It'd just be something like, "Careful. If you keep doing that, you might get silenced." It could be driven by reports.
forum
Have BanchoBot send you a silence warning
posted
Total Posts
41
Topic Starter
that might be something we could send to you guys. but it have to be translated and stuff..
so it's basically !faq
which we already have.
so it's basically !faq
which we already have.
Well, if it's a spam stuff, it can be easily done I guess.theowest wrote:
that might be something we could send to you guys. but it have to be translated and stuff..
so it's basically !faq
which we already have.
It's a Genius idea.
Send the guy to banchobot so he can't miss the !faq
This would be a really good idea! However, as told already, we need that much of translations...
Maybe we could persuade some people to help? I can translate Dutch
Maybe we could persuade some people to help? I can translate Dutch
yeahSaten wrote:
Send the guy to banchobot so he can't miss the !faq
maybe !faq word + username
Or maybe: !warning word + usernametheowest wrote:
yeahSaten wrote:
Send the guy to banchobot so he can't miss the !faq
maybe !faq word + username
That's the same as if you used !faq
The !faq word is basically a warning, and most wont understand with just a warning. The !faq word explains it much better
Or do you mean that !warning word + username is basically !faq but differently used?
Well !faq is much shorter to begin with, much easier to use imo.
The !faq word is basically a warning, and most wont understand with just a warning. The !faq word explains it much better
Or do you mean that !warning word + username is basically !faq but differently used?
Well !faq is much shorter to begin with, much easier to use imo.
!warn is much shorter than !warning.
Why do we even need to type it out? Bancho could do this automatically. If it can silence automatically, it can warn for silence automatically.
Why do we even need to type it out? Bancho could do this automatically. If it can silence automatically, it can warn for silence automatically.
it will be done automatically if it's with !faq word + userTheVileOne wrote:
!warn is much shorter than !warning.
Why do we even need to type it out? Bancho could do this automatically. If it can silence automatically, it can warn for silence automatically.
There are many different types of situations
It's not possible for bb to handle them all automatically.
If that were the case, you wouldn't need any moderation.
It auto-silences you if you typed 4 lines within 3-5 sec
It doesn't need to warn you.
It's not possible for bb to handle them all automatically.
If that were the case, you wouldn't need any moderation.
It auto-silences you if you typed 4 lines within 3-5 sec
It doesn't need to warn you.
faq- freqently asked questions
how is it related with silence?
If ,then i prefer !warn
how is it related with silence?
If ,then i prefer !warn
Why would you do something to have a warning sent to you in the first place?
I see this request as a means for spammers, etc. to test BanchoBot and see how much they can get away with before they receive a silence warning which would make it more vulnerable to abuse
I see this request as a means for spammers, etc. to test BanchoBot and see how much they can get away with before they receive a silence warning which would make it more vulnerable to abuse
I never realized that I would get a warning for typing too fast just untill the other day. I got my silence warning without realizing in a private multiplayer game.
This would be really useful! Well, for newer users at least. Now I know that I can get silenced I won't be typing sending too many messages quickly xD
This would be really useful! Well, for newer users at least. Now I know that I can get silenced I won't be typing sending too many messages quickly xD
Silences are already the warning. I see no point in this feature request.
Yes.
Get 10 Infringements and you are screwed.
The infringements will disappear after a month or so after you get them.
Get 10 Infringements and you are screwed.
The infringements will disappear after a month or so after you get them.
When someone russian user has 21 h of silence I don't want to give him double doze, but if there were warnings it will be enough for stop doing bad things.Loctav wrote:
Silences are already the warning. I see no point in this feature request.
I think this request is a good idea.
Finally, someone else that understands that this is useless \o/Loctav wrote:
Silences are already the warning. I see no point in this feature request.
No, this is not.Kuro wrote:
Finally, someone else that understands that this is useless \o/
Topic Starter
How the hell did I get 4 stars
This request is not about auto-warn
Donating maybe?NitcoGames wrote:
How the hell did I get 4 stars
Topic Starter
uh...Saten wrote:
This request is not about auto-warn
ok sure why not
Because it's pointless
You only need to make 4 post in a short amount of time, and then you are silenced.
It would just be be a pain in the length if it were to warn you for every 2nd post you made.
The !faq <word> <user> would be better, because it's not always about spamming lines.
You only need to make 4 post in a short amount of time, and then you are silenced.
It would just be be a pain in the length if it were to warn you for every 2nd post you made.
The !faq <word> <user> would be better, because it's not always about spamming lines.
