Nadeln13boot wrote:

Hey man, this is really good. Can i make suggestions here? If you make a jump sequence where you jump from one note far to another, in $50 don't immediatly make a stream. very confusing.
Loving it 10 million times more than BlueDragon's version because this is actually playable!

1. In the other ranked Big Money the mapper used "renard" and "lapfox" in the Tags.

1. Well, it's a 0.69 star diff so... Since it's a very Easy diff go very Easy all the way and use CS-1.
2. 00:36:885 (1) - The sound at the start and the end of the slider is the same as 00:30:028 (1,1) so use Finish+Clap (but keep the finish only on the arrow)
3. 00:39:671 (2,3) - ^ (Or, if you think it's too much remove the clap+finish on 00:30:028 (1,1))
4. 00:42:028 (1) - Finish?
5. 00:51:456 (1,3) - Not exactly symetrical.
6. 01:14:599 (1) - Finish?
7. 01:14:599 (1,2,3,4) - 1 and 4 are symetrical but not 2 and 3.
8. 01:48:885 (1,2,3) - Same as 00:36:885.
9. 01:54:028 (1) - Finish?
10. 02:52:313 (2) - Finish at the end?

1. 01:20:599 (3) - It touches the HP bar.
2. 02:12:885 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Maybe a little bit too hard for a "Hard". Not the pattern in itself but the fact that there are 14 sliders in a row. Maybe soften by adding a break in the middle by remplacing the sliders with some notes like this:
   
3. 02:40:313 (1) - You nearly have a blanket so why not doing one? Move the second point to x=32 y=308 and the third point to x=52 y=264.
4. 02:47:385 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Not very interesting to play. I wouls suggest to replace it with notes/slider like before or to make some jump between the sliders. (move/move/move/move or wait/jump/wait/jump is more interesting to play than wait/move/wait/move imo.)

1. 00:30:028 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - A straight line? Really? I think you can find a lot of way better pattern to do with 7 notes. Besides you already used some straight line with the small 4-notes stream.
2. 00:35:171 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The idea is good but jump isn't really progressive. 00:35:171 (1,2) is x0.8 00:35:599 (1,2) is x1.3 00:35:599 (1,2) is x3.3 00:36:456 (1,2) is x3.8. Try making something more like x1 then x2 then x3 then x4 for example. (But the >x3 jump are really surprising since you start with no jump at all in the quiet part of the song then despite the fact that the song is still the same you add these big jump! I'm not against them but maybe soften them a little)
3. 00:43:313 (3,4) - The curve doesn't look really good imo. Keep them straight.
4. 01:14:385 (1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - You have pattern only notes and pattern sliders/notes. I think the effect would be better while playing if you would altern these pattern. Currently you start with the "only notes" pattern then finish with the "slider/notes" pattern but why note alterning the two?
5. 01:50:599 (1,2,3) - Try doing a blanket here?
6. 01:55:742 (3) - Put at the center of the palyfield like you did at 00:43:313 (3,4,5).
7. 02:12:028 (1) - Maybe put it at the center? Or at x=72 y=160 aligned with the others.

1. I'm not sure the AR10 is really necessary. I know that it's 280BPM and there aren't a lot of AR10 ranked map (only 2 if i remember correctly if you don't count the approved and 2008 map) but the part where the song is 140BPM-like makes me wonder if it's a goo idea to use AR10.
2. 00:26:599 (1) - In all your diff you mark the scratchin' sound by a deformation near the head of the slider so why not doing this here?
3. 00:42:885 (3,4,1,2,3) - In the 50$ diff you did a jump here but not at 00:42:028 (1,2). Here you do the opposite. But i would suggest to do just like the 50$ diff (jump at 00:42:885 (3,4,1,2,3)) because it fits the song better imo.
4. 00:58:313 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Why not keeping the symmetry and doing this:
   
   You just have to move 00:58:099 (4) somewhere else.
5. 01:42:028 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Not symetrical.
6. 01:44:385 (4) - Move it to x=80 y=320 in order to have a rectangle with 01:43:742 (1,2,3).
7. 01:45:885 (2,3,5,6) - 3 and 5 are at the same high but not 2 and 6.
8. 01:53:171 (3,4) - x4.47 jump + AR10 is maybe a little bit exagerated....
9. 01:55:313 (1,2,3,4,5) - Do a star instead?
10. 02:41:813 (4) - Move it to x=140 y=128? Like you did for 02:44:171 (3,4) and 02:45:028 (3,4).
11. 02:50:492 (11,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - These jump are actually easier than those in the 50$ diff... Just saying.

