1. 00:30:170 (5,1) - Swap NC? I'm sure enough the combo pattern is supposed to be like that here.
2. 00:36:170 (2,1,2) - Make it look like this? You can also make (2) a 1/1 slider with a repeat. This is less confusing than the previous rhythm.
3. 01:14:795 (1) - I don't think the NC is needed. Remove the NC?

1. I think AR6 is too fast... AR5?
2. 00:29:045 (4,5,1) - Why does the spacing change between these notes? They would look better and won't be confusing or weird if the spacing is the same between the three of them.
3. 00:38:795 (1) - This is slightly off-screen. It doesn't affect gameplay, but it does look strange...
4. 00:46:295 (4) - Make it curved like this?
5. 00:54:920 (1) - It's weird to have a slider that ends at a downbeat here, IMO... Split them into two circles instead?
6. 00:56:795 (4,5) - Make it look like this? If you really did this, though, remember to correct the spacing around here.
7. 01:00:920 (1,2) - Swap NC?
8. 01:05:045 (2) - Slightly offscreen.
9. 01:20:420 (1,2) - These two sliders... The movement is too sudden to the point where they can break the flow here, IMO. Make the rhythm like this?
10. 01:21:545 (4,1) - I think it would fit the song better if you combine them into a 1/1 slider that repeats once instead.

• (As a note; lots of these suggestions might not fit your style, so feel free to do what you want here. This also applies for Oni. I just have a kinda weird sense of sound when it comes to Taiko; mostly following vocal pitch if the instruments around are not strong enough.)

1. 00:02:420 (1,1) - Swap the d and k? (Keep the finish on the same place.)
2. 00:03:545 (2) - k?
3. 00:04:857 (1,1) - Swap?
4. 00:05:794 (1) - D?
5. 00:07:576 (2,1) - Swap?
6. 00:08:795 (1) - K?
7. 00:09:170 (2) - d?
8. 00:09:920 (1,3) - k?
9. 00:11:045 (2) - d?
10. 00:11:607 (2,1) - Swap?
11. 00:12:170 (1) - k?
12. 00:12:732 (1) - d?
13. 00:25:670 (2) - k?
14. 00:28:107 (2) - ^
15. 00:30:357 (1) - Move this to 00:30:170?
16. 00:33:357 (3) - k?
17. 00:39:357 (1) - Move to 00:39:545 and make it k?
18. 00:40:670 (2) - k?
19. 00:41:420 (3) - d?
20. 00:42:170 (2) - k?
21. 00:43:482 (3) - ^
22. 00:44:420 (2) - d?
23. 00:44:795 (1,2,1,1,1) - k k d k d? (Yes, inverted from d d k d k.)
24. 00:47:045 (1) - k?
25. 00:49:295 (2) - ^
26. 00:53:795 (3) - ^
27. 00:55:295 (1) - d?
28. 00:56:045 (3,1) - Swap?
29. 00:58:670 (1) - Remove? This seriously feels out-of-place...
30. 01:00:920 (2,1) - Swap?
31. 01:01:857 (2) - d?
32. 01:05:045 (1) - k?
33. 01:05:795 (1) - ^
34. 01:06:920 (3) - d?
35. 01:09:076 (2,3) - k?
36. 01:09:545 (1) - d?
37. 01:10:670 (3) - k?
38. 01:12:357 (2,4) - ^
39. 01:13:295 (2) - d?
40. 01:13:670 (1) - k?
41. 01:14:607 (1,1) - Swap?
42. 01:15:545 (1) - Move this to 01:15:357?
43. 01:16:295 (1) - k?
44. 01:17:045 (3) - ^
45. 01:18:545 (10) - ^
46. 01:21:545 (1) - Make it not repeat and add a D at 01:22:295?