Warnings aren't faqs alone.Since we're human beings, we warn manual aswell:
"@Saten please stop posting"
Like so.This is unneeded imo.You have 10 chances which are plenty of warnings.
"@Saten please stop posting"
Like so.This is unneeded imo.You have 10 chances which are plenty of warnings.
Exactly, as if saying that nice little message you get at the bottom of your userpage isn't enoughUnless you were a complete idiot that disregards your userpage. Then you would need more than just those 10Lolicore Flandre wrote:
Warnings aren't faqs alone.Since we're human beings, we warn manual aswell:
"@Saten please stop posting"
Like so.This is unneeded imo.You have 10 chances which are plenty of warnings.
I don't think this is pointless, if you're talking to a friend it's very easy to accidentally get silenced if you rage or something
like after 10 messages "oops you can't talk"
yeah
it would be nice if it would tell you
like after 10 messages "oops you can't talk"
yeah
it would be nice if it would tell you
How the hell are we even SUPPOSED to get 10 infringements if one silence is two weeks long?Saten wrote:
Yes.
Get 10 Infringements and you are screwed.
The infringements will disappear after a month or so after you get them.
Start with silence which is not a week long.thelewa wrote:
How the hell are we even SUPPOSED to get 10 infringements if one silence is two weeks long?Saten wrote:
Yes.
Get 10 Infringements and you are screwed.
The infringements will disappear after a month or so after you get them.
Ask this guy
Because people these days don't have logic or read.Silynn wrote:
I don't think this is pointless, if you're talking to a friend it's very easy to accidentally get silenced if you rage or something
like after 10 messages "oops you can't talk"
yeah
it would be nice if it would tell you
\o/Lolicore Flandre wrote:
Because people these days don't have logic or read.
Topic Starter
I'm just going to voice my opinion on this for one second.
A silence is not a warning. A silence is a punishment. A warning tells you that you can be punished.
Also, I don't think I've seen anyone warn someone like that ever.
A silence is not a warning. A silence is a punishment. A warning tells you that you can be punished.
Again, I don't think silences are warnings. They are the punishments.Lolicore Flandre wrote:
Warnings aren't faqs alone.Since we're human beings, we warn manual aswell:
"@Saten please stop posting"
Like so.This is unneeded imo.You have 10 chances which are plenty of warnings.
Also, I don't think I've seen anyone warn someone like that ever.
You have this as well, you can't really say you dont know the rules, and even if you don't, not knowing the rules isn't reason to not follow them, as they are availaible to you.
Punishment or warning, if you get silenced, you did something wrong, and you need to check your profile to know what you did wrong.
Punishment or warning, if you get silenced, you did something wrong, and you need to check your profile to know what you did wrong.
Topic Starter
Seriously, I've been silenced for types of "spam" or some shit like that I didn't even know existed. And no, they are not made clear in the rules.Sakura wrote:
You have this as well, you can't really say you dont know the rules, and even if you don't, not knowing the rules isn't reason to not follow them, as they are availaible to you.
Punishment or warning, if you get silenced, you did something wrong, and you need to check your profile to know what you did wrong.
PEOPLE: Either improve the rules or start warning us.
NitcoGames wrote:
Seriously, I've been silenced for types of "spam" or some shit like that I didn't even know existed. And no, they are not made clear in the rules.Sakura wrote:
You have this as well, you can't really say you dont know the rules, and even if you don't, not knowing the rules isn't reason to not follow them, as they are availaible to you.
Punishment or warning, if you get silenced, you did something wrong, and you need to check your profile to know what you did wrong.
PEOPLE: Either improve the rules or start warning us.
Forum-wide rulesLooks pretty clear to me
1. Do not spam forums with useless posts, herein defined as posts with no informational value or going grossly out of thread's topic scope.
2. Do not flood forums either. Flooding consists of excessive posting, usually with little value (see spam above).
Silynn wrote:
Those are not in-game rules, completely different
IRC rulesThis rule?
1. No spamming/flooding. This is obvious.
Yeah, however it's not lenient enough
I've been silenced for sending a few messages really quickly to a FRIEND (not any of the public channels)
that is just not very fun
Either make it more lenient in private channels or add a warning
I've been silenced for sending a few messages really quickly to a FRIEND (not any of the public channels)
that is just not very fun
Either make it more lenient in private channels or add a warning
It is already more lenient in private channels (about 10 lines within 1 second or something like that)
Topic Starter
Wait... you can get silenced in private chat?Sakura wrote:
It is already more lenient in private channels (about 10 lines within 1 second or something like that)
how did i never know this
This is automatic protection by BanchoBot. Moderators won't silence you.NitcoGames wrote:
how did i never know this