Heanday wrote:

Hi !

[1$]

This dif sounds perfect i can't found mistake, so only sugggestion

00:16:314 (1) - What about revers this one ? Sounds strange slid + circle if we check what you did after. ( then it's revers / slid circle / revers / ... you got it ) I think it's not really necessary...

Hitsound : You you you'll NEED IT !!

Whistle

I suggest to whistle them => 00:17:171 (2) - / 00:18:885 (4) - / 00:19:742 (1) - end slid / 00:22:314 (3) - / 00:24:028 (2) - / 00:25:742 (5) - Applied in all diffs

Finish

01:14:599 (1) - need it
01:20:599 (3) - Same end slid
02:40:313 (1) - ^
02:52:313 (2) - ^ end slid I don't know what the hell happened, fixed

Clap

01:59:171 (1) - Revers need a clap imo
02:00:456 (2) - ^
02:00:885 (3) - revers ^
02:02:171 (4) - ^
02:02:599 (1,2,1,2) - all of them end slid
02:12:885 (1) - revers
02:14:171 (2) - early slid Applied in all diffs as well!

[10$]


Little stupid idea for change the rythme here => 01:24:885 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Try it => http://puu.sh/3yDCg.jpg Well, maybe I can but it would be odd because I have never used it before

02:19:742 (1) - You must delete it, he is useless imo Ok

02:38:171 (2) - here you follow voice right ? Why don't finish by the " it " ? lol, sounds strange imo ! I did it in 100$ so fixed

Hitsound : You you you'll NEED IT !!

Whistle

Same than easy

00:17:171 (2) - early slid / 00:18:885 (5) - ^ / 00:19:742 (1) - ^ / 00:20:599 (2,3) - early slid / 00:23:171 (1) - ^ / 00:24:671 (3) - ^

For this Kiai time, you spam whistle too much you can't !, you need to explain the rythm, we can't understand the rythm if you spam it :p

Kiai time whistle :
00:47:813 (2) - / 00:48:671 (4) - / 00:49:313 (2) - end slid / 00:49:742 (3) - whole slid whistle / 00:51:242 (2) - / 00:52:099 (4) - / 00:52:742 (2) - end slid / 00:53:171 (3) - Whole slid whistle / 00:54:671 (2) - / 00:55:313 (4) - end slid / 00:56:385 (2) - / 00:56:599 (3) - whole slid ^ / 00:57:885 (2) - end slid / 00:58:313 (3) - end slid Only them need to whistle ! Revoke all of the rest in the kiai time please

Same for second kiai time & last kiai time

Fixed all whistles and fixed also in other diffs

Finish

01:21:456 (1) - early slid Ok

[50$]

00:47:171 (1,2,3,4) - What about this http://puu.sh/3yFKC.jpg ? Then stack 4 with 1, fits with the music I prefer the current one, sorry

rest sounds good, but, same than hard, you can't spam whistle, revoke some !

[100$]

00:43:528 (2) - Ctrl G ? Better flow Sure
Care about spam whistle in kiai like other dif, and that's all for this one, realy good dif i played it many time ._. Gogo rank :°

Hope it help, gl !

