Welcome to the osu! World Cup 2020 Discussion Thread.
Here you can discuss everything related to the biggest country-based osu! tournament.
Notable changes:
- Warmups are removed from the matches
- Added extra timer rules when picking and getting ready
If warmups are vetted before hand I don't see why there would be a problem?lardon wrote:
I'm curious as to why warmups are removed? The new timer rules make sense though.
lardon wrote:
I'm curious as to why warmups are removed? The new timer rules make sense though.
Never over 4v4, but in the strange case we dont have enough players (not only on this cup but on any world cup) we have this line in case we need to re-scale the tournament. Shouldnt be a thing on OWC afaik.Apraxia wrote:
"While this competition is planned as a 4 versus 4 setup, this may change depending on the number of incoming registrations."
I'm assuming you don't mean to scale up the number of players per roster (this would be really sick if you did though), so please don't lower the amount. Eight is a low number for some of these teams as is.
The experience has shown that people doesnt want to spoil the surprise and most of the warmups are uploaded in a time range of 1 hour to 5 mins before the match (there are people who literally wait to be in the room to upload the map).PainTensei wrote:
Couldn't you ask a team to 'lock in' their warmup map an X amount of days before the match?
You could let someone quickly check it for inappropriate stuff, hand it out to the opponent team beforehand so there is no possible long download and every player can decide for themselves if they think it's worthy of playing.
The experience was based on that there wasn't any time limit to submit their warmups. By sharing the warmup link ONLY to the designated streamer, referees, and the opponent, the chance of it leaking out to livestream viewers and "spoiling the surprise" is pretty low imo. If they wanted to keep the surprise from the opponent... well... too bad. It's for the sake of smooth progression of the tourney.WalterToro wrote:
The experience has shown that people doesnt want to spoil the surprise and most of the warmups are uploaded in a time range of 1 hour to 5 mins before the match (there are people who literally wait to be in the room to upload the map).PainTensei wrote:
Couldn't you ask a team to 'lock in' their warmup map an X amount of days before the match?
You could let someone quickly check it for inappropriate stuff, hand it out to the opponent team beforehand so there is no possible long download and every player can decide for themselves if they think it's worthy of playing.
Locking the map doesnt help too as some team warmups depends on what they wanna test and they might actually change opinion depending on who is available to play or if they dont feel confident on something in that moment.
I agree with Jakads; warmups are great to create hype and entertainment for the viewers. So please reconsider this OWC to try out stricter rules for warmups instead of completely removing them. If the new rules don't work out, then remove them in OWC2021?Jakads wrote:
The experience was based on that there wasn't any time limit to submit their warmups. By sharing the warmup link ONLY to the designated streamer, referees, and the opponent, the chance of it leaking out to livestream viewers and "spoiling the surprise" is pretty low imo. If they wanted to keep the surprise from the opponent... well... too bad. It's for the sake of smooth progression of the tourney.WalterToro wrote:
The experience has shown that people doesnt want to spoil the surprise and most of the warmups are uploaded in a time range of 1 hour to 5 mins before the match (there are people who literally wait to be in the room to upload the map).PainTensei wrote:
Couldn't you ask a team to 'lock in' their warmup map an X amount of days before the match?
You could let someone quickly check it for inappropriate stuff, hand it out to the opponent team beforehand so there is no possible long download and every player can decide for themselves if they think it's worthy of playing.
Locking the map doesnt help too as some team warmups depends on what they wanna test and they might actually change opinion depending on who is available to play or if they dont feel confident on something in that moment.
Also, players uploading warmups right before the deadline is natural. However, it won't affect the tournament since you can set the deadline a few days before the match so that everyone involved would have already downloaded it.
For teams that use warmups strategically to test opponent's skills, it could be a bummer to not be able to apply the current situation to their choice, as you've mentioned. There's plenty of other resources that they can use though, such as the opponent's best plays, past matches, and so on, so I believe it won't affect them as much as you worried. And they won't have to worry about their own team composition, because it has no effect on match scores and its purpose is to just "warm up."
Finally, as a former player in the tournament and as a viewer, warmup is a GREAT way to pre-hype the players and the viewers if it's a "geniune" pick, or to just entertain the viewers and relax the nerves a bit before the match if it's a "meme" pick. Either way, it's a 7-year-old custom that everyone has accustomed to and enjoyed. Really hope you would reconsider and bring warmups back to the people who want it.
Cybertec wrote:
Hey is there anyway to see wich players a already in the teams or is it still not safe?
Maybe another year! That would be fun!adia wrote:
It is a pity that Kazakhstan does not participate!
