことが
2016-10-23 04:11 tasuke912: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6385469
2016-10-23 04:12 tasuke912: 顔が隠れているのでy座標wo下げましょう
2016-10-23 04:12 thzz: なるほど……すみませんやり方教えて頂いても構いませんか？
2016-10-23 04:13 tasuke912: .osu => [Events]
2016-10-23 04:13 tasuke912: 0,0,"servant.jpg",0,0
2016-10-23 04:13 tasuke912: この画像パスの右側の数字が座標なので
2016-10-23 04:13 tasuke912: 一番右の数字を大きくすればBGが下がります
2016-10-23 04:14 thzz: 良かいです、調性してみます
2016-10-23 04:14 tasuke912: 恐らく120くらいが丁度いいです
2016-10-23 04:17 thzz: update doneです :3
2016-10-23 04:17 thzz: 150が丁度よさそうだったのでそうなりました！