Stefan wrote:

Any chances that Taiko Diffs can be added? If not, get feeded a bit by my stars.

rezoons wrote:

Hi ,

Mod from your victory in the The French Baguette queue!
(Heanday, it was me who was supposed to mod his diff.... I think.... We still need to be more organised)

[General]

1. In the other ranked Big Money the mapper used "renard" and "lapfox" in the Tags. Well, let's try, then

[1₣]

1. Well, it's a 0.69 star diff so... Since it's a very Easy diff go very Easy all the way and use CS-1. Ok, let's try it
2. 00:36:885 (1) - The sound at the start and the end of the slider is the same as 00:30:028 (1,1) so use Finish+Clap (but keep the finish only on the arrow) Yep
3. 00:39:671 (2,3) - ^ (Or, if you think it's too much remove the clap+finish on 00:30:028 (1,1)) Fixed
4. 00:42:028 (1) - Finish? Sure
5. 00:51:456 (1,3) - Not exactly symetrical. Fixed
6. 01:14:599 (1) - Finish? Already fixed in previous mod
7. 01:14:599 (1,2,3,4) - 1 and 4 are symetrical but not 2 and 3. Tried to fix
8. 01:48:885 (1,2,3) - Same as 00:36:885. Fixed here too
9. 01:54:028 (1) - Finish? Fixed in previous mod
10. 02:52:313 (2) - Finish at the end? ^

(the same hitsounds suggestion can be applied on other diff so if you agree check your other diff at the same place) Of course

[10₣]

1. 01:20:599 (3) - It touches the HP bar. Really? In my skin it doesn't, anyways I don't fix hp bar problems, I'd risk to destroy the flow
2. 02:12:885 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Maybe a little bit too hard for a "Hard". Not the pattern in itself but the fact that there are 14 sliders in a row. Maybe soften by adding a break in the middle by remplacing the sliders with some notes like this: I think it's not a big problem, they are not very hard to click and the notes can be a little confusing imo
   -cut-
3. 02:40:313 (1) - You nearly have a blanket so why not doing one? Move the second point to x=32 y=308 and the third point to x=52 y=264. Sure, why not
4. 02:47:385 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Not very interesting to play. I wouls suggest to replace it with notes/slider like before or to make some jump between the sliders. (move/move/move/move or wait/jump/wait/jump is more interesting to play than wait/move/wait/move imo.) You're right, I put some little jumps but not too much because it's an hard

[50₣]

1. 00:30:028 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - A straight line? Really? I think you can find a lot of way better pattern to do with 7 notes. Besides you already used some straight line with the small 4-notes stream. I put some jumps
2. 00:35:171 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The idea is good but jump isn't really progressive. 00:35:171 (1,2) is x0.8 00:35:599 (1,2) is x1.3 00:35:599 (1,2) is x3.3 00:36:456 (1,2) is x3.8. Try making something more like x1 then x2 then x3 then x4 for example. (But the >x3 jump are really surprising since you start with no jump at all in the quiet part of the song then despite the fact that the song is still the same you add these big jump! I'm not against them but maybe soften them a little) Sorry but no, they are readable, so I think there isn't any problem
3. 00:43:313 (3,4) - The curve doesn't look really good imo. Keep them straight. Sorry but I don't like straight things if you know what I mean
4. 01:14:385 (1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - You have pattern only notes and pattern sliders/notes. I think the effect would be better while playing if you would altern these pattern. Currently you start with the "only notes" pattern then finish with the "slider/notes" pattern but why note alterning the two? I think I can try but I don't think it's really useful, I'll wait for further suggestions anyway
5. 01:50:599 (1,2,3) - Try doing a blanket here? Nah, I don't want to breask the symmetry
6. 01:55:742 (3) - Put at the center of the palyfield like you did at 00:43:313 (3,4,5). Okay
7. 02:12:028 (1) - Maybe put it at the center? Or at x=72 y=160 aligned with the others. Center, symmetry ftw

[100₣]