Pretty sure it's from Round of 16, like usual!Corvidae wrote:
when are the support banners coming around
It's planned to start at 20 UTC today, over here: https://www.twitch.tv/osulivexxnoobxx wrote:
Any idea when the qualifier results will be released?
Not OWC specific, but included! https://discord.com/invite/0Vxo9AsejDkGlk3HAndy26 wrote:
OWC Discord server?
They might be in the public Discord server linked above. If not, they should be available on the statistics sheet when it's made. That will be linked on the wiki page.rubyRain wrote:
Guys, where can I find qualifiers results?
It is 4vs4, correct. More details can be found on the wiki page.Lollps wrote:
How is a battle going up, like 4 vs 4 or any other way?
Feel free to ask questions and give feedback, but please avoid saying such unnecessary things. It's both rude and inaccurate. Since you have been involved as a staff member yourself quite a lot, you should know that staff are humans with their own circumstances. If you feel that you can contribute to improve things, you are always welcome to reach out.Lefafel wrote:
What's with the total lack of information on the wiki (or other official sources)? It's wednesday night and we have no
- qualifier results or stats
- RO32 mappool
- bracket
Only source of any official info that I've been able to find was the results/showcase livestream. You can't seriously expect that's sufficient.
Really starting to feel like this tournament has completely abandoned the spectators.
Note: as of this post, the RO32 mappool has been updated onto the wiki, along with a link to a challonge bracket. So now we're "only" missing the actual qualifier results. A schedule was also updated, though it can't be considered final as the rescheduling window has not yet closed.PuffBuck wrote:
Feel free to ask questions and give feedback, but please avoid saying such unnecessary things. It's both rude and inaccurate. Since you have been involved as a staff member yourself quite a lot, you should know that staff are humans with their own circumstances. If you feel that you can contribute to improve things, you are always welcome to reach out.Lefafel wrote:
What's with the total lack of information on the wiki (or other official sources)? It's wednesday night and we have no
- qualifier results or stats
- RO32 mappool
- bracket
Only source of any official info that I've been able to find was the results/showcase livestream. You can't seriously expect that's sufficient.
Really starting to feel like this tournament has completely abandoned the spectators.
I do agree that it would be proper for information to be added ASAP, which is not always possible. One reason is that reschedules can be requested until 23:59 UTC on Wednesdays (though a mistake in the wiki states otherwise right now) and to keep things less confusing, a bigger wiki update is being made once they have been settled. Let's be patient and respectful.
We are always working on improving things and if you compare the times they work to when they don't, things are running very smoothly as a whole, which is another reason to not throw out statements as soon as something is lacking.
You can usually find links faster through the Twitch channel, because I update them as soon as I have them myself, usually before the wiki updates are pushed. In case anyone wants to have the results quickly, the VOD is available.
Giving feedback through me personally or the Discord server is a possibility.
With that, please mind what you say. We always welcome feedback. All I'm asking for is keeping it as respectful and civil as possible.
While I agree that feelings shouldn't be prioritized over facts, I am a strong believer of emotional intelligence. To claim that a tournament, aka the staff team, has "abandoned the spectators" over a wiki update is not only disproportionate but also incorrect, which was a point I had hoped you would pick up on as a member of staff yourself. That also answers why it might have come off as censoring, something I'm actively working against.Lefafel wrote:
Note: as of this post, the RO32 mappool has been updated onto the wiki, along with a link to a challonge bracket. So now we're "only" missing the actual qualifier results. A schedule was also updated, though it can't be considered final as the rescheduling window has not yet closed.
I don't think anything I said was unnecessary, or out of line. If you're so familiar with my contributions to the community, you'd know I don't censor my thoughts for the sake of your feelings. In fact, I find such an approach quite unpleasant and detrimental to the discourse.
If it's more people you need, just openly ask for more help. I saw many people make their own brackets, mappool listings, qualifier result tables etc. within hours of the showcase stream. It's not a lot of work, nor does it take any significant qualifications. Just. Ask. For. Help.
If it's the wiki update process itself that's the issue, then you need a secondary, actually functional platform for sharing info. I would suggest the OP of this thread, for example. The bottom line is, it's unacceptable to not have any of this stuff available this far into the week.
I specifically did not include lack of schedules in my OP, since I'm aware of the rescheduling rules (It would be fine to just have the match pairings listed with a TBD for the match times, for example). Those of us who actually need that info earlier, can generally get it by asking the relevant players for it.
This is only the second week of OWC2020, and both weeks we saw a major lapse in communication towards the public. I dearly hope it doesn't turn into 3 out of 3 next week, but surely you can see why some of us are sceptical at this point.
Yes, that would be fun!PuffBuck wrote:
Maybe another year! That would be fun!adia wrote:
It is a pity that Kazakhstan does not participate!