1. 00:02:420 (1) - k?
2. 00:03:170 (1) - Move to 00:03:076?
3. 00:03:545 (3) - k?
4. 00:03:920 (1) - Move to 00:03:826?
5. 00:04:858 (1,1) - Swap?
6. 00:05:608 (2) - k?
7. 00:06:545 (3) - d?
8. 00:06:920 (1) - k?
9. 00:07:577 (2,1) - Swap?
10. 00:08:608 (2,1) - ^
11. 00:09:170 (1) - Move to 00:09:076?
12. 00:09:358 (1) - k?
13. 00:10:295 (2) - ^
14. 00:30:451 (3) - Remove?
15. 00:33:732 (3,5) - k?
16. 00:35:232 (1) - ^
17. 00:51:919 (1) - ^
18. 00:52:482 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - kd kkd?
19. 00:53:420 (1) - Remove?
20. 00:54:076 (2) - k?
21. 00:57:357 (1,1) - Swap the d and k?
22. 01:03:357 (2,1) - Swap?
23. 01:03:357 (2,1) - K?
24. 01:09:357 (3,1) - Swap?
25. 01:10:107 (1,2) - k?
26. 01:18:451 (2,3) - ^
27. 01:23:232 (4,1) - Swap?
28. 01:22:670 (2) - K?
29. 01:23:795 (1,1) - Swap?

1. 00:18:451 (4) - It would be better it this slider is not almost entirely overlapped by 00:18:170 (3). Slight touch is fine for me, but I think this is weird.
2. 00:23:795 (1,2,3,1) - The sudden spacing changes here are weird and made them kinda hard to read, IMO.
3. 00:52:295 (1,2) - This looks weird... Make it look similar to 00:53:045 (3,4)?
4. 01:03:170 (2) - The speed-up on this slider is somewhat unexpected for me...

1. It's too hard to read those notes flying around with AR9. AR8 works far better here. Also, I think OD8 is really harsh for a map like this, so maybe OD7?
2. 01:03:920 (1,2,1) - ...Linear 1/4 jumps just won't work here, IMO.
3. 01:16:107 (7,1) - Why are these two notes spaced? I personally think there's no need for that here.

1. 00:02:795 - Offset here. Take your red line now, omit first bar line, add red line here.
2. 00:17:795 - Red line here.
3. 00:26:795 -
4. 00:52:295 -

1. Slider tick rate 1, the majority of your map is 1/1 only.

1. 01:16:107 (1,1) - 1/1 feels really, really short for a spinner>circle break.

1. 00:23:795 (1,2,3,1) - This violates spacing so much it's not even funny. Not readable first play, I'm sure you can find a better alternative.
2. 00:41:795 (1) - Slider end should snap to 1/2.
3. 00:49:295 (1) - Reverse arrow covered by 00:48:732 (6) - . Alternative placement makes it much better.
4. 00:52:295 (1,2,3,4) - All kinds of wrong snapping. Use short>long, or just follow 01:04:295 (1,2,3,4) - for better effect.
5. 00:54:357 (4,5) - Real awkward to play, the "ta" in "egakareta" is stressed and this beat should be played instead of just released.

1. 00:06:639 (2) - Please find an alternative that the music supports.
2. 00:08:045 (4) - 1/4 too long, as is 00:11:045 (5) - , especially since this song has a very strong 1/2 beat throughout. And a whole lot occur in the rest of the diff. Ask yourself, if you replace every slider with a circle for the beginning and a circle for the end, which circles don't make sense? Then you'll know which sliders to shorten/lengthen.
3. 00:20:608 (7) - Bad beat placement, starting slider on offbeat especially bad here since 00:20:795 - is a new measure and should be played, not just released.

those wrote:

[No_Gu]

1. 00:23:795 (1,2,3,1) - This violates spacing so much it's not even funny. Not readable first play, I'm sure you can find a better alternative.added NC for them
2. 00:41:795 (1) - Slider end should snap to 1/2.if you listen carefully,you will hear that "wa" is long vowel So I make a sense of it
3. 00:49:295 (1) - Reverse arrow covered by 00:48:732 (6) - . Alternative placement makes it much better.k
4. 00:52:295 (1,2,3,4) - All kinds of wrong snapping. Use short>long, or just follow 01:04:295 (1,2,3,4) - for better effect.hhh why do you think that's wrong snapping?if you listen carefully,00:52:576 - "no" 00:53:326 - "de" no one says we need to follow all vocals right?and this is easy to play,also I won't miss a drum sound on each white line
5. 00:54:357 (4,5) - Real awkward to play, the "ta" in "egakareta" is stressed and this beat should be played instead of just released.did a change

Melophobia wrote:

Let's save the precious BAT resources ~

SamiPale wrote:

共洗你呀~