1. I'm not sure the AR10 is really necessary. I know that it's 280BPM and there aren't a lot of AR10 ranked map (only 2 if i remember correctly if you don't count the approved and 2008 map) but the part where the song is 140BPM-like makes me wonder if it's a goo idea to use AR10. I'm sorry but I will keep AR10, for players that can't play AR10 there is 50$ diff
2. 00:26:599 (1) - In all your diff you mark the scratchin' sound by a deformation near the head of the slider so why not doing this here? Uhm, I like this slider that way, anyway I'll think about it
3. 00:42:885 (3,4,1,2,3) - In the 50$ diff you did a jump here but not at 00:42:028 (1,2). Here you do the opposite. But i would suggest to do just like the 50$ diff (jump at 00:42:885 (3,4,1,2,3)) because it fits the song better imo. I totally agree
4. 00:58:313 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Why not keeping the symmetry and doing this:
   -cut-
   You just have to move 00:58:099 (4) somewhere else. Of course, it's awesome
5. 01:42:028 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Not symetrical. I did it on purpose anyways I moved a bit some notes to accentuate the asymmetry
6. 01:44:385 (4) - Move it to x=80 y=320 in order to have a rectangle with 01:43:742 (1,2,3). Okay
7. 01:45:885 (2,3,5,6) - 3 and 5 are at the same high but not 2 and 6. Fixed
8. 01:53:171 (3,4) - x4.47 jump + AR10 is maybe a little bit exagerated.... Yeah but a player can notice it because of the 2 previous sliders
9. 01:55:313 (1,2,3,4,5) - Do a star instead? I thought about it too but I'd need to raise the spacing and it's a bit too much imo, I don't know how to explain it well in english :/
10. 02:41:813 (4) - Move it to x=140 y=128? Like you did for 02:44:171 (3,4) and 02:45:028 (3,4). It would break the oval flow
11. 02:50:492 (11,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - These jump are actually easier than those in the 50$ diff... Just saying. I think it depends by the player, imo they are harder, anyways I'll think about it

Well... A good map by a mapper i like. ^^
Take my star and good luck for ranking it. I hope my mod was useful .

Gero wrote:

Hey Riki

I Finished My Diff do not forget to add me, to the tags! GL!

Cherry Blossom wrote:

about diff names
isn't that $"number" instead of "number"$ ?
for example "$100" instead of "100$"

SPOILER

No Kudo please, if really it is.

Harez wrote:

lol, nice diff names 8)

star~

SPOILER

SPOILER

SPOILER

156,36,144028,6,0,B|200:64|200:64|208:40|208:40|216:64|216:64|224:40|224:40|232:64|232:64|240:40|240:40|248:64|248:64|256:40|256:40|264:64|264:64|304:124|428:168|516:128|480:28|380:-12|316:24|320:140|352:192|388:228|496:224,1,779.999964294435,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

SPOILER

SPOILER

Kiyro wrote:

$100 =/= 100$
kds pl0x
mod incoming

RikiH_ wrote:

Harez wrote:

lol, nice diff names 8)

star~

Thanks

CreamLegit wrote:

RikiH_ wrote:

Thanks

Wow RikiH b stealin' my credit ;-;
Also, AR10 plz, 100$ isn't really hard anymore without it.

Dark_Ai wrote:

Hey mod from my Queues ~

General

• • seem fine

Gero's $5

• • 00:43:099 - add a Circle here maybe? it fits with the music very well Why not
  • 01:01:742 (2) - 1 grid down to fix spacing Sure
  • 01:18:456 (2,3) - I'd prefer to unstack these notes I think it's fine
  • 01:24:456 (5,6) - same here ^
  • 01:55:099 (2) - may add a Note here? It would fit really well Sure
  •

$10

• • 01:50:385 (2) - may stack this better with 01:48:671 (7) ? It plays well, it's not important because they are quite far in the timeline and the comboburst won't annoy the players
  • 02:19:742 (1) - uhm... why the kiai time end at this part? I'd add it here too You are right but I wanted to emphasize this sound 02:24:028 with a kiai and I can't add a kiai immediately before...

$100

• • 01:49:313 - what do you think about to add a Note here? I think it would fit really well imo
  • 01:49:956 - same herer I wanted to emphasize the sound in the song, so no...

well thats all.. sorry for ma noob mod tho
Good luck with ranked anyway~

_Asagi_ wrote:

$$$$$$$$$$$$$
due to M4M and you just ask me ingame XD.. im gonna mod your map
btw im not a pro :3
sorry bad english

$50

-i think its better to map the 3 long breaks I'm lazy for that :<
-00:26:599 (1) - i think its better you put it in the middle.. under 00:26:385 (5) I didn't put it in the middle but I moved it a bit!
-00:58:313 (1) - 4beat slider.. remove this and replace it something like this 00:57:456 (1,2,3,4)
-01:17:171 (1) - ^ I don't see anything bad with them :<

$100

-well i agree with ar10.. but my god.. the HP drain. maybe you can reduce 1 or 2 Reduced by 1!
-00:26:599 (1) - put this in the middle :3 and do it something like this I like it, it's very creative, but the actual one flows better, sorry!

i think that slider fits with the sounds
and put the end in the white tick
-00:46:742 (1,2,3,4,5) - 280 bpm stream , just make it 1/3 stream.. think its better
-01:14:385 (1,2,3,4) - ^
-02:40:099 (1,2,3,4) - ^ I agree, 280 BPM stream is an excess, I replaced them with sliders but not with 1/3, the music is 1/4 so it doesn't make sense tu put 1/3 instead imo...
-00:59:171 (1) - i know this diff is the last.. but this jump is too far.. Moved a bit
-01:52:313 (1,2,3,4) - seriously?? STAHP. I changed it anyway
02:26:599 (2) - to 02:36:885 (1) - map this part What? It's mapped...

if this mod didnt help you dont give me kudosu

Hope this help
Good luck with this beatmap

Nemis wrote:

• Suggestion
• High suggestion/must fix

[General]
Nothing

[$100]
• Usa AR9, AR10 non è necessario, non c'è nulla così difficile da leggere da doverlo usare gtfo
• Usa HP7 per aumentare la difficoltà, a livello di giocabilità non è nulla di particolarmente difficile nonostante il BPM alto Uhm, ok

• 00:47:171 (1,2,3) - Sistema questo blanket: Ok

SPOILER

• 00:52:528 (2) - Muovi questo slider 1 grid down per sistemare 00:52:313 (1,2,3) - questo blanket Ok
• 00:58:099 (4) - Stacka questa nota su 00:58:313 (1) - o muovila altrove, non lasciara vicino a 00:57:885 (3) - questo slider No, vorrei mantenere la simmetria con i due slider precedenti
• 01:03:671 (6,1) - Sistema questo blanket Ok
• 01:06:242 (2,3) - Stackerei queste due note, personalmente non mi piacciono due singole note (1/2 e 1/4) senza uno slider prima o dopo distanziate con il distance snap Vanno bene così
• 01:19:742 (1,2) - Sistema questo blanket Va bene così com'è
• 01:24:885 (1,2,3,4) - Prova a rendere gli slider più aderenti alla nota centrale (sistema il blanket quindi) Non ha molta importanza sinceramente...
• 01:25:742 (1,2,3,4) - Stessa cosa di sopra visto che si parla dello stesso pattern ^
• 01:47:171 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Come mai questo slowdown? Non mi convince molto... Non voglio mettere jump estremi con AR10
• 01:52:313 (1) - Da qui hai spezzato la consistenza dei claps, ti consiglierei di aggiungerli (00:40:313 (1) - stessa cosa quì anche se si nota molto meno) Me l'hanno già detto ma preferirei di no dato che iniziano i finish nella song
• 01:53:171 (3) - Aggiungi un finish sulla sua testa Giusto
• 01:53:599 (4,1) - Si sente una bella nota fra questi due slider, vedi di mapparla Uhm, no
• 02:01:849 (5,6) - Stessa cosa di 01:06:242 (2,3) - , 02:06:992 (6,7) - quì pure Non sono d'accordo...
• 02:06:028 (1,2) - Sistema questo blanket Va bene così
• 02:07:528 (9,2) - Se metti AR9 stacka questi due elementi meglio perchè la nota sotto potrebbe risultare poco leggibile Ho lasciato AR10, quindi...
• 02:08:492 (5) - Muovi questo slider a x:488 y:260 per migliorare il blanket Ma è già a 488|260 D:
• 02:18:885 (1,2,3,4) - Aggiungerei qualche whistle su questi sliders Secondo me i finish ci stanno bene...
• 02:44:599 (1,2) - Migliora questo blanket Uffa che nazi, va bene così com'è :/
• 02:45:456 (1,2) - Stessa cosa di sopra ^
• 02:49:956 (7) - Aggiungi una new combo su questa nota Okay

[$50]
• 00:25:635 (6,1,2,3) - Rendi questa singletap perfettamente lineare Va bene
• 00:26:599 (1) - Aggiungi un break dopo questo slider Ok
• 00:38:599 (1,2) - Sistema lo stack coda-coda Va bene
• 00:43:742 (5) - Aggiungi una new combo su questa nota Non l'ho fatto da nessuna parte quindi non penso sia necessario
• 00:43:742 (5) - Aggiungi un break dopo questa nota Sì
• 02:50:385 (1) - Rimuovi questa new combo ed aggiungine una 02:50:599 (2) - quà ed una 02:51:456 (6) - quà Fatto

[$10]
• Questa difficoltà è piena di greenlines ripetute ed inutili, sistemale e ricordati di togliere anche queste sotto che erano quelle utilizzate per gli slider 1/4 prima dei KIAI nelle altre diffs (46742 e 160099) Va bene

• 00:32:599 (2) - CTRL+H ci sta meglio secondo me Non cambia assolutamente niente...
• 02:11:171 (1,2) - Migliora questo blanket ^

[Gero's $5]
• The greenlines at 26599 and 60885 are no needed Ok

• 00:16:314 (1,2) - Improve this blanket a little bit Questo in effetti è brutto
• 00:26:599 (1) - Add a break after this note
• 00:43:313 (3) - Add a break after this slider Fixed both
• 00:58:313 (2) - Reverse this slider (CTRL+G), add a reverse and then remove 00:59:171 (3) - this note: Suona malissimo, lo slider finisce sul downbeat, dove inizia un altro suono, e quel suono è mappato dal secondo slider, se metot un repeat quel suono rimane scoperto, non so come spiegare

SPOILER

• 01:18:028 (1,2,3) - Change its rhythm, it's really strange and probably hard to read in a normal difficulty for an intermediate player Al momento non dovrebbe causere problemi, comunque se qualcun altro me lo fa notare lo cambio
• 01:55:313 (3) - Add a break after this slider
• 02:38:171 (2) - Maybe add a break after this note too Fixed both
• 02:50:599 (1,3) - Improve this stack a little bit Non si nota giocandolo, quindi lo lascio così

[$1]
• Anche questa difficoltà ha molte greenlines inutili come nella $10, sistemale Done

• 00:26:599 (1) - Add a break after this slider
• 00:42:028 (1) - Add a break after this spinner Fixed both
• 00:53:171 (3) - This slider touches the HP bar, move it a bit down Non fixo le robe che toccano la barra degli HP, anche perchè questa la sfiora appena...
• 01:11:171 (1) - Add a break after this note
• 01:54:028 (1) - Add a break after this slider Fixed both
• 02:00:885 (3,4) - Make a blanket with these two elements: No, voglio rispettare la simmetria con lo slider precedente

SPOILER

• 02:36:885 (1) - Add a break after this slider Sì
• 02:49:742 (4,2) - Prova a fare un blanket con questi due sliders (rendi quindi (2) aderente a (4) ) Ma sono a 2 secondi e mezzo di distanza, se anche lo facessi non lo noterebbe nessuno giocando

Papysh wrote:

rank this plz

RikiH_ wrote:

I will fix when I'll be back from holidays (13th August)

Sorry but the Background is awesome, I mean, there is a giant dollar D:

Papysh wrote:

RikiH_ wrote:

I will fix when I'll be back from holidays (13th August)

Sorry but the Background is awesome, I mean, there is a giant dollar D:

Rikih